Content area
Full text
Randy Burke Hensley, Guest Columnist
Curious" and "creative" are terms that are often used by educators as adjectives when describing the characteristics of individual students. Unfortunately, they are often also used indiscriminately, with little attention to the importance these individual characteristics have in the overall context of teaching and learning. This article identifies the calls for incorporating creativity and curiosity into teaching and learning, provides definitions of the terms as well as how they fit within the context of work defining individuality and intellect, and argues that it is possible and necessary to incorporate curiosity and creativity into information literacy teaching and learning from a theoretical and practical perspective.
Calls for Transforming the Curriculum
There have been many calls for transforming the educational curriculum throughout the last decade. Some have defended a "back to basics" approach; others call for a complete revision of the curriculum. Often these reviews are predicated on the assumption that educational organizations, from K-12 to higher education, can effect change from a top-down approach by orchestrating structure in the classroom. But along with these advocations, some reports contend that learning is an individual experience fostered by a creative and questioning environment and that those involved in the teaching and the learning process need to acknowledge this premise.
One report that stands out in this respect is the Boyer Commission Report. In its call for a new model of undergraduate education, the Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University emphasizes that students "should understand the unique quality of the institutions and the concomitant opportunities to enter a world of discovery in which they are active participants, not passive receivers."1 What is interesting in the Boyer Commission's articulation of the need for an inquiry-based curriculum is that it defines the prevailing structure of higher education as lacking sufficient stimulus for discovery-discovery being a process predicated on the individual's creativity and curiosity.
The Boyer Commission is not alone in its call for educational reform through discovery-based learning. Kay points out in "Let's Stop Teaching and Let Our Children Learn" that curiosity and creativity along with other attributes are suppressed by teaching through the use of a process of "telling and testing." He encourages fostering an environment of demonstrations, guidance, and encouragement...