INTRODUCTION
Babesia is an apicomplexan parasite which infect the red blood cells (RBCs) of a wide range of vertebrates, causing babesiosis (1). This disease, transmitted by ticks, has a significant impact on human and animal health. Two billion cattle worldwide are exposed to the infection causing substantial economic losses. The disease is also an emergent zoonosis of humans (2–4).
Once the vertebrate host has been bitten by an infected tick, sporozoites invade RBCs and begin an asexual life cycle known as merogony. This cycle has been partially elucidated and involves RBC invasion, metabolism and replication by a form of binary fission involving budding, resulting in merozoites that egress and destroy the host cell to seek and invade new uninfected RBCs (uRBCs) within seconds to minutes, thus perpetuating the infection (5, 6).
After several rounds of replication,
The merogony of
In spite of recent advances, our comprehension of the asexual
In addition to a detailed morphological description of
RESULTS
Three-dimensional structure of the
To characterize the 3D architecture of
FIG 1
Correlative cryo-epifluorescence and cryo-soft X-ray tomography imaging of
Reconstructed tomograms were used to recover the intracellular 3D cartography of the main seven IE stages (Fig. 1 and 2). Three-dimensional data showed a morphological shape characteristic of each parasite stage. Thus, free merozoites are polarized ellipsoidal cells with an apical width prominence at the end (Fig. 2a and b). Single (Fig. 2c and d), double (Fig. 2e and f), and quadruple (Fig. 2g and h) trophozoites showed a round shape, while paired pyriforms (Fig. 2i and j), tetrads (Fig. 2k and l), and double paired pyriforms (Fig. 2m to p) exhibited the characteristic pear-shaped form. Some 3D subcellular compartments were clearly discernible in both free merozoites and IE stages, including an elongated mitochondrion (1 to 2 μm) and a round apicoplast (300 nm) next to the nucleus (700 nm), which occupied most of the parasite cytoplasm. Dense granules were positioned on one side of the round trophozoites or close to the apical end of free merozoites and pear-shaped parasites (Fig. 2). It was not possible to resolve clearly the 3D structure of the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) due to the resolution attained (∼50 nm in 3D). We also detected by cryo-SXT other intracellular structures in free merozoites and IE stages that may correspond to micronemes, rhoptries, and the inner membrane complex, previously observed by TEM (8, 9). However, it was not possible to unequivocally identify and/or count them (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).
FIG 2
3D architecture of intact
Other membranous systems were clearly visible in the iRBCs. These include (i) possible hemoglobin-containing vesicles within the parasite cytoplasm and (ii) low-absorbing vesicles with submicron size and novel long membrane structures, both within the cytoplasm of iRBCs. Thus, a single round dense feature was detected exclusively in the cytoplasm of trophozoites (Fig. S2a and b). Since these dense structures exhibited a similar X-ray linear absorption coefficient to the one of hemoglobin from the RBC cytoplasm, we hypothesized that they could be hemoglobin-containing vesicles. It is interesting to note that similar hemoglobin inclusions, and the possible parasite endocytic uptake of the hemoglobin from the cytoplasm of iRBCs, were observed in TEM serial sections (Fig. S2c to h). These membranous structures were heterogeneous in size (250 to 600 nm) and could be the result of the internalization of an RBC cytoplasm portion to form the hemoglobin-containing vesicle.
The submicron vesicles present in the cytoplasm of iRBCs showed different sizes (120, 250, and 400 nm), and some of them were also observable by cryo-SXT and TEM (see Fig. S3).
Long structures (1.5 to 3 μm) appeared as a unique membranous extension. This feature extended from the parasite plasma membrane to the RBC plasma membrane, establishing a connection between the parasite and the RBC (see Fig. S4).
In addition to finding and recognizing the seven main IE stages in a whole-cell context, we observed other novel IE transient morphological forms with a complex pleomorphic 3D architecture. The elucidation of the origin and role of these new IE forms in the parasite life cycle was addressed using a combination of cryo-SXT and long-term time-lapse video microscopy, as described below.
Intraerythrocytic asexual cycle of
Both asynchronous
We captured images of newly iRBCs and RBCs already parasitized with single trophozoites. Video microscopy showed how these single trophozoites reproduced by a form of transverse binary fission that involves budding. Some details were also observable by cryo-SXT. In a first phase of development, trophozoites adopted amoeboid shapes (Fig. 3a and 2g) until they reached a round form with two protuberant buds (Fig. 3b and 2h). This form was previously observed by TEM in
FIG 3
Dynamic development of single trophozoite and paired pyriform stages. The figure shows the development of the single trophozoite and paired pyriform stages and the transient forms that intersperse in a chronological order between both main stages within the human RBC. (a to f) Time-lapse image sequences, captured by video microscopy, of
Notably, after imaging the morphogenesis of the trophozoite during its development by video microscopy and cryo-SXT, we were able to correctly identify and sequentially organize the corresponding IE forms when we saw them by light microscopy (Fig. 3q to t).
Moreover, by combining video microscopy and cryo-SXT, we obtained a 4D model description of the
FIG 4
4D reconstruction of the main and intermediate IE stages that encompass the
The paired pyriform dominates the asexual cycle of
After describing the dynamic development of the trophozoite, we continued analyzing the asexual cycle using the same experimental approach and following the chronological order established by (7). Hence, we captured images of RBCs parasitized with paired pyriforms entering into a dynamic cycle of multiple pathways. Instead of egressing from the host cell (6), an alternative development of the paired pyriform was to divide transversely yielding two pear-shaped cells. Several hours later, both cells adopted the characteristic round shape of the double trophozoite stage as was previously proposed (7). (Fig. 3e, f, j, k, o, and p and t to u, Fig. 4k to j; see also Fig. S6a in the supplemental material and Movie S2 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c). Our recent studies showed that the dissociation of single paired pyriforms into two pear-shaped sister cells occurs along the fine waist in a few seconds (6). However, the biomechanical process is not completely characterized and needs further study to understand the separation process.
Continuing with the cycle reconstruction, double trophozoites were transformed into double paired pyriforms (7). During this dynamic process (Fig. 4k to o), each trophozoite multiplied by binary fission following the morphogenesis described above for a single trophozoite, but not necessarily simultaneously (see Fig. S6b and Fig. S7 in the supplemental material; see Movies S3 and S4 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c).
Of considerable interest was the development of paired pyriforms into tetrads. Instead of dividing transversely, both sister pear-shaped cells remained attached and multiplied simultaneously yielding an attached double budding form or double “Mickey Mouse” that ultimately developed into a tetrad (Fig. 4e to g; see also Fig. S8a in the supplemental material and Movie S5 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c). We also observed that tetrads can separate, yielding double paired pyriforms (Fig. 4g and o; see also Fig. S8b and S9a in the supplemental material and Movies S6 and S7 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c), but we did not detect tetrads developing into quadruple trophozoites, as previously suggested (7).
Less frequently, the development of double paired pyriforms was observed to develop into quadruple trophozoites (Fig. 4o and h to i; see also Movie S8 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c).
Double paired pyriforms and quadruple trophozoites are involved in the development of multiparasite
After formation of double paired pyriforms and quadruple trophozoites, the cycle continued with the development of multiparasite stages as was previously proposed (7) (Fig. 4h; see also Fig. S9b in the supplemental material and Movie S9 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c). Double paired pyriforms and quadruple trophozoites underwent consecutive rounds of multiplication following a complex pathway of development and resulting in different multiparasite stages or polyparasitized RBCs infected with multiple combinations of parasite forms (Fig. 4p; see also Fig. S10a in the supplemental material and Movie S10 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c). Notably, multiparasite stages underwent new rounds of multiplication before ultimately egressing from the host cell (see Fig. S10b in the supplemental material and Movie S11 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c).
Finally, the time IE parasites took to transform into the next stages was measured and evaluated (Table 1). Of special interest is the finding that, regardless of the stage and the asynchronous multiplication of two or more parasites within the same RBC, the time elapsed from the budding form to the resulting new stage was similar. That is, trophozoites from any stage took similar times from the budding form to the paired pyriform (1 h 38 min ± 48 min). This time was also comparable to the time required for the paired pyriforms when developed through a synchronized budding to tetrads (Table 1).
TABLE 1
The time that intraerythrocytic parasites take to transform to the next stages
Intraerythrocytic-stage development | Mean ± SD |
---|---|
Trophozoite to paired pyriform ( | |
Trophozoite to budding form | 3 h 33 min ± 2 h |
Budding form to pyriform | 1 h 58 min ± 51 min* |
Total time | 5 h 31 min ± 1 h 24 min |
Paired pyriforms to double trophozoites ( | |
Total time | 7 h 37 min ± 3 h 1 min |
Double trophozoites to double paired pyriforms ( | |
First trophozoite to budding form | 6 h 38 min ± 3 h 55 min |
Budding form to first pyriform | 1 h 58 min ± 55 min* |
Second trophozoite to budding form | 7 h 35 min ± 5 h 4 min |
Budding form to second pyriform | 1 h 57 min ± 50 min* |
Total time | 9 h 32 min ± 5 h 3 min |
Paired pyriform to tetrad ( | |
Paired pyriform to double budding form | 4 h 14 min ± 2 h 36 min |
Double budding form to tetrad | 1 h 48 min ± 38 min* |
Total time | 5 h 54 min ± 2 h 40 min |
Tetrad to double paired pyriforms ( | |
Total time | 3 h 3 min ± 2 h 54 min |
Double paired pyriforms to quadruple trophozoites ( | |
Total time | 10 h 15 min |
Double paired pyriforms to multiparasite stage ( | |
Total time | 7 h 40 min ± 5 h 32 min |
Quadruple trophozoites to multiparasite stage ( | |
Total time | 4 h 5 min |
Multiparasite stage development ( | |
Total time | 5 h 20 min ± 3 h 11 min |
a
The table shows the average times that parasites take to transform from one main stage to the next. The phases of the development for some main stages are detailed in table footnotes. *, the time from the budding form or double budding form to the next stage is very similar between trophozoites.
b
SD, standard deviation.
c
Paired pyriform splits into double trophozoites.
d
Tetrad splits into double paired pyriforms.
e
Double paired pyriforms split into quadruple trophozoites.
DISCUSSION
By combining cryo-SXT and video microscopy we have obtained reconstructions and data in unprecedented detail, which significantly clarifies our understanding of the asexual cycle of
The cryo-SXT tomograms revealed the main IE stages, as well as unexpected forms of the parasite, that were also observed and recognized by video microscopy as intermediate IE forms. These intermediate forms that interposed in a sequential order between one main stage and the next explain the origin and development of trophozoites, pyriforms, tetrads, and multiparasite stages (see Movies S12 to S14 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c).
Interestingly, the pattern of
The combination of video microscopy and cryo-SXT allowed the chronological ordering of a pattern of formation of the entire IE population, adopted by
In the first phase of this process, the single trophozoite develops into a paired pyriform rather than undergoing a duplicate binary fission event to develop into a tetrad, as previously suggested (14). The new paired pyriform precedes all the next stages that may occur in the second phase of the asexual cycle, and the resulting paired pyriform can egress from the RBC (6) or remains within the cell to develop into a tetrad or a double trophozoite (7). Interestingly, the tetrad exclusively derives from the paired-pyriform stage. The tetrad development occurs when the paired pyriform, for unknown reasons, does not complete the fission process to separate in two trophozoites. As a consequence, the two pear-shaped forms that encompass the paired pyriform remain attached to each other, while both undergo a simultaneous but independent multiplication round involving budding. Each pear-shaped form yields two daughter cells, i.e., four attached cells in total, that form a tetrad. This could be a common cell biological feature of the
The resulting tetrad, in contrast to other models (7), can egress or become double paired pyriforms within the RBC rather than develop to quadruple trophozoites. Double trophozoites, in contrast to other models (7), do not leave the cell but develop into double paired pyriforms. The latter may exit or remain within the original RBC and develop into quadruple trophozoites, a stage that does not leave the cell as well (6) but develops into a multiparasite stage (7). Moreover, double paired pyriforms undergo a novel pathway, not described previously, consisting of sequential rounds of multiplication to yield multiparasite stages without developing first into intermediate quadruple trophozoites. Finally, multiparasite stages egress from the host cell, and the resulting free merozoites invade new RBCs (Fig. 5).
FIG 5
Simplified model of the
Notably, the asexual cycle is an asynchronous process, and replication of two or more parasites within the same RBC does not necessarily occur simultaneously. Except for the paired pyriforms that develop into tetrads, we observed that most of the parasites multiply at different times in the presence of other parasites within the same host cell. These phenomena, far from occurring as random events, probably follow coordinated paths, tightly controlled by the ratios of invasion, development, and egression based on environmental conditions (7, 21).
The main stages grow slowly and multiply, by binary fission involving budding, within the human RBC for several hours in order to achieve the next stage. The main IE forms resulting are highly active and with a great capacity for deformation and transformation to intermediate or transitory forms during the process. In this context, the integration of cryo-SXT and video microscopy data also provided a comprehensive and dynamic view of the binary fission and budding process complementary to the static view provided previously by TEM (9, 10). Indeed, it was possible to identify at least two key events to explain how fission occurs: (i) the formation of a local constriction and its transformation into a protuberant knob and ultimately into a narrow waist and (ii) the longitudinal stresses and the transverse rupture of the waist. While constriction formation is crucial to successful distribution of the cytoplasm to sister cells, narrow waist formation is essential for rupture to occur. Thus, a longitudinal tension force, exerted by the paired pyriform (6), probably increases longitudinal stresses in the waist to break this structure yielding two identical pear-shaped cells concluding the fission process (see Movie S14 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c). Fission has been recognized as a rapid process in such superior asexual organisms as freshwater planarians, which generate the forces necessary for division using only their own musculature and substrate traction (22). However, the fission process remains poorly understood in the majority of organisms because of the difficult of capturing it in real time (22). Taking into account that
Apart from a detailed description of the 3D morphology and kinetics of
After this stationary hemoglobin phase, trophozoites apparently do not egress from the host cell but grow and multiply by binary fission in order to provide pear-shaped parasites (Fig. 5). Then, these resulting paired pyriforms perpetuate the cycle by using two different strategies: (i) leaving the cell as free merozoites in order to invade new RBCs (6) or (ii) undergoing new rounds of multiplication in order to yield new IE trophozoites and pear-shaped parasites (7) (Fig. 5; see also Movies S13 and S14 at https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c).
During this dynamic cyclic process,
Thus, both round trophozoites and pear-shaped forms are highly active and interacting parasites and have different but complementary roles. While trophozoites probably ensure the first nutrients by capturing hemoglobin, pear-shaped parasites seem to be the first step in perpetuating the cycle.
Undoubtedly, the life cycle of
Further exploration of the whole
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics statement.
Human A+ blood from healthy donors was used to maintain cultures of
Parasite propagation.
Cryo-epifluorescence microscopy.
Cultures of
Cryo-soft X-ray tomography.
Holey carbon-coated (R 2/2; Quantifoil) Au-G200F1 grids were analyzed in cryo-conditions by MISTRAL microscope at ALBA synchrotron (13). RBCs infected with red fluorescence
Tilt series were normalized to the flatfield, deconvolved by the measured apparent transfer function of the microscope (26) using python and MATLAB scripts and aligned with IMOD (27). XTEND data series were processed as described previously (28) using python scripts. Tomographic reconstructions were performed using TOMO3D software, 30 iterations of simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT) algorithm (29) and edge enhanced using TOMOEED (30). Segmentation of volumes was carried out with SuRVoS (31), and volumes were represented with Chimera (32) and ImageJ (33).
Staining
Long-term time-lapse recording and video processing.
Time-lapse video was conducted using a Leica TCS SP5 confocal laser microscope (Leica Microsystems) equipped with epifluorescence microscopy (Leica DMI 6000B microscope) and incubation systems to control temperature, humidity, and CO2 conditions. To avoid loss of focus during the video recording, a 96-well plate containing RBCs infected with green fluorescence
Time-lapse images of iRBCs were then recorded at one frame per 5 min interval using the following parameters: a 488-nm laser line and a laser level of 10%, a speed of 700 Hz, a 2.25 AU pinhole aperture, a zoom of 2×, 2.5×, or 3×, and bright-field imaging under the same environmental conditions. Frames were captured for 18 to 21 h in a single z-section. The videos generated by the LAS AF software were processed with ImageJ and Fiji software (33, 34).
Transmission electron microscopy.
For TEM ultrastructural analysis,
Statistical analysis.
Means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated using Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA), and results were expressed as averages ± the SD.
Data availability.
Supplemental materials (Movies S1 to S14) are available at Figshare (https://figshare.com/s/8ba6afd9e161899d682c).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2020 Conesa et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE Babesiosis is a disease caused by intraerythrocytic
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer