Durum wheat breeding in Mediterranean environments - influence of climatic variables on quality traits

Abstract

Two durum wheat trials were carried out in Mediterranean conditions during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 growing seasons at Plant Breeding Station-Elvas (Portugal). Thirty durum wheat genotypes were studied and six quality parameters were evaluated: thousand kernel weight, test weight, vitreousness, protein content, SDS test and pigment content through Minolta CR 300 Colorimeter analysis. ANOVA showed that all sources of variation for four quality traits were highly significant for both years, except for SDS volume and index b* that were not significant during the two years of trials. Environmental effects showed that total water input during grain filling, appears to affect negatively grain quality by reducing test weight, TKW and semolina yield. Maximum temperatures during the same period reduced test weight, TKW, semolina yield and pigment content, but increased protein content. A negative correlation was found between protein content and test weight and a positive correlation between test weight and semolina yield.

Headnote

Abstract

Two durum wheat trials were carried out in Mediterranean conditions during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 growing seasons at Plant Breeding Station-Elvas (Portugal). The experiments were conducted under rainfed conditions however, in 2012, due to extreme drought it was necessary to use artificial irrigation between booting and mid grain filling stage. Thirty durum wheat genotypes were studied and six quality parameters were evaluated: thousand kernel weight (TKW), test weight, vitreousness, protein content, SDS test and pigment content through Minolta CR 300 Colorimeter (L*a*b*) analysis. ANOVA showed that all sources of variation for four quality traits were highly significant (P < 0.001) for both years, except for SDS volume and index b* that were not significant during the two years of trials. Environmental effects showed that total water input during grain filling, appears to affect negatively grain quality by reducing test weight, TKW and semolina yield. Maximum temperatures during the same period reduced test weight, TKW, semolina yield and pigment content (L*), but increased protein content. A negative correlation was found between protein content and test weight and a positive correlation between test weight and semolina yield. Technological trait associated with pasta quality pigment index (b*) was significant different among the genotypes.

Key words: Durum wheat, Advanced breeding lines, Climatic variables, Quality traits

Introduction

Durum wheat is considered a minor cereal crop, representing only the 8 to 10% of cultivated wheat around the world (Mohammadi et al., 2011), being an important crop in the Mediterranean basin (Pedro et al., 2011). However, durum wheat cultivation have gradually decreased in some countries in the Mediterranean region such as Portugal, Spain and others due to world policies as well as the fact that high yielding durum wheat cultivars cannot compete with the best bread wheat varieties. Nevertheless, durum wheat is an economically important crop because of its unique features related to grain end use products. It is generally considered the hardiest of all wheats. Durum kernels are large, golden amber and translucent. Durum wheat quality is highly dependent of the genotype, agricultural production technology packages and fluctuations in biotic and abiotic environmental factors (Autran et al., 1983; Nachit et al., 1993). In addition, soil fertility, fertilization and water availability are the main factors affecting the quality stability (di Fonzo et al., 2000). Environmental conditions are known to have a significant influence on end-use quality characteristics, but the relative magnitude of environment, genetic and genotype x environment (GxE) effects on quality is unclear (Peterson et al., 1992). The GxE interaction effects on durum wheat pasta quality have been studied by several groups of researchers (Rharrabti et al., 2003; Kilic et al., 2005; Mohammadi et al., 2011), who found that environment and year, significantly affect protein content, sedimentation volume, gluten index and yellow pigment content (Sakin et al., 2011). Moreover, test weight, kernel size and vitreousness are also important, as they are strongly related to semolina yield and brightness appearance of semolina (Dziki and Laskowski, 2005). For breeders, stability of quality attributes is a goal to pursue for the importance in terms of genotypes changing ranks across environments and affects selection efficiency. In the last century, substantial genetic progress has been made and achieved on what concern to quality characteristics of durum wheat, mainly, from the last decades of XX century up to now. For grain end-users as millers, consistency in quality of cultivars is of great importance, regardless the regularity along the years (Rharrabti et al., 2003; Letta et al., 2008). However, as mentioned by Grausgruber et al. (2000) the quality of a genotype usually reacts like other quantitative characters to favorable or unfavorable environmental conditions. Improvement of durum wheat quality is one of the main goals of the Durum Breeding Program carried out by the Portuguese Plant Breeding Station (EMP, Elvas) of the National Institute of Agrarian and Veterinary Research (INIAV). The majority of the work is focusing the main quality parameters to obtain varieties with high quality for pasta production. The purposes of the study discussed on the present paper were: (i) to evaluate a group of advanced durum wheat lines obtained in EMP, considering technological performance; (ii) to study the quality parameters correlations and to estimate environmental effect in some of these parameters concerning pasta quality.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and growing conditions

Two field trials were conducted during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 seasons with 27 advanced durum wheat lines and three varieties Celta, Hélvio and Marialva (Table 1), developed at EMP Cereal Breeding Program, belonging to National Institute of Agrarian and Veterinary Research (INIAV). Genotypes were sown in a randomised complete block design with four replications. Seed rate was adjusted for a density of 350 viable seeds m"2 and plot size area was 9.6 m2 (8 m long and six rows, 20 cm apart).

In spring 2012 it was decided to use artificial irrigation between booting and grain formation initiation with a total of 40 mm of water in order to assure the normal grain development of the plants.

In order to evaluate the germplasm utilization value the following parameters were studied: thousand-kernel weight (TKW), test weight, vitreousness, protein content and SDS sedimentation test. Semolina yield and its color were evaluated using a Minolta CR300 Colorimeter (Minolta Corp., Ramsey, NJ). Colorimeter L* values represent 'lightness', with score of 100 as white and 0 as black (Morris et al., 2000). Colorimeter a* values reflect red-green colors with '+' values indicating 'redness', and '-' values as 'greenness'. Colorimeter b* values measure yellow to blue colors, with '+' values indicating 'yellowness' and '-' values indicating 'blueness'.

Climatic variables

In each trial, total amount of water input was calculated adding natural rainfall plus irrigation (when needed), supplied during growth cycle from sowing to physiological maturity, sowing to anthesis and beginning of grain filling to physiological maturity (end of grain filling). Maximum temperature was also recorded from anthesis to end of maturity.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed on SPSS programme (IBM, version 17.0). Means were compared using Tukey Student's test (significance level P < 0.05). Climatic variables were plotted against each quality parameter and relevant associations are presented graphically in the results section. Correlation coefficients are also presented for the same parameters.

Results

Climatic variables

Agro-ecological characteristics and climatic data observed during for 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 seasons are shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, which illustrate the kind of climatic variability usual in the Mediterranean region. It can be assumed that the most important water stress constraints for wheat, in Mediterranean environments, occurred from stem elongation to booting and from anthesis to grain filling. Grain filling and grain ripening are the most important development stages that determine the final grain quality. During 2011/2012 season, artificial irrigation started in the beginning of tillering in order to promote a normal development of plant biomass and to assure enough soil humidity during anthesis. Sprinkler irrigation was applied since the beginning of grain formation up to mid grain filling in a total of 24 nun of water.

Trials were sowed on 25-01-2011 for 2010/2011 season and on 07-12-2011 for 2011/2012 season. Harvesting took place on 01-07-2011 for 2010/2011 season and on 06-07-2012 for 2011/2012 season.

Figure 2 shows the temperature between the 10th April and the 15th of June for the two trials seasons. The maximum temperatures in the first 3 weeks after beginning of grain filling in 2011 were 10°C higher than those recorded for the same period in 2012. From May until the end of grain filling, daily temperatures were similar in both years.

Genotype and environmental conditions effects on durum wheat quality

The traits related with quality, such as protein content, test weight, thousand-kernel weight, SDS sedimentation test, semolina yield and pigment content of 30 durum wheat genotypes were evaluated. The ANOVA results (Table 3) indicated a strong influence of the year on quality traits. Only SDS and the yellowness (b*) showed no influence of environmental conditions during trials seasons. Genotypic effects were mainly observed for pigment contents a* and b* (P < 0.001).

The mean quality traits for each growing season are presented in Table 4. The means of TKW, test weight, vitreousness, semolina yield and L*a*b* increased in the second year (2011/2012). The mean values for SDS associated with protein content decreased in the second year also. It may be due to a decrease in production once, during 2010/2011, grain yields were significantly lowers than in 2011/2012 (data not shown). Other aspect to highlight, which was related to weather conditions during 2011/2012, were the values for TKW that were significantly higher than in 2010/11 season. It must be mentioned that the color of pasta products is mainly influenced by yellow pigment, which is largely controlled by the genotype since the average for the two year trials showed no significant differences in the values of L* and b*.

Influence of climatic variables

The effect of maximum temperature and water (precipitation and supplemental irrigation when used) during grain filling period on germplasm performance are presented in Figures 2 and 3. Test weight, semolina yield, TKW and L* index were negatively associated with maximum temperature during grain filling. Protein content showed a positive association with that climatic variable (Figure 2). L* index and TKW were positively associated with grain filling duration (Figure 3). Concerning water during grain filling, this climatic variable was associated negatively associated with test weight (Figure 3). TKW was positively affected by grain filling duration and on the opposite, was negatively affected by maximum temperature and precipitation during the same period (Table 5). Test weight was negatively influenced by maximum temperature and precipitation but showed a positive and significant correlation with the duration of grain filling. It was found no effect of the environment in grain vitreousness (Table 5), showing all genotypes high values in both years (Table 4). Protein showed a high positive correlation with maximum temperature and rainfall, and showed a negative correlation with the duration of grain filling period. Semolina yield directly related with test weight, showed a negative correlation with maximum temperature and water availability during grain filling. Concerning the colorimeter parameters, which reflect the pigment content in the grain, brightness (L*) and a* values (redness) were negatively affected by rainfall and maximum temperature. L* was negatively correlated to protein, positively correlated with test weight and TKW (Table 5).

Redness (a* values) was negatively affected by maximum temperature during grain filling and yellowness (b*), which indicates the brightness of pasta, showed no correlation with the climatic variables (Table 5).

Associations between quality traits

Quality traits were, in general, significantly correlated and some interesting associations can be highlighted (Table 6). TKW was positively correlated to test weight, semolina yield and brightness, but negatively correlated with protein content. Test weight showed a positive association with vitreousness, semolina yield and brightness, although interacted negatively with protein content. Higher values of grain protein showed a negative correlation with semolina yield and brown hue (L*).

Quality traits associated with pasta technological quality

Durum wheat protein quantity and gluten quality are widely responsible for the pasta cooking characteristics, whereas yellow pigments are effective on pasta products colour (Borrelli et al., 1999; Sakin et al., 2011).

In addition, vitreousness is an important trait to durum wheat quality, once there is a strong relation with semolina yield and brightness appearance of semolina. Quality traits mean values associated with pasta quality of 30 durum wheat genotypes are present in Table 7. Protein contents of the 30 genotypes studied ranged from 14.6% to 15.9%, and there were not significant differences between genotypes (Table 7). Vitreousness is traditionally an important quality trait for pasta industry, as it is associated to commercial value; this trait is responsible for high semolina yield, good granulation and purity. The endosperm vitreousness varied between 93.5% and 98.7%. No statistically significant differences were found between genotypes. Gluten quality of durum wheat is commonly evaluated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and gluten index (GI) tests. In this study only SDS was determined. The mean values varied from 30.8ppm and 46.8ppm although no significant differences were found between genotypes (Table 7). Semolina and pasta yellow colour is a traditional rather than functional characteristic of quality. Brightness (L*) ranged between 82.96 and 84.88 and yellowness (b*) varied from 16.01 to 25.10. For this last trait, data showed that INIAV 18 is significantly higher than commercial varieties, Hélvio and Marialva and INIAV 11 is significantly higher than Marialva (Table 7).

Discussion

In this paper were studied the relative contributions of genotype, environment and GxE on grain quality variation in 30 durum wheat genotypes tested across two seasons. During grain filling period, genotypes were subjected to temperature and moisture conditions that differed in the two seasons. Although the qualitative composition of the wheat grain is genetically determined, the quantitative composition could be significantly modified by growing conditions (Mpofu et al., 2006). Understanding semolina quality variations due to different environments would be useful for improving pasta quality. Several studies carried out in Italy have also reported the high influence of environment and genotype x environment interaction in determining durum wheat quality (Mariani et al., 1995; Nachit et al., 1995; Boggini et al., 1997; Novaro et al., 1997). Other results (Miezan et al., 1977; Zhu and Khan, 2001) provide the evidence that interannual and multilocal variation on thousand- kernel weight and protein content are much more influenced by environmental conditions than by genotype. As presented in our findings, the protein content was positively associated with moderately high temperatures during grain filling (Figure 2) what was in accordance with results of Rao et al. (1993) and Uhlen et al. (1998). The maximum temperature, from 25°C to 30°C, that occurred in the first days of grain filling period during 2011, contribute to lower TKW and test weight reducing grain yield with implications on protein contents in accordance with Williams et al. (1986), which reported that durum wheat protein content is inversely correlated with grain yield. Previous studies correlations by Matsuo and Dexter (1980) have illustrated that low test weight is an indication of shrivelled kernels and higher protein content, indicating a possible cause of high levels of protein content found in 2010/2011 season.

The study of climatic variability effect on grain quality revealed that though the Mediterranean climate irregularity causes great fluctuation on grain yield (data not shown) that irregularity may also comprise an opportunity for good expression of durum wheat quality traits, in accordance with Borghi et al. (1997). Associations between quality traits revealed a positive correlation between test weight and vitreousness, TKW, semolina yield and pigment content (L*). Similar associations were also found by Novaro et al. (1997) and Rharrabti et al. (2003). Regarding the main technological parameters associated with pasta quality, it was found no significant differences in protein, vitreousness, SDS and brightness L* within the germplasm studied. Durum protein content ranges from 6% to 20%, depending on variety, environmental conditions and cultural practices during growth (CWC, 2005). For pasta products quality, the protein content level should be between 12% and 16%. The modem pasta manufacturing requires durum semolina to contain over 14% protein, which corresponds to 15% grain protein content (Landi and Guameri, 1992). The values obtained in the present study for grain protein content were within the range for production of high-quality pasta products according the previously mentioned authors. Vitreousness values obtained for all genotypes were in accordance with Dexter and Matsuo (1981), Dexter et al. (1988, 1989) and Matsuo and Dexter (1980) which stand that the acceptable minimum value of kernel vitreousness is 80%. The end-product utilization of the durum wheat crop focuses on the semolina market; hence there exists the need to investigate the quality attributes required to supply this market. It is recognized that high extraction rates for dumm wheat semolina (rather than the smaller particle sized flour) is of importance to the miller (Troccoli et al., 2000), and that semolina yield is related to kernel hardness. Nevertheless researchers have linked traits such as test weight and thousand kernel weight to semolina yield and therefore indirectly to grain hardness (Marshall et al., 1986). In this research all the genotypes had high grain weight, high vitreousness and moderate values of test weight. This aspect may have contributed to the high values of semolina yield. For pigment index (L*) genotypes showed values that matches the exigency for the most important pasta industry in Portugal, which defines values for this index between 82 to 83 for high quality dumm wheat (personal information). Other pigment index (b*) values obtained also range in the parameters defined by Portuguese industry, which define values for this index greater than 23. The vast majority of genotypes reached this value, with exception of varieties Marialva (18.95) and Hélvio (19.90) with the lowest values and advanced lines INIAV 26 and INIAV 27 which also denote low values of yellow pigments.

Conclusion

Although environmental factors, such as maximum temperatures and water available during grain filling period, have important effects on wheat grain protein accumulation and quality for pasta technology, dumm wheat quality is a genotype-dependent trait. In general, moderately high temperature, proper soil moisture (resulting from rainfall and irrigation) and adequate solar radiation may improve dumm wheat quality. Some ecological factors, including soil physiological and chemical properties and geographic latitude, can also affect durum wheat quality. Durum wheat quality may be improved by breeding elite varieties, better management practices and exploiting the synergism between genotype and environment (Costa et al. 2012). A large amount of information is available on the relative importance of genotype, environment, and GXE interaction effects on the dumm wheat quality traits grown in the Mediterranean region. Studies including a sizeable number of genotypes and water regimes may provide useful information not only on quality performance and stability of germplasm, but also on the specific characteristics of the tested environments. This kind of information can support decisions regarding the definition of target zones favorable for good expression of particular quality traits. In conclusion, the improvement achieved in durum wheat breeding Program developed by EMP in Portugal has contributed to identify genotypes and to obtain dumm wheat varieties, able to express high yield potential and good technological quality.

References

References

Autran, J. C., J. Abecassis and P. Feillet. 1983. Statistical evaluation of different technological and biochemical tests for quality assessment in dumm wheats. Cereal Chem. 63:390-394.

Boggini, G., M. A. Doust, P. Annicchiaro and L. Pecetti. 1997. Yielding ability, yield stability and quality of exotic dumm wheat germplasm in Sicily. Plant breed. 116:541-545.

Borrelli, G. M., A. Troccoli, N. Di Fanzo and C. Fares. 1999. Durum wheat lipoxygenase activity and other quality parameters that affect pasta color. Cereal Chem. 76:335-340.

Borghi, B., M. Corbellini, C. Minoia, M. Palumbo, N. di Fonzo and M. Perenzin. 1997. Effects of mediterranean climate on wheat bread-making quality. Eur. J. Agron. 6:145-154.

Costa, R., N. Pinheiro, A. S. Almeida and B. Maçàs. 2012. Influence of enhanced UV-B radiation on wheat production in relation with abiotic, biotic and socioeconomics constraints. Emir. J. Food Agrie. 24(6):565-575.

CWC, 2005. Description of durum wheat semolina quality factors. http://www.California wheat, org.

Dexter, J. E. and R. R. Matsuo. 1981. Effect of starchy kernels, immaturity, and shrunken kernels on durum wheat quality. Cereal Chem. 58:395-400.

Dexter, J. E., B. A. Marchylo, A. W. MacGregor and R. Tkachuk. 1989. The structure and protein composition of vitreous, piebald and starchy durum wheat kernels. J. Cereal Sei. 10:19-32.

Dexter, J. E., P. C. Williams, N. M. Edwards and D. G. Martin. 1988. The relationship between durum wheat vitreousness, kernel hardness and processing quality. J. Cereal Sei. 7:169-181.

di Fonzo, N., P. De Vita, A. Gallo, C. Fares, O. Padalino and A. Troccoli. 2000. Crop management efficiency as a tool to improve durum wheat quality in Mediterranean areas. In: J. Abecassis, P. Braun, P. Feuillet, P. Joudrier, B. Pascal and P. Roumet (Eds.), pp. 44-59. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Durum Wheat, Semolina and Pasta Quality: Recent Achievements and New Trends, INRA, Montpellier, France, November 27, 2000.

Dziki, D. and J. Laskowski. 2005. Wheat kernel physical properties and milling process. Acta Agrophys. 6:59-71.

Grausgruber, H., Berforester, M., Werteker, M., Ruckenbauer, P. and Vollmann, J. 2000. Stability of quality traits in Austrian-grown winter wheats, Field Crops Res. 66: 257-267.

Kilic, H., Erdemci, I., Karahan, T., Aktas, H., Karahan, H. and Kendal, E. 2005. Determination of adaptation capability of some durum wheat cultivars in the southeastern Anatolian conditions. GAP IV, Agricultural Congress, Sep 21-23, Sanliurfa, Turkey. 768-773.

Landi, A. and R. Guarnen. 1992. Durum wheat and pasta industries: Twenty years of achievement in science and technology. In: Cereal Chemistry and Technology: A long past and a bright future. Proceeding of 9th Int. Cereal and Breed Congress, 1-5 June Paris 1992, pp. 139-142.

Lefia, T., M. G. D'Egidio and M. Abinasa. 2008. Stability Analysis for Quality Traits in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Varieties under south Eastern Ethiopian conditions, World J. Agri. Sei. 4(l):53-57.

Marshall, D. R., D. J. Mares, H. J. Moss and Elliason, F.W. 1986. Effect of grain shape and size on milling yields in wheat. Experimental studies. Austr. J. Agrie. Res. 37:331-342.

Mariani, B. M., M. G. D'Egidio and P. Novaro. 1995. Durum wheat quality evaluation: influence of genotype and environment. Cereal Chem. 72(2): 194.

Matsuo, R. R. and J. E. Dexter. 1980. Relantionship between some durum wheat physical characteristics and semolina milling properties. Can J. Plant Sei. 60:49-53.

Miezan, K., E. G. Heyne and K. F. Finney. 1977. Genetic and environmental effects on the grain protein content in wheat. Crop Sei. 14:175-180.

Mohammadi, M., R. Karimizadeh, M. K. Shefazadeh and B. Sadeghzadeh. 2011. Statistical analysis of durum wheat yield under semi-warm dryland condition. Austr. J. Crop Sei. 5(10): 1292-1297.

Morris, C. F., H. C. Jeffers and D. A. Engle. 2000. Effect of processing, formula and measurement variables on alkaline noodle color - toward an optimized laboratory system. Cer. Chem. 77:77-85.

Mpofu, A., D. Harry, H. D. Sapirstein and T. Beta. 2006. Genotype and environmental variation in phenolic content, phenolic acid composition, and antioxidant activity of hard spring wheat. J. Agrie. Food Chem. 54:1265-1270.

Nachit, M. M., M. Baum, A. Impiglia and H. Ketata. 1993. Studies on some grain quality traits in durum wheat grown in Mediterranean environments. In: N. Di Fonzo, F. Kaan and M. Nachit (Eds.) pp. 17-19. Durum Wheat Quality in the Mediterranean Region, CIHEAM/ICARDA/CIMMYT, Zaragoza, Spain.

Nachit, M. M., M. Baum, A. Impiglia and H. Ketata. 1995. Studies on some grain quality traits in durum wheat grown in Mediterranean environments. In: N. Di Fonzo, F. Kaan and M. Nachit (Eds.) pp. 181-187. Durum Wheat Quality in the Mediterranean Region, CIHEAM/ICARDA/CIMMYT, Zaragoza, Spain.

Novaro P., M. G. D'Egidio, L. Bacci and B. M. Mariani. 1997. Genotype and environment: their effect on some durum wheat quality characteristic. J. Gen. Breed. 51:247-252.

Pedro, A., R. Savin, Z. D. Habash and G. A. Slafer. 2011. Physiological attributes associated with yield and stability in selected lines of a durum wheat population, Euphytica 180:195-208.

Peterson, C. J., P. S. Graybosh, P. S. Baenziger and A. W. Grombacher. 1992. Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Agron. J. 85:1023-1028.

Rao, A. C. S., J. L. Smith, V. K. Jandhyala, R. I. Papendiek and J. F. Parr. 1993. Cultivar and climatic effects on protein content of soft white winter wheat. Agron. J. 85:1023-1028.

Rharrabti, Y., D. Villegas, C. Royo, V. Martos-Núñez and L. F. Garcia del Moral. 2003. Durum wheat quality in Mediterranean environments II. Influence of climatic variables and relationships between quality parameters. F. Crops Res. 80:133-140.

Sakin, M. A., A. Sayaslan, O. Duzdemir and F. Yuksel. 2011. Quality characteristics of registered cultivars and advanced lines of durum wheats grown in different ecological regions of Turkey. Can. J. Plant Sei. 91:261-271.

Troccoli, A., G. M. Borrelli, P. De Vita, C. Fares and N. di Fonzo. 2000. Durum wheat quality: a multidisciplinar concept. J. Cereal Sei. 32:99-113.

Uhlen, K. A., R. Hafskjold, A. H. Kalhovd, S. Sahlström, Longva and E. M. Âmagnus. 1998. Effects of cultivars and temperature during grain filling on wheat protein content, composition, and dough mixing properties. Cereal Chem. 75:460-465.

Williams, P. C., M. Nachit, A. Shehadeh, A. Sategh and M. Michael. 1986. Comparative quality of Sebou with Gezira. Sham I, Rachis 5(2):55.

Zhu, J. and K. Khan. 2001. Effects of genotype and environment on glutenin polymers and bread-making quality. Cereal Chem. 78:125-130.