It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Our commentary responds to claims made by DiMarco and colleagues in an article published in this journal that the majority of victims of rape are men and that 80% of those who rape men are women. Although we strongly believe that studying male sexual victimization is a highly important research and policy endeavour, we have concerns with the approach taken by DiMarco and colleagues to discuss these incidents. Specifically, we critique their paper by addressing the definitions of rape used by the authors, questioning their interpretation of national victim surveys, evaluating their analysis of the underreporting of male rape, and highlighting the heteronormative framework they use to outline the landscape of male sexual victimization. With this commentary, we call for a holistic, nuanced, and balanced study of male sexual victimization that recognizes the reality of both female-on-male and male-on-male violence, the experiences of survivors, and multi-layered barriers that male victims often encounter.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Westminster, School of Social Sciences, London, UK (GRID:grid.12896.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 9046 8598)
2 Old Dominion University, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Norfolk, USA (GRID:grid.261368.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 3177)
3 Towson University, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminal Justice, Towson, USA (GRID:grid.265122.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0719 7561)
4 Michigan State University, School of Criminal Justice, East Lansing, USA (GRID:grid.17088.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2150 1785)
5 ICF Incorporated, LLC, Fairfax, USA (GRID:grid.420806.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 9697 6104)
6 Cleveland State University, Department of Criminology, Anthropology, and Sociology, Cleveland, USA (GRID:grid.254298.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 4730)
7 University of North Florida, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Jacksonville, USA (GRID:grid.266865.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 4358)