It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Abstract
Cortical injury on the surface of the brain in children with hypoxic ischemic injury (HII) can be difficult to demonstrate to non-radiologists and lay people using brain images alone. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is helpful to communicate the volume loss and pathology due to HII in children’s brains. 3D printed models represent the brain to scale and can be held up against models of normal brains for appreciation of volume loss. If 3D printed brains are to be used for formal communication, e.g., with medical colleagues or in court, they should have high fidelity of reproduction of the actual size of patients’ brains. Here, we evaluate the size fidelity of 3D printed models from MRI scans of the brain, in children with prior HII. Twelve 3D prints of the brain were created from MRI scans of children with HII and selected to represent a variety of cortical pathologies. Specific predetermined measures of the 3D prints were made and compared to measures in matched planes on MRI. Fronto-occipital length (FOL) and bi-temporal/bi-parietal diameters (BTD/BPD) demonstrated high interclass correlations (ICC). Correlations were moderate to weak for hemispheric height, temporal height, and pons-cerebellar thickness. The average standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.48 cm. Our results demonstrate high correlations in overall measurements of each 3D printed model derived from brain MRI scans versus the original MRI, evidenced by high ICC values for FOL and BTD/BPD. Measures with low correlation values can be explained by variability in matching the plane of measurement to the MRI slice orientation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603)
2 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.239552.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0680 8770)
3 University College London, Undergraduate in the Department of Mathematics, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
4 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.239552.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0680 8770); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)