- Preview Available
- Scholarly Journal
Evaluation of RANO response criteria compared to clinician evaluation in WHO grade III anaplastic astrocytoma: implications for clinical trial reporting and patterns of failure
Evaluation of RANO response criteria compared to clinician evaluation in WHO grade III anaplastic astrocytoma: implications for clinical trial reporting and patterns of failureKazda, Tomas; Hardie, John G; Pafundi, Deanna H; Kaufmann, Timothy J; Brinkmann, Debra H
; et al.
Journal of Neuro - Oncology; New York Vol. 122, Iss. 1, (Mar 2015): 197-203.
DOI:10.1007/s11060-014-1703-z
You might have access to more details...
Try and log in through your library or institution to see if they have access.
Title
Evaluation of RANO response criteria compared to clinician evaluation in WHO grade III anaplastic astrocytoma: implications for clinical trial reporting and patterns of failure
Author
Kazda, Tomas; Hardie, John G; Pafundi, Deanna H; Kaufmann, Timothy J; Brinkmann, Debra H; Laack, Nadia N
Pages
197-203
Publication year
2015
Publication date
Mar 2015
ISSN
0167594X
e-ISSN
15737373
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1661544602
Copyright
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015





