Content area

Abstract

Three types of objections have been raised against sweatshops. According to their critics, sweatshops are (1) exploitative, (2) coercive, and (3) harmful to workers. In "The Ethical and Economic Case Against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment," Powell and Zwolinski critique all three objections and thereby offer what is arguably the most powerful defense of sweatshops in the philosophical literature to date. This article demonstrates that, whether or not unregulated sweatshops are exploitative or coercive, they are, pace Powell and Zwolinski, harmful to workers.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Details

Title
The Ethical and Economic Case for Sweatshop Regulation
Author
Coakley, Mathew; Kates, Michael
Pages
553-558
Publication year
2013
Publication date
Oct 2013
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
01674544
e-ISSN
15730697
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1442601037
Copyright
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013