Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), the cotton bollworm, also known as the gram pod borer or the tomato fruit worm, is a polyphagous agricultural pest with a wide geographical distribution, recorded from Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, and recently South America (Czepak et al. 2013; Specht et al. 2013; Bueno & Sosa-Gómez 2014; Murúa et al. 2014). Larvae of H. armigera have been reported from over 67 host families, including Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Poaceae, and Solanaceae (Pogue 2004), and this pest has caused losses to economically important crops such as cotton, legumes, sorghum, maize, tomato, soybean, ornamental plants, and fruit trees (Moral-Garcia 2006; Specht et al. 2013).
Helicoverpa armigera females lay eggs on host flowers and fruit, and larvae feed on various parts of the plants, although they prefer buds, inflorescences, fruits, and pods (Moral-Garcia 2006; Perkins et al. 2009; Specht et al. 2013) and thus cause damage to reproductive structures. This study reports the first occurrence of H. armigera feeding on Plectranthus neochilus Schltr. (Lamiales: Lamiaceae). Larvae were collected during Aug 2014, in Paraná State (Londrina, Embrapa Soybean; 23.190667°S, 51.184056°W; 630 m asl), Brazil, feeding on inflorescences of "boldo-rasteiro" (P. neochilus) (Fig. 1A).
The collected larvae were kept under laboratory conditions with natural diet (inflorescences) until pupation. Pupae were separated by sex and emerging adults identified by external (pattern and color of wings; Fig. 1B) and internal (morphology of male and female genital organs) characteristics (Pogue 2004). A pair of adults was allowed to mate in a cage, and the eggs used to confirm species identification (Kirkpatrick 1961). Male and female genitalia were cleared in a 10% potassium hydroxide solution and mounted on microscope slides (Specht et al. 2013). We performed the molecular characterization of H. armigera in the Laboratório de Entomologia da Embrapa Soja (Londrina/ PR, Brazil). For DNA extraction, moth samples were obtained from 2 adults (heads and legs). The analyses followed the methods of Behere et al. (2008).
Specimens were diagnosed as H. armigera based on adult external and internal morphology, especially the genitalia. Other morphological characters used to identify specimens were the external structure of the eggs, the shape of the base of abdominal sternite and of the valves, and the number of cornuti (= spines) inside the aedeagus (12 cornuti sets or less). Vouchers of genitalia slides and pinned specimens were deposited in the Laboratory of Biological Control of Caterpillars (Embrapa Soybean, Brazil).
For molecular characterization, we used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of partial COI (511 bp) and Cyt b (434 bp) genes for each specimen; DNA from all individuals was amplified successfully. The restriction endonuclease digest of the 511 bp COI PCR product resulted in 2 bands of 318 bp and 193 bp. Within the 434 bp of Cyt b sequences, the recognition site for HphI [GGTGA (N)8] was present, and the restriction digestion of the 434 bp Cyt b PCR product therefore resulted in 2 bands of 280 bp and 154 bp (Fig. 1C). These data are consistent with the molecular identification of H. armigera described in the literature (Behere et al. 2008).
Larvae of H. armigera prefer to feed on the reproductive structures of the host (Moral-Garcia 2006; Perkins et al. 2009), and this was observed in this study, with larvae on P. neochilus found only on the flowers (Fig. 1A). Growers should monitor other species of plants that may be temporary reservoirs during the period between harvests of economically important crops.
Furthermore, P. neochilus and other Plectranthus species are common throughout Brazil and associated with fruit orchards, home gardens, and vegetable gardens, because they have medicinal uses, especially in the treatment of digestive disorders (Lorenzi & Matos 2008). Because P. neochilus is widespread and is now a recorded host, this may be vital information in developing pest management strategies. The importance of plant-reservoirs is recognized for other species of insect pests and crops in Brazil (Krinski & Pelissari 2012; Krinski et al. 2012, 2015; Krinski 2013a,b, 2015). Furthermore, producers of commercial boldo crops should be aware of this pest and the damage potential it poses.
In Brazil, management of this pest is in the initial stages. Therefore, information about new host plants and correct identification and sampling techniques for adults, eggs, larvae, and pupae are essential for determining appropriate control tactics. Researchers in other coun1Federal tries have studied H. armigera on different host plants (e.g., Razmjou et al. 2014). Because this species is new to Brazil and its ecology, behavior, and host preferences may differ, studies with different host plants should be conducted to better understand the biology and development of this pest in Brazil.
According to Lammers & MacLeod (2007), the worldwide cost per year to control this pest, along with yield losses, reaches US$ 5 billion. In India and China, 50% of pesticides in agriculture are used to control this pest. In Spain, H. armigera is one of the most serious pests of tomato. In Brazil, losses in the 2012-2013 crop season were estimated at US$ 0.8 billion (Bueno & Sosa-Gómez 2014). Considering this level of damage, it is essential that monitoring for this pest and natural enemies is established. Surveillance and monitoring of new host records and changes in distribution, and research on control methods, such as natural enemies and plant deterrents (extracts and essential oils) as previously reported in the literature (Favetti et al. 2013; Bueno & Sosa-Gómez 2014; Krinski et al. 2014), will help determine what control options will be chosen. The Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) has already emphasized that effective monitoring of eggs, larvae, pupae, and adults of H. armigera is critical to successfully implementing management strategies for this pest, because these factors determine what control tactics will be used (Bueno & Sosa-Gómez 2014).
The authors acknowledge the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and the Fundação Araucária for a post-doctoral scholarship to the first author (Accord 069/2014 - Project 41138). Daniel Ricardo Sosa-Gómez and Adeney de Freitas Bueno provided logistical support and technical staff José Jairo da Silva, Jhibran Ferral Piña, Sérgio Henrique da Silva, and Ivanilda Luzia Soldorio, who all helped collect and rear the larvae in the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Soybean) laboratory.
Summary
Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a polyphagous agricultural pest recorded in Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, and recently South America. Larvae of H. armigera are recorded from over 67 host families, including Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Poaceae, and Solanaceae. This study documents for the first time H. armigera larvae feeding on inflorescences of "boldo-rasteiro" Plectranthus neochilus Schltr. (Lamiales: Lamiaceae). The species was identified according to external and internal characteristics of adults, morphology of eggs, and by molecular characterization.
Key Words: identification; morphology; molecular characterization; new host record; boldo-rasteiro
Sumário
Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) é uma praga agrícola polífaga com distribuição geográfica registrada na Europa, Ásia, África, Oceania e, recentemente, na América do Sul. Devido à sua distribuição mundial, suas larvas foram relatados em cerca de 67 famílias, incluindo Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Poaceae e Solanaceae. Com o recente registro de sua ocorrência no Brasil, novas espécies de plantas hospedeiras tem sido registradas. Portanto, este estudo relata a primeira ocorrência de lagartas de H. armigera atacando inflorescências de "boldo-rasteiro" Plectranthus neochilus Schltr. (Lamiales: Lamiaceae). A espécie foi identificada de acordo com as características externas e internas, morfologia dos ovos e também por caracterização molecular.
Palavras Chave: identificação; morfologia; caracterização molecular; registro de novo hospedeiro; boldo-rasteiro
References Cited
Behere GT, Tay WT, Russell DA, Batterham P. 2008. Molecular markers to dis - criminate among four pest species of Helicoverpa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 98: 599-603.
Bueno AF, Sosa-Gómez DR. 2014. The Old World bollworm in the Neotropical region: the experience of Brazilian growers with Helicoverpa armigera. Outlooks on Pest Management 25: 261-264.
Czepak C, Albernaz KC, Vivan LM, Guimarães HO, Carvalhais T. 2013. First reported occurrence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 43: 110-113.
Favetti BM, Krinski D, Butnariu AR, Loiácono MS. 2013. Egg parasitoids of Edessa meditabunda (Fabricius) (Pentatomidae) in lettuce crop. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 57: 236-237.
Kirkpatrick TH. 1961. Comparative morphological studies of Heliothis species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Queensland. Queensland Journal of Agricultural Science 18: 179-194.
Krinski D. 2013a. Physalis angulata L. (Solanaceae): a potential host-plant of stink bugs Edessa meditabunda F. (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Biota Neotropica 13: 336-339.
Krinski D. 2013b. First report of phytophagous stink bug in chicory crop. Ciência Rural 43: 42-44.
Krinski D. 2015. First report of squash vine borer, Melittia cucurbitae (Harris, 1828) (Lepidoptera, Sessidae) in Brazil and South America: distribution extension and geographic distribution map. Check List 11-1625: 1-3.
Krinski D, Pelissari TD. 2012. Occurrence of the stinkbug Edessa meditabunda F. (Pentatomidae) in different cultivars of lettuce Lactuca sativa L. (Asteraceae). Bioscience Journal 28: 654-659.
Krinski D, Favetti BM, Butnariu AR. 2012. First record of Edessa meditabunda (F.) on lettuce in Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 41: 79-80.
Krinski D, Massaroli A, Machado M. 2014. Insecticidal potential of the Annonaceae family plants. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 36: 225-242.
Krinski D, Foerster LA, Grazia J. 2015. Hypatropis inermis (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae): first report on rice crop. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 59: 12-13.
Lammers JW, MacLeod A. 2007. Report of a Pest Risk Analysis: Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner, 1808). Plant Protection Service (NL) and Central Science Laboratory (UK) Joint Pest Risk Analysis for Helicoverpa armigera (European Union), 2007. https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/phiw/riskRegister/plant-health/documents/helicoverpa.pdf (last accessed 22 Apr 2015).
Lorenzi H, Matos FJA. 2008. Plantas medicinais no Brasil: nativas e exóticas. Instituto Plantarum de Estudos da Flora, Nova Odessa, São Paulo, Brazil.
Moral-Garcia FJ. 2006. Analysis of the spatiotemporal distribution of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in a tomato field using a stochastic approach. Biosystems Engineering 93: 253-259.
Murúa MB, Scalora FS, Navarro FR, Cazado LE, Casmuz A, Villagrán ME, Lobos E, Gastaminza G. 2014. First record of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Argentina. Florida Entomologist 97: 854-856.
Perkins LE, Cribb BW, Hanan J, Zalucki MP. 2009. The role of two plant-derived volatiles in the foraging movement of 1st instar Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner): time to stop and smell the flowers. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 3: 173-179.
Pogue MG. 2004. A new synonym of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) and differentiation of adult males of H. zea and H. armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 1222-1226.
Razmjou J, Naseri B, Hemati SA. 2014. Comparative performance of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on various host plants. Journal of Pest Science 87: 29-37.
Specht A, Sosa-Gómez DR, Paula-Moraes SV, Yano SAC. 2013. Morphological and molecular identification of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and expansion of its occurrence record in Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 48: 689-692.
Diones Krinski1* * and Ana Flávia Godoy2
University of Paraná (UFPR), Department of Plant Science and Phytosanitarism, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Caixa Postal 19061, 81531-990, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas), Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Fazenda Experimental Lageado, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Câmpus de Botucatu, Caixa Postal 237, 18610-307, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
*Corresponding author; Email: [email protected]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Florida Entomological Society Dec 2015