1. Introduction
The secondary cell wall (SCW) is typically composed of lignin, cellulose, and hemicelluloses (xylan and glucomannan and galactoglucomannans). The SCW is formed inside the primary cell wall after the cell is fully expanded. SCW structures have large impacts on the characteristics of plant cells and organ development and play important roles in the dehiscence of anthers and silique pods, enhance mechanical support of organs, facilitate water transport, and provide a barrier against invasive pathogens [1,2,3,4]. The SCW is characteristically formed in xylem vessels and fibers and is crucial in the development of secondary xylem. The deposition of secondary walls reinforces stability of these cells, allowing them to provide structural support and protection [5]. The secondary walls of anther endothecium have striated patterns similar to those in tracheary elements. These secondary wall thickenings are necessary for anther dehiscence, and they generate the tensile force necessary for the rupture of the stomium [6]. Lignification in the endodermal layer of the valve margin of silique pods is necessary for their dehiscence, generating tension via desiccation and leading to pod shattering [7,8,9].Thus, SCW provides crucial biological roles in various organs, and unveiling mechanisms behind the regulation of SCW formation has been an important topic in the plant developmental research.
Extensive studies have been performed in multiple species from angiosperms such as Arabidopsis and Zinnia elegance to resolve the transcriptional network controlling xylem vessel differentiation and SCW formation. Several proteins in the plant-specific NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2 and CUC2) transcription factor (TF) family have been found to play a central role in this process [4,10,11]. NAC TFs have been found to play important roles in plant development and environmental responses [12,13,14,15,16]. Members of this family have been reported to be involved in the ripening and softening of fleshy fruits such as citrus [17], tomato [18,19], peach [20], kiwifruit [21], and apple [22]. These TFs share an NAC domain consisting of 130–150 amino acids at their N-terminus that allows for their interaction with DNA. The NAC domain is further divided into five subdomains, A–E, from N-terminus to C-terminus, respectively [23]. NAC TFs also contain a transcriptional regulatory (TR) domain at the C-terminal region, and some NAC TFs have a transmembrane domain within the TR domain [24].
NST1, originally identified in Arabidopsis, is a member of the NAC domain transcription factor family with a highly conserved N-terminal NAC domain [2]. NST1 and NST2 act redundantly to regulate the SCW thickenings in anther walls [2], and NST1 and NST3 (also called SND1/ANAC012) redundantly regulate the SCW thickenings in interfascicular fibers of inflorescence stems, secondary xylem of hypocotyls, and silique cells [25]. During anther development, MYB26 plays a regulatory role in determining cell development, or competence for secondary thickening, and acts upstream of the lignin biosynthesis pathway presumably via NST1 and NST2 [2]. NST1 promoter activity was detected in various tissues in which lignified secondary walls develop [2]. Recent studies have shown that NSTs and orthologs positively and coordinately regulate SCW formation in several plant species [26,27,28]. Thus, NST1 is considered a master regulator for SCW formation [2,14]. Among NAC proteins, some closely related members including VND, NST, SMB, and BRN of Arabidopsis have been termed the VNS (VND, NST/SND, SMB related protein) family [29,30]. Vascular-related NAC-DOMAIN1-7 (VND1-7) proteins regulate xylem differentiation in A. thaliana [11]. VND6 and VND7 are determinants of tracheary element differentiation which is also associated with SCW deposition [11,31,32,33], whereas VND1-VND5 might induce tracheary element differentiation indirectly, for example, by inducing the expression of VND6 and VND7 [31]. VND-related Arabidopsis proteins, namely SOMBRERO (SMB), BEARSKIN1 (BRN1), and BRN2, induce ectopic SCW deposition in many cell types when overexpressed, such as root, hypocotyl, shoot meristem, and cotyledon [34,35]. Thus, VNSs have a common role to promote SCW deposition.
Functional analysis of VNS homologs from various plant species, including the wood-associated NAC domain transcription factors (PtrWNDs), BpNAC012, OsNAC29/31, and PpNAC1, demonstrated that they are functional orthologs of Arabidopsis SND1 and NST1 and are involved in the regulation of SCW biosynthesis [28,36]. The PtrWND genes are expressed in developing poplar wood. Expression of PtrWNDs in the Arabidopsis snd1nst1 double mutant rescues the SCW defect [28]. In maritime pine, PpNAC1 acted as a main regulator of phenylalanine biosynthesis, and OsNAC29 and OsNAC31 regulate cellulose synthases genes (CESAs) in rice [37,38]. These studies indicated that VNSs from evolutionary distinct plant species participated in the regulation of SCW biosynthesis and that the VNS-mediated activation of the SCW biosynthetic program is highly conserved.
Fragaria vesca, the woodland strawberry, is emerging as a model plant for the cultivated octoploid strawberry as well as the Rosaceae family due to its small and sequenced genome, diploidy (chromosome number: 2n = 14; genome size = 240 Mbp), small stature, ease of growth, short life cycle, and ease of transformation [39,40,41,42,43]. The strawberry fruit is unique in that the edible flesh is actually an enlarged receptacle tissue. The true fruit are the numerous dry achenes spreading out of the receptacle’s surface. It offers an opportunity to investigate signal coordination and communication between different organs due to strawberry’s unique fruit structure [44]. The secondary wall thickening plays a great role in plant growth and development, but information about NAC transcription factors related to SCW thickening in fleshy fruits has not yet been investigated in detail. Therefore, studies on molecular mechanisms of SCW formation in strawberry will help us to understand the SCW thickening pathways and development cycling in fleshy fruits. Recently, FcNAC1 and FaNAC035/FaRIF were cloned in strawberry, respectively, which are involved in cell wall biosynthesis and fruit ripening [45]. FcNAC1 interacts with FcPL (Fragaria chiloensis pectin lyase) and contributes to cell wall remodeling [46]. Although FcNAC1 was reported to be clustered with VND family members in the phylogenetic analysis, whether it has the ability to induce the SCW thickening as members from other species has not been tested yet. FaRIF regulates ABA biosynthesis/signaling and cell wall degradation/modification [45]. Lignin synthesis is an important pathway regulated by VNSs. VNSs may have additional significance in strawberry fruit development besides regulators of SCW development, since biosynthesis pathway of lignin and anthocyanin, an important factor of color formation in strawberry fruit, share common precursor molecules [47,48]. Balance between lignin synthesis and anthocyanin synthesis needs to be well-coordinated for proper strawberry fruit development, and regulation towards VNSs may have roles in this process.
In this study, we isolated and characterized a VNS subfamily gene in Fragaria vesca and named FvNST1b. The sequence information, subcellular localization, and expression pattern of FvNST1b were investigated. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing FvNST1b showed abnormal SCW thickening and induction of SCW-associated genes. Ectopic xylem cells were also produced by transient overexpression of FvNST1b in strawberry fruits. Our work demonstrated that FvNST1b of the NAC transcription factor family in strawberry possess conserved activity to promote SCW development, and may play critical roles in SCW formation in fruit.
2. Results
2.1. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of FvNST1b
Characterization of VNS genes from Fragaria vesca has not been performed yet. We identified Fragaria vesca VNS candidate genes from the SGR: Strawberry Genomic Resources database (
2.2. Subcellular Localization of FvNST1b Protein
As a transcription factor, FvNST1b is expected to function in the nucleus. In order to examine its subcellular localization in vivo, we generated a vector containing coding region of FvNST1b fused with GFP reporter gene. The fusion gene plasmid and GFP control plasmid were transiently transformed into Nicotiana Benthamiana (hereafter tobacco) leaves and strawberry fruits. At 3 days after injection, a strong fluorescence signal was detected in the nucleus of tobacco leaf epidermal cells (Figure 3A), and strong GFP signal in nucleus was detected in the strawberry fruits at 4 days after injection (Figure 3B). In some cells, the GFP signal was also weakly detected in the surrounding area of the nucleus presumably in cytosol or ER that may represent FvNST1-GFP protein unsorted to the nucleus. At 7 days after induction, tobacco cells with ectopic striated cell walls are formed as in the overexpression of AtNST1 reported by others (Supplemental Figure S1) [2]. Transient overexpression of FvNST3-GFP also induced similar effects (Supplemental Figure S1). We also generated stably transformed Arabidopsis plants with FvNST1-GFP. Arabidopsis transgenic seedlings also showed strong nuclear-localized GFP signals and weak cytoplasmic/ER signals in roots (Figure 3C).
2.3. Expression Analysis of the FvNST1b Gene
Tissue-specific expression analysis of FvNST1b was performed by qRT-PCR using various tissues from strawberry plants. FvNST1b displayed a differential expression pattern in F. vesca (Figure 4). FvNST1b transcripts were almost undetectable in leaf and white fruit, and its expression was detected in vegetative parts of strawberry at relatively low levels, including in roots and stems, whereas its expression in flowers and green fruits are significantly higher, with the highest level in green fruits. This observation suggested that FvNST1b mainly function in the fruits of strawberry at the earlier developmental stages.
2.4. Overexpression of FvNST1b Induces Ectopic Thickening of Secondary Walls in Various Tissues of A. thaliana
In order to test if FvNST1b has the ability to promote SCW deposition, we expressed FvNST1b-GFP ectopically under the control of the CaMV35S promoter (35S:FvNST1b-GFP) in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. The 35S:FvNST1-GFP b plants were usually smaller and grew more slowly than wild-type plants. Ectopic expression of FvNST1b-GFP induced ectopic lignified secondary wall thickening in various tissues, including anthers, stamens, ovules, stems, leaves, and root tissues as reported for the overexpression of Arabidopsis NST1 [2]. Epidermal cells with ectopic secondary wall thickening typically had a striated appearance similar to that of tracheary elements (Figure 5).
These observations suggest that the abnormal appearance of leaves and floral organs of 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plants was due to the ectopic accumulation of lignified materials, reflecting previous reports that NSTs are regulators of secondary wall thickening in various tissues.
2.5. Overexpression of FvNST1b Induces SCW Formation in Strawberry Fruits
To further confirm that FvNST1b has the ability to promote SCW deposition in strawberry fruit, we transiently overexpressed the FvNST1b gene by using the agrobacterium infiltration into S7 fruits of Fragaria vesca (Figure 6), which is at the green stage and make the transition to ripening [49]. After four days from infiltration, the 35S:FvNST1b-GFP infiltrated strawberry fruits exhibited GFP signals (Figure 6A–D). After five days, the 35S:FvNST1b-GFP infiltrated strawberry fruits exhibited enhanced lignification phenotypes, along with many cells having striated appearance similar to that of tracheary elements (Figure 6E,F,J–L). The 35S:FvNST1b-GFP infiltrated fruits tended to be more pliable and the space among seeds closer than that of 5d after the injection of PGWB505 vector-control infiltrated fruits (Figure 6G–I,M–O). Longitudinal sections of strawberry fruits stained for lignin and cell wall structure confirmed that overexpression of FvNST1b-GFP resulted in excessive SCW deposition in strawberry fruit cells, indicating their ability to promote SCW formation in strawberry fruits.
2.6. Enhanced Gene Expression of SCW Related Genes in 35S:FvNST1b Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants
To further prove the ability of FvNST1b to promote SCW development as in the orthologous genes from other species such as AtNST1, we examined the effect of FvNST1b-GFP overexpression in Arabidopsis on gene expression of known downstream genes for AtNST1 (Figure 7). We examined the expression of IRREGULAR XYLEM3 (IRX3; encodes a cellulose synthase), IRX4 (encodes a cinnamoyl CoA reductase), IRX12 (encodes a putative laccase) as genes known to be upregulated by AtNST1 overexpression [50,51,52], and HOMEOBOX GENE8 (ATHB-8), which is involved in the vascular developmental process upstream of VNDs/NSTs [53].
The expression of the IRX3, IRX4, and IRX12 genes was enhanced 1- to 10-fold in all four of the independent 35S:FvNST1b-GFP transgenic lines examined, as compared with the wild type. In contrast, ATHB-8 was not upregulated in 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plants. Our results suggest that FvNST1b has the ability to function as a crucial regulator for secondary wall thickening by inducing key downstream genes similar to their counterpart transcription factors in other plant species.
3. Discussion
Strawberry is one of the most economically important fruit crops and has been considered a genuine example of a plant showing non-climacteric fruit ripening [54,55]. The ripe strawberry fruits undergo continual softening and easily become rotten. Thus, improvement of strawberry shelf life has become an important factor in current breeding programs, even when these quality attributes are controlled by a complex genetic background [56]. Secondary wall thickening provides mechanical support for various plant tissues, and thus the SCW formation may contribute to fruit firmness [25,57]. NSTs/VNDs are master transcriptional switches regulating the developmental program of SCW biosynthesis by activating downstream transcription factors [25,58]. Although NAC transcription factors and the lignin biosynthesis have been studied in strawberry fruit development recently [45,46], their contribution regarding the molecular control of secondary wall thickening is largely unknown. In the present study, we described the isolation and characterization of FvNST1b, an NST1-like homolog from Fragaria vesca.
Amino acid sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis suggested that FvNST1b is a member of the NST class of NACs. Plant NAC domain proteins are one of the largest groups of plant-specific transcriptional factors and have been reported to participate in many developmental processes, including SCW formation and biotic and abiotic stress responses [59,60]. Amino acid sequences of NAC proteins typically contain an NAC domain; five highly conserved subdomains at the N-terminal. The five highly conserved subdomains are also present in the FvNST1b sequence. Our phylogenetic analysis placed FvNST1a and FvNST1b as the closest homolog of Arabidopsis NST1 and NST2. Indeed, results of our overexpression experiments suggested that FvNST1b and FvNST3 have the ability to promote SCW development as in Arabidopsis NSTs. In our phylogenetic analysis, we could not find counterparts for some members of the VND-related Arabidopsis proteins, namely SOMBRERO (SMB), BEARSKIN1 (BRN1), and BRN2 among strawberry VNS candidates [35]. Those proteins still have the ability to induce ectopic SCW deposition when overexpressed, but they are involved in root cap development in Arabidopsis [34,35]. It is speculated that there may be other unidentified members of the VND family or other transcription factors in strawberry to regulate the development of strawberry root caps.
FvNST1b is expressed preferentially in strawberry green fruit, suggesting that it has important roles in the regulation of strawberry fruit development. Overexpression of FvNST1b in Arabidopsis caused ectopic deposition of SCW (Figure 5), in agreement with previous studies. In addition, overexpression of FvNST1b in strawberry fruits also caused ectopic deposition of SCW along with lignin accumulation, fruit shrinkage, and fruit color change. Anthocyanin contributes to the fruit color in strawberry. Biosynthetic pathways for lignin and flavonoids, including anthocyanin, share common precursors from the general phenylpropanoid pathway [48]. Several TF genes in the MYB family are reported to co-repress or co-activate genes involved in the biosynthesis of lignin and flavonoids. There are also cases of regulation towards lignin or flavonoid synthesis to achieve proper balance of carbon flow between lignin and flavonoids. Some of those members such as AtMYB20 are reported to be under regulation by VNSs [61]. Thus, VNSs in strawberry including FvNST1b may contribute to co-regulate and/or balance lignin deposition and anthocyanin synthesis, which is a crucial factor for strawberry fruit quality and commercial value. Future analysis of contribution of VNSs on the regulation of flavonoid-synthesis-related genes will be important to further prove this idea.
A nuclear localization signal was predicted within FvNST1b amino acid sequences, and the transient transformation of tobacco and strawberry fruit cells with FvNST1b fused to a reporter gene showed that FvNST1-GFP localizes to the nucleus. Furthermore, nuclear localization was detected in 35S:FvNST1b-GFP transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Other members of this NAC family also exhibited nuclear localization: an NAC from S. lycopersicum was shown to be located in the nucleus when ectopically expressed in onion epidermal cells, as was also the case for AtNAC2 [62]. MtNST1 from alfalfa, described as a SCW master switch, was also identified in the nucleus of epidermal tobacco cells [63]. The tomato SlNAC3 has been localized in the nucleus of onion epidermal cells by transient expression analysis [62]. Seven GhSWN proteins from cotton all located in the nucleus and were consistent with their functions as transcription factors [27]. In order to test whether FvNST1b has ability to activate SCW-related genes as in AtNSTs, the expression of IRX3, IRX4, IRX12, and ATHB-8 were examined in 35S:FvNST1b transgenic plants, which are involved in the differentiation of tracheary elements upstream or downstream of AtNSTs [2]. IRX3, IRX4, and IRX12 were upregulated in 35S:FvNST1b transgenic plants. In contrast, ATHB-8 was not regulated in 35S:FvNST1b plants, which is in line with previous reports in Arabidopsis. These results show that FvNST1b is a positive regulator of secondary wall thickening. Induction of downstream genes of AtNST1 in transgenic 35S:FvNST1b Arabidopsis plants further support the idea that FvNST1b acts as a transcriptional factor to regulate downstream processes of SCW development.
In summary, an NST1-like gene, FvNST1b, was isolated and characterized from strawberry. FvNST1b has high sequence similarity to other NSTs homologs and contained the well-conserved NAC domain. The FvNST1b protein mainly localizes in the nucleus. FvNST1b is highly expressed in young fruit. In addition, overexpression of FvNST1b caused ectopic deposition of SCW and upregulated the expression of genes related to the differentiation of tracheary elements such as IRX3, IRX4, and IRX12 in transgenic Arabidopsis. Moreover, overexpression of FvNST1b in strawberry fruits also caused ectopic deposition of SCW along with lignin accumulation and fruit shrinkage. These results suggest that FvNST1b is a transcription factor promoting SCW thickening in strawberry. Although we were unable to detect any expression of FvNST1a in strawberry fruit, we also showed that at least another closely related member, FvNST3, which is expressed in fruit, has a similar function. Functional redundancy as well as their specialization will be explored in the future. The evidence provided will contribute to understanding the regulatory network that takes place during the development and ripening of strawberry fruit.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Diploid strawberry plants (Fragaria vesca), Yellow Wonder 5AF7 (YW5AF7) [40], planted in pots (90 mm × 90 mm × 90 mm) were used in this study. The seedlings were grown and maintained in a growth room with the following conditions: 22 °C, 60% humidity, and a 16-h photoperiod. Hand pollination was performed by using downy water bird feather to obtain pollinated fruit. Samples of root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit were collected for tissue-specific expression assays. For Arabidopsis transformation, Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) was used and grown in soil at 22 °C with 16 h of light daily.
4.2. DNA Preparation and Gene Cloning
Genomic DNA (gDNA) of strawberry samples was isolated by the CTAB method. To clone the FvNST1b gene, the AtNST1 protein was used for a BLAST search in the strawberry genome GBrowse (
4.3. Bioinformatics Analysis
The amino acid sequence of FvNST1b was downloaded in JGI (
4.4. Construction of Plasmid DNA
The GATEWAY™ conversion technology (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was used in the experiment. To generate the FvNST1b overexpression vector, full-length FvNST1b DNA (1541 bp) was amplified and inserted into the PDONR221 vector under the treatment of BP Enzyme (Invitrogen). The entry vector DNAs were transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α cells and sequenced. The PDONR221-FvNST1b was treated with LR Enzyme (Invitrogen) and cloned into the PGWB505 vector containing the GFP reporter gene to generate PGWB505-FvNST1b-GFP.
4.5. Transient Expression of FvNST1b in Nicotiana Benthamiana Leaves and Sub-Cellular Localization Analysis
PGWB505-FvNST1b vector was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by thermal shock in liquid nitrogen. Transformed bacteria were plated on a selective medium yeast mold agar containing kanamycin, hygromycin, and rifampicin at a final concentration of 100 µg/mL each. Resistant colonies were analyzed by PCR for the presence of full-length FvNST1b gene using the primers mentioned above. A positive colony was cultured in selective LB liquid medium and incubated at 28 °C until an O.D.600 between 0.8 and 1.0, and then the cells were resuspended in infection buffer and shaken for 2 h at 28 °C. A 1-mL syringe was used to inject the agrobacterium suspension into the abaxial face of young tobacco leaves (two weeks old), and samples were analyzed after two days of infiltration. Subcellular localization of FvNST1b in transient-transformed leaf samples was analyzed through visualization of the tissue under a confocal fluorescence microscope (Leica Confocal microscope SP8X; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany ) with a 10× objective lens, a 488 nm laser from tunable white light laser for excitation, and a 499 nm to 551 nm bandwidth for detection.
4.6. Gene Expression Level Analysis
Total RNA from the strawberry samples was extracted using the polysaccharide and polyphenolics-rich RNAprep Pure Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China); cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Perfect Real Time) (Takara). Total RNA of Arabidopsis was extracted using the PLANT RNA Kit (omega). The cDNA samples were diluted 1:5 with water; 2 μL of the diluted cDNA was used as a template for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed in the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara). The PCR program included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, and 30 s at 57 °C. Each sample represented three biological replicates; each of them included four technical replicates. The relative expression levels of target genes were calculated with the formula 2−ΔΔCT in strawberry and 2−ΔCT in Arabidopsis.
In strawberry, the Actin gene was used as the internal control. The gene-specific primers used were as follows: 5′-GCC AGA AAG ATG CTT ATG TCG GTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGG GGC AAC ACG AAG CTC AT-3′ (reverse) for Actin as in the previous publication from others [49]; 5′- ATG GTT GTT GGA TTG GAC TTT GG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TAG ACG TAA CAC CCT GCC TGC-3′ (reverse) for FvNST1b with primer efficiency of 95.3% calculated by 1:10 serial dilution standard curve containing 5 points. In Arabidopsis, the internal control Actin gene was used in the qRT-PCR analysis. The gene-specific primers used were as follows according to a previous publication from others [2]: 5′- CCA CAT GCT ATT CTG CGT TTG GAC C -3′ (forward) and 5′- CAT CCC TTA CGA TTT CAC GCT CTG C-3′ (reverse) for Actin; 5′-GGC AAA CTC AAG TGG CTT GAG CG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TAA CTC CGC TCC ATC TCA ATT CC-3′ (reverse) for IRX3; 5′-CGT TAT CTC CTA GCC GAG AGT GCT C-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGC CAT TTT CCA CGG ATT CTT GCG ATG C-3′ (reverse) for IRX4; 5′-GGT GGA TGG GTC GTC ATG AGA TTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGT GGC GTG ATG TTG ATA TGT CGC CC-3′ (reverse) for IRX12; 5′-TGT GTT GCT CAC TCA AGG CCT TA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGT CGA AGA TCT TGT CGA GAG TGA-3′ (reverse) for AtHB-8.
4.7. Arabidopsis Transformation
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain mentioned earlier were transformed into wild-type Arabidopsis plants using the floral dip method. Transgenic seedlings were selected on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar plates containing 50 mg/L hygromycin and 200 mg/L Timentin; antibiotic-resistant plants were then tested by GFP signal and separation ratio to confirm the presence of the transgene. Four independent lines of the T3 generation were randomly chosen for further analysis.
4.8. Transient Overexpression of FvNST1b in Strawberry Fruit
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 mentioned above was used to perform transient expression analyses in strawberry fruits [64]. For Agrobacterium infection, the Agrobacterium suspension was injected into the fruit using a syringe of 1 mL capacity. To do this, the needle tip was inserted into the fruit center from the top, and then the Agrobacterium suspension was slowly and evenly injected into the fruits until the strawberry fruit was completely infected. After the infection, the fruits were incubated under the conditions required for the different experimental aims. The effect of overexpression was evaluated by examining the changes in both reporter gene expression and related phenotypes after Agrobacterium infection.
4.9. Fruit Sections and Staining
The infected strawberry fruits were embedded in 10% agarose gel at 7 days after, and 200 µm thick sections were cut with a vibratome. Strawberry fruit sections and Arabidopsis seedlings were fixed with 4% PFA for 60–120 min at 23–25 °C temperature with vacuum treatment. After fixation, the materials were washed twice for 1 min in 1 × PBS and moved to the clearing solution. After rinsing in 1 × PBS, the plant material was transferred to the ClearSee solution [65] and cleared overnight at room temperature. We prepared 0.1% Auramine O in ClearSee solution and the materials were stained overnight. Then, the materials were washed for at least 1 h with gentle shaking. The materials were transferred to 0.1% Calcofluor White in ClearSee solution and stained for 30 min; the materials were washed in ClearSee for 30 min with gentle shaking. Materials were analyzed with Leica TCS SP8X inverted confocal microscope. Imaging Calcofluor White was performed by a 405-nm diode laser for excitation and detection band width at 425–475 nm. Imaging Auramine O was performed with 488 nm from a tunable white light laser and band width detected at 505–530 nm.
Conceptualization, X.D. and S.N.; methodology, X.D.; investigation, X.D., B.Z. and C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.D.; writing—review & editing, B.Z., C.L. and S.N.; supervision, S.N.; project administration, S.N.; funding acquisition, S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
We acknowledge T. Nakagawa at Shimane University for providing us pGWB505. We thank the Cell Biology Core facility in HBMC, FAFU for assisting imaging experiments.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 1. Amino acid sequences alignment of FvVNS and NAC proteins from Arabidopsis including AtVNSs (A–E). The proteins were initially aligned using Clustal omega. The NAC domain was marked with solid lines.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of FvVNS and AtVNS proteins. The proteins were initially aligned using Clustal omega and then submitted for phylogenetic analysis using MEGA X software. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replications. Numbers indicate bootstrap values for the clades that received support values of over 50%.
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of FvNST1b–GFP fusion protein. The tobacco leaf cells, strawberry fruit cells, and Arabidopsis were transformed with the plasmid FvNST1b–GFP or with the control vector with GFP. (A) Subcellular localization of FvNST1b-GFP fusion protein transiently expressed in tobacco leaf cells. The images of bright field, GFP and merged image of BF and GFP were shown. Scale bars represent 50 μm. (B) Subcellular localization of FvNST1b-GFP fusion protein in strawberry fruit cells. The images of bright field, GFP and merged were shown. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (C) Subcellular localization of FvNST1b-GFP fusion protein in stably transformed Arabidopsis root cells. The images of bright field, GFP and merged were shown. Scale bars represent 10 μm for zoom and 100 μm for root, respectively.
Figure 4. Analysis on tissue expression pattern of FvNST1b. Each column represented the mean of three replicates. Error bars on each column represented the standard error (S.E.) of three replicates.
Figure 5. Overexpression of FvNST1b-GFP in Arabidopsis caused abnormal plant development and ectopic deposition of SCW. (A) WT and 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plants grow on soil for 40 days. 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plants grew more slowly than wild-type plants. (B) WT and 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plants grow on soil for 21 days. 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plants showing upwardly curled rosette leaves. (C) Magnified view of 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plant in (B). (D) Leaf epidermis of a 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plant under UV illumination. (E) Ovules of Wild-type plant under UV illumination. (F) Ovules of a 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plant under UV illumination. (G) Wild-type root stained with Calcofluor White and Auramine O. (H) A root from a 35S:FvNST1b-GFP plant stained with Calcofluor White and Auramine O. Root was abnormally bent and ectopic lignified secondary wall thickening is apparent as Auramine O fluorescence signal (yellow signal, red allows). Scale bars represent 50 mm for (A), 10 mm for (B), 2 mm for (C), and 100 μm for (D–H).
Figure 6. Overexpression of FvNST1b in strawberry fruits induced ectopic deposition of SCW. (A,B) A whole fruit (A) and a section image (B) of strawberry fruit at four days after Agrobacterium infection of 35S:FvNST1b-GFP. (C,D) GFP image of a whole strawberry fruit (C) and a section (D) of a strawberry fruit at four days after Agrobacterium infection of 35S:FvNST1b-GFP. GFP signal is detected in most part of fruit sample. (E) Section image of strawberry fruit at five days after Agrobacterium infection of 35S:FvNST1b-GFP. (F) Close-up view of strawberry fruit at five days after Agrobacterium infection of 35S:FvNST1b-GFP. (G) Section image of strawberry fruit at five days after Agrobacterium infection of empty vector. (H) GFP image of strawberry fruit at five days after Agrobacterium infection of empty vector without detectable GFP signal. (I) Fruit image at five days after Agrobacterium infection of empty vector. (J–L) Images of hand-sectioned 35S:FvNST1b infected fruit stained with Calcofluor White and Auramine O. Ectopic lignified secondary wall thickening is apparent as yellow signal in fruit cells. (J,L) is a magnified image of (K), with positions indicated as squares. (M–O) Images of hand-sectioned empty vector infected fruit stained with Calcofluor White and Auramine O. (M,O) is a magnified image of (N) with positions indicated as squares. Scale bars represent 2 mm for (A–I), 100 μm for (J,L,M,O), and 1 mm for (K,N).
Figure 7. Induction of expression of genes related to the differentiation of tracheary elements in transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing FvNST1b-GFP. Expression of genes related to the differentiation of tracheary elements were analyzed in 2 WT plants as controls and 4 independent transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing FvNST1b-GFP by quantitative RT-PCR. Each bar represents the amount of the transcript of a gene relative to that of the internal control. Error bars represent ± SD (n = 3). Asterisk indicate a significant difference compared to the WT1 by t-test (****, p < 0.0001; ***, p < 0.001).
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Caño-Delgado, A.; Penfield, S.; Smith, C.; Catley, M.; Bevan, M. Reduced cellulose synthesis invokes lignification and defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.; 2003; 34, pp. 351-362. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01729.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12713541]
2. Mitsuda, N.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M. The NAC Transcription Factors NST1 and NST2 of Arabidopsis Regulate Secondary Wall Thickenings and Are Required for Anther Dehiscence. Plant Cell; 2005; 17, pp. 2993-3006. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.036004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16214898]
3. Fratzl, P.; Elbaum, R.; Burgert, I. Cellulose fibrils direct plant organ movements. Faraday Discuss.; 2008; 139, pp. 275-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b716663j] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19049001]
4. Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M. NAC transcription factors NST1 and NST3 regulate pod shattering in a partially redundant manner by promoting secondary wall formation after the establishment of tissue identity. Plant J.; 2008; 56, pp. 768-778. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03633.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657234]
5. Mauseth, J. Plant Anatomy; Blackburn Press: Caldwell, NJ, USA, 1988.
6. Keijzer, C. The processes of anther dehiscence and pollen dispersal: I. The opening mechanism of longitudinally dehiscing anthers. New Phytol.; 1987; 105, pp. 487-498. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00886.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33873908]
7. Spence, J.; Vercher, Y.; Gates, P.; Harris, N. ‘Pod shatter’in Arabidopsis thaliana Brassica napus and B. juncea. J. Microsc.; 1996; 181, pp. 195-203. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1996.111391.x]
8. Liljegren, S.J.; Ditta, G.S.; Eshed, Y.; Savidge, B.; Bowman, J.L.; Yanofsky, M.F. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature; 2000; 404, pp. 766-770. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35008089]
9. Liljegren, S.J.; Roeder, A.H.; Kempin, S.A.; Gremski, K.; Østergaard, L.; Guimil, S.; Reyes, D.K.; Yanofsky, M.F. Control of fruit patterning in Arabidopsis by INDEHISCENT. Cell; 2004; 116, pp. 843-853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00217-X]
10. Fukuda, H.; Komamine, A. Establishment of an Experimental System for the Study of Tracheary Element Differentiation from Single Cells Isolated from the Mesophyll of Zinnia elegans. Plant Physiol.; 1980; 65, pp. 57-60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.65.1.57]
11. Kubo, M.; Udagawa, M.; Nishikubo, N.; Horiguchi, G.; Yamaguchi, M.; Ito, J.; Mimura, T.; Fukuda, H.; Demura, T. Transcription switches for protoxylem and metaxylem vessel formation. Genes Dev.; 2005; 19, pp. 1855-1860. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1331305]
12. Fang, Y.; You, J.; Xie, K.; Xie, W.; Xiong, L. Systematic sequence analysis and identification of tissue-specific or stress-responsive genes of NAC transcription factor family in rice. Mol. Genet. Genom.; 2008; 280, pp. 547-563. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-008-0386-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18813954]
13. Kim, Y.S.; Kim, S.G.; Park, J.E.; Park, H.Y.; Lim, M.H.; Chua, N.H.; Park, C.M. A membrane-bound NAC transcription factor regulates cell division in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2006; 18, pp. 3132-3144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.043018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17098812]
14. Zhong, R.; Lee, C.; Ye, Z.H. Global analysis of direct targets of secondary wall NAC master switches in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant; 2010; 3, pp. 1087-1103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq062] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20935069]
15. Takada, S.; Hibara, K.-i.; Ishida, T.; Tasaka, M. The CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON1 gene of Arabidopsis regulates shoot apical meristem formation. Development; 2001; 128, pp. 1127-1135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.128.7.1127] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11245578]
16. Sablowski, R.W.; Meyerowitz, E.M. A homolog of NO APICAL MERISTEM is an immediate target of the floral homeotic genes APETALA3/PISTILLATA. Cell; 1998; 92, pp. 93-103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80902-2]
17. de Oliveira, T.M.; Cidade, L.C.; Gesteira, A.S.; Coelho Filho, M.A.; Soares Filho, W.S.; Costa, M.G.C. Analysis of the NAC transcription factor gene family in citrus reveals a novel member involved in multiple abiotic stress responses. Tree Genet. Genomes; 2011; 7, pp. 1123-1134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0400-8]
18. Zhu, M.; Chen, G.; Zhou, S.; Tu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Dong, T.; Hu, Z. A new tomato NAC (NAM/ATAF1/2/CUC2) transcription factor, SlNAC4, functions as a positive regulator of fruit ripening and carotenoid accumulation. Plant Cell Physiol; 2014; 55, pp. 119-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pct162]
19. Kou, X.; Liu, C.; Han, L.; Wang, S.; Xue, Z. NAC transcription factors play an important role in ethylene biosynthesis, reception and signaling of tomato fruit ripening. Mol. Genet. Genom.; 2016; 291, pp. 1205-1217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1177-0]
20. Zhou, H.; Lin-Wang, K.; Wang, H.; Gu, C.; Dare, A.P.; Espley, R.V.; He, H.; Allan, A.C.; Han, Y. Molecular genetics of blood-fleshed peach reveals activation of anthocyanin biosynthesis by NAC transcription factors. Plant J.; 2015; 82, pp. 105-121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12792]
21. Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Chen, X.; Wang, M.Y.; Matich, A.J.; Perez, R.L.; Allan, A.C.; Green, S.A.; Atkinson, R.G. Natural variation in monoterpene synthesis in kiwifruit: Transcriptional regulation of terpene synthases by NAC and ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3-like transcription factors. Plant Physiol; 2015; 167, pp. 1243-1258. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.254367]
22. Zhang, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, C.; Yu, J.; Li, T.; Yang, W.; Zhang, S.; Su, H.; Wang, L. A novel NAC transcription factor, MdNAC42, regulates anthocyanin accumulation in red-fleshed apple by interacting with MdMYB10. Tree Physiol.; 2020; 40, pp. 413-423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaa004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32031661]
23. Kikuchi, K.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Yoshida, K.T.; Nagato, Y.; Matsusoka, M.; Hirano, H.-Y. Molecular analysis of the NAC gene family in rice. MGG Mol. Gen. Genet.; 2000; 262, pp. 1047-1051. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00008647] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10660065]
24. Hisako, O.; Kouji, S.; Koji, D.; Toshifumi, N.; Yasuhiro, O.; Kazuo, M.; Kenichi, M.; Naoki, O.; Jun, K.; Piero, C. et al. Comprehensive analysis of NAC family genes in Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res.; 2003; 10, pp. 239-247.
25. Mitsuda, N.; Iwase, A.; Yamamoto, H.; Yoshida, M.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M. NAC transcription factors, NST1 and NST3, are key regulators of the formation of secondary walls in woody tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2007; 19, pp. 270-280. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.047043] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17237351]
26. Takata, N.; Awano, T.; Nakata, M.T.; Sano, Y.; Sakamoto, S.; Mitsuda, N.; Taniguchi, T. Populus NST/SND orthologs are key regulators of secondary cell wall formation in wood fibers, phloem fibers and xylem ray parenchyma cells. Tree Physiol.; 2019; 39, pp. 514-525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30806711]
27. Fang, S.; Shang, X.; Yao, Y.; Li, W.; Guo, W. NST- and SND-subgroup NAC proteins coordinately act to regulate secondary cell wall formation in cotton. Plant Sci.; 2020; 301, 110657. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110657]
28. Zhong, R.; Lee, C.; Ye, Z.-H. Functional Characterization of Poplar Wood-Associated NAC Domain Transcription Factors. Plant Physiol.; 2010; 152, pp. 1044-1055. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.148270]
29. Ohtani, M.; Nishikubo, N.; Xu, B.; Yamaguchi, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Goue, N.; Shi, F.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Demura, T. A NAC domain protein family contributing to the regulation of wood formation in poplar. Plant J.; 2011; 67, pp. 499-512. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04614.x]
30. Xu, B.; Ohtani, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Toyooka, K.; Wakazaki, M.; Sato, M.; Kubo, M.; Nakano, Y.; Sano, R.; Hiwatashi, Y. et al. Contribution of NAC transcription factors to plant adaptation to land. Science; 2014; 343, pp. 1505-1508. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1248417]
31. Endo, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Tamura, T.; Nakano, Y.; Nishikubo, N.; Yoneda, A.; Kato, K.; Kubo, M.; Kajita, S.; Katayama, Y. et al. Multiple classes of transcription factors regulate the expression of VASCULAR-RELATED NAC-DOMAIN7, a master switch of xylem vessel differentiation. Plant Cell Physiol.; 2015; 56, pp. 242-254. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu134]
32. Oda, Y.; Iida, Y.; Kondo, Y.; Fukuda, H. Wood cell-wall structure requires local 2D-microtubule disassembly by a novel plasma membrane-anchored protein. Curr. Biol.; 2010; 20, pp. 1197-1202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.038] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20619818]
33. Yamaguchi, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohtani, M.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Kato, K.; Demura, T. VASCULAR-RELATED NAC-DOMAIN7 directly regulates the expression of a broad range of genes for xylem vessel formation. Plant J.; 2011; 66, pp. 579-590. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04514.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21284754]
34. Willemsen, V.; Bauch, M.; Bennett, T.; Campilho, A.; Wolkenfelt, H.; Xu, J.; Haseloff, J.; Scheres, B. The NAC Domain Transcription Factors FEZ and SOMBRERO Control the Orientation of Cell Division Plane in Arabidopsis Root Stem Cells. Dev. Cell; 2008; 15, pp. 913-922. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.09.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19081078]
35. Bennett, T.; van den Toorn, A.; Sanchez-Perez, G.F.; Campilho, A.; Willemsen, V.; Snel, B.; Scheres, B. SOMBRERO, BEARSKIN1, and BEARSKIN2 regulate root cap maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2010; 22, pp. 640-654. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.072272] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20197506]
36. Hu, P.; Zhang, K.; Yang, C. BpNAC012 Positively Regulates Abiotic Stress Responses and Secondary Wall Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol.; 2019; 179, pp. 700-717. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01167]
37. Pascual, M.B.; Llebres, M.T.; Craven-Bartle, B.; Canas, R.A.; Canovas, F.M.; Avila, C. PpNAC1, a main regulator of phenylalanine biosynthesis and utilization in maritime pine. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2018; 16, pp. 1094-1104. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12854] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29055073]
38. Huang, D.; Wang, S.; Zhang, B.; Shang-Guan, K.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Wu, K.; Xu, Z.; Fu, X. et al. A Gibberellin-Mediated DELLA-NAC Signaling Cascade Regulates Cellulose Synthesis in Rice. Plant Cell; 2015; 27, pp. 1681-1696. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00015] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26002868]
39. Shulaev, V.; Sargent, D.J.; Crowhurst, R.N.; Mockler, T.C.; Folkerts, O.; Delcher, A.L.; Jaiswal, P.; Mockaitis, K.; Liston, A.; Mane, S.P. et al. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat. Genet.; 2011; 43, pp. 109-116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.740]
40. Slovin, J.P.; Schmitt, K.; Folta, K.M. An inbred line of the diploid strawberry Fragaria vesca f. semperflorens for genomic and molecular genetic studies in the Rosaceae. Plant Methods; 2009; 5, 15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-5-15]
41. Folta, K.M.; Slovin, J.P.; Atari, M.F.M.; Smith, K.; Gonzalez, L.; Needleman, H. Strawberry Transformation as a Means to Accelerate Functional and Translational Studies in the Rosaceae. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol. Anim.; 2011; 47, S21.
42. Folta, K.M.; Dhingra, A. Transformation of strawberry: The basis for translational genomics in rosaceae. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant; 2006; 42, pp. 482-490. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1079/IVP2006807]
43. Oosumi, T.; Gruszewski, H.A.; Blischak, L.A.; Baxter, A.J.; Wadl, P.A.; Shuman, J.L.; Veilleux, R.E.; Shulaev, V. High-efficiency transformation of the diploid strawberry (Fragaria vesca) for functional genomics. Planta; 2006; 223, pp. 1219-1230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0170-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16320068]
44. Kang, C.; Darwish, O.; Geretz, A.; Shahan, R.; Alkharouf, N.; Liu, Z. Genome-scale transcriptomic insights into early-stage fruit development in woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca. Plant Cell; 2013; 25, pp. 1960-1978. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.111732] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898027]
45. Martin-Pizarro, C.; Vallarino, J.G.; Osorio, S.; Meco, V.; Urrutia, M.; Pillet, J.; Casanal, A.; Merchante, C.; Amaya, I.; Willmitzer, L. et al. The NAC transcription factor FaRIF controls fruit ripening in strawberry. Plant Cell; 2021; 33, pp. 1574-1593. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab070] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624824]
46. Carrasco-Orellana, C.; Stappung, Y.; Mendez-Yanez, A.; Allan, A.C.; Espley, R.V.; Plunkett, B.J.; Moya-Leon, M.A.; Herrera, R. Characterization of a ripening-related transcription factor FcNAC1 from Fragaria chiloensis fruit. Sci. Rep.; 2018; 8, 10524. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28226-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002382]
47. Ring, L.; Yeh, S.Y.; Hucherig, S.; Hoffmann, T.; Blanco-Portales, R.; Fouche, M.; Villatoro, C.; Denoyes, B.; Monfort, A.; Caballero, J.L. et al. Metabolic interaction between anthocyanin and lignin biosynthesis is associated with peroxidase FaPRX27 in strawberry fruit. Plant Physiol.; 2013; 163, pp. 43-60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.222778]
48. Zhang, S.; Yang, J.; Li, H.; Chiang, V.L.; Fu, Y. Cooperative Regulation of Flavonoid and Lignin Biosynthesis in Plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.; 2021; 40, pp. 109-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2021.1898083]
49. Liao, X.; Li, M.; Liu, B.; Yan, M.; Yu, X.; Zi, H.; Liu, R.; Yamamuro, C. Interlinked regulatory loops of ABA catabolism and biosynthesis coordinate fruit growth and ripening in woodland strawberry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2018; 115, pp. E11542-E11550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812575115]
50. Taylor, N.G.; Scheible, W.-R.; Cutler, S.; Somerville, C.R.; Turner, S.R. The irregular xylem3 locus of Arabidopsis encodes a cellulose synthase required for secondary cell wall synthesis. Plant Cell; 1999; 11, pp. 769-779. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.5.769]
51. Jones, L.; Ennos, A.R.; Turner, S.R. Cloning and characterization of irregular xylem4 (irx4): A severely lignin-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2001; 26, pp. 205-216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01021.x]
52. Brown, D.M.; Zeef, L.A.; Ellis, J.; Goodacre, R.; Turner, S.R. Identification of novel genes in Arabidopsis involved in secondary cell wall formation using expression profiling and reverse genetics. Plant Cell; 2005; 17, pp. 2281-2295. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.031542] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15980264]
53. Baima, S.; Nobili, F.; Sessa, G.; Lucchetti, S.; Ruberti, I.; Morelli, G. The expression of the Athb-8 homeobox gene is restricted to provascular cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development; 1995; 121, pp. 4171-4182. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.121.12.4171] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8575317]
54. Cherian, S.; Figueroa, C.R.; Nair, H. ’Movers and shakers’ in the regulation of fruit ripening: A cross-dissection of climacteric versus non-climacteric fruit. J. Exp. Bot.; 2014; 65, pp. 4705-4722. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru280] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24994760]
55. Li, C.; Jia, H.; Chai, Y.; Shen, Y. Abscisic acid perception and signaling transduction in strawberry: A model for non-climacteric fruit ripening. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2011; 6, pp. 1950-1953. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.6.12.18024]
56. Zorrilla-Fontanesi, Y.; Cabeza, A.; Domínguez, P.; Medina, J.J.; Valpuesta, V.; Denoyes-Rothan, B.; Sánchez-Sevilla, J.F.; Amaya, I. Quantitative trait loci and underlying candidate genes controlling agronomical and fruit quality traits in octoploid strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa). Theor. Appl. Genet.; 2011; 123, pp. 755-778. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1624-6]
57. Sakamoto, S.; Somssich, M.; Nakata, M.T.; Unda, F.; Atsuzawa, K.; Kaneko, Y.; Wang, T.; Bagman, A.M.; Gaudinier, A.; Yoshida, K. et al. Complete substitution of a secondary cell wall with a primary cell wall in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants; 2018; 4, pp. 777-783. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0260-4]
58. Zhong, R.; Richardson, E.A.; Ye, Z.H. Two NAC domain transcription factors, SND1 and NST1, function redundantly in regulation of secondary wall synthesis in fibers of Arabidopsis. Planta; 2007; 225, pp. 1603-1611. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-007-0498-y]
59. Nuruzzaman, M.; Sharoni, A.M.; Kikuchi, S. Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. Front. Microbiol.; 2013; 4, 248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00248]
60. Zhong, R.; Lee, C.; Ye, Z.H. Evolutionary conservation of the transcriptional network regulating secondary cell wall biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci.; 2010; 15, pp. 625-632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.007]
61. Geng, P.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Zhao, C.; Wu, J.; Cao, Y.; Fu, C.; Han, X.; He, H.; Zhao, Q. MYB20, MYB42, MYB43, and MYB85 Regulate Phenylalanine and Lignin Biosynthesis during Secondary Cell Wall Formation. Plant Physiol.; 2020; 182, pp. 1272-1283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.01070]
62. Han, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Luo, Z.; Ziaf, K.; Ouyang, B.; Wang, T.; Ye, Z. Identification and expression pattern of one stress-responsive NAC gene from Solanum lycopersicum. Mol. Biol. Rep.; 2012; 39, pp. 1713-1720. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0911-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637957]
63. Zhao, Q.; Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Wang, H.; Zeng, Y.; Ding, S.Y.; Chen, F.; Dixon, R.A. An NAC transcription factor orchestrates multiple features of cell wall development in Medicago truncatula. Plant J.; 2010; 63, pp. 100-114. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04223.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20408998]
64. Fu, D.Q.; Zhu, B.Z.; Zhu, H.L.; Jiang, W.B.; Luo, Y.B. Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato fruit. Plant J.; 2005; 43, pp. 299-308. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02441.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15998315]
65. Ursache, R.; Andersen, T.G.; Marhavy, P.; Geldner, N. A protocol for combining fluorescent proteins with histological stains for diverse cell wall components. Plant J.; 2018; 93, pp. 399-412. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13784] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29171896]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Secondary cell wall thickening plays a crucial role in plant growth and development. Diploid woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) is an excellent model for studying fruit development, but its molecular control of secondary wall thickening is largely unknown. Previous studies have shown that Arabidopsis NAC secondary wall thickening promoting factor1 (AtNST1) and related proteins are master regulators of xylem fiber cell differentiation in multiple plant species. In this study, a NST1-like gene, FvNST1b, was isolated and characterized from strawberry. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis showed that the FvNST1b protein contains a highly conserved NAC domain, and it belongs to the same family as AtNST1. Overexpression of FvNST1b in wild-type Arabidopsis caused extreme dwarfism, induced ectopic thickening of secondary walls in various tissues, and upregulated the expression of genes related to secondary cell wall synthesis. In addition, transient overexpression of FvNST1b in wild-type Fragaria vesca fruit produced cells resembling tracheary elements. These results suggest that FvNST1b positively regulates secondary cell wall formation as orthologous genes from other species.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2 Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University–University of California, Riverside, Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China





