1. Introduction
The genus Giardia has been classified into six species or assemblies depending on the host, with Giardia lamblia (syn. G. intestinalis, G. duodenalis) being the only specie found infecting humans (assemblages A and B). G. lamblia also infects a broad range of other mammals including wild and domestic animals and causes giardiasis, a disease also related to zoonotic transmission [1]. The host specificity is important when distinguishing different species because the morphology and ultrastructure of the parasites are very similar. For instance, the assemblages C and D infect dogs; E infects cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, and water buffaloes; F infects cats; and G is restricted to rodents [2]. From the data obtained so far, it is strongly suggested that the assemblages A and B are different species [3]. Using comparative proteomics, differences were found in several proteins between Giardia isolates from assemblages A and B [4]. Additionally, differences in metabolism, nucleotide content, in vitro and in vivo growth rates, drug sensitivity, and clinical features, among other characteristics, have been reported between both assemblages [5,6,7,8,9]. Some groups have shown that several differences in excretory-secretory products (ESPs), including extracellular vesicles (EVs), occurred between assemblage A and B trophozoites, which altered the gene expression of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) when interacted in vitro [10,11]. For instance, it was shown that the interaction of the two assemblages with IECs led to distinct antioxidative reactions [11]. Interestingly, the dominant proteins that trigger an immune response during an infection, known as Variable Surface Proteins (VSPs), along with a significant amount of High Cysteine Membrane Proteins (HCMPs), were found in the ESPs of the assemblage A isolate. Conversely, fewer VSPs and HCMPs were detected in the assemblage B isolates ESPs [11]. More recently, EVs were isolated from both assemblages and subjected to nanoparticle tracking and proteomic analysis, revealing two types of EVs: small vesicles (exosome-like particles, <100 nm) and large vesicles (microvesicles-like particles, 100–400 nm) [12]. Typical rounded or cup-shaped vesicles with a membrane bilayer of around 100~200 nm were also reported for Assemblage A [13,14]. Regarding EVs, they have emerged as a ubiquitous mechanism for transferring information between cells and organisms across the three kingdoms of life, serving as vehicles for the transfer of cytosolic and membrane proteins, lipids, and RNAs [15,16,17]. In parasites, EVs are regularly released during different stages of development and, in addition to their functions in normal physiology, they also transport virulence factors to hosts and can spread antigens and infectious agents [18,19,20]. The RNA cargo composition of EVs involves various biotypes, such as small non-coding RNAs, fragmented and intact messenger RNAs (mRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). [21]. Little is known about the biogenesis and regulation of small RNAs (sRNAs) with a size less than 40 nt in Giardia, although several sRNAs have been identified [22,23]. Moreover, the sRNAs cargo composition of giardial EVs is unknown, but it is possible that it differs from the content of the sRNAs found in growing and encysting trophozoites as it was found in other cells [24,25,26]. To disclose whether sRNAs packaging into EVs is a selective process, we performed a careful analysis of the sequencing data and experimental verification of the sRNA found in exosomal-like vesicles (ElVs) derived from assemblages A, B, and E. We demonstrated that all EIVs exhibited the size and shape of exosomes and were enriched with small RNAs, including ribosomal-small RNAs (rsRNAs), messenger-small RNAs (msRNAs), and transfer-small RNAs (tsRNAs). We observed active internalization of the specifically labeled sRNAs contained in the EIVs, followed by cytoplasmic localization, after exposing them to trophozoites from all three assemblages. As sRNAs delivered in EVs are involved in diverse biological functions such as gene regulation and post-transcriptional control [27], we propose that this intercellular communication may be a possible mechanism used by the parasite to ensure its survival inside the host. In this work, we refer to Giardia assemblages as groups that are genetically distinct within the specie, while we will refer to isolates (e.g., WB/1267, GS/H7, and P15) as those obtained from patients, which belong to different assemblages, and that we use to study sRNA differences and cellular behavior.
2. Results
2.1. The Assemblages A, B, and E of Giardia Release Exosome-like Vesicles Containing Small RNAs
Using a combination of biochemical and cell biology analyses, we recently showed that G. lamblia releases ElVs of similar size, shape, and protein and lipid composition to that described for exosomes from other eukaryotic cells [14]. To analyze the RNA content of the ElVs released for each assemblage, we first examined whether the enriched fractions of ElVs showed vesicles of similar shape and size for each assemblage. As shown in Figure 1A, the ElVs purified from the isolates WB/1267 (Assemblage A), GS/H7 (Assemblage B), and P15 (Assemblage E) showed a range size of 70 to 100 nm with a cup-shaped morphology being consistent with the ElVs we reported previously for WB/1267 [14]. Although the analysis of the protein components of the secretome of assemblages A and B has been published [10,28,29], the RNAs cargo has not yet been described. To obtain an overview of the RNA repertoire, duplicate samples of total RNA from trophozoites and enriched ElVs were separated on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The results showed a higher yield of RNAs of different sizes from trophozoite lysates (T) compared to ElVs. However, the three ElV samples (ElV) displayed a specific enrichment of sRNAs (Figure 1B).
To confirm whether the small RNAs were truly packaged into ElVs, isolated ElVs were subjected to treatment with Triton X-100 followed by RNAse A (ElV*). The results showed that this population of sRNAs was indeed packaged inside membrane-bound vesicles and protected from degradation by the ElVs (Figure 1B).
2.2. RNA-Seq of Giardia ElVs Revealed the Presence of Different sRNA Biotypes
To characterize the RNA cargo of ElVs, we performed deep sequencing of small RNAs from isolated vesicles, as detailed in the Materials and Methods section. To assess reproducibility, we prepared three small RNA libraries from two independent preparations of Giardia ElVs. Standard bioinformatics tools were used to map and assign the reads to RNA biotypes and to identify putative small RNAs (Figure 2A and Materials and Methods section). We observed unique and shared sequences between the three assemblages (Figure 2B), suggesting that small RNAs can be selectively packaged into ElVs. We also identified de novo RNA expression clusters, which represented the most abundant transcripts in each isolate, using the Shortstack pipeline [30].
These sequences were then used to perform a specific alignment within the genome and transcriptome of each isolate using Blastn [31], which allowed us to identify the origin of most clusters and the genes to which they correspond. Additionally, we used a reference-based approach by entering the Binary Alignment (BAM) files generated by Shortstack into the featureCounts program of the Rsubread package in the R environment. The program identified the already annotated genes to which all the reads mapped by ShortStack corresponded, irrespective of their participation in expression clusters. Next, a summary table grouping the sRNAs by biotypes was generated in the R environment, enabling comparisons between isolates (Table S1). Analysis using miRDeep (an integrated application tool for micro RNA—miRNA—identification from RNA sequencing data) [32], did not allow us to identify miRNA-like sequences from either Giardia or other species (see Discussion). Although we were unable to detect representative miRNAs, our analysis showed several sRNA sequence reads of rsRNAs, tsRNAs, and msRNAs for all three isolates, with differences in the number of representative sequences for each (Figure 2C). Our results showed that the rsRNAs constituted the majority of reads among the three isolates analyzed, with the WB/1267 isolate having the highest raw number of reads. Although 76.4% of the sRNAs were shared between all isolates (Figure 2B), there were also sRNAs exclusive to each isolate (4.1–7.7%) and shared between pairs (1.3–3.7%). Although statistical comparisons were not possible due to methodological limitations, some notable differences in the principal sRNAs detected in each sample were observed. In particular, the WB isolate exhibited high expression levels of VSPs, which was among the top five most expressed sRNAs, whereas the other isolates showed only minimal expression of VSP.
2.3. The ElVs of the Assemblages A, B, and E of Giardia Contain Unique and Shared Small RNAs
RT-PCR was applied to confirm the presence of shared as well as unique RNA fragments of the ElVs from the three isolates. Using reverse complementary probes to their identical 5′ end sequence, we analyzed rsRNA-28S, present in the ElVs of the three isolated, as well as tsRNA-Gln, tsRNA-Pro, and tsRNA-Ser for isolates WB1267, GS/H7, and P15, respectively. We used RT-PCR to confirm the presence of shared as well as unique RNA fragments of the ElVs from the three isolates. To analyze rsRNA-28S, present in the ElVs of all three isolates, we used reverse complementary probes to their identical 5′ end sequence (Table 1).
qPCR identified small RNAs from Giardia trophozoites and ElVs. The results showed common rsRNAs as well as unique tsRNA and msRNAs in the isolates. The most abundant fragments from each isolate were selected and are presented in Table 2. Despite improvements to the qPCR assay, we detected tsRNA-Pro amplification in negative and positive controls of trophozoites and ElVs from the GS/H7 isolate. This non-specific amplification might be due to the primers having a high degree of homology to other RNA sequences in the sample or due to off-target effects.
2.4. The Extracellular Vesicle RNA Cargo Is Internalized by the Trophozoites
Previous studies have demonstrated that incubating differentiated Caco-2 cells with either large or small EVs from Giardia trophozoites or with the whole secretome can affect the gene expression of the host cells [10,28,29]. However, communication between trophozoites has not been reported until now. Although the molecular mechanism for ElV uptake by recipient cells is unknown, the most common mechanism of internalization involves endocytosis, whereby extracellular vesicles are taken up into endosomes [33]. In the endosome, RNA content might be released into the luminal space or into the cytoplasm. To track the RNA delivery into the trophozoites, we labeled the ElV RNA using the SYTO® RNASelect™ Green Fluorescent Cell Stain reagent. This compound is a cell-permeant nucleic acid stain that is highly selective for RNA since it is nonfluorescent in the absence of nucleic acids, exhibits bright green fluorescence when bound to RNA, and only a weak fluorescent signal when bound to DNA. This stain very efficiently labels the exosomal RNA cargo [34]. After labeling, ElVs were incubated with their belonging trophozoites for 5 min or 1 h. At 5 min, green spots similar to the localization of the endosomal-lysosomal peripheral vacuoles (PVs) situated below the plasma membrane were observed, indicating effective EIV internalization (Figure 3A). Later, the green-labeled sRNAs were observed on the cytoplasm of the trophozoites (Figure 3A). The same amount of PBS (100 µL) without ElVs were treated with SYTO® RNASelect™ and used as control for specific ElVs uptake (Figure 3B). The results showed the lack of green labelling on the trophozoites treated with the control samples, strongly indicating that the RNA was only efficiently delivered to the trophozoites via the ElVs.
3. Discussion
The unique biology and roles of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in cell-to-cell communication have attracted strong interest due to their increasing utility in studying cell behavior and potential clinical applications. For extracellular parasites, the impact of EVs has been analyzed, showing an important function in modulating the host immune system [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. However, how extracellular parasites communicate with each other to ensure their survival, either by triggering cell differentiation, regulating protein expression, and/or changing their metabolism according to the environment’s requirements, is less explored. In this sense, an important role is played by the RNA cargo, which can elicit its functional effect when it reaches the cytoplasm of another cell. For example, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) can inhibit the translation of specific transcripts, whereas messenger msRNAs can be translated into functional proteins [43].
The present work aims to demonstrate that the ElVs produced by Giardia’s assemblages A, B, and C have the size and shape of exosomes and are enriched with rsRNA, msRNA, and tsRNA. Furthermore, we have made progress in observing the delivery of cargo by extracellular vesicles to recipient trophozoites in these three assemblages, although the mechanism behind this process remains unclear. Additionally, we were able to identify and compare similar and specific sRNAs that are trafficked in each delivered EV.
The biological properties of isolates belonging to different assemblages have shown differences in terms of relative infectivity, host-specificity, and zoonotic potential [44,45]. Additionally, there are assemblage-specific differences in the efficiency of encystation in vitro [46,47]. As Giardia might be considered a complex species, we intended to analyze whether different assemblages possess a mechanism of extracellular vesicle production and release that might explain these differences. We observed that assemblages A, B, and E released cup-shaped EVs with an average size of 80 nm, consistent with the description of the smallest extracellular vesicles produced by most cells [17]. This agrees with our previous report and with other investigations showing the host-cell acquisition of EVs from the culture supernatants of assemblages A and B [10,28]. In this work, we also showed that the ElVs are enriched with sRNAs, which might be protected from degradation outside the trophozoite when they are packaged into these vesicles. It is possible that long RNAs could be incorporated in a condensed configuration [48], and their absence in the polyacrylamide gel of this work might reflect their relatively low abundance in the giardial EVs. Deep sequencing revealed that the sRNAs from the three assemblages are enriched in msRNA, rsRNA, and tsRNA. Interestingly, the majority of the rsRNA fragments were derived from the large 28S ribosomal subunit sequences, whereas a lower quantity corresponded to the 18S small subunit fragments. In this sense, the overall level of rsRNA fragments in EVs is too high to be attributed to contaminating factors. However, it is possible that other sRNAs, such as snoRNA or sRNAse, were underrepresented because the rsRNA was not removed in our assays and may have masked their presence. rsRNA fragmentation products are now known to be prevalent in all EVs [49,50] and play essential roles in cellular communication via extracellular vesicles [49,50,51,52]. A similar case occurs for tsRNA [53]. To date, a wide variety of tRNA-derived fragments, such as tRNA fragments and tsRNAs, have been identified, some with the direct ability to inhibit protein synthesis and function as miRNAs [54]. Additionally, the miRNA and tsRNA pathways may be linked to the mechanism involving Dicer and Argonaute [55,56]. In this study, we found a predominance of vesicular tsRNA-Gly, tsRNA-Gln, and tsRNA-Arg for assemblages A, B, and E, respectively. Previous research has shown that trophozoites of assemblage A produced tRNA-derived sRNAs and proposed that they might be associated with the downregulation of gene expression [57].
The relative abundance of tsRNAs in the EVs of the three assemblages is consistent with previous findings in other protozoan parasites [54,58,59,60,61]. However, it has yet to be determined whether these tsRNA fragments contribute to any biological functions in these parasites. Additionally, an interesting finding was that msRNAs in EVs could serve as a source of novel proteins in recipient cells [62,63].
In this work, the presence of a high amount of msRNA belonging to hypothetical proteins is not surprising, since according to the Giardia database (GDB), 70% of the Giardia genome comprises non-conserved protein genes. However, this study observed the ElVs-mediated transfer of msRNAs of the actin cytoskeleton regulators, metabolic regulators, and extracellular matrix remodeling, which agrees with reports in other eukaryotic cells [64]. Importantly, the ElVs transported by assemblage A carried a larger amount of msRNA for VSPs, suggesting that these ElVs might be implicated in the control of antigenic variation in the recipient cells of this assemblage. It has been shown that the secretome of the coculture of IECs with trophozoites of assemblage A contained many VSPs, the primary proteins that stimulate the immune system during infection, whereas the secretome of assemblage B displayed fewer VSPs [11]. Although the differential secretion of VSPs and msRNA of VSPs can be attributed to the utilization of a fragmented genome in assemblages B and E, our finding alerts for a possible assemblage-specific VSPs switching that helps these parasites better evade the host immune system.
It was not possible to identify miRNA in any ElVs using the prediction of their canonical structure by miRDeep, which was not surprising given that Giardia lacks proteins that participate in miRNA processing, such as DROSHA and XPO5 [65,66]. This points to the possibility that this parasite possesses a non-canonical miRNA generation pathway, as has been suggested [65]. Furthermore, the comparison of the sequences with the few known miRNAs present in the Giardia trophozoites from assemblage A was not successful, possibly due to the lack of data available in this nascent field [65,66].
sRNA cargo delivery by EVs can be facilitated by using and tracking labeled RNAs in recipient cells. Our results showed that trophozoites internalized fluorescent-green sRNA from ElVs belonging to the same isolate. Immediately upon entering the trophozoites, the RNA seemed to be localized below the plasma membrane in the endo-lysosomal PVs, similar to reports of endosomal-sRNA localization in other cells [67]. Later, the sRNAs were localized in the trophozoites’ cytoplasm, suggesting an active mechanism for PVs escape. In the cytoplasm, the sRNA cargo might reach its functional effect. Further research is underway to determine whether the differential packaging of sRNA and proteins in ElVs is used by each assemblage to establish host-specific infection and parasite pathogenicity.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cell Culture and EV Isolation
Axenic cultures of Giardia trophozoites of isolates WB clone 1267 (ATCC 50582, Assemblage A), GS/M (ATCC 50581, Assemblage BIV) were purchased at (
4.2. Exosome-like Vesicles (ElVs) Size and Electron-Microscopy Images
For negative electron microscopy staining, ElVs were diluted in PBS, placed on copper grids, and incubated 15 min at room temperature. Liquid excess was removed by blotting. The grid was placed on 2% uranyl acetate (w/v) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 30 s and observed in a JEOL 1230 transmission electron microscope, as performed before [14].
4.3. ElVs RNA Profiling
RNA profiling was performed on lysate of trophozoites, enriched ElVs, and ElVs treated with Triton X-100 and RNase A using the Total Exosome RNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen) and following the manufacturer’s instructions available at as-sets,
4.4. Small RNA Libraries and RNA-Seq
The sRNA fraction (200 ng) obtained from Giardia trophozoites ElVs, without any enzymatic treatment or rRNA depletion step, was used for library preparation following the manufacturer’s instructions (NEBNext_ Small RNA Library Prep Set for Illumina from New England BioLabs, MA, USA). For deep sequencing, the library generation protocol was performed according to the AQ Seq protocol from the lab of Narry Kim [72,73], with minor modifications. In brief, total RNA was ligated with randomized 3′ adapter using T4 RNA ligase 2 truncated KQ (NEB) in 1X T4 RNA ligase reaction buffer (NEB) supplemented with 20% PEG8000 (NEB). The ligated miRNA-adapter fragments were gel-purified and eluted in 300 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA (pH 8). After centrifugation, the EtOH-precipitated fragments were resuspended in water and ligated to 0.25 µM randomized 5′ RNA adapter using T4 RNA ligase 1 (NEB) in the same buffer conditions as described above. Reverse transcription was performed with Superscript III First-Strand synthesis supermix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 5 µM RT Primer (“RTP”; Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. After cDNA amplification, the PCR amplicons representing miRNA-sized inserts were gel-purified again, precipitated, and finally resuspended in water. The quality of the libraries was assessed by qPCR and Tapestation measurements, and the pooled libraries were sequenced on a Nextseq 550 sequencer (Illumina) as an 80-cycle single-end run.
4.5. Bioinformatic Analysis
The RNA reads obtained from sequencing were trimmed to remove the adapters and then mapped to the genomes of each of the Giardia isolates in FASTA format (GiardiaDB:
4.6. PCR Detection and Quantification of Small RNAs
To confirm the presence of sRNAs in ElVs, RNA was isolated from both trophozoites and freshly isolated ElVs using the Total Exosome RNA and Protein Isolation kit, following the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). RT-qPCR was performed to verify the selected RNA targets identified from the RNA-seq analysis (Table 1). Briefly, two micrograms of total RNA from each sample were reverse transcribed with Reverse Transcriptase M-MLV (Promega) and the specific Rloop reverse primer (Table 2). The resulting cDNA was analyzed by real-time PCR with SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), using 100 ng of the input total RNA equivalent as single-stranded cDNA and 800 nm of amplification primer in a reaction volume of 20 μL. Primers used in this study are listed in Table 3. The runs were conducted on a standard 7500 system (Applied Biosystems). The qPCR was performed using the Common Reverse Primer and a forward primer specific to the target small RNA (see below). The RT-qPCR conditions were 50 °C for 2 min; 95 °C for 510 min; and 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s; and 60 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 1 s min after 95 °C for 15 s; 60 °C for 1 min; and 95 °C for 14 s. Recorded cycle threshold (Ct) values were descriptively compared. These assays were performed in duplicates. All DNA oligonucleotides were purchased from Macrogen (Macrogen, Seoul, Republic of Korea).
4.7. Labelling the RNA from EVs
ElVs were labelled with RNA-specific dye SYTO® RNASelect™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, except that removal of excess dye was performed by ultracentrifugation. Briefly, enriched ElVs from the trophozoites were suspended in 100 µL of PBS per labelling reaction. Then, 1 µL of the 1 mM dye stock solution was added to the samples and mixed before incubating at 37 °C for 20 min, protected from light. To remove the excess of unincorporated dye, two rounds of ultracentrifugation at 100,000× g for 200 min using a 60Ti rotor (Beckman-coulter L-70 Ultracentrifuge) were performed. The pellet containing the freshly labelled ElVs was recovered and used in uptake assays. As control for unspecific ElVs RNA staining, the same procedure was performed on samples containing SYTO® RNASelect™ but lacking the ElVs. Briefly, 1 µL of the 1 mM dye stock solution was added to 100 µL of PBS per labelling reaction and mixed before incubating at 37 °C for 20 min, protected from light. Later, two rounds of ultracentrifugation at 100,000× g for 200 min using a 60Ti rotor (Beckman-coulter L-70 Ultracentrifuge) were performed. After washing, the fraction from the bottom of the tube was recovered and used for uptake experiments.
4.8. Cell Uptake Assays
100,000 trophozoites of each assemblage were incubated with the corresponding fluorescently labeled ELVs at 37 °C for 5 min (to trace early incorporation of RNA) or 1 h (to observe the final destination of RNA inside the cell). The same volume of PBS without ELVs, treated with SYTO RNA, was used as a control. After washing with PBS, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) at room temperature for 5 min, following the protocol described by the company (
Conceptualization, M.C.T.; methodology, L.N., G.L.P., B.d.l.C.-T., J.M., S.M., and N.E.; software, L.N.; validation, L.N., M.M.M. and M.C.T.; formal analysis, L.N., C.F., G.L.P. and M.C.T.; investigation, L.N., C.F., G.L.P. and M.C.T.; resources, A.S.R., G.M., M.M.M., C.F. and M.C.T.; data curation, L.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.R., C.F., M.M.M. and M.C.T.; writing—review and editing, A.S.R., C.F., M.M.M. and M.C.T.; visualization, M.C.T.; supervision, M.C.T.; project administration, A.S.R., C.F., M.M.M. and M.C.T.; funding acquisition, A.S.R., C.F., M.M.M. and M.C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The data presented in this study are available in this article and in the
L.N. and S.M. are recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). G.L.P. is the beneficiary of a doctoral fellowship from the Agencia Nacional para la Promoción de la Ciencia y Tecnología, Argentina, grant number PICT2018-713. We thank Andrea Pellegrini and Gonzalo Quassollo for their technical assistance.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. The Giardia isolates WB/1267, GS/H7, and P15 produce exosomal-like vesicles enriched in small RNAs. (A) Negative staining electron microscopy shows cup-shaped vesicles. Bar: 100 nm. (B) Silver staining of total RNA extracted from trophozoites (T), ElVs (ElV), and ElVs treated with Triton-X100 and RNAse A (ElV*) for each isolate. MW is shown on the left.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Functional categorization of sequencing reads from small RNA-seq libraries of ElVs of the isolates WB/1267, GS/H7, and P15 of Giardia. (A) A scheme of the bioinformatic data performed after sequencing for all isolates is presented. (B) The Venn diagram illustrates all sRNAs identified in ElVs from WB/1267, GS/H7, and P15 of Giardia isolates. (C) The biotypes of sRNA are based on G. lamblia genome annotations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. The sRNA contained in the ElVs can be observed inside the Giardia trophozoites. (A) Confocal microscopy images show trophozoites from the isolates WB/1267, GS/H7, and P15 incubated for 5 min or 1 h with their corresponding SYTO® RNASelect™-labelled ElVs (green). (B) Trophozoites incubated with free-ElVs labelled samples do not show RNA internalization. Confocal microscopy images show trophozoites from the isolates WB/1267, GS/H7, and P15 incubated for 5 min or 1 h with free-ElVs sample with SYTO® RNASelect™ (green). 4 6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) stains the nuclei (blue). Overlaying fluorescence and differential interference contrast (DIC) images are shown in the merge panels. Bars, 5.0 μm. Images are representative of three independent experiments with n = 50 trophozoites.
Selected common and unique sRNAs for primer design and qRT-PCR assay.
| Isolate | sRNA | Sequence | GiardiaDB-ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| WB/1267 | rsRNA-28S | CCCGCGGAACGGCGUCGG | GL50803_r0021 |
| GS/H7 | rsRNA-28S | CCCGCGGAACGGCGUCGG | GL50803_r0021 1 |
| P15 | rsRNA-28S | CCCGCGGAACGGCGUCGG | GL50803_r0021 1 |
| WB/1267 | tsRNA-Gln | UGGGGCGUGGUGCAGCGGGAGC | GL50803_t0051 |
| GS/H7 | tsRNA-Pro | CUUUGGGUGCGAGAGGCC | GL50581_4624 |
| P15 | tsRNA-Ser | UGGGGCGUGGUGCAGCGGGAGC | GLP15_4341 |
| WB/1267 | msRNA-VSP | CGACUGCCCGAUCGAGAACUGC | GL50803_3327 |
| GS/H7 | msRNA-HP | CUCUUGUAGACCGUCGCU | GL50581_1332 |
| P15 | msRNA-IF | AUGUGAGAGUAGGUCAUC | GLP15_4980 |
1 Gene ID was predicted from the annotated GL50803 Assemblage. VSP: Variant-specific protein; HP: Hypothetical protein; IF: Translation initiation factor.
Recorded cycle threshold (Ct) values of the assemblage-specific qRT-PCR assays.
| Isolate | sRNA | Sample | Ct Value ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| WB/1267 | rsRNA-28S | Trophozoites’ RNA |
33.09 ± 1.89 |
| tsRNA-Gln | Trophozoites’ RNA |
26.41 ± 1.70 |
|
| msRNA-VSP | Trophozoites’ RNA |
29.25 ± 1.71 |
|
| GS/H7 | rsRNA-28S | Trophozoites’ RNA |
33.50 ± 0.97 |
| tsRNA-Pro | Trophozoites’ RNA |
- |
|
| msRNA-HP | Trophozoites’ RNA |
35.95 ± 0.53 |
|
| P15 | rsRNA-28S | Trophozoites’ RNA |
33.50 ± 0.90 |
| tsRNA-Ser | Trophozoites’ RNA |
22.46 ± 0.70 |
|
| msRNA- IF | Trophozoites’ RNA |
36.80 ± 0.37 |
SD: standard deviation. VSP: Variant-specific protein; HP: Hypothetical protein; IF: Translation initiation factor.
qRT-PCR primers.
| Name | sRNA | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| R1loop | rsRNA-28S | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACGGCCGA |
| F1 | rsRNA-28S | TAATAAGGCCCGCGGAACG |
| R2loop | tsRNAGly/tsRNASer | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACGCTCCC |
| F2 | tsRNAGly/tsRNASer | ATAGTATGGGGCGTGGTGC |
| R3loop | tsRNA-Pro | GTCGTATCCAGTG GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACGGCCTC |
| F3 | tsRNA-Pro | AAGAATTCGCTTTGGGTGCG |
| R4loop | msRNA-VSP | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACGCAGTT |
| F4 | msRNA-VSP | AACTTCCGACTGCCCGATC |
| R5loop | msRNA-HP | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACCAAGCG |
| F5 | msRNA-HP | AACCACTGACTCTTGTAGAC |
| R6loop | msRNA- IF | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACTCGATG |
| F6 | msRNA- IF | AAGCGACCAGATGTGAGAGTAG |
| Common Reverse Primer | - | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGT |
VSP: Variant-specific protein; HP: Hypothetical protein; IF: Translation initiation factor.
Supplementary Materials
The supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Sprong, H.; Caccio, S.M.; van der Giessen, J.W. Identification of zoonotic genotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2009; 3, e558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000558] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956662]
2. Adam, R.D. Biology of Giardia lamblia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2001; 14, pp. 447-475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.3.447-475.2001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11432808]
3. Monis, P.T.; Caccio, S.M.; Thompson, R.C. Variation in Giardia: Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus. Trends Parasitol.; 2009; 25, pp. 93-100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2008.11.006]
4. Steuart, R.F.; O’Handley, R.; Lipscombe, R.J.; Lock, R.A.; Thompson, R.C. Alpha 2 giardin is an assemblage A-specific protein of human infective Giardia duodenalis. Parasitology; 2008; 135, pp. 1621-1627. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182008004988]
5. Andrews, R.H.; Chilton, N.B.; Mayrhofer, G. Selection of specific genotypes of Giardia intestinalis by growth in vitro and in vivo. Parasitology; 1992; 105, Pt 3, pp. 375-386. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000074540]
6. Thompson, R.C.; Lymbery, A.J. Genetic variability in parasites and host-parasite interactions. Parasitology; 1996; 112, pp. S7-S22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000076629]
7. Homan, W.L.; Mank, T.G. Human giardiasis: Genotype linked differences in clinical symptomatology. Int. J. Parasitol.; 2001; 31, pp. 822-826. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00183-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11403774]
8. Sahagun, J.; Clavel, A.; Goni, P.; Seral, C.; Llorente, M.T.; Castillo, F.J.; Capilla, S.; Arias, A.; Gomez-Lus, R. Correlation between the presence of symptoms and the Giardia duodenalis genotype. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol.; 2008; 27, pp. 81-83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0404-3]
9. Haque, R.; Roy, S.; Kabir, M.; Stroup, S.E.; Mondal, D.; Houpt, E.R. Giardia assemblage A infection and diarrhea in Bangladesh. J. Infect. Dis.; 2005; 192, pp. 2171-2173. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/498169]
10. Dubourg, A.; Xia, D.; Winpenny, J.P.; Al Naimi, S.; Bouzid, M.; Sexton, D.W.; Wastling, J.M.; Hunter, P.R.; Tyler, K.M. Giardia secretome highlights secreted tenascins as a key component of pathogenesis. GigaScience; 2018; 7, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy003]
11. Ma’ayeh, S.Y.; Liu, J.; Peirasmaki, D.; Hornaeus, K.; Bergstrom Lind, S.; Grabherr, M.; Bergquist, J.; Svard, S.G. Characterization of the Giardia intestinalis secretome during interaction with human intestinal epithelial cells: The impact on host cells. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2017; 11, e0006120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006120]
12. Grajeda, B.I.; De Chatterjee, A.; Villalobos, C.M.; Pence, B.C.; Ellis, C.C.; Enriquez, V.; Roy, S.; Roychowdhury, S.; Neumann, A.K.; Almeida, I.C. et al. Giardial lipid rafts share virulence factors with secreted vesicles and participate in parasitic infection in mice. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2022; 12, 974200. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.974200]
13. Pu, X.; Li, X.; Cao, L.; Yue, K.; Zhao, P.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, Z. et al. Giardia duodenalis Induces Proinflammatory Cytokine Production in Mouse Macrophages via TLR9-Mediated p38 and ERK Signaling Pathways. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2021; 9, 694675. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.694675] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336841]
14. Moyano, S.; Musso, J.; Feliziani, C.; Zamponi, N.; Frontera, L.S.; Ropolo, A.S.; Lanfredi-Rangel, A.; Lalle, M.; Touz, M. Exosome Biogenesis in the Protozoa Parasite Giardia lamblia: A Model of Reduced Interorganellar Crosstalk. Cells; 2019; 8, 1600. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121600]
15. Gruenberg, J.; Stenmark, H. The biogenesis of multivesicular endosomes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2004; 5, pp. 317-323. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1360]
16. Hurley, J.H. ESCRT complexes and the biogenesis of multivesicular bodies. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.; 2008; 20, pp. 4-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.12.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18222686]
17. Colombo, M.; Raposo, G.; Thery, C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2014; 30, pp. 255-289. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326]
18. Montaner, S.; Galiano, A.; Trelis, M.; Martin-Jaular, L.; Del Portillo, H.A.; Bernal, D.; Marcilla, A. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Modulating the Host Immune Response during Parasitic Infections. Front. Immunol.; 2014; 5, 433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00433] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25250031]
19. Coakley, G.; Maizels, R.M.; Buck, A.H. Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles: The New Communicators in Parasite Infections. Trends Parasitol.; 2015; 31, pp. 477-489. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.06.009]
20. Marti, M.; Johnson, P.J. Emerging roles for extracellular vesicles in parasitic infections. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.; 2016; 32, pp. 66-70. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2016.04.008]
21. O’Brien, K.; Breyne, K.; Ughetto, S.; Laurent, L.C.; Breakefield, X.O. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2020; 21, pp. 585-606. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0251-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457507]
22. Li, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhou, H.; Liao, J.Y.; Ma, L.M.; Chen, Y.Q.; Qu, L.H. Stress-induced tRNA-derived RNAs: A novel class of small RNAs in the primitive eukaryote Giardia lamblia. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2008; 36, pp. 6048-6055. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn596]
23. Saraiya, A.A.; Wang, C.C. snoRNA, a novel precursor of microRNA in Giardia lamblia. PLoS Pathog.; 2008; 4, e1000224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000224] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043559]
24. Valadi, H.; Ekstrom, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjostrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lotvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol.; 2007; 9, pp. 654-659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1596]
25. Villarroya-Beltri, C.; Baixauli, F.; Gutierrez-Vazquez, C.; Sanchez-Madrid, F.; Mittelbrunn, M. Sorting it out: Regulation of exosome loading. Semin Cancer Biol; 2014; 28, pp. 3-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.04.009]
26. Villarroya-Beltri, C.; Gutierrez-Vazquez, C.; Sanchez-Madrid, F.; Mittelbrunn, M. Analysis of microRNA and protein transfer by exosomes during an immune synapse. Methods Mol. Biol.; 2013; 1024, pp. 41-51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-453-1_4]
27. Bushati, N.; Cohen, S.M. microRNA functions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2007; 23, pp. 175-205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123406] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17506695]
28. Ma’ayeh, S.Y.; Knorr, L.; Skold, K.; Garnham, A.; Ansell, B.R.E.; Jex, A.R.; Svard, S.G. Responses of the Differentiated Intestinal Epithelial Cell Line Caco-2 to Infection With the Giardia intestinalis GS Isolate. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2018; 8, 244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00244] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30062089]
29. Gavinho, B.; Sabatke, B.; Feijoli, V.; Rossi, I.V.; da Silva, J.M.; Evans-Osses, I.; Palmisano, G.; Lange, S.; Ramirez, M.I. Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibition Abolishes the Production of Large Extracellular Vesicles From Giardia intestinalis, Affecting Host-Pathogen Interactions by Hindering Adhesion to Host Cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2020; 10, 417. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00417]
30. Axtell, M.J. ShortStack: Comprehensive annotation and quantification of small RNA genes. Rna; 2013; 19, pp. 740-751. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.035279.112]
31. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol.; 1990; 215, pp. 403-410. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2]
32. An, J.; Lai, J.; Lehman, M.L.; Nelson, C.C. miRDeep*: An integrated application tool for miRNA identification from RNA sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2013; 41, pp. 727-737. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1187]
33. Abels, E.R.; Maas, S.L.N.; Nieland, L.; Wei, Z.; Cheah, P.S.; Tai, E.; Kolsteeg, C.J.; Dusoswa, S.A.; Ting, D.T.; Hickman, S. et al. Glioblastoma-Associated Microglia Reprogramming Is Mediated by Functional Transfer of Extracellular miR-21. Cell Rep.; 2019; 28, pp. 3105-3119.e3107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.036]
34. Nicola, A.M.; Frases, S.; Casadevall, A. Lipophilic dye staining of Cryptococcus neoformans extracellular vesicles and capsule. Eukaryot. Cell; 2009; 8, pp. 1373-1380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00044-09] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19465562]
35. Twu, O.; de Miguel, N.; Lustig, G.; Stevens, G.C.; Vashisht, A.A.; Wohlschlegel, J.A.; Johnson, P.J. Trichomonas vaginalis exosomes deliver cargo to host cells and mediate hostratioparasite interactions. PLoS Pathog.; 2013; 9, e1003482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003482]
36. Olmos-Ortiz, L.M.; Barajas-Mendiola, M.A.; Barrios-Rodiles, M.; Castellano, L.E.; Arias-Negrete, S.; Avila, E.E.; Cuellar-Mata, P. Trichomonas vaginalis exosome-like vesicles modify the cytokine profile and reduce inflammation in parasite-infected mice. Parasite Immunol.; 2017; 39, e12426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pim.12426] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345149]
37. Barbosa, F.M.C.; Dupin, T.V.; Toledo, M.D.S.; Reis, N.; Ribeiro, K.; Cronemberger-Andrade, A.; Rugani, J.N.; De Lorenzo, B.H.P.; Novaes, E.B.R.R.; Soares, R.P. et al. Extracellular Vesicles Released by Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis Promote Disease Progression and Induce the Production of Different Cytokines in Macrophages and B-1 Cells. Front. Microbiol.; 2018; 9, 3056. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03056] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627118]
38. Nogueira, P.M.; de Menezes-Neto, A.; Borges, V.M.; Descoteaux, A.; Torrecilhas, A.C.; Xander, P.; Revach, O.Y.; Regev-Rudzki, N.; Soares, R.P. Immunomodulatory Properties of Leishmania Extracellular Vesicles During Host-Parasite Interaction: Differential Activation of TLRs and NF-kappaB Translocation by Dermotropic and Viscerotropic Species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2020; 10, 380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00380]
39. Nogueira, P.M.; Ribeiro, K.; Silveira, A.C.; Campos, J.H.; Martins-Filho, O.A.; Bela, S.R.; Campos, M.A.; Pessoa, N.L.; Colli, W.; Alves, M.J. et al. Vesicles from different Trypanosoma cruzi strains trigger differential innate and chronic immune responses. J. Extracell. Vesicles; 2015; 4, 28734. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.28734]
40. Cronemberger-Andrade, A.; Xander, P.; Soares, R.P.; Pessoa, N.L.; Campos, M.A.; Ellis, C.C.; Grajeda, B.; Ofir-Birin, Y.; Almeida, I.C.; Regev-Rudzki, N. et al. Trypanosoma cruzi-Infected Human Macrophages Shed Proinflammatory Extracellular Vesicles That Enhance Host-Cell Invasion via Toll-Like Receptor 2. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2020; 10, 99. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00099]
41. Diaz-Godinez, C.; Rios-Valencia, D.G.; Garcia-Aguirre, S.; Martinez-Calvillo, S.; Carrero, J.C. Immunomodulatory effect of extracellular vesicles from Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites: Regulation of NETs and respiratory burst during confrontation with human neutrophils. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2022; 12, 1018314. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1018314] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389143]
42. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiu, F.; Wang, J.; Cong, H.; He, S.; Shi, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, H. Characterization of exosomes derived from Toxoplasma gondii and their functions in modulating immune responses. Int. J. Nanomed.; 2018; 13, pp. 467-477. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S151110] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403276]
43. Hung, M.E.; Leonard, J.N. A platform for actively loading cargo RNA to elucidate limiting steps in EV-mediated delivery. J. Extracell. Vesicles; 2016; 5, 31027. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v5.31027]
44. Solaymani-Mohammadi, S.; Singer, S.M. Giardia duodenalis: The double-edged sword of immune responses in giardiasis. Exp. Parasitol.; 2010; 126, pp. 292-297. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2010.06.014]
45. Singer, S.M.; Nash, T.E. T-cell-dependent control of acute Giardia lamblia infections in mice. Infect. Immun.; 2000; 68, pp. 170-175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.1.170-175.2000] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10603384]
46. Einarsson, E.; Ma’ayeh, S.; Svard, S.G. An up-date on Giardia and giardiasis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.; 2016; 34, pp. 47-52. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2016.07.019]
47. Einarsson, E.; Troell, K.; Hoeppner, M.P.; Grabherr, M.; Ribacke, U.; Svard, S.G. Coordinated Changes in Gene Expression Throughout Encystation of Giardia intestinalis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2016; 10, e0004571. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004571]
48. Nolte-’t Hoen, E.; Cremer, T.; Gallo, R.C.; Margolis, L.B. Extracellular vesicles and viruses: Are they close relatives?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. 9155-9161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605146113]
49. Lefebvre, F.A.; Benoit Bouvrette, L.P.; Perras, L.; Blanchet-Cohen, A.; Garnier, D.; Rak, J.; Lecuyer, E. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of human and Drosophila extracellular vesicles. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 27680. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27680]
50. Fiskaa, T.; Knutsen, E.; Nikolaisen, M.A.; Jorgensen, T.E.; Johansen, S.D.; Perander, M.; Seternes, O.M. Distinct Small RNA Signatures in Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Breast Cancer Cell Lines. PLoS ONE; 2016; 11, e0161824. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161824]
51. Hewson, C.; Capraro, D.; Burdach, J.; Whitaker, N.; Morris, K.V. Extracellular vesicle associated long non-coding RNAs functionally enhance cell viability. Noncoding RNA Res; 2016; 1, pp. 3-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ncrna.2016.06.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28090596]
52. Wei, H.; Zhou, B.; Zhang, F.; Tu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhai, Q. Profiling and identification of small rDNA-derived RNAs and their potential biological functions. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, e56842. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056842] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23418607]
53. Keam, S.P.; Hutvagner, G. tRNA-Derived Fragments (tRFs): Emerging New Roles for an Ancient RNA in the Regulation of Gene Expression. Life; 2015; 5, pp. 1638-1651. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life5041638] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26703738]
54. Lambertz, U.; Oviedo Ovando, M.E.; Vasconcelos, E.J.; Unrau, P.J.; Myler, P.J.; Reiner, N.E. Small RNAs derived from tRNAs and rRNAs are highly enriched in exosomes from both old and new world Leishmania providing evidence for conserved exosomal RNA Packaging. BMC Genom.; 2015; 16, 151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1260-7]
55. Dou, S.; Wang, Y.; Lu, J. Metazoan tsRNAs: Biogenesis, Evolution and Regulatory Functions. Noncoding RNA; 2019; 5, 18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ncrna5010018]
56. Di Fazio, A.; Schlackow, M.; Pong, S.K.; Alagia, A.; Gullerova, M. Dicer dependent tRNA derived small RNAs promote nascent RNA silencing. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2022; 50, pp. 1734-1752. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac022] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35048990]
57. Liao, J.Y.; Guo, Y.H.; Zheng, L.L.; Li, Y.; Xu, W.L.; Zhang, Y.C.; Zhou, H.; Lun, Z.R.; Ayala, F.J.; Qu, L.H. Both endo-siRNAs and tRNA-derived small RNAs are involved in the differentiation of primitive eukaryote Giardia lamblia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2014; 111, pp. 14159-14164. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414394111]
58. Garcia-Silva, M.R.; Sanguinetti, J.; Cabrera-Cabrera, F.; Franzen, O.; Cayota, A. A particular set of small non-coding RNAs is bound to the distinctive Argonaute protein of Trypanosoma cruzi: Insights from RNA-interference deficient organisms. Gene; 2014; 538, pp. 379-384. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.01.023]
59. Fernandez-Calero, T.; Garcia-Silva, R.; Pena, A.; Robello, C.; Persson, H.; Rovira, C.; Naya, H.; Cayota, A. Profiling of small RNA cargo of extracellular vesicles shed by Trypanosoma cruzi reveals a specific extracellular signature. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.; 2015; 199, pp. 19-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2015.03.003]
60. Bayer-Santos, E.; Lima, F.M.; Ruiz, J.C.; Almeida, I.C.; da Silveira, J.F. Characterization of the small RNA content of Trypanosoma cruzi extracellular vesicles. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.; 2014; 193, pp. 71-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.02.004]
61. Artuyants, A.; Campos, T.L.; Rai, A.K.; Johnson, P.J.; Dauros-Singorenko, P.; Phillips, A.; Simoes-Barbosa, A. Extracellular vesicles produced by the protozoan parasite Trichomonas vaginalis contain a preferential cargo of tRNA-derived small RNAs. Int. J. Parasitol.; 2020; 50, pp. 1145-1155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.07.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822680]
62. Lai, C.P.; Kim, E.Y.; Badr, C.E.; Weissleder, R.; Mempel, T.R.; Tannous, B.A.; Breakefield, X.O. Visualization and tracking of tumour extracellular vesicle delivery and RNA translation using multiplexed reporters. Nat. Commun.; 2015; 6, 7029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8029] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25967391]
63. Zomer, A.; Maynard, C.; Verweij, F.J.; Kamermans, A.; Schafer, R.; Beerling, E.; Schiffelers, R.M.; de Wit, E.; Berenguer, J.; Ellenbroek, S.I.J. et al. In Vivo imaging reveals extracellular vesicle-mediated phenocopying of metastatic behavior. Cell; 2015; 161, pp. 1046-1057. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.042] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26000481]
64. de la Cuesta, F.; Passalacqua, I.; Rodor, J.; Bhushan, R.; Denby, L.; Baker, A.H. Extracellular vesicle cross-talk between pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells and endothelium during excessive TGF-beta signalling: Implications for PAH vascular remodelling. Cell Commun Signal; 2019; 17, 143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12964-019-0449-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703702]
65. Li, W.; Saraiya, A.A.; Wang, C.C. Gene regulation in Giardia lambia involves a putative microRNA derived from a small nucleolar RNA. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2011; 5, e1338. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001338]
66. Meningher, T.; Boleslavsky, D.; Barshack, I.; Tabibian-Keissar, H.; Kohen, R.; Gur-Wahnon, D.; Ben-Dov, I.Z.; Sidi, Y.; Avni, D.; Schwartz, E. Giardia lamblia miRNAs as a new diagnostic tool for human giardiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2019; 13, e0007398. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007398] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206518]
67. Toribio, V.; Morales, S.; Lopez-Martin, S.; Cardenes, B.; Cabanas, C.; Yanez-Mo, M. Development of a quantitative method to measure EV uptake. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 10522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47023-9]
68. Koudela, B.; Nohynkova, E.; Vitovec, J.; Pakandl, M.; Kulda, J. Giardia infection in pigs: Detection and in vitro isolation of trophozoites of the Giardia intestinalis group. Parasitology; 1991; 102, Pt 2, pp. 163-166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000062442]
69. Keister, D.B. Axenic culture of Giardia lamblia in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with bile. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.; 1983; 77, pp. 487-488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(83)90120-7]
70. Thery, C.; Amigorena, S.; Raposo, G.; Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2006; 30, pp. 3-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30]
71. Chomczynski, P.; Sacchi, N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem.; 1987; 162, pp. 156-159. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2440339]
72. Willenbrock, H.; Salomon, J.; Sokilde, R.; Barken, K.B.; Hansen, T.N.; Nielsen, F.C.; Moller, S.; Litman, T. Quantitative miRNA expression analysis: Comparing microarrays with next-generation sequencing. Rna; 2009; 15, pp. 2028-2034. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.1699809] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19745027]
73. Kim, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.; Chang, H.; You, K.; Kim, V.N. Bias-minimized quantification of microRNA reveals widespread alternative processing and 3’ end modification. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2019; 47, pp. 2630-2640. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1293] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30605524]
74. Langmead, B.; Trapnell, C.; Pop, M.; Salzberg, S.L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol.; 2009; 10, R25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25]
75. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics; 2014; 30, pp. 923-930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656]
76. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods; 2012; 9, pp. 676-682. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Gabriel Luna Pizarro 1 ; Moyano, Sofía 1 ; de la Cruz-Thea, Benjamin 1
; Musso, Juliana 1 ; Rópolo, Andrea S 1 ; Eichner, Norbert 2 ; Meister, Gunter 2 ; Musri, Melina M 1 ; Feliziani, Constanza 1 ; Touz, María C 1
1 Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (INIMEC-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba 5016, Argentina;
2 Regensburg Center for Biochemistry (RCB), Laboratory for RNA Biology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany