It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Abstract
The increasing demand for cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reveals drawbacks in current sample preparation protocols, such as sample waste and lack of reproducibility. Here, we present several technical developments that provide efficient sample preparation for cryo-EM studies. Pin printing substantially reduces sample waste by depositing only a sub-nanoliter volume of sample on the carrier surface. Sample evaporation is mitigated by dewpoint control feedback loops. The deposited sample is vitrified by jets of cryogen followed by submersion into a cryogen bath. Because the cryogen jets cool the sample from the center, premounted autogrids can be used and loaded directly into automated cryo-EMs. We integrated these steps into a single device, named VitroJet. The device’s performance was validated by resolving four standard proteins (apoferritin, GroEL, worm hemoglobin, beta-galactosidase) to ~3 Å resolution using a 200-kV electron microscope. The VitroJet offers a promising solution for improved automated sample preparation in cryo-EM studies.
There is a need to further improve the automation of cryo-EM sample preparation to make it more easily accessible for non-specialists, reduce sample waste and increase reproducibility. Here, the authors present VitroJet, a single device, where sub-nl volumes of samples are deposited by pin printing thus eliminating the need for sample blotting, which is followed by jet vitrification, and they show that high-resolution structures can be obtained using four standard proteins.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Nijpels Frank J T 2 ; Henderikx Rene J M 2 ; Weissenberger Giulia 2 ; Thewessem Sanne 3
; Gijsbers Abril 1 ; Beulen Bart W A M M 4
; López-Iglesias, Carmen 1 ; Peters, Peter J 2
1 Maastricht University, The Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht, Netherlands (GRID:grid.5012.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0481 6099)
2 Maastricht University, The Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht, Netherlands (GRID:grid.5012.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0481 6099); CryoSol-World, Maastricht, Netherlands (GRID:grid.5012.6)
3 Maastricht University, Instrument Development, Engineering and Evaluation (IDEE), Maastricht, Netherlands (GRID:grid.5012.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0481 6099)
4 CryoSol-World, Maastricht, Netherlands (GRID:grid.5012.6); Maastricht University, Instrument Development, Engineering and Evaluation (IDEE), Maastricht, Netherlands (GRID:grid.5012.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0481 6099)




