ABSTRACT
Physicochemical, bacteriological and sensory parameters of sausages made from waste of Nile tilapia with the prebiotic inulin added and reduced sodium were investigated. Mechanically separated carcass meat and mechanically separated head meat were processed into sausages with or without inulin and salt replacer. Tl and T3 showed greatest lipid, but lowest carbohydrate levels, a* and b* values (P < 0.05). In general, the inulin formulations showed higher acceptability and purchase intent (P < 0.05). The addition of inulin to low-sodium tilapia sausages is a promising technological strategy to minimize negative effects on the taste and texture from KC1 increment.
Keywords: fish waste, healthy products, inulin, Oreochromis mloticus, potassium chloride, salt replacer
1. INTRODUCTION
The Nile tilapia is the most important species for aquaculture in the world. Tilapia is marketed either as whole fish or as fresh or frozen fillets, although consumers prefer fillets. Reported fillet yields of Nile tilapia vary widely (30-40%), generating a large amount of wastes that are commonly underutilized, used as animal feed, or discarded (MONTEIRO et al., 2012; MONTANHINI NETO and OSTRENSKY, 2013).
The utilization of fish-processing waste to develop new products provides an important opportunity for the food industry to produce sustainable and value-added products as a source of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (DECKELBAUM and TORREJON, 2012) and high-value protein. Further studies are needed to develop ways to use fish waste to produce functional products with lower costs (MONTEIRO et al., 2014a; PALMEIRA et al., 2014a; PALMEIRA et al, 2014b).
Some investigators have reported the beneficial effects of including inulin as a fat replacer in chicken and pork sausages, with desirable effects such as improved texture. In addition, inulin has a prebiotic physiological effect, attributed to fructan, which stimulates the growth of beneficial bacteria in the intestine of the host (MENDOZA et al., 2001; MENEGAS et al, 2013).
The reduction of sodium in processed products has constituted a challenge for the food industry, particularly in view of the contemporary consumer's awareness of the relationship between food and health. The need to reduce salt contents is further reinforced by agreements between the industrial sector and the World Health Organization (WHO). The main challenge is to maintain the acceptability as well as physicochemical parameters of the food (DESMOND, 2006; DOTSCH et ai, 2009; MONTEIRO et al., 2014b), considering microbiological quality standards. However, inulin and sodium replacers in fish products have not been studied.
This study evaluated the effect of sodium reduction and inulin addition on physicochemical, bacteriological and sensory parameters of sausages manufactured from mechanically separated meat of Nile tilapia.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Obtaining mechanically separated tilapia meat
The wastes from heads and carcasses of tilapia were obtained from a fish-farming cooperative in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The fish heads and carcasses were passed through a deboning machine (KME, Säo Paulo) to remove the muscle from the bones, and were then washed.
The mechanically separated carcass meat (MSCM) and mechanically separated head meat (MSHM) were frozen and packed in 1kg polyethylene packages at -18°C. The samples were transported in cold boxes to keep them frozen during transport to the pilot plant of the Centro de Tecnologia SEN AI Alimentos e Bebidas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where they were stored in a freezer (-18°C) until the MSHM and MSCM were used to produce sausages. Four different sausage formulations were prepared: 100% NaCl without inulin (Tl), 100% NaCl + 6% inulin (T2), 50% NaCl and 50% KCl + without inulin (T3), and 50% NaCl and 50% KC1 + 6% inulin (T4). In formulations without inulin, MSHM was used as a replacer, and potassium chloride (KCl) was used to reduce the sodium content. All formulations are described in Table 1.
2.2. Experimental design
Ten kg and thirty-kg of MSHM and MSCM were obtained, respectively. For each experimental replication (n = 2), the samples were divided into four groups each with 3.5 kg of MSHM (Tl and T3), 1.5 kg of MSHM (T2 and T4), and 7.5 kg of MSCM. Each group was divided at random into 40 g portions, resulting a total of 40 samples per group which were separated in the proposed formulations and analyzed on days 0 and 34 of refrigerated storage, totaling 80 samples units.
2.3. Sausage manufacturing
To compose the sausage, the ingredients (Table 1) were mixed in a cutter. After the emulsion was formed in the cutter, the sausage mass was placed in a manual sausage maker using sausage collagen casings of 21 mm diameter, and separated into sections. The sausage was heat-treated, starting with pre-cooking in a drying oven (Incomaf Indústria Ltda., Säo Paulo, Brazil) with circulating hot air at 50°C for 15 min with an open chimney, then raised to 60°C for 30 min with a closed chimney and increased by 5°C every 5 min (steam drying) until the sausage reached 72°C internally, as measured with the aid of a thermocouple. The sausages were then cooled in a water bath to an internal temperature of 40°C. The sausages were stored in a cooling chamber at 5°C until the next day, when the membranes were delaminated and the products were vacuum-packed in polythene bags and stored under refrigeration (5°C). The products were placed in isothermal boxes and transported to the laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where they were kept under refrigeration (4°C) for 34 days until analytical procedures. The analyses on day 0 were performed immediately after the arrival of the samples.
2.4. Physicochemical analyses
Water, ash, protein and lipid contents were evaluated in MSHM and MSCM on day 0 (AOAC, 2012). In the sausages, pH values were determined with a digital pH meter (Digimed®DM-22) equipped with a DME-R12 electrode (Digimed®) according to CONTE-JUNIOR et al. (2008). Water, ash, protein, lipid and carbohydrate contents were determined by standard methods (AOAC, 2012). The carbohydrate content was estimated taking into account the ingredient composition. The energy content (kcal/100g) was estimated according to TRIKI et al. (2013). These analyses were performed immediately after manufacture and repeated after 34 days of storage, to assess the maintenance of quality and identity of the product.
In addition, on day 0 the cooking yield was calculated as the cooked weight of the sausages divided by the weight of the pre-cooked sausage, multiplied by 100 (HORITA et al., 2011). All analyses were performed in quadruplicate for each treatment.
The instrumental color parameters were determined using a Konica Minolta CR-400 colorimeter (Konica Minolta Sensing, Osaka, Japan) previously calibrated with CIE Standard Illuminant D65, a 8 mm-diameter aperture, and a 2° standard observer (AMSA, 2012). Samples were macerated to a thickness of 3 cm in a beaker with a diameter of 15 cm. Results are expressed in CIEL AB L* (lightness), a* (redness) and b* (yellowness) values. Measurements were performed in triplicate for each treatment.
2.5. Bacteriological analysis
Bacteriological analyses of the MSHM, MSCM and sausages were performed on day 0. Total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TAMB), Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus bacterial counts, and most probable number of thermotolerant coliforms were evaluated. The presence of Salmonella spp. was evaluated and the results were expressed as presence or absence in 25 g of sample (APHA, 2001).
2.6. Sensory evaluation
The panelists were recruited from the students, faculty, and staff of the Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil. Sausage samples were analyzed at room temperature (20°C) and were coded with three-digit random numbers. The samples were presented to 100 untrained panelists (38 men and 62 women, 18 to 47 years old) who were instructed to evaluate their overall liking for each sausage sample, using the 9-point hedonic scale (l=dislike extremely, 9=like extremely). The panelists also recorded their purchase intent (5-point scale: 1 = "definitely would not buy", 5 = "definitely would buy") (STONE and SIDEL, 1998). These consumer tests were conducted in two stages: with no information (blind - first stage), and with the information "Mechanically separated tilapia meat was used to make the sausages, and its use reduces environmental pollution and encourages sustainability" (informed - second stage) (GARCIA et al, 2009).
In the first stage, color, bitter taste, salty taste, succulence, elasticity and softness were also evaluated using a five-point Just About Right (JAR) scale (1 = much too weak, 2 = somewhat weak, 3 = just about right, 4 = somewhat strong, and 5 = much too strong) according to CERVANTES et al. (2010).
An unsalted cracker and a glass of water at 25°C were offered to cleanse the palate between samples. The sensory evaluation was performed two days after the sausage was manufactured, to ensure adequate bacteriological quality.
2.7. Statistical analysis
Data for chemical composition, energy value, pH, overall liking and purchase intent were evaluated separately for treatment and time (days 0 and 34) or stages (blind and informed) by ANOVA. Cooking yield, instrumental color parameters, JAR data and bacteriological results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. These data were further analyzed using a Tukey test when the means were considered different (P < 0.05). Chemical composition of MSHM and MSCM was evaluated by one-way ANOVA at a 95% confidence interval.
In addition, a principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to assess the parameters that were influenced by addition of inulin and potassium chloride. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) was performed to assess if the determinant parameters contributed positively or negatively to the overall liking of the samples. Penalty analysis (PA) was used to analyze the JAR data in order to identify possible alternatives for product improvement. Pearson's correlation at a 5% significance level (P < 0.05) was performed to correlate the physicochemical and sensory data (color and texture parameters). All statistical analyses were performed using the software XLSTAT version 2012.6.08 (Addinsoft, Paris, France).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
3.1. Physicochemical and bacteriological analyses of MSHM and MSCM
MSCM and MSHM exhibited 0.43% (±0.0006) and 0.73% (± 0.0008) ash, 86.14% (±0.001) and 69.41% (± 0.0069) water, 2.34% (±0.0013) and 18.39% (± 0.0112) lipid, and 4.78% (±0.0056) and 12.62% (± 0.0044) protein, respectively. The MSHM had a higher content of lipids, ash and proteins and lower water content than the MSCM. MONTEIRO et al. (2012) also observed higher lipid and ash, but lower water content in MSHM than in MSCM.
Regarding bacterial quality, Salmonella spp. and Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus were not detected in the samples. The most probable number of thermo-tolerant coliform and TAMB counts were within the official limits (ICMSF, 1986) which was also observed by MONTEIRO et al. (2012) in mechanically separated tilapia meat.
Our results suggest that the process of obtaining mechanically separated meat was conducted appropriately, and that the use of tilapia wastes can be a viable alternative for the development of value-added products.
3.2. Physicochemical parameters of tilapia sausage
Water, ash and protein contents did not differ significantly among the treatments (P > 0.05) on both days 0 and 34 (Table 2). Tl and T3 showed higher lipid and lower carbohydrate contents than T2 and T4 (P < 0.05). This can be explained by inulin addition, replacing the MSHM in T2 and T4. In agreement with our findings, MENEGAS et al. (2013) reported that foods with added carbohydrate (inulin) as a fat replacer showed lower lipid and higher carbohydrate contents.
Although the lipid content of Tl and T3 differed from T2 and T4, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed in energy value among all treatments, regardless of storage period. Thus, in the sausages with lower fat content, the loss of energy value was offset by the increased carbohydrate levels. However, sausages made with mechanically separated tilapia meat residue still have a very low caloric value, similar to low-fat sodium reduced fresh merguez sausage (TRIKI et al, 2013). This is a desirable factor for both fish processors and consumers.
The pH values of the sausages did not differ (P > 0.05) among the treatments on days 0 and 34 of refrigerated storage. MONTEIRO et al. (2014c) also observed no difference among pH values of restructured tilapia steaks.
The samples were stored under refrigeration, and after 34 days of storage at 4 ± 1°C, the analyses were repeated. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in water, ash, protein, lipid, carbohydrate, energy value and pH values (Table 2), which indicates that the identity of the product was maintained after refrigerated storage.
With regard to cooking yield, no differences (P > 0.05) were observed among the treatments (Table 3). Similarly, HORITA et al. (2011) and MONTEIRO et al. (2014b) found no significant differences in cooking yield when NaCl was replaced with KCl in low-fat bologna and restructured tilapia steaks, respectively. However, TRIKI et al. (2013) reported that replacing sodium chloride with a salt mixture (potassium chloride, calcium chloride and magnesium chloride) increased cooking losses.
The direct relationship between fat content and cooking yield is due to the emulsion stability provided by fat. Inulin has the ability to form a gel and acts similarly to fat (FRANCK, 2002). In this study, there was no relationship between fat content and cooking yield. Similarly, BRENNAN et al. (2004) found no differences in cooking loss (fluid loss) with the inclusion of inulin in spaghetti pasta. However, ÁLVAREZ and BARBUT (2013) suggested that inulin powder produces a higher yield compared to inulin gel. FELISBERTO et al. (2015) suggested that significant fluid losses were observed in formulations containing inulin or polydextrose. Our results suggest that inulin and KC1 addition at the levels of the present study did not affect the product yield.
Color from tilapia muscle can be strongly affected by meat processing, and consequently influence consumer acceptability. Therefore, it is important to study color behavior in fish waste destined for human consumption, to predict changes that may occur in the final product (RAWDKUEN et al., 2009; MONTEIRO et al., 2014a). T4 exhibited a higher L* value (P < 0.05) than the other treatments (Table 3). MENEGAS et al. (2013) observed that the inclusion of inulin increased the lightness of dry-fermented chicken sausage. In addition, MONTEIRO et al. (2014b) observed that the L* value was intensified in restructured tilapia steaks manufactured with 50% NaCl and 50% KC1. T2 and T4 presented higher a* values (P < 0.05). These formulations had a lower lipid content (inulin added to replace MSHM). CANDOGAN and KOLSARICI (2003) noted that products with reduced lipid tend to be redder, due to concentration of lean meat, which in this study, was represented by the MSCM. T3 exhibited lower (P < 0.05) a* and b* values than the other treatments (Table 3), suggesting that replacing 50% NaCl with KC1 can affect color parameters, as also observed by MONTEIRO et al. (2014b) in tilapia products. In contrast to our findings, HORITA et al. (2011) and CANTO et al. (2014) found no difference (P > 0.05) in the a* and b* values in reduced-fat mortadella and restructured caiman steaks after replacing 50% NaCl with KC1, respectively. Nevertheless, it is important to evaluate if the differences detected with instrumental analyses will be perceived by consumers.
3.3. Bacteriological quality of tilapia sausages
No difference (P > 0.05) was observed among treatments. TAMB counts were below the limit of 7.0 log CFU/g (ICMSF, 1986) in all treatments, ranging from 3.06 to 3.38 log CFU/g. Salmonella sp., Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus and thermo-tolerant coliforms were not detected in any sausage formulation.
In the present study, the partial replacement of salts and inulin addition did not compromise the bacteriological quality of the product. DESMOND (2006) and MENEGAS et al. (2013) reported similar results. Nevertheless, the adoption of hygienic procedures before, during, and after processing is essential to obtain a product with optimum quality. Our findings suggest that the sausage-making process was conducted appropriately.
3.4. Sensory evaluation of tilapia sausages
With regard to overall liking, all treatments exhibited mean scores between "like slightly" and "like moderately" (Table 4). OLIVEIRA FILHO et al. (2010) found lower overall liking for sausages with different percentages of inclusion of minced tilapia. In this study, differences were observed among the blind samples, where T2 showed higher (P < 0.05) overall liking than T3. After the scorers received information about the products, T3 and T4 exhibited lower (P < 0.05) overall liking than Tl and T2. All formulations received mean scores between "maybe/maybe not" and "probably would buy" (Table 4), which indicates the consumer acceptability of this new product. In general, Tl and T2 showed higher scores (P < 0.05) for purchase intent than T3 and T4. The sentence "Mechanically separated tilapia meat was used to make the sausages, and its use reduces environmental pollution and encourages sustainability" submitted to the panelists did not affect (P > 0.05) the overall liking and purchase intent of all treatments. However, our results indicate that the inulin formulations had better potential, regardless of any information provided. MENEGAS et al. (2013) reported that acceptability of dry-fermented chicken sausages was not affected by inulin addition.
According to FRANCK (2002), when thoroughly mixed with water or another aqueous liquid, inulin forms a particle-gel network, resulting in a white creamy structure with a spreadable texture. This formulation can easily be incorporated into foods to replace up to 100% of the fat.
On the other hand, our findings for overall liking and purchase intent indicated that sodium reduction can be still a major challenge for the industry. Nevertheless, all formulations exhibited color, taste (bitter and salty), and texture (succulence, elasticity, and softness) attributes close to ideal (2.51 - 3.55) (Table 4). Color, salty taste, succulence and elasticity did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatments, suggesting that the consumers were unable to differentiate the low-sodium and inulin added in the formulations by these attributes. T3 showed a stronger (P < 0.05) bitter taste than T2, whereas softness was lower (P < 0.05) in T1 compared to the T4 formulation.
ARMENTEROS et al. (2012) noted that reduction of the salt content by more than 40-50% negatively affected the sensory quality of ham, especially taste, with some bitter and metallic after tastes perceived by consumers.
In agreement with our results, PALMEIRA et al. (2014a) observed taste (spicy and bitter) and texture attributes close to ideal in trout meatballs with salt replacement; however, the consumers perceived difference among formulations by these attributes. MONTEIRO et al. (2014b) found close to ideal taste (bitter and salty) and texture attributes in restructured tilapia steaks manufactured with 50% salt replacer (KCl). CANTO et al. (2014) found a salty taste and texture attributes close to ideal in restructured caiman steaks with 50% KC1. Both authors reported that consumers were not able to differentiate among treatments with respect to attributes evaluated.
Two principal components (PCI and PC2) explained 99.73% of total data variance (Fig. 1) and separated two groups (Tl and T3; T2 and T4), based mainly on lipid and carbohydrate contents, bitter taste, texture parameters, and a* and b* values. The inulin treatments (T2 and T4) were characterized by greater softness, succulence, carbohydrate, a* and b* values, with a less bitter taste and lower lipid content than Tl and T3. Taste and texture attributes were the most important for the salt-replacer formulations. T3 showed a stronger bitter taste and less softness than T4. MONTEIRO et al. (2014b) found that replacing 50% of NaCl with KC1 slightly increased the bitter taste and negatively influenced the succulence and softness. MENDOZA et al. (2001) found a softer texture in cooked meat products when the inulin was added. Our results suggest that adding inulin can minimize the negative effects of KC1 on the sensory parameters of food products.
The most important correlations were between softness and succulence (r = 1.00), between softness and elasticity (r = 1.00), between cooking yield and bitter taste (r = - 0.99), between cooking yield and salty taste (r = - 0.99), between lipid and carbohydrate (r = - 0.92) and between lipid and a* values (r = - 0.85). These correlations may explain the stronger bitter taste perceived in the formulations with salt replacer (T3 and T4), which was probably influenced by cooking yield. The direct relationship between softness and succulence as well as the inverse relationship between lipid, carbohydrate and a* values may clarify the positive effect of inulin addition on the chemical composition, color and texture parameters observed.
The PLSR model (Fig. 2) explained 99.4% of consumer acceptance (Y-axis) and 93.1% of the untrained-panel sensory scores and physicochemical parameters (X-axis), with a cumulative Q of 0.925. The X-axis parameters were considered important when their respective 'Variable Important to the Projection' was >1.0 (WOLD et al., 2001). Ash, pH and bitter taste were detrimental to overall liking whereas cooking yield, salty taste, succulence and elasticity positively contributed to overall liking (Fig. 3). With regard to cooking yield, T3 and T4 showed similar results, as did Tl and T2. This can be explained by the greater ionic strength of potassium (1.33) than sodium (0.95), which decreases the electrostatic repulsion between the peptide chains and the space between the myofibrils, retaining less water between the myofibrillar spaces (MARCHESE and BEVERIDGE, 1984; DAMODARAN et al., 2007).
Regarding to Penalty Analysis, major detrimental attributes were those with a > 0.5 penalty score and more that 20% occurrence. Tl, T2 and T3 were penalized as having tooweak color (Table 5). Color intensity {a* and b*) was lower in Tl and T3 than T2 and T4, suggesting that the panelists were unable to differentiate color among treatments. Moreover, color was not determinant for acceptability. Only formulation T3 was penalized for having a too-bitter taste. The consumers penalized the T3 and T4 formulations as having a too-weak salty taste. This results suggest that use of 50% KC1 can decrease the salt perception, which was important for product acceptability. Regarding the texture attributes, Tl, T3 and T4 were penalized as having too little succulence, and Tl and T3 as having too little elasticity. Moreover, only formulation Tl was penalized for being too soft. Apparently, KCl affected texture parameters that were determinant for acceptability, whereas inulin addition to foods together with sodium reduction may be an alternative to improve the acceptability of these products, taking into account the enhancement of taste and texture.
The effect of fiber addition in products differs, depending on the type and the level of the fiber added, as well as by the presence of other ingredients (JIMENEZ-COLMENERO et al., 2005).
Our findings indicate that the level of inulin used was sufficient to maintain the physicochemical and sensory parameters of the tilapia sausages. On the other hand, 50% KC1 as a sodium-chloride replacer negatively influenced the sensory attributes. Further studies should be performed to evaluate lower levels of KC1 and/or the use of other ingredients in this product since herbs and spices is a promising alternative to suppress or decrease the sensory effects caused by the use of KCl (AHN et al., 2004).
4. CONCLUSIONS
Sausages manufactured with mechanically separated tilapia meat represent a potential alternative for sustainable use of this waste, with high consumer acceptance. The inclusion of inulin is an option to produce a low-fat food, improve the emulsion stability, and ensure the prebiotic effect of the sausage. Replacing sodium with 50% KC1 decreased the acceptance and purchase intent of the tilapia sausages; however, the inclusion of inulin in fish products with sodium reduction is a promising technological strategy to solve possible problems with taste and texture due to KC1 addition.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful for financial support from the Fundaçâo Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), process numbers FAPERJ E-26/112.620/2012, E-26/111.130/2014 and E-26/101.403/2014; the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), process numbers CNPq 401922/2013-8 and 441987/2014-1; and the Coordenaçâo de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)/FAPERJ E-45 - PAPDRJ/2013 (E-26/101.403/2014). D.P. Bessa was supported by the Coordenaçâo de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES). The Centro de Tecnología (SENAI) de Alimentos e Bebidas is gratefully acknowledged for providing the processing-plant facilities.
REFERENCES
Ahn J., Grün LU. and Mustapha A. 2004. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of natural extracts in vitro and in ground beef. J. Food Protect. 67:148-155.
Álvarez D. and Barbut S. 2013. Effect of inulin, (3-Glucan and their mixtures on emulsion stability, color and textural parameters of cooked meat batters. Meat Sei. 94:320-327.
AMSA. 2012. "Meat color measurement guidelines" 1» Ed. American Meat Science Association, Champaign, USA.
AOAC. 2012. "Official Methods for analysis" 19" Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, USA.
APHA. 2001. "Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods" 4ih Ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
Armenteros M., Aristoy M.C., Barat J.M. and Toldrá F. 2012. Biochemical and sensory changes in dry-cured ham salted with partial replacement of sodium by a mixture of potassium, calcium and magnesium. Meat Sei. 90:361-367.
Brennan C.S., Kuri V. and Tudorica C.M. 2004. Inulin-enriched pasta: effects on textural properties and starch degradation. Food Chem. 86:189-193.
Candogan K. and Kolsarici N. 2003. Storage stability of low-fat beef frankfurters formulated with carrageenan or carrageenan with pectin. Meat Sei. 64:207-214.
Canto A.C.V.C.S., Costa Lima B.R.C., Suman S.P., Lazaro C.A., Monteiro M.L.G., Conte-Junior C.A., Freitas M.Q., Cruz A.G., Santos E.B. and Silva T.J.P. 2014. Physico-chemical and sensory attributes of low-sodium restructured caiman steaks containing microbial transglutaminase and salt replacers. Meat Sei. 96:623-632.
Cervantes B.G., Aoki N.A. and Almeida C.P.M. 2010. Aceitaçâo sensorial de biscoito de polvilho elaborado com farinha de okara e análise de dados com metodología de penalty analysis. Braz. J. Food Technol. 1: 3-10.
Conté-Júnior C.A., Fernández M. and Mano S.B. 2008. Use of carbon dioxide to control the microbial spoilage of bullfrog {Rana catesbeiana) meat. Ch. 3. In "Modern Multidisciplinary Applied Microbiology". A. Mendez-Vilas (Ed.) p. 356-361. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Germany, DE.
Damodaran S., Parkin K.L. and Fennema O.R. (Ed.). 2007. "Fennemas food chemistry" 4th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FI.
Deckelbaum R.J. and Torrejon C. 2012. The omega-3 fatty acid nutritional landscape: Health benefits and sources. J. Nutr. 142:587S-591S.
Desmond E. 2006. Reducing salt: A challenge for the meat industry. Meat Sei. 74:188-196.
Dotsch M., Busch J., Batenburg M., Liem G., Tareilus E., Mueller R. and Meijer G. 2009. Strategies to reduce sodium consumption: A food industry perspective. Food Sei. Nutr. 49:841-851.
Felisberto M.H.F., Galväo M.T.E.L., Picone C.S.F., Cunha R. and Pollonio M.A.R. 2015. Effect of prebiotic ingredients on the rheological properties and microstructure of reduced-sodium and low-fat meat emulsions. LWT - Food Sei. Technol. 60:148-155.
Franck A. 2002. Technological functionality of inulin and oligofructose. Brit. J. Nutr. 87:S287-S291.
Garda K., Sriwattana S., No H.K., Corredor J.A.H. and Prinyawiwatkul W. 2009. Sensory optimization of a mayonnaise-Type spread made with rice bran oil and soy protein. J. Food Sei. 74:248-254.
Horita C.N., Morgano M.A., Celeghini R.M.S. and Pollonio M.A.R. 2011. Physico-chemical and sensory properties of reduced-fat mortadella prepared with blends of calcium, magnesium and potassium chloride as partial substitutes for sodium chloride. Meat Sei. 89:426-433.
ICMSF. 1986. "Microorganisms in foods, sampling for microbiological analysis: principles and specific applications" 2-j Ed. International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods, Toronto, Canada.
Jimenez-Colmenero F., Ayo M J. and Carballo J. 2005. Physicochemical properties of low sodium frankfurter with added walnut: effect of transglutaminase combined with caseinate, KCl and dietary fiber as salt replacers. Meat Sei. 69:781-788.
Marchese F.T. and Beveridge D.L. 1984. Pattern recognition approach to the analysis of geometrical features of solvation: application to the aqueous hydration of lithium(l+), sodium(l+), potassium(l+), fluoride(l-), and chloride(l-) ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106:3713-3720.
Mendoza E., García M.L., Casas C. and Selgas M.D. 2001. Inulin as fat substitute in low fat, dry fermented sausages. Meat Sei. 57:387-393.
Menegas L.Z., Pimentel T.C., Garcia S. and Prudencio S.H. 2013. Dry-fermented chicken sausage produced with inulin and corn oil: Physicochemical, microbiological, and textural characteristics and acceptability during storage. Meat Sei. 93:501-506.
Montanhini Neto R. and Ostrensky A. 2013. Nutrient load estimation in the waste of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.) reared in cages in tropical climate conditions. Aquae. Res. In press.
Monteiro M.L.G., Mársico E.T., Viriato I.M., Souza J.M.L. and Conte Junior C.A. 2012. Preparation of added value by products from the waste material of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) processing. J. Aquae. Res. Dev. 3:150-155.
Monteiro M.L.G., Mársico E.T., Lázaro C.A., Ribeiro R.O.R., Jesus R.S. and Conté-Júnior C.A. 2014a. Flours and instant soup from tilapia wastes as healthy alternatives to the food industry. Food Sei. Technol. Res. 20:571-581.
Monteiro M.L.G., Mársico E.T., Lázaro C.A., Canto A.C.V.C.S., Costa Lima B.R.C., Cruz A.G. and Conte-Junior C.A. 2014b. Partial sodium replacement in tilapia steak without loss of acceptability. Food Sei. Technol. Int. In press.
Monteiro M.L.G., Mársico E.T., Lázaro C.A., Canto A.C.V.C.S., Costa Lima B.R.C., Cruz A.G. and Conté-Júnior C.A. 2014c. Effect of transglutaminase on quality characteristics of a value-added product tilapia wastes. J. Food Sei. Technol. 52: 2598-2609.
Oliveira Filho P.R.C., Netto F.M., Ramos K.K., Trindade M.A. and Viegas E.M.M. 2010. Elaboration of sausage using minced fish of Nile tilapia filleting waste. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 53:1383-1391.
Palmeira K.R., Rodrigues B.L., Gaze L., Freitas M.Q., Teixeira C.E., Mársico E.T., Cruz A.G. and Conte Junior C.A. 2014a. Use of transglutaminase, soybean waste and salt replacement in the elaboration of trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) meatball. Int. Food Res. J. 21:1597-1602.
Palmeira K.R., Mársico E.T., Doro L.H., Lemos M., Teixeira C.E., Paschoalin V.M.F., Monteiro M.L.G. and Conte-Junior C.A. 2014b. Quality of semi-prepared products from rainbow trout waste (Onchorynchus mykiss) by using different technological strategics. Food Nutr. Sei. 05:571-580.
Rawdkuen S., Sai-Ut S., Khamsorn S., Chaijan M. and Benjakul S. 2009. Biochemical and gelling properties of tilapia surimi and protein recovered using an acid-alkaline process. Food Chem. 112:112-119.
Stone H. and Sidel J.L. 1998. Quantitative descriptive analysis: developments, applications, and the future. Food Technol. 52:48-52.
Triki M., Herrero A.M., Jiménez-Colmenero F. and Ruiz-Capillas C. 2013. Storage stability of low-fat sodium reduced fresh merguez sausage prepared with olive oil in konjac gel matrix. Meat Sei. 94:438-446.
Wold S., Sjostrom M. and Eriksson L. 2001. PLS-Regression: A Basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 58:109-130.
Paper Received May 19, 2015 Accepted August 20, 2015
D. PEIREIRA BESSA, C.E. TEIXEIRA, R. MAIA FRANCO, M. QUEIROZ DE FREITAS, M.L. GUERRA MONTEIRO *, C.A. CONTE-JUNIOR, L. VARON GAZE, F. ALVES DA SILVA and E. TEIXEIRA MÁRSICO
Departament of Food Technology, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 24230-340
Departament of Food Engineering, Federal de Goiás University, Rod. Goiânia/Nova Veneza, Km 0, Goiânia,
GO, Brazil, 74690-900
*Corresponding author: Tel.: + 55 02126299545; fax: + 55 02126299541
E-mail address: [email protected]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Chiriotti Editori 2016