Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- Overview of Emotional Labor
- Previous Perspectives on Emotional Labor
- Hochschild's (1983) Perspective
- Ashforth and Humphrey's (1993) Perspective
- Morris and Feldman's (1996) Perspective
- Emotional Labor as Managing Expressions and Feelings: Surface and Deep Acting
- Emotion Regulation Theory Applied to Emotional Labor
- General Model of Emotion Regulation
- Antecedent-Focused Emotion Regulation
- Attentional deployment
- Cognitive change
- Response-Focused Emotion Regulation
- Mechanisms of Emotion Regulation
- General Predictions for Surface and Deep Acting Based on Emotion Regulation Theory
- Deep Acting
- Surface Acting
- A Caveat
- A Model of Emotional Labor
- Situational Antecedents of Emotional Labor
- Customer Interaction Expectations
- Emotional Events
- Stress and Well-Being as Outcomes of Emotional Labor
- Burnout
- Job Satisfaction
- Work Behaviors as Outcomes of Emotional Labor
- Customer Service Performance
- Withdrawal Behaviors
- Personal and Organizational Factors Affecting Emotional Labor
- Personal Characteristics Related to Emotional Labor
- Gender
- Emotional expressivity
- Emotional intelligence
- Self-monitoring
- Affectivity
- Organizational Factors
- Autonomy
- Supervisor and coworker support
- Conclusions and Future Directions
Figures and Tables
Abstract
The topic of emotions in the workplace is beginning to garner closer attention by researchers and theorists. The study of emotional labor addresses the stress of managing emotions when the work role demands that certain expressions be shown to customers. However, there has been no overarching framework to guide this work, and the previous studies have often disagreed on the definition and operationalization of emotional labor. The purposes of this article are as follows: to review and compare previous perspectives of emotional labor, to provide a definition of emotional labor that integrates these perspectives, to discuss emotion regulation as a guiding theory for understanding the mechanisms of emotional labor, and to present a model of emotional labor that includes individual differences (such as emotional intelligence) and organizational factors (such as supervisor support).
In the past, emotions were ignored in the study of organizational behavior (Arvey, Renz, & Watson, 1998; Putnam & Mumby, 1993). The workplace was viewed as a rational environment, where emotions would get in the way of sound judgment. Thus, emotions were not even considered as explanations for workplace phenomenon. This view is being dismantled as more researchers are finding how workplace emotions help to explain important individual and organizational outcomes (for a review, see Arvey et al., 1998). More specifically,...