It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Common bunt of wheat caused by Tilletia laevis and/or T. caries (syn. T. tritici), is a major disease in wheat-growing regions worldwide that could lead to 80% or even total loss of production. Even though T. laevis can be distinguished from T. caries on the bases of morphology of teliospores using microscopy technique. However, molecular methods could serve as an additional method to quantify the pathogen. To develop a rapid diagnostic and quantify method, we employed the ISSR molecular marker for T. laevis in this study. The primer ISSR857 generated a polymorphic pattern displaying a 1385 bp T. laevis-specific DNA fragment. A pair of specific primers (L57F/L57R) was designed to amplify a sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) (763 bp) for the PCR detection assay. The primers amplified the DNA fragment in the tested isolates of T. laevis but failed in the related species, including T. caries. The detection limit of the primer set (L57F/L57R) was 5 ng/µl of DNA extracted from T. laevis teliospores. A SYBR Green I real-time PCR method for detecting T. laevis with a 100 fg/µl detection limit and droplet digital PCR with a high sensitivity (30 fg/µl detection limit) were developed; this technique showed the most sensitive detection compared to the SCAR marker and SYBR Green I real-time PCR. Additionally, this is the first study related the detection of T. laevis with the droplet digital PCR method.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Institute of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.464356.6)
2 Institute of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.464356.6); Shihezi University, Key Laboratory at Universities of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region for Oasis Agricultural Pest Management and Plant Protection Resource Utilization, Xinjiang, China (GRID:grid.411680.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0514 4044)
3 Institute of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.464356.6); Yangtze University, School of Agriculture, Hubei, China (GRID:grid.410654.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8880 6009)
4 Shihezi University, Key Laboratory at Universities of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region for Oasis Agricultural Pest Management and Plant Protection Resource Utilization, Xinjiang, China (GRID:grid.411680.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0514 4044)