1. Introduction
Biodiversity plays a central role in ecosystem functioning and understanding changes in biodiversity is a central focus in ecology. Species in montane regions are frequently cited as being particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Mountain ecosystems have unique edaphic, climatic conditions, and vegetation types even over small spatial extents. Thus, these altitudinal gradients provide “natural experiments” to study biological diversity patterns [1]. Over the past century, variations in biodiversity along altitudinal gradients have been studied with great interest [2,3]. About 250 years ago, Linnaeus and his contemporaries observed diversity patterns of plants and animals along altitudinal gradients, and these observations had a significant impact on the development of ecology and biogeography [4]. Previous studies of generalized altitudinal patterns of biodiversity answered the question of how individual species and/or community composition responded to altitudinal gradients [5,6]. The assembly processes and mechanisms that shape the community distributions of plants and animals along with altitudinal gradients have been investigated [7,8]. However, limited studies have focused on microbial diversity along altitudinal gradients and little is known about how the microbial community is assembled across elevation gradients [9,10]
A common framework to understand assembly processes is the distinction between deterministic (niche) and stochastic (neutral) processes that shape communities [11,12]. Initially, it was assumed that due to short generation time, large population size, faster growth, and high dispersal rate of microorganisms traditionally assembled by deterministic processes. However, in recent decades, microbial communities have provided evidence that in addition to environmental heterogeneity, stochastic processes can be important drivers of community assembly processes [13,14,15]. Community assembly processes can be categorized easily, such as demographic drift, death and birth rate, as well as population size as purely stochastic processes [16]. Species sorting and environmental filtering are totally deterministic processes, while on the other hand, dispersal and diversity can be either deterministic or stochastic [17,18]. The degree of dispersion within a meta-community can range from a very low to a very high degree of community turnover. Low levels of dispersal inhibit the turnover of microbes between local communities, leading to the geographic fluctuation in composition; this is referred to as “dispersal limitation.” Limiting dispersal, on the other hand, is insufficient to generate geographic turnover in the community’s composition. The structure of ecological communities may diverge as a result of stochastic variations in population size due to the limited exchange of organisms between small communities. As a result, dispersal limitation facilitates drift to create a considerably greater geographic variation in community composition than drift alone [19].
Fungi are important soil eukaryotic microorganisms that drive a variety of vital ecosystem functions such as litter decomposition, nutrient cycling, and plant growth control [20]. In recent years, the development of modern molecular methods has led to the growth in the number of studies on fungal diversity patterns along elevation gradients [21,22]. Most of these studies indicate that fungal diversity can be influenced by the environment along with altitudinal gradients. For example, Want et al. reported that fungal diversity along elevation was governed by pH [23]. The ectomycorrhizal fungi have shown a humped-shaped diversity pattern along altitudinal gradients of mount Fuji ranging from 1100–2250 m [3]. In addition, non-significant distribution patterns of fungal communities were also reported [24]. Regarding subsurface diversity and assembly processes of soil fungi and bacteria, it has been suggested that diversity from surface to subsurface may differ [25].
The Tibetan Plateau is the largest and highest plateau in the world (average altitude 4500 m above sea level). It covers an area of 2.61 × 106 km2 in western China and includes Tibet and Qinghai provinces, as well as some areas of Xinjiang, Gansu, Sichuan, and Yunnan provinces [26]. Furthermore, the Tibet Plateau is distinguished by unique weather and climate factors due to its complex terrain and diverse boundary conditions [27]. Summers are hot and humid, while winters are cool and dry, with an average annual temperature of 1.61 °C and 413.6 mm of precipitation [28]. Therefore, the Tibetan Plateau serves as an excellent natural laboratory for researchers interested in regional microbial distribution patterns. Due to the mostly non-anthropogenic conditions, this area is suitable for studying natural soil microbial distributions and the ecological processes that influence community structure and composition at various soil layers [29]. The current study focused on the Tibetan Plateau because human activity is too rare, and there are very typical plateau landscapes along the mountain [23]. Several studies (listed below) on the Tibetan Plateau were conducted to investigate microbial community composition and structure, including an investigation on the contemporary environment affecting the bacterial community composition between the surface (0–15 cm) and subsurface (15–30 cm) soil layers [29]. Another recent study showed that bacterial community composition varied according to elevation and land use [30]. Other studies on the Tibetan Plateau mainly focused on freshwater lakes and saline lakes to investigate microbial community composition and diversity patterns [31,32,33,34]. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study to investigate fungal community composition, diversity, abundance, and assembly mechanisms along altitudinal gradients in three different soil layers on Tibetan Plateau. In addition, we compared the composition of fungal communities, taxonomic, phylogenetic diversity patterns, and assembly mechanisms with quantified environmental variables and variations in nutrient availability in different soil layers along altitudinal gradients.
This study addressed four questions: (1) what is the composition and structure of fungal communities along altitudinal gradients? (2) How do fungal diversity, richness, and abundance vary along elevation and different soil layers? (3) What are the assembly processes that govern fungal community composition along elevation? (4) What are the major factors (spatial and/or environmental) that influence the community structure and assembly processes of fungi? To answer these questions, we collected soil samples from seven different altitudes (889 m–3787 m), soil samples were collected from each altitude surface and subsurface (0–100 cm). The fungal abundance was investigated by using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The community structure and composition of fungi were analyzed by using the Illumina sequencing platform. The neutral community model of Sloan et al. [35] was used to assess the impact of neutral or stochastic processes in driving the biogeography of the fungal community. To determine the influence of environmental and/or spatial distance on fungal diversity and assembly processes, we performed the Mantel test.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area and Soil Sample Collection
This study was conducted on the Tibet Plateau (98°27′41″ E–98°52′4″ E, 26°12′39″ N–28°6′33″ N), which is the largest and highest plateau in the world with an average elevation of over 4000 m. The soil types in this study area were brown, Calcareous cinnamon, and Frozen embryonic soil. Land cover types were defined based on field evidence, including vegetation cover and dominant species (trees, shrubs, herbs). The elevation of sampling sites ranged from 889 m to 3837 m and the latitude from 26.12 to 50° W. Along the altitudinal gradient, there were mountainous temperate zones from 889 to 3350 m sampling site, subalpine cool temperate zones between altitudes 3350 and 3837 m sampling site. The sampling site description is shown in Table S1, Figure 1. A standard protocol was used throughout sampling and transport to avoid any contamination [36,37]. The soil layers in this study were classified according to changes in soil appearance (i.e., color and structure): surface (0–20 cm), middle (20–60 cm), deep (60–100 cm). From each altitude, 9 soil subsamples were collected belonging to 3 different depths, where each depth was represented by 3 replicates. Soil samples were collected at a depth interval of 0–20 cm, 20–60 cm, and 60–100 cm, and the distance between replicates did not exceed 100 m. The entire soil profiles were collected with a spade. For each replicate, at least 300 g of soil was collected from the bottom to upper layers.
A total of 63 soil samples were collected from 7 different altitudes, each represented by 3 different depths, and then kept in sterilized plastic zipper bags at the study location. Soil samples were transferred on ice packs to Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environmental Microbiology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, for physicochemical analysis and imminent microbial analysis. Roots, stones, and other residues were removed from soil samples by grinding them and sieving them through a 2 mm mesh. Following sieving, the soil samples were divided into 3 parts, 2 of which were kept at −80 °C for microbial analysis and quantification of soil nitrification rate. The third portion was air-dried at room temperature for 48 h before being subjected to soil physicochemical analysis.
2.2. Soil Physicochemical Analysis
Soil organic matter was determined by the potassium dichromate method (external heating) [38], and total nitrogen (TN) was determined by the semi-micro Kjeldahl method [39]. Soil pH was determined using a glass electrode at a soil-to-water ratio of (1:2.5) [40]. The alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method was used to quantify the available nitrogen (AN) [41]. The pH of the soil was determined using distilled water extracts and a pH meter [42]. A platinum electrode was used to measure the soil’s electrical conductivity (EC) in a water–soil suspension (5:1) [39]. An Auto Analyzer 3 (Bran+ Luebbe GmbH, Germany) was used to determine ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) and nitrate–nitrogen (NO3−-N) [43,44]. The colorimetric Mo-Sb method was used to quantify soil phosphorus (TP) and available phosphorus (AP) [39].
2.3. Soil Genomic DNA Extraction and Determination of Quality and Quantity
FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals LLC, Solon, OH, USA) was used to extract total genome DNA from samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to measure DNA concentration, and 0.8% agarose gel was used to verify DNA quality. For sequencing and qPCR, the samples were stored frozen at −80 °C.
2.4. ITS1 Gene Amplification, Purification, Library Construction and Sequencing
Next-generation sequencing, library preparations and Illumina MiSeq sequencing were conducted at GENEWIZ Inc. (Suzhou, China). Briefly, the fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region was analyzed using the ITS1F and ITS2 primers [45]. The reaction mixture for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) consisted of 25 μL reaction mixture containing 2.5 μL of TransStart Buffer, 2 μL of dNTPs, 1 μL of each primer, and 20 ng of template DNA and ddH2O to the total volume 25 μL for each sample. The thermal cycle conditions for PCR were initially denaturated at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product was checked on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The primers included adaptor sequences in addition to the ITS1 target-specific sequence for high-complexity library amplification and downstream NGS sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq. DNA libraries concentration was validated by Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, DNA libraries were multiplexed and added to an Illumina MiSeq instrument. (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The sequencing was carried out using a 300 bp paired-end (PE) setup. The MiSeq Control Software (MCS) on the MiSeq instrument was used to perform image analysis and base calling.
2.5. Processing of Fungal Sequencing Data and Diversity Analysis
The forward and reverse readings were merged, and samples were assigned to their barcode. The barcode and primer sequences were cut using Cutadapt (1.9.1) [46]. Sequences that did not fulfill the quality filtering requirements of 200 bp, no ambiguous bases, and a mean quality score of >20 were removed. After that, the sequences were compared to the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP V 2.2) using the UCHIME method to look for chimeric sequences, which were subsequently eliminated. For the final analysis, the most successful sequences were used. Using the clustering program VSEARCH (1.9.6) against the UNITE ITS database (
2.6. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)
The 18S rRNA gene for the fungal community was quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The 18S rRNA gene was quantified using the FR1/FF390 primers [48]. Absolute quantification was performed using the Applied Biosystems QuantStudioTM 6 Flex real-time PCR system (Life Technologies Corporation, Carls-bad, CA, USA). Hieff™ qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) was used as a qPCR amplifier. The total volume of the qPCR reaction was 20 μL, with 10 μL 2 × SYBR® Green Mix, 0.4 μL forward and reverse primer (10 mol/μL), 1 μL diluted (10 ng/μL) DNA template, and 7.4 μL double distilled water. The qPCR reaction protocol was based on Siles and Margesin’s description [49], with the following minor changes: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 60 s.
2.7. Null Model Based Phylogenetic Diversity Matrices and Ecological Assembly Analysis
To evaluate the phylogenetic diversity and ecological assembly processes, we utilized the null model “taxa. labels” to quantify the phylogenetic alpha diversity, such as nearest taxa index (NTI), which is a measure of mean pairwise phylogenetic distance at the local level and quantifies tip-level divergences (putting more emphasis on terminal clades and is akin to “local” clustering) in phylogeny. Briefly, this method records original phylogenetic distances in a phylogenetic tree and then generates 1000 randomizations of the phylogenetic tree (whilst keeping richness preserved) to calculate the phylogenetic distances on these distributions. Afterward, the mean and standard deviation of these distances obtained from a randomization procedure was used in a method called “statistical effect size” for comparison against the original distances to give NRI/NTI estimates. The values of NRI/NTI hold importance as they can be used to discern an underlying ecological mechanism. For a single community, NTI values > +2 suggest environmental filtering (phylogenetic clustering), and values < −2 indicate competitive exclusion (phylogenetic overdispersion) among species as the driver of community structure [50]. Although both NRI and NTI use similar thresholding cut off, NTI is typically preferred over NRI for ecological interpretation because of the presence of phylogenetic signals across short phylogenetic distances [51]. Therefore, in the current study, we calculated NTI. We quantified mean-nearest-taxon-distance (MNTD) and the nearest-taxon-index (NTI), using ‘mntd’ and ‘ses.mntd’ functions in R package ‘picante’ [52].
Ecological null modeling was performed in order to investigate the ecological drivers controlling fungal communities. Specifically, β-nearest taxon index (βNTI) and the Bray–Curtis-based Raup–Crick metric (RCbray) were used to determine contributions from selective and dispersal-based processes, respectively. First, β-mean nearest taxon distance (βMNTD) was calculated for each possible pairwise comparison within fungal communities using ‘comdistnt’ in R package “picante” [52]. By comparing these observed βMNTD values to those obtained from 999 community randomizations, βNTI was calculated according to Stegen et al. [53,54]. These βNTI results can then be used to investigate the phylogenetic turnover within the community and to understand whether deterministic (i.e., selection) or stochastic (i.e., random) processes affect community composition. If a |βNTI| value exceeds 2, a deterministic process shapes the fungal community; if a βNTI value is less than 2 and greater than −2, a stochastic process affects the community. Deterministic processes can then be distinguished based upon the sign of the βNTI value. When βNTI is greater than 2, communities are significantly more different than would be explained by random chance due to variable selection. If βNTI is less than −2, communities are significantly more similar than would be expected by random chance due to homogeneous selection [55]. In addition to βNTI calculations, the RCbray was used to further distinguish observed stochastic processes as described by Stegen et al. and chase et al. [54,56] on pairwise comparisons with |βNTI| < 2. Briefly, the RCbray index is the magnitude of deviation between observed and expected Bray–Curtis values, varied from −1 to 1, and we compared the values of |βNTI| < 2 and (RCbray). In the context of |βNTI| < 2, a value of (RCbray) > +0.95 indicates that the observed turnover is dominated by the dispersal limitation, (RCbray) value < −0.95 indicates the effect of homogeneous dispersal, and (RCbray) < 0.95 value indicates the influence of drift. The undominated concept described a situation in which ecological drift, rather than dispersion or selection, was the fundamental source of differences in population compositions (stochastic birth and death events cause population size to fluctuate) [53].
2.8. Evidence of Neutral and Niche Processes by Sloan’s Neutral Community Model for Fungal Community
The neutral community model (NCM) is a neutral-based process analysis that has been effectively applied to various ecological approaches. NCM is an effective technique for evaluating stochastic processes affecting community assemblages [57,58]. To determine the importance of neutral processes in the assembly of fungal taxa (OTUs in our data), we applied Sloan’s neutral community fit model [35,59]. Sloan’s model was fit to the relative abundance of OTUs observed in all samples (metacommunity) and their observed detection frequency in each sample. We used R package MicECO with the neutral function fit according to Burns et al., [58]. In the current study, we first fit Sloan’s model to the overall fungal community in all samples then we applied this approach to each soil layer to determine the role of neutral processes on overall community assembly, then at a specific soil layer. In general, the parameter m indicates an estimate of the migration rate reveals the probability that a dead member would be replaced by immigrants from the metacommunity, which disperse into the local community [60]. The calculation for the best fit of the rate of m was estimated by using nonlinear least squares and maximum likelihood methods. Sloan’s neutral model categorizes OTUs in the population according to whether they occur more often than ("above" partition), within ("neutral" partition), or less often than ("below" partition) the 95 percent confidence interval. Briefly, the OTUs above the partition were vigorously selected for, while the OTUs below the partition were forcefully selected against. The goodness-of-fit of the Sloan neutral community model was assessed using the generalized R-squared (Rsqr = 1– the sum of squares of residuals/the total sum of squares) [61]. A high R2 value (> 0.2) shows that a neutral process of ecological drift and dispersal contributes more to community assembly, whereas a low R2 value (0.2) indicates that poor fitting occurs and other mechanisms (e.g., selective growth/attachment) contribute to community assembly [62,63]. The log-normal model (LNM), based on niche theory were used to quantified the contribution of niche processes [64]. The model assumes that the logarithmic form of species abundance is normally distributed. The model is defined as:
where S(R) is the number of species within the Rth octave to the left and right of the symmetrical curve; S0 is the number of species within the modal abundance octave and 1/a is the distribution width [65]. The log-normal model was performed using the “radfit” function in the vegan package in [66]. Akaike information criterion (AIC) values were used to test for significant differences between the expected and observed species abundance distribution patterns. The AIC values close to zero indicating best model fitting. The AIC calculations were carried out in R using the package ‘vegan’ [67].2.9. Statistical Analyses
We used Pearson correlation analyses to investigate the relationship between environmental factors. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare gene copy numbers between soil layers and altitudes. Furthermore, Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the effect of soil layers and altitudinal gradients on fungal gene abundance. Pearson correlations (r) were also run among soil physiochemical properties and fungal abundance data. The influence of physical and chemical factors on the distribution of fungal communities was investigated using canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). A variance portioning analysis (VPA) was used to assess the impact of individual environmental factors and geographic distance on the composition of fungal communities. The Mantel test was used to show the correlation between the physicochemical properties of the samples and the community structures of the most dominant fungal genera, and the results were combined with the “ggClusterNet” package in R [68]. The correlation analysis of beta diversity indices such as taxonomic (Bray–Curtis), phylogenetic (weighted UniFrac), null model-based beta diversity (βMNTD), and βNTI values (stochastic/deterministic processes) with environmental and geographic distance were performed by Mantel Pearson correlation analysis. The ‘ade4’ package in R was used to calculate significance using 9999 permutations [69]. Using standardized Euclidean distances, total geographic, and environmental differences across samples were estimated. Using partial Mantel tests with Pearson’s correlation coefficient and 999 permutations, the correlations between βNTI and the 2 geographical variables (Euclidean distances in environmental parameters and geographic distance) were investigated.
3. Results
3.1. Soil Physicochemical Analysis
Nine soil physicochemical parameters were measured (Figure S1). The pH values were higher in the surface soil layer at lower altitudes while, on the contrary, pH values decreased with the increase in altitude. Soil EC gradually increased along with soil depth and decreased along with altitudinal gradients. The highest electrical conductivity was found in a deeper layer at 1789 m altitude, which was 130.67 μs/cm while the lowest values were noted at 3837 m. Soil available nutrients, including SOM, decreased along with soil depth and increased along with altitude. Soil TN and AN increased along with soil depth and altitudinal gradients. We found a decline in NH4+-N from surface to deeper soil layers, and NH4+-N increased gradually along with elevation in the surface soil layer. Asymmetric variations are found in the availability of NO3−-N along with elevation and soil layers. Soil chemical elements TP showed asymmetric distribution along with elevation gradient while TP concentration increased along with soil depths and AP increased along with soil layers and elevations. Pearson correlation analysis (Table S2) showed that pH was significantly positively correlated with EC while negatively associated with SOM, TN, AN, NH4+-N, TP, and AP concentration in soil. The soil pH values negatively correlated with the availability of nutrients in the soil. Soil electrical conductivity negatively correlated with SOM and positively correlated with NO3−-N, which indicated accumulation of soil organic matters significantly alters soil conductivity and pH values in natural soil habitat. Soil organic matters positively correlated with TN, AN, AP, NH4+-N, and TP. The nitrogen availability, either organic nitrogen or alkaline nitrogen, showed similar trends as SOM.
3.2. Quantification of Fungal Gene Abundance
The fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine the amount of 18S rRNA fungal gene copies per gram of dry soil across soil layers and an altitudinal gradient (Figure 2). The reaction was performed in triplicate for each sample, and mean values were considered for quantification. The 18S rRNA gene log copy numbers in all samples ranged from 5.118 to 8.610 per gram of dry soil. Considering soil depth, the fungal gene copy numbers were the highest in the surface soil layer for all altitudes except 3350 m, where a slightly higher value was recorded for the deeper layer while the middle soil layer exhibited significantly lower gene copies. Regarding altitudinal gradients, we found the lowest gene copies at lower altitudes, and gene abundance increased with elevational gradients, while the highest gene copies were observed at altitudes of 1812 m (8.610 log copies per gram of dry soil). Two-way ANOVA results shown in (Table 1) indicating that altitudes and altitudes with soil depth effect strongly (F = 5.88 and 7.74 p = 0.000) fungal gene abundance than soil depth alone (F = 5.81, p = 0.006). Interestingly, the 3350 m sample middle layer had a significantly lower value. For samples, 889 m, 1812 m, and 3837 m, the gene abundance decreased with the soil depth, while for 1297 m, 1660 m, and 1789 m samples, slightly higher results were obtained for the deep layer than middle layers. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation between environmental variables and fungal gene abundance. Fungal gene abundance surprisingly showed a non-significant correlation with soil pH, EC, and SOM, while it was positively correlated with TN, AN, NH4+-N and AP (Table S2).
3.3. Sequence Analysis and Fungal Community Composition
Illumina yielded valid 4,208,571 sequences by amplifying the ITS1 region from 63 soil samples with an average number of 66802 (SD = 20,052.61) sequences per sample. After quality checking and removing reads present in one replicate, a total of 41,769,64 high-quality reads were obtained with an average number of 66,301 (SD = 19,716.66) reads per sample and selected for further analysis. The sequence data were assigned to operation taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a 97% similarity level; 8039 fungal OTUs were classified. The annotation of assigned OTUs revealed almost 82% of the fungal sequence being classified at the phyla level. A total of 19 phyla, 58 classes, 134 orders, 299 families, and 702 genera were identified. The fungal phylum Ascomycota was dominant (48%), followed by Basidiomycota (14%) and Mortierellomycota (12%). The fungal phylum Ascomycota richness decreased from surface to deep soil layers (from 71%, 56%, to 37%, respectively). The overall asymmetric richness of Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota along altitudinal gradients was found, the highest richness of Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota was found at altitudes 1789, 3350, and 3837, respectively, while the lowest richness was found at altitudes 3350, 889, and 1297, respectively (Figure S2). Regarding soil layers, the dominance of fungal phylum, Ascomycota decreased sharply from surface to middle soil layer while it slightly increased in deeper soil layer (from 59.88% to 42.61% and 43.61%, respectively). Fungal phylum Basidiomycota decreased from the surface to middle soil layer and increased in the deeper soil layer, while phylum Mortierellomycota increased significantly from surface to deeper soil layers (from 3.97% to 16.31%). We also analyzed the fungal community composition at the genus level. A total of 702 fungal genera were identified from all samples; the top 15 genera are shown in (Figure S3). Unclassified fungal taxa at the genus level accounted for 33.57%, followed by Mortierella, Fusarium, Endocarpon, and f_unidentified_Unclassified (9.51%, 7.57%, 4.32%, and 4.01%, respectively). The classified genus Mortierella dominated at altitudes 889 and 1669 (14.15% and 14.26%, respectively), decreasing sharply at the highest altitudes (4.34%). The fungal genera Solicoccozyma and f_Mortierellaceae_Unclassified increased along the altitudinal gradient (from 0 to 7.27% and 6.28%, respectively). With respect to soil layers, the classified fungal genera Mortierella, Fusarium, Solicoccozyma, Lactifluus and f_unidentified_Unclassified, f_Nectriaceae_Unclassifi, and f_Mortierel also increased along soil layers. The relative abundance of genus Endocarpon decreased sharply from surface to deeper soil layers (from 12.85% to 0%).
3.4. Alpha Diversity Analysis
The fungal richness index (ACE and Chao1 estimator), diversity index (Shannon, Simpson index), phylogenetic diversity index (PD), and species richness index (SR) were all calculated (Table S3). Our results indicated that the indices SR, ACE, and Chao1 values decreased from surface to deeper soil layers (from 563, 645, and 646 to 207, 219, and 221, respectively), while fungal species richness (SR) increased with the increase in altitudinal gradients (from 205 to 573). Furthermore, fungal richness increased along with altitude, highest richness was found at 3887 m in the surface soil layer. The diversity index Shannon and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD) values showed similar diversity patterns; fungal diversity increased along the altitudinal gradient (from 3.28 to 6.26 and 58.71 to 143.10, respectively), while it decreased among soil layers (from 5.13 to 4.16 and 126.30 to 62.10, respectively). Our findings indicated that the fungal community diversification rate was higher at higher altitudinal gradients and reduced along with soil depth. Across all altitudinal gradients and soil layers, we calculated NTI from standardized size effect of mean nearest taxon index using the null model were positive and range between 2 and −2 (Figure S4A). In addition, NTI values were relatively higher at surface soil layers than middle and deeper soil layers, while NTI values increased significantly along with altitudinal gradients (Figure S4B). Analysis of taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity
The distribution of the fungal community was distinct among lower and higher altitudinal gradients based on taxonomic weighted Bray–Curtis based NMDS analysis (Figure 3). The fungal community with closer altitudes showed lower dissimilarity. Similarly, the composition of the fungal community in altitudes 3350 and 3837 showed more similarity for distinct community composition than lower altitudes. The community dissimilarity between soil layers was not significantly different, while at middle altitude, 1789 in the community in a deeper soil layer were distinct from the surface and middle soil layers. For further confirmation, we applied taxonomic Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, phylogenetic weighted UniFrac, and βMNTD analysis to investigate the role of altitudinal and/or soil layer on community distribution. Linear regression analysis of beta diversity indices, Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, w.Unifrac, and βMNTD (Figure S5), showed that fungal community dissimilarity along altitudinal gradients was very low (r2 = 0.008, r2 = 0.005, r2 = 0.0002, respectively). On the other hand, fungal dissimilarity along with soil layers was also low; comparatively, fungal communities present in the middle soil layer were much more diverse than the surface and deeper soil layers. Fungal community similarity was higher in deeper soil layers. These results suggest that the composition of the fungal community in the middle soil layer is influenced by altitudinal gradients compared to the surface soil and deeper soil layers (Figure S6).
3.5. Quantification of Neutral Processes and Migration Rate
We assumed that habitat heterogeneity between soil layers and altitudinal gradients might lead to major spatial differences in fungal community assembly. It is important to examine whether neutral and/or niche processes play a role in the shaping of microbial communities in different soil layers and throughout the altitudinal gradients. According to Sloan‘s neutral model, the neutral model presented an excellent fit to the distribution of the fungal community (R2 = 0.75). These findings suggested that there are more serious dispersal limits for the eukaryotic community (Figure 4). Dispersal limitation increased along with soil layers, and a lower migration rate was noted at deeper soil layers for the fungal community. Furthermore, we employed a log-normal model to validate the role of niche processes in the fungal community composition. Based on AIC values (7564.75), the results showed that the log-normal model is not fitted on all soil samples, which is constant with NTI values and indicates that neutral processes were the main drivers for fungal community assemblage (Figure S7).
3.6. Assembly Processes of the Fungal Community and Contribution of Deterministic and Stochastic Processes
We estimated null model-based βNTI values to see if stochastic or deterministic mechanisms may better explain the assembly processes of fungal community composition across soil layers and altitudinal gradients. The distribution of βNTI across elevational gradients showed stochastic processes were dominant (96.15%), while the lowest stochastic rate was noted at altitude 1660. These findings indicated that the fungal community was assembled by the stochastic process with βNTI values between −2 and 2 across altitudinal gradients (Figure 5A). Among soil layers for the fungal community, the stochastic rate increased from surface to deeper soil layers (from 95.24% to 95.55%), suggesting that the fungal community present in the surface soil layer is slightly vulnerable to environmental selection. The (RCbray)-based results showed that the influence of selection (deterministic processes) on the fungal community structure along the altitudinal gradient was very low, while a contribution of 12.9% of variable selection was detected at altitude 1660 site. The dispersal limitations contributed a greater proportion to the fungal community along altitudinal gradients, while the dispersal limitations decreased from the surface to the middle and deeper soil layers (from 75.72% to 53.81 and 32.38%, respectively), followed by undominated processes. Furthermore, at each soil layer, the undominated process increased from surface to middle and deeper soil layers (from 16% to 36.67% and 59.05%, respectively) (Figure 5B). Hence, our findings indicated a contrary trend in dispersal limitation and undominated community assembly processes in controlling the composition of fungal communities.
3.7. Integration of Environmental and Spatial Distance in Shaping Fungal Communities
To explore the key drivers shaping the fungal community structure and composition among soil layers along with altitudinal gradients, we utilized comprehensive statistical methods to investigate the role of environmental variables and/or spatial distance. To analyze the influence of environmental factors on the relative composition of fungal communities, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was performed. The results showed that 18.52% and 14.41% variations at OTUs levels were explained by the X and Y axis, respectively. There was a positive correlation between the EC and fungal community present in lower altitudes, while pH positively correlated with fungal community composition at altitude 1660. The fungal community at high altitudinal gradients 3350 and 3837 showed a negative correlation with EC and pH. These findings suggest EC and pH are major environmental variables that influence fungal community composition at lower altitudinal gradients (Figure 6A). CCA analysis could not explain the contribution of individual variables; therefore, we performed variance portioning analysis (VPA) analysis. VPA results showed that (29.40%) community variations were explained by environmental factors and geographic distance. The geographic distance and EC explained 9.65% and 3.36%, respectively (Figure 6B). The environmental and geographic distance showed the lowest proportion of explained variables. Environmental distance and geographic distance explained 15.35% and 0.8% variations, respectively, while a mutual effect of both parameters revealed (0.9%) variations in fungal community distributions (Figure 6C).
The relationship of dominant fungal genera based on Bray–Curtis distance with environmental factors was analyzed by the Mantel test (Figure 7), and the results indicated that TP and AP significantly influenced the compositions of Russula, Inocybe, Lactifluus, Solicoccozyma, Protoglossum, and f_Mortierellaceae_Unclassified. The nitrogen content (TN and AN) also influenced the composition of Russula, Inocybe, Lactifluus. SOM influenced the composition of Russula and Inocybe. Soil pH showed a positive correlation with f_unidentified_Unclassified, Solicoccozyma, and f_Mortierellaceae_Unclassified. These findings suggest that the composition of Russula and Inocybe were affected by multiple factors, including TP, AP, TN, AN, and SOM, while pH and EC indicate minor roles in the composition of dominant fungal genera.
In order to examine whether the local environmental variables and/or spatial distance exhibited an influence on the beta diversity of fungal communities, we performed Mantel Spearman correlation analysis. Fungal taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity indices Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and weighted UniFrac distance and βMNTD showed a significant positive correlation with environmental variables. The βMNTD and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index showed higher correlation with environmental factors than weighted UniFrac distance (r = 0.387 and r = 0.356, p = 0.001 respectively). While βNTI values showed a negative correlation with environmental variables, these findings are similar with RCbray analysis, which showed only 4.4% influence of environmental variables. Among soil layers, both diversity indices showed that environmental variables exhibit the strongest correlation with the community present in the deeper soil layer (r = 0.91 and r = 0.92), indicating the highest influence of environmental variables on diversity (Figure 8A). Further, we investigated the role of geographic distance on diversification of the fungal community. Mantel test results showed the influence of geographic distance on the fungal community diversity indices (Figure 8B). The phylogenetic beta diversity weighted UniFrac distance showed relatively higher correlation (r = 0.361, p = 0.001) with geographic distance than taxonomic Bray–Curtis and βMNTD diversity index (r = 0.336 and 0.335, p = 0.001 respectively). The βNTI showed a negative correlation with geographic distance. Furthermore, the middle soil layer diversification rate and geographic distance showed a higher correlation while weak correlations were found in deeper soil layers (Table S4).
4. Discussion
High altitudinal soils are unique and may be challenging for life due to specific environmental factors such as their oligotrophic nature, dramatic freeze-thaw cycles, and exposure to radiations [70,71,72]. Several studies on soil fungi have been published at various elevations, including the Himalayan Mountains range in Nepal, the Colorado Rocky Mountains in the United States, the Milla and Segrilla Mountains in Tibet, central Veracruz in Mexico, Mt. Fuji in Japan, and Mt. Kinabalu in Malaysia [3,72,73,74,75,76]. In addition, some studies also reported fungal community composition and diversity along the altitudinal gradients but have mainly focused on the topsoil layer [77,78,79]. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of fungal abundance, composition, diversity, and assemblages between different soil layers and altitudinal gradients by qPCR analysis and ITS1 region Illumina sequencing. We found that the fungal gene log copies are in the range of 5.11 to 8.61 per gram of dry soil among all soil samples, which was higher than found by [49]. The fungal gene abundance dramatically increased from lower to higher altitudinal levels from 5.840 to 8.610 log number gene copies, respectively. Regarding soil layers, the surface layer had the higher fungal gene copy numbers, while the middle layer harbored the lowest gene copy numbers. These findings are good in line with previous studies reporting that the fungal gene abundance was positively associated with altitudinal gradients [80,81]. Previous studies have shown that change in fungal communities can be associated with soil texture, pH, and soil nitrogen availability [10,82,83,84]. Some studies also reported that microbial biomass of mountain ecosystems is affected by coniferous litter inputs on surface layers [85,86]. The decomposition and litter inputs lead to the accumulation of C, N, and EC in alpine and subalpine soils [49]. Previously, it was reported that environmental variables N, C, and EC were positively correlated with fungal abundance [87]. In this study, we found that fungal gene abundance was positively correlated with N and P, while soil organic matter and pH showed non-significant correlations. We can conclude that higher fungal gene abundance in the surface soil layer may be due to the higher availability of nitrogen and environmental conditions.
In this study, we found that the Ascomycota (Leotiomyceta) was dominated by fungal phyla followed by Basidiomycota (Agaricomycetes) and Mortierellomycota. Some differences in the relative abundance of these two phyla were observed in the different ecosystems, for example, compared with desert soils, forest soils had more Basidiomycota. However, our findings are in good agreement with the previous study reported on the Tibetan Plateau, such as Zhang et al. [88] who reported Ascomycota and Basidiomycota accounting for 83.6 % of fungal sequences in the Tibetan Plateau, while we found comparatively lower abundance 62% of fungal sequences. Ascomycota accounted for 48% fungal sequence. This might be due to their higher ability to decompose cellulose as compared to other fungal taxa [89]. At higher altitudinal levels, we found a relatively higher abundance of Ascomycota, which may reflect the specific ecological functions of the subalpine cool temperate zone’s ecosystem. A significant decline in Ascomycota was observed from surface to deeper soil layers (from 71% to 37%) because above-ground fungal community was closely related to vegetation, which indicated that above-ground plant vegetation could be an important factor that determined Ascomycota community composition. At genus level fungal taxa distributions, we found saprotrophic Mortierella and cosmopolitan Fusarium followed by lichen-forming Endocarpon fungal genera. We observed the asymmetric abundance pattern of Mortierella along altitudinal gradients, while other studies reported this to have increased in abundance along elevation [90]. We also found that Mortierella abundance showed a non-significant correlation with environmental variables; it may track changes in nutrient quality rather than quantity or be partially determined by vegetation turnover due to its potentially endophytic trophic lifestyle. In addition, a comprehensive ecological study of Mortierella at higher elevational gradients in relation to plant roots needs to be further investigated. The pathogenic cosmopolitan plant Fusarium was dominant in our study, as also reported in the soil studied by Devi et al. [91]. The fungal genus Endocarpon decreased sharply from surface to deeper soil layers. The reduction of Endocarpon along soil layers may be due to increases in soil moisture content and its ability to tolerate harsh conditions [88,92]. We found a stronger impact of environmental variables such as TP, AP, TN, AN, and SOM on fungal genera Russula and Inocybe. Our results were consistent with previous reports that Russula abundance in the soil ecosystem was associated with the C:N ratio [93,94]. Elevation is a complex and indirect gradient along which many environmental factors vary with altitudinal levels. Several published studies highlighted the effect of elevation on Ectomycorrhizal fungal distributions such as Jarvis et al., who found that at a genus level, only Russula and Inocybe displayed a significant pattern, increasing in occurrence with altitude [90,95]. Another study reported that Ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa were host specific such as Russula genotypic diversity have preference for Pine Forest on mountain regions [96]. In this study, we observed that -diversity, species richness, AC, Shannon, and phylogenetic diversity index increased significantly at higher altitudes, and our findings were contrary to previous research [97,98]. Our contrary findings may be due to different elevation gradients because other studies included lower altitudinal gradients (24 to 2600 m). Another possible reason could be the study site and the Tibetan Plateau exhibiting unique environmental conditions [99], such as several studies reporting that geographic location is also an important factor affecting microbial diversity [100]. As expected, NMDS showed that higher altitudes exhibit distinct fungal communities (Figure 3). The “local community” refers to a sample from one point showing fungal mean NTI values less than +2 indicating weak phylogenetic clustering. This provides evidence of the weak role of deterministic processes or environmental filtering at the local community level [47]. Several reasons can explain this phenomenon. Firstly, as elevation increases, environmental harshness can also increase factors affecting fungal diversity and richness [101]. Secondly, climate change significantly impacts soil fungal diversity along with elevation [102].
To measure the impact of geographical and environmental factors on fungal community composition, we conducted VPA analysis. Environmental factors and spatial distance played a limited impact on shaping the fungal community, according to the VPA analysis (29.40 percent). Several studies have found a significant proportion of unexplained variation in bacterioplankton and microeukaryote communities in different habitats and sampling areas [103,104,105]. Several reasons could explain our results. First, the unexplained variations in the fungal community in this study could be due to the exclusion of other important factors, such as temperature, radiation, and precipitation through VPA [106,107,108]. Second, several studies have found that microbial co-occurrence can alter community distribution, which is not measurable via VPA [109,110]. Third, the VPA has a tendency to underestimate the contribution explained by environmental factors [111]. This may also explain the low contributions to the microeucharyotic community variation by deterministic or selective processes. The Mantel test results indicated that beta-diversity indices Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, weighted UniFrac distance, βMNTD, and βNTI showed distinct trends along with spatial and environmental correlations. Our results clearly indicated that stochastic processes dominated (96%) over deterministic processes (|βNTI| < 2) in shaping the fungal community across altitudes and soil layers. Fungal βNTI showed a weak negative correlation with environmental variables and spatial distance, indicating less influence on fungal community assemblages. The negative correlation between fungal community and spatial distance and environmental distance indicates the importance of selection and drift [112,113]. To confirm the possible role of selection and drift, we performed the neutral community model (NCM).
Sloan’s [35] neutral model was used to determine the biogeographic distribution of fungal communities. The NCM findings suggest that the stochastic balance between fungal loss and gain (such as stochastic births, deaths, and immigration) played a role in the shaping of fungal communities across all locations. Furthermore, the role of stochastic processes was confirmed by a considerable distance-decay pattern of the fungal population among soil strata. Our results are similar to previous studies on microeukaryotic communities in subtropical rivers (R2 = 0.89) [114]. According to Hubbell’s neutral theory [19], the community similarity is predicted to decrease along with spatial (geographic distance) gradients due to dispersal limitations [115]. While these correlations are almost similar to previous studies on smaller spatial scales, such as planktonic and sedimentary bacterial communities (R2 = 0.775) [116], they are larger than coastal lakes in the Antarctic (R2 ≤ 0.50) [117]. The migration rate is an important indicator for neutral and non-neutral portioning. We found a lower migration rate in this study, which has been shown to indicate a higher dispersal limitation [114]. In recent studies, dispersal limitations have been widely accepted as a major driver for shaping fungal community assembly [118,119,120]. Further, we calculated βNTI values and performed RCbray analysis to investigate the role of dispersal limitation and other ecological processes. While it was assumed in our study that higher environmental variability could lead to higher structure heterogeneity as reported in previous studies, but our results indicated that dispersal limitation and undominated processes dominated ecological processes shaping the fungal community. Some studies have reported that dispersion of fungi is higher [121], while other studies have suggested the larger size of fungi compared to other microbes [91]. In our study, we found higher dispersal limitations along altitudinal gradients, and dispersal limitations were at the topsoil layer, while undominated processes lead to fungal assembly in deeper soil layers. Previously, it was found that limited availability of nutrients can lead to structural variability in microbial communities [122,123]; the higher dispersal limitations along altitudinal gradient might be due to availability of limited nutrients along altitudinal gradients. These findings are in agreement with [124] who reported that fungal dispersal limitation in paddy soil decreased along with soil depth. The dispersion of fungi is still controversial, many studies have reported that fungi are free to disperse thus dispersal limitation does not exist [121], while other studies have reported that due to the large size of fungi over other microbes, their dispersal is limited [91].
5. Conclusions
This study revealed fungal community composition, diversity, and assembly processes along altitudinal gradients among soil layers using qPCR and high-throughput DNA sequencing techniques. A positive correlation between soil fungal gene abundance and altitude differences was found on the Tibetan Plateau. Our study shows that the composition and diversity of soil fungi at the surface are determined by elevation gradients. The plant pathogenic fungal genus Fusarium increased from surface to deeper soil layers and was positively correlated with EC, while fungal genera Russula and Inocybe showed a positive correlation with environmental variables. Soil physicochemical parameters explained only 15% of the variation in fungal community composition along the elevations. Our study clearly indicates that the fungal community is assembled by stochastic processes. However, dispersal limitations and undominated factors were major stochastic forces to drive community composition as βNTI analysis, NCM, and the log-normal model indicated the predominance of stochastic processes in community composition. Future studies on a larger scale with more environmental variables will provide insight into the factors that influence fungal communities in these unique environments. This study will help to better predict the responses of soil fungi to environmental changes at the landscape level.
Conceptualization, S.H. and Y.Z.; Methodology, S.H. and Y.Y.; Software, S.H. and S.L.; Validation, S.H. and Y.Z.; Formal analysis, H.L. and S.L; Investigation, H.C. and Y.Z.; Resources, H.C. and Y.Z.; Data curation, S.H.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.H.; Writing—review and editing, Z.Y. and H.L.; Visualization, S.H.; Supervision, H.C. and Y.Z.; Project administration, H.C. and S.H.; Funding acquisition, H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077026, 41501279).
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. The quantitative gene abundance per gram dry soil in different soil layers and altitudes. Different lower-case superscript letters on different bars indicate significant differences between samples (Duncan’s test, p < 0.05).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Fungal Community Bray–Curtis distance-based Non-Metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling plot at OTU level of soil samples among different soil layers and altitudinal gradients.
![View Image - Figure 4. Fit of occurrences frequency of different fungal OTUs as a function mean relative abundance applying Sloan’s model [35]. Red and yellow dots indicate more or less frequently than given by the model. Green dots between dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals of the model. R2 denotes fitness of model, R2 > 0.2 fitness of model more, m indicates migration rate. (A) Overall community, (B) surface layer, (C) middle layer, (D) deeper layer.](https://media.proquest.com/media/hms/THUM/8/6RarL?_a=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&_s=HDcknAQo2u1aXDsV7MWBky8eC4U%3D "View Image - Figure 4. Fit of occurrences frequency of different fungal OTUs as a function mean relative abundance applying Sloan’s model [35]. Red and yellow dots indicate more or less frequently than given by the model. Green dots between dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals of the model. R2 denotes fitness of model, R2 > 0.2 fitness of model more, m indicates migration rate. (A) Overall community, (B) surface layer, (C) middle layer, (D) deeper layer.")
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Fit of occurrences frequency of different fungal OTUs as a function mean relative abundance applying Sloan’s model [35]. Red and yellow dots indicate more or less frequently than given by the model. Green dots between dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals of the model. R2 denotes fitness of model, R2 > 0.2 fitness of model more, m indicates migration rate. (A) Overall community, (B) surface layer, (C) middle layer, (D) deeper layer.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. (A) Scatter plot of βNTI across spatial scales of Tibetan soil. Blue line indicating the median values of each sampling location. (B) Quantitative analysis of relative importance of each assembly process that govern the fungal community composition.
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. (A) Relationship between environmental variables and fungal community structures. The length of the arrow represents the degree of correlation between environmental variables and community structures. (B) Variance partitioning analysis of individual environmental variables and spatial distance of soil fungal communities. (C) Variance partitioning analysis of combined environmental factors and geographic distance. Numbers indicate the proportion of explained variation and residuals indicate unexplained variations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. Pairwise comparisons of environmental factors and their effects on top dominated fungal genera community composition. Spearman’s correlation is shown in a color gradient. Fungal genera based on Bray–Curtis distance are correlated to environmental factors by Mantel test, with edge representing Mantel’s r for correlations and the color corresponding to the significance.
Enlarge this image.Figure 8. (A) Scatter plot diversity indices on Mantel test Spearman correlation “r” show the relationship of taxonomic, phylogenetic null model-based and βNTI values of fungal communities with environmental variables (Euclid based distance). (B) Scatter plot diversity indices on Mantel test Spearman correlation “r” show the relationship of taxonomic, phylogenetic null model-based, and βNTI values of fungal communities with geographic distance.
The effect of elevations and soil layers on fungal gene abundance as indicated by two-way ANOVA.
| Factors | Fungal Gene Abundance (Log Copies) | |
|---|---|---|
| F | p | |
| SL | 5.813 | 0.006 |
| A | 5.881 | 0.000 |
| SL × A | 7.746 | 0.000 |
Values represent mean with standard error in parenthesis. SL, Soil Layers; A, Altitudes.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at
References
1. Körner, C. The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol. Evol.; 2007; 22, pp. 569-574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17988759]
2. Tedersoo, L.; Bahram, M.; Põlme, S.; Kõljalg, U.; Yorou, N.S.; Wijesundera, R.; Ruiz, L.V.; Vasco-Palacios, A.M.; Thu, P.Q.; Suija, A. et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science; 2014; 346, 6213. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688]
3. Miyamoto, Y.; Nakano, T.; Hattori, M.; Nara, K. The mid-domain effect in ectomycorrhizal fungi: Range overlap along an elevation gradient on Mount Fuji, Japan. ISME J.; 2014; 8, pp. 1739-1746. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.34]
4. Linnaeus, C. On the increase of the habitable earth. Amoenitates Acad.; 1781; 2, pp. 17-27.
5. Lomolino, M.V.; Sax, D.F.; Brown, J.H. Foundations of Biogeography: Classic Papers with Commentaries; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2004.
6. Lomolino, M.V. Elevation gradients of species-density: Historical and prospective views. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.; 2001; 10, pp. 3-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00229.x]
7. Herzog, S.K.; Kessler, M.; Bach, K. The elevational gradient in Andean bird species richness at the local scale: A foothill peak and a high-elevation plateau. Ecography; 2005; 28, pp. 209-222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03935.x]
8. Zheng, Z.; Gong, D.J.; Sun, C.X.; Li, X.J.; Li, W.J. Altitudinal patterns of species richness and species range size of vascular plants in Xiaolongshan Reserve of Qinling Mountain: A test of Rapoport’s rule. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao; 2014; 25.
9. Bryant, J.A.; Lamanna, C.; Morlon, H.; Kerkhoff, A.J.; Enquist, B.J.; Green, J.L. Microbes on mountainsides: Contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2008; 105, pp. 11505-11511. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801920105]
10. Fierer, N.; Jackson, R.B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2006; 103, pp. 626-631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507535103] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16407148]
11. Vellend, M.; Srivastava, D.S.; Anderson, K.M.; Brown, C.D.; Jankowski, J.E.; Kleynhans, E.J.; Kraft, N.J.; Letaw, A.D.; Macdonald, A.A.M.; Maclean, J.E. Assessing the relative importance of neutral stochasticity in ecological communities. Oikos; 2014; 123, pp. 1420-1430. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/oik.01493]
12. Hubbell, S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32); Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2011.
13. Ofiţeru, I.D.; Lunn, M.; Curtis, T.P.; Wells, G.F.; Criddle, C.S.; Francis, C.A.; Sloan, W.T. Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2010; 107, pp. 15345-15350. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000604107]
14. Ferrenberg, S.; O’neill, S.P.; Knelman, J.E.; Todd, B.; Duggan, S.; Bradley, D.; Robinson, T.; Schmidt, S.K.; Townsend, A.R.; Williams, M.W. Changes in assembly processes in soil bacterial communities following a wildfire disturbance. ISME J.; 2013; 7, pp. 1102-1111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.11] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23407312]
15. Zhou, J.; Liu, W.; Deng, Y.; Jiang, Y.-H.; Xue, K.; He, Z.; Nostrand, J.D.V.; Wu, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, A. et al. Stochastic assembly leads to alternative communities with distinct functions in a bioreactor microbial community. MBio; 2013; 4, e00584-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00584-12]
16. Vellend, M. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol.; 2010; 85, pp. 183-206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/652373]
17. Martiny, J. Dispersal and the microbiome. Microbe; 2015; 10, pp. 191-196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/microbe.10.191.1]
18. Nemergut, D.R.; Schmidt, S.K.; Fukami, T.; O’Neill, S.P.; Bilinski, T.M.; Stanish, L.F.; Knelman, J.E.; Darcy, J.L.; Lynch, R.C.; Wickey, P. et al. Patterns and Processes of Microbial Community Assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.; 2013; 77, pp. 342-356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00051-12] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24006468]
19. Hubbell, S.P. The Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography and Stephen Jay Gould. Paleobiology; 2005; 31, pp. 122-132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0122:TNTOBA]2.0.CO;2]
20. Wardle, D.A.; Bardgett, R.D.; Klironomos, J.N.; Setälä, H.; van der Putten, W.H.; Wall, D.H. Ecological Linkages Between Aboveground and Belowground Biota. Science; 2004; 304, pp. 1629-1633. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1094875] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15192218]
21. Bahram, M.; Põlme, S.; Kõljalg, U.; Zarre, S.; Tedersoo, L. Regional and local patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure along an altitudinal gradient in the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran. New Phytol.; 2012; 193, pp. 465-473. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03927.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21988714]
22. Lentendu, G.; Zinger, L.; Manel, S.; Coissac, E.; Choler, P.; Geremia, R.A.; Melodelima, C. Assessment of soil fungal diversity in different alpine tundra habitats by means of pyrosequencing. Fungal Divers.; 2011; 49, pp. 113-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0101-5]
23. Wang, J.-T.; Zheng, Y.-M.; Hu, H.-W.; Zhang, L.-M.; Li, J.; He, J.-Z. Soil pH determines the alpha diversity but not beta diversity of soil fungal community along altitude in a typical Tibetan forest ecosystem. J. Soils Sediments; 2015; 15, pp. 1224-1232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1070-1]
24. Gao, C.; Shi, N.-N.; Liu, Y.-X.; Peay, K.G.; Zheng, Y.; Ding, Q.; Mi, X.-C.; Ma, K.-P.; Wubet, T.; Buscot, F. et al. Host plant genus-level diversity is the best predictor of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity in a Chinese subtropical forest. Mol. Ecol.; 2013; 22, pp. 3403-3414. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.12297] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624421]
25. Yang, T.; Adams, J.M.; Shi, Y.; Sun, H.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chu, H. Fungal community assemblages in a high elevation desert environment: Absence of dispersal limitation and edaphic effects in surface soil. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 2017; 115, pp. 393-402. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.013]
26. Liu, S.; Sun, Y.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, H.; Dong, S.; Zhao, S.; Beazley, R. The spatio-temporal patterns of the topsoil organic carbon density and its influencing factors based on different estimation models in the grassland of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. PLoS ONE; 2019; 14, e0225952. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225952] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805113]
27. Du, M.; Kawashima, S.; Yonemura, S.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S. Mutual influence between human activities and climate change in the Tibetan Plateau during recent years. Glob. Planet. Chang.; 2004; 41, pp. 241-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.01.010]
28. Ding, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z.; Bai, W. The relationship between NDVI and precipitation on the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geogr. Sci.; 2007; 17, pp. 259-268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11442-007-0259-7]
29. Chu, H.; Sun, H.; Tripathi, B.M.; Adams, J.M.; Huang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y. Bacterial community dissimilarity between the surface and subsurface soils equals horizontal differences over several kilometers in the western Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Microbiol.; 2016; 18, pp. 1523-1533. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13236]
30. Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, Z.; Rossel, R.; Wu, Y.U. Interactive effects of elevation and land use on soil bacterial communities in the Tibetan Plateau. Pedosphere; 2020; 30, pp. 817-831. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(19)60836-2]
31. Xing, P.; Tao, Y.; Jeppesen, E.; Wu, Q.L. Comparing microbial composition and diversity in freshwater lakes between Greenland and the Tibetan Plateau. Limnol. Oceanogr.; 2021; 66, pp. S142-S156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lno.11686]
32. Jiang, H.; Deng, S.; Huang, Q.; Dong, H.; Yu, B. Response of Aerobic Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacterial Diversity to Environment Conditions in Saline Lakes and Daotang River on the Tibetan Plateau, NW China. Geomicrobiol. J.; 2010; 27, pp. 400-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490450903480269]
33. Jiang, H.; Dong, H.; Yu, B.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Ji, S.; Zhang, C.L. Microbial response to salinity change in Lake Chaka, a hypersaline lake on Tibetan plateau. Environ. Microbiol.; 2007; 9, pp. 2603-2621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01377.x]
34. Xing, P.; Hahn, M.W.; Wu, Q.L. Low Taxon Richness of Bacterioplankton in High-Altitude Lakes of the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, with a Predominance of Bacteroidetes and Synechococcus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2009; 75, pp. 7017-7025. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01544-09]
35. Sloan, W.T.; Lunn, M.; Woodcock, S.; Head, I.M.; Nee, S.; Curtis, T.P. Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structure. Environ. Microbiol.; 2006; 8, pp. 732-740. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00956.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16584484]
36. Hu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, D.; Cheng, G.; Mu, J.; Wu, Q.; Niu, F.; An, L.; Feng, H. Diversity and community structure of fungi through a permafrost core profile from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China. J. Basic Microbiol.; 2014; 54, pp. 1331-1341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201400232]
37. Shi, T.; Reeves, R.H.; Gilichinsky, D.A.; Friedmann, E.I. Characterization of Viable Bacteria from Siberian Permafrost by 16S rDNA Sequencing. Microb. Ecol.; 1997; 33, pp. 169-179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002489900019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9115180]
38. Schulte, E.; Hoskins, B. Recommended soil organic matter tests. Recomm. Soil Test. Proced. North. East. USA Northeast. Reg. Publ.; 1995; 493, pp. 52-60.
39. Bremner, J.M. Nitrogen-total. Methods Soil Anal. Part. 3 Chem. Methods; 1996; 5, pp. 1085-1121.
40. Eckert, D.; Sims, J.T. Recommended soil pH and lime requirement tests. Recomm. Soil Test. Proced. Northeast. United States Northeast. Reg. Bull.; 1995; 493, pp. 11-16.
41. Bao, S.D. Agricultural and Chemistry Analysis of Soil; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2005; pp. 355-356.
42. Yun, T.; Sun, X.; Li, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Cao, J.; Lu, Z. Biochar made from green waste as peat substitute in growth media for Calathea rotundifola cv. Fasciata. Sci. Hortic.; 2012; 143, pp. 15-18.
43. Searle, P.L. The Berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen. A review. Analyst; 1984; 109, pp. 549-568. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/an9840900549]
44. Kempers, A.J.; Luft, A.G. Re-examination of the determination of environmental nitrate as nitrite by reduction with hydrazine. Analyst; 1988; 113, pp. 1117-1120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/an9881301117]
45. White, T.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, F.; White, T.; Lee, S.H.; Taylor, L.; Shawetaylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. A Guide Methods Appl.; 1990; 18, pp. 315-322.
46. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J.; 2011; 17, pp. 10-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200]
47. Kembel, S.W. Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: Assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. Ecol. Lett.; 2010; 12, pp. 949-960. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01354.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19702749]
48. Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré, N.; Christen, R.; Dequiedt, S.; Mougel, C.; Lelièvre, M.; Jolivet, C.; Shahbazkia, H.R.; Guillou, L.; Arrouays, D.; Ranjard, L. Validation and application of a PCR primer set to quantify fungal communities in the soil environment by real-time quantitative PCR. PLoS ONE; 2011; 6, e24166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024166]
49. Siles, J.A.; Margesin, R. Abundance and Diversity of Bacterial, Archaeal, and Fungal Communities along an Altitudinal Gradient in Alpine Forest Soils: What Are the Driving Factors?. Microb. Ecol.; 2016; 72, pp. 207-220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0748-2]
50. Stegen, J.C.; Lin, X.; Konopka, A.E.; Fredrickson, J.K. Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities. ISME J.; 2012; 6, pp. 1653-1664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.22] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22456445]
51. Wang, J.; Shen, J.; Wu, Y.; Tu, C.; Soininen, J.; Stegen, J.C.; He, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, E. Phylogenetic beta diversity in bacterial assemblages across ecosystems: Deterministic versus stochastic processes. ISME J.; 2013; 7, pp. 1310-1321. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.30] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23446837]
52. Webb, C.O.; Ackerly, D.D.; McPeek, M.A.; Donoghue, M.J. Phylogenies and Community Ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.; 2002; 33, pp. 475-505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448]
53. Stegen, J.C.; Lin, X.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Konopka, A.E. Estimating and mapping ecological processes influencing microbial community assembly. Front. Microbiol.; 2015; 6, 370. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00370]
54. Stegen, J.C.; Lin, X.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Chen, X.; Kennedy, D.W.; Murray, C.J.; Rockhold, M.L.; Konopka, A. Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J.; 2013; 7, pp. 2069-2079. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.93] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23739053]
55. Stegen, J.C.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Wilkins, M.J.; Konopka, A.E.; Nelson, W.C.; Arntzen, E.V.; Chrisler, W.B.; Chu, R.K.; Danczak, R.E.; Fansler, S.J. et al. Groundwater–surface water mixing shifts ecological assembly processes and stimulates organic carbon turnover. Nat. Commun.; 2016; 7, 11237. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11237] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052662]
56. Chase, J.M.; Kraft, N.J.; Smith, K.G.; Vellend, M.; Inouye, B.D. Using null models to disentangle variation in community dissimilarity from variation in α-diversity. Ecosphere; 2011; 2, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES10-00117.1]
57. Zhou, J.; Ning, D. Stochastic community assembly: Does it matter in microbial ecology?. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.; 2017; 81, e00002-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00002-17]
58. Burns, A.R.; Stephens, W.Z.; Stagaman, K.; Wong, S.; Rawls, J.F.; Guillemin, K.; Bohannan, B.J. Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. ISME J.; 2016; 10, pp. 655-664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.142]
59. Sloan, W.T.; Woodcock, S.; Lunn, M.; Head, I.M.; Curtis, T.P. Modeling Taxa-Abundance Distributions in Microbial Communities using Environmental Sequence Data. Microb. Ecol.; 2007; 53, pp. 443-455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9141-x]
60. Roguet, A.; Laigle, G.S.; Therial, C.; Bressy, A.; Soulignac, F.; Catherine, A.; Lacroix, G.; Jardillier, L.; Bonhomme, C.; Lerch, T.Z. et al. Neutral community model explains the bacterial community assembly in freshwater lakes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.; 2015; 91, fiv125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv125]
61. Östman, Ö.; Drakare, S.; Kritzberg, E.S.; Langenheder, S.; Logue, J.B.; Lindström, E.S. Regional invariance among microbial communities. Ecol. Lett.; 2010; 13, pp. 118-127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01413.x]
62. Ling, F.; Whitaker, R.; LeChevallier, M.W.; Liu, W.-T. Drinking water microbiome assembly induced by water stagnation. ISME J.; 2018; 12, pp. 1520-1531. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0101-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588495]
63. Venkataraman, A.; Bassis, C.M.; Beck, J.M.; Young, V.B.; Curtis, J.L.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Schmidt, T.M. Application of a neutral community model to assess structuring of the human lung microbiome. MBio; 2015; 6, e02284-14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02284-14]
64. Preston, F.W. The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology; 1948; 29, pp. 254-283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1930989]
65. Kevan, P.G.; Greco, C.F.; Belaoussoff, S. Log-normality of biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystemic health: Pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry heaths. J. Appl. Ecol.; 1997; 34, pp. 1122-1136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2405226]
66. Huber, J.A.; Welch, D.B.M.; Morrison, H.G.; Huse, S.M.; Neal, P.R.; Butterfield, D.A.; Sogin, M.L. Microbial Population Structures in the Deep Marine Biosphere. Science; 2007; 318, pp. 97-100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1146689]
67. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.O.; Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.; Wagner, H. Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.0-5. 2014; Available online: http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 15 November 2021).
68. Zhang, M.-S.; Li, W.; Zhang, W.-G.; Li, Y.-T.; Li, J.-Y.; Gao, Y. Agricultural land-use change exacerbates the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes via surface runoffs in Lake Tai Basin, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2021; 220, 112328. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112328]
69. Dray, S.; Dufour, A.-B. The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists. J. Stat. Softw.; 2007; 22, pp. 1-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v022.i04]
70. Freeman, K.R.; Pescador, M.Y.; Reed, S.C.; Costello, E.K.; Robeson, M.S.; Schmidt, S.K. Soil CO2 flux and photoautotrophic community composition in high-elevation, ‘barren’ soil. Environ. Microbiol.; 2009; 11, pp. 674-686. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01844.x]
71. Schmidt, S.; Nemergut, D.; Miller, A.; Freeman, K.; King, A.; Seimon, A. Microbial activity and diversity during extreme freeze–thaw cycles in periglacial soils, 5400 m elevation, Cordillera Vilcanota, Perú. Extremophiles; 2009; 13, pp. 807-816. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00792-009-0268-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19597697]
72. Freeman, K.R.; Martin, A.P.; Karki, D.; Lynch, R.C.; Mitter, M.S.; Meyer, A.F.; Longcore, J.E.; Simmons, D.R.; Schmidt, S.K. Evidence that chytrids dominate fungal communities in high-elevation soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2009; 106, 18315. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907303106]
73. Geml, J.; Morgado, L.N.; Semenova-Nelsen, T.A.; Schilthuizen, M. Changes in richness and community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi among altitudinal vegetation types on Mount Kinabalu in Borneo. New Phytol.; 2017; 215, pp. 454-468. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14566] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28401981]
74. Liu, L.; Hart, M.M.; Zhang, J.; Cai, X.; Gai, J.; Christie, P.; Li, X.; Klironomos, J.N. Altitudinal distribution patterns of AM fungal assemblages in a Tibetan alpine grassland. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.; 2015; 91, fiv078. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv078]
75. Gómez-Hernández, M.; Williams-Linera, G.; Guevara, R.; Lodge, D.J. Patterns of macromycete community assemblage along an elevation gradient: Options for fungal gradient and metacommunity analyse. Biodivers. Conserv.; 2012; 21, pp. 2247-2268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0180-3]
76. Gai, J.; Tian, H.; Yang, F.; Christie, P.; Li, X.; Klironomos, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity along a Tibetan elevation gradient. Pedobiologia; 2012; 55, pp. 145-151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.12.004]
77. Siles, J.A.; Öhlinger, B.; Cajthaml, T.; Kistler, E.; Margesin, R. Characterization of soil bacterial, archaeal and fungal communities inhabiting archaeological human-impacted layers at Monte Iato settlement (Sicily, Italy). Sci. Rep.; 2018; 8, 1903. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20347-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382933]
78. Ji, L.; Yang, Y.; Yang, L. Seasonal variations in soil fungal communities and co-occurrence networks along an altitudinal gradient in the cold temperate zone of China: A case study on Oakley Mountain. CATENA; 2021; 204, 105448. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105448]
79. Li, J.; Li, C.; Kou, Y.; Yao, M.; He, Z.; Li, X. Distinct mechanisms shape soil bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks in a mountain ecosystem. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.; 2020; 96, fiaa030. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa030] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32109277]
80. Shigyo, N.; Umeki, K.; Hirao, T. Seasonal Dynamics of Soil Fungal and Bacterial Communities in Cool-Temperate Montane Forests. Front. Microbiol.; 2019; 10, 1944. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01944]
81. Tanaka, D.; Sato, K.; Goto, M.; Fujiyoshi, S.; Maruyama, F.; Takato, S.; Shimada, T.; Sakatoku, A.; Aoki, K.; Nakamura, S. Airborne Microbial Communities at High-Altitude and Suburban Sites in Toyama, Japan Suggest a New Perspective for Bioprospecting. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.; 2019; 7, 12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00012]
82. Girvan, M.S.; Bullimore, J.; Pretty, J.N.; Osborn, A.M.; Ball, A.S. Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2003; 69, pp. 1800-1809. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.3.1800-1809.2003]
83. Blagodatskaya, E.V.; Anderson, T.-H. Interactive effects of pH and substrate quality on the fungal-to-bacterial ratio and qCO2 of microbial communities in forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 1998; 30, pp. 1269-1274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00050-9]
84. Frey, S.D.; Knorr, M.; Parrent, J.L.; Simpson, R.T. Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. For. Ecol. Manag.; 2004; 196, pp. 159-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.018]
85. Liu, L.; Gundersen, P.; Zhang, T.; Mo, J. Effects of phosphorus addition on soil microbial biomass and community composition in three forest types in tropical China. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 2012; 44, pp. 31-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.08.017]
86. Zhou, G.; Guan, L.; Wei, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, J.; Wen, D.; Liu, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, Z. et al. Litterfall Production Along Successional and Altitudinal Gradients of Subtropical Monsoon Evergreen Broadleaved Forests in Guangdong, China. Plant. Ecol.; 2007; 188, pp. 77-89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9149-9]
87. Tang, M.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; You, J.; Li, J.; Chen, X. Elevational is the main factor controlling the soil microbial community structure in alpine tundra of the Changbai Mountain. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 12442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69441-w] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709903]
88. Zhang, X.F.; Zhao, L.; Xu, S.J., Jr.; Liu, Y.Z.; Liu, H.Y.; Cheng, G.D. Soil moisture effect on bacterial and fungal community in Beilu River (Tibetan Plateau) permafrost soils with different vegetation types. J. Appl. Microbiol.; 2013; 114, pp. 1054-1065. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.12106] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23241008]
89. Štursová, M.; Žifčáková, L.; Leigh, M.B.; Burgess, R.; Baldrian, P. Cellulose utilization in forest litter and soil: Identification of bacterial and fungal decomposers. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.; 2012; 80, pp. 735-746. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01343.x]
90. Veach, A.M.; Stokes, C.E.; Knoepp, J.; Jumpponen, A.; Baird, R. Fungal Communities and Functional Guilds Shift Along an Elevational Gradient in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Microb. Ecol.; 2018; 76, pp. 156-168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1116-6]
91. Soininen, J.; McDonald, R.; Hillebrand, H. The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography; 2007; 30, pp. 3-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.04817.x]
92. Liu, Y.-R.; Eldridge, D.J.; Zeng, X.-M.; Wang, J.; Singh, B.K.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M. Global diversity and ecological drivers of lichenised soil fungi. New Phytol.; 2021; 231, pp. 1210-1219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17433] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914920]
93. Wubet, T.; Christ, S.; Schöning, I.; Boch, S.; Gawlich, M.; Schnabel, B.; Fischer, M.; Buscot, F. Differences in Soil Fungal Communities between European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Dominated Forests Are Related to Soil and Understory Vegetation. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e47500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047500] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23094057]
94. Toljander, J.F.; Eberhardt, U.; Toljander, Y.K.; Paul, L.R.; Taylor, A.F.S. Species composition of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community along a local nutrient gradient in a boreal forest. New Phytol.; 2006; 170, pp. 873-884. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01718.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16684245]
95. Jarvis, S.G.; Woodward, S.; Taylor, A.F.S. Strong altitudinal partitioning in the distributions of ectomycorrhizal fungi along a short (300 m) elevation gradient. New Phytol.; 2015; 206, pp. 1145-1155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13315] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25655082]
96. Khalid, M.; Du, B.; Tan, H.; Liu, X.; Su, L.; Saeedur, R.; Ali, M.; Liu, C.; Sun, N.; Hui, N. Phosphorus elevation erodes ectomycorrhizal community diversity and induces divergence of saprophytic community composition between vegetation types. Sci. Total. Environ.; 2021; 793, 148502. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148502] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166904]
97. Yang, H.; Lü, G.; Jiang, H.; Shi, D.-N.; Liu, Z. Diversity and distribution of soil micro-fungi along an elevation gradient on the north slope of Changbai Mountain. J. For. Res.; 2017; 28, pp. 831-839. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0344-9]
98. Devi, L.S.; Khaund, P.; Nongkhlaw, F.M.W.; Joshi, S.R. Diversity of Culturable Soil Micro-fungi along Altitudinal Gradients of Eastern Himalayas. Mycobiology; 2012; 40, pp. 151-158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2012.40.3.151] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23115506]
99. Yang, W.; Zheng, Y.; Gao, C.; Duan, J.-C.; Wang, S.-P.; Guo, L.-D. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community composition affected by original elevation rather than translocation along an altitudinal gradient on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 36606. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36606]
100. Cho, J.C.; Tiedje, J.M. Biogeography and Degree of Endemicity of Fluorescent Pseudomonas Strains in Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2000; 66, pp. 5448-5456. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.12.5448-5456.2000]
101. Margesin, R.; Jud, M.; Tscherko, D.; Schinner, F. Microbial communities and activities in alpine and subalpine soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.; 2009; 67, pp. 208-218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00620.x]
102. Newsham, K.K.; Hopkins, D.W.; Carvalhais, L.C.; Fretwell, P.T.; Rushton, S.P.; O’Donnell, A.G.; Dennis, P.G. Relationship between soil fungal diversity and temperature in the maritime Antarctic. Nat. Clim. Chang.; 2016; 6, pp. 182-186. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2806]
103. Zhang, W.; Pan, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, H.; Holohan, B.; Vaudrey, J.; Lin, S.; McManus, G.B. The diversity and biogeography of abundant and rare intertidal marine microeukaryotes explained by environment and dispersal limitation. Environ. Microbiol.; 2018; 20, pp. 462-476. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13916]
104. Chen, W.; Pan, Y.; Yu, L.; Yang, J.; Zhang, W. Patterns and processes in marine microeukaryotic community biogeography from Xiamen coastal waters and intertidal sediments, southeast China. Front. Microbiol.; 2017; 8, 1912. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01912]
105. Mo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yang, J.; Lin, Y.; Yu, Z.; Lin, S. Biogeographic patterns of abundant and rare bacterioplankton in three subtropical bays resulting from selective and neutral processes. ISME J.; 2018; 12, pp. 2198-2210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0153-6]
106. Lindström, E.S.; Langenheder, S. Local and regional factors influencing bacterial community assembly. Environ. Microbiol. Rep.; 2012; 4, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00257.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23757223]
107. Nabout, J.C.; Siqueira, T.; Bini, L.M.; Nogueira, I.d.S. No evidence for environmental and spatial processes in structuring phytoplankton communities. Acta Oecol.; 2009; 35, pp. 720-726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2009.07.002]
108. Attayde, J.L.; Bozelli, R.L. Assessing the indicator properties of zooplankton assemblages to disturbance gradients by canonical correspondence analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.; 1998; 55, pp. 1789-1797. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f98-033]
109. Lima-Mendez, G.; Faust, K.; Henry, N.; Decelle, J.; Colin, S.; Carcillo, F.; Chaffron, S.; Ignacio-Espinosa, J.C.; Roux, S.; Vincent, F. Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science; 2015; 348, 6237. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1262073]
110. Wei, G.; Li, M.; Li, F.; Li, H.; Gao, Z. Distinct distribution patterns of prokaryotes between sediment and water in the Yellow River estuary. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2016; 100, pp. 9683-9697. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7802-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557722]
111. Gilbert, B.; Bennett, J.R. Partitioning variation in ecological communities: Do the numbers add up?. J. Appl. Ecol.; 2010; 47, pp. 1071-1082. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01861.x]
112. Jiao, S.; Yang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Y. Balance between community assembly processes mediates species coexistence in agricultural soil microbiomes across eastern China. ISME J.; 2020; 14, pp. 202-216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0522-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31611655]
113. Hanson, C.A.; Fuhrman, J.A.; Horner-Devine, M.C.; Martiny, J.B.H. Beyond biogeographic patterns: Processes shaping the microbial landscape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2012; 10, pp. 497-506. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2795]
114. Chen, W.; Ren, K.; Isabwe, A.; Chen, H.; Liu, M.; Yang, J. Stochastic processes shape microeukaryotic community assembly in a subtropical river across wet and dry seasons. Microbiome; 2019; 7, 138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0749-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640783]
115. Chase, J.M.; Myers, J.A. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.; 2011; 366, pp. 2351-2363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0063] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21768151]
116. Liu, T.; Zhang, A.; Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Jiang, X.; Dang, C.; Ma, T.; Liu, S.; Chen, Q.; Xie, S. Integrated biogeography of planktonic and sedimentary bacterial communities in the Yangtze River. Microbiome; 2018; 6, 16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0388-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351813]
117. Logares, R.; Lindström, E.S.; Langenheder, S.; Logue, J.B.; Paterson, H.; Laybourn-Parry, J.; Rengefors, K.; Tranvik, L.; Bertilsson, S. Biogeography of bacterial communities exposed to progressive long-term environmental change. ISME J.; 2013; 7, pp. 937-948. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.168] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23254515]
118. Wang, Y.-L.; Gao, C.; Chen, L.; Ji, N.-N.; Wu, B.-W.; Li, X.-C.; Lü, P.-P.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, L.-D. Host plant phylogeny and geographic distance strongly structure Betulaceae-associated ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in Chinese secondary forest ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.; 2019; 95, fiz037. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz037]
119. Wu, B.-W.; Gao, C.; Chen, L.; Buscot, F.; Goldmann, K.; Purahong, W.; Ji, N.-N.; Wang, Y.-L.; Lü, P.-P.; Li, X.-C. et al. Host Phylogeny Is a Major Determinant of Fagaceae-Associated Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Community Assembly at a Regional Scale. Front. Microbiol.; 2018; 9, 2409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02409] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364168]
120. Glassman, S.I.; Peay, K.G.; Talbot, J.M.; Smith, D.P.; Chung, J.A.; Taylor, J.W.; Vilgalys, R.; Bruns, T.D. A continental view of pine-associated ectomycorrhizal fungal spore banks: A quiescent functional guild with a strong biogeographic pattern. New Phytol.; 2015; 205, pp. 1619-1631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13240]
121. Finlay, B.J. Global Dispersal of Free-Living Microbial Eukaryote Species. Science; 2002; 296, pp. 1061-1063. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1070710]
122. Moeller, H.V.; Peay, K.G.; Tadashi, F. Ectomycorrhizal fungal traits reflect environmental conditions along a coastal California edaphic gradient. Fems Microbiol. Ecol.; 2014; 87, pp. 797-806. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12265]
123. Truong, C.; Gabbarini, L.A.; Corrales, A.; Mujic, A.B.; Escobar, J.M.; Moretto, A.; Smith, M.E. Ectomycorrhizal fungi and soil enzymes exhibit contrasting patterns along elevation gradients in southern Patagonia. New Phytol.; 2019; 222, pp. 1936-1950. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15714]
124. Li, P.; Li, W.; Dumbrell, A.J.; Liu, M.; Li, G.; Wu, M.; Jiang, C.; Li, Z.; Shank, E.A. Spatial Variation in Soil Fungal Communities across Paddy Fields in Subtropical China. mSystems; 2020; 5, e00704-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00704-19]
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environmental Microbiology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;