[ProQuest: [...] denotes non US-ASCII text; see PDF]
Pengli Lu 1 and Ke Gao 1 and Yang Yang 1
Academic Editor:Francisco R. Villatoro
School of Computer and Communication, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
Received 11 November 2016; Revised 18 January 2017; Accepted 26 January 2017; 2 March 2017
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Let G=(V(G),E(G)) be a simple graph on n vertices and m edges. Let di =dG (vi ) be the degree of vertex vi in G and D(G) be the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries d1 ,d2 ,...,dn . Let A(G) denote the adjacency matrix of a graph G. The Laplacian matrix and the signless Laplacian matrix of G are defined as L(G)=D(G)-A(G) and Q(G)=D(G)+A(G), respectively. Let ψ(A(G);x)=det[...](xIn -A(G)), or simply ψ(A(G)) (ψ(L(G)) and ψ(Q(G)), resp.), be the adjacency (Laplacian and signless Laplacian, resp.) characteristic polynomial of G and its roots be the adjacency (Laplacian and signless Laplacian, resp.) eigenvalues of G, denoted by λ1 (G)≥λ2 (G)≥[...]≥λn (G) (0=μ1 (G)<=μ2 (G)<=[...]<=μn (G) and ν1 (G)<=ν2 (G)<=[...]<=νn (G), resp.). The line graph of G is denoted by l(G).
The generalized characteristic polynomial of G, introduced by Cvetkovi et al. [1], is defined to be [varphi]G (x,t)=det[...](xIn -(A(G)-tD(G))). The generalized characteristic polynomial covers the cases of usual characteristic polynomial A(G) and Laplacian L(G) and signless Laplacian Q(G) polynomials of graph G, due to variation of the parameter t and, whenever necessary, replacing x by -x. We can get that the characteristic polynomials of A(G), L(G), and Q(G) are equal to [varphi]G (x,0), (-1)|V(G)|[varphi]G (-x,1), and [varphi]G (x,-1).
Let G be a connected graph. For two vertices u and v of G, the resistance distance between u and v is defined to be the effective resistance between them when unit resistors are placed on every edge of G. It is a distance function on graphs introduced by Klein and Randic [2]. The Kirchhoff index of G, denoted by Kf(G), is the sum of resistance distances between all pairs of vertices of G. For a connected graph G of order n [3], Kf(G)=n∑i=2n (1/μi ). Recently, many results on Kirchhoff index were obtained [2, 4-8]. Laplacian-Energy-Like Invariant LEL(G)=∑i=2nμi was named in [9]. The motivation for introducing LEL was in its analogy to the earlier studied graph energy and Laplacian energy [10]. Although Kirchhoff index and LEL both depend on Laplacian eigenvalues, their comparative study started only quite recently [11, 12].
Graph operations, such as the disjoint union , the join , the corona , the edge corona , and the neighborhood corona [13-17], are techniques to construct new classes of graphs from old ones. In [18], a real molecular graph of ferrocene is a join graph obtained from graphs G1 =K1 and G2 =2C5 , where 2C5 is a disjoint union of two pentagons. In [4-6, 8, 14] the resistance distance and Kirchhoff index of artificial graphs are computed. Although most of the constructed graphs in the literature are contrived, they may be of use for chemical and physical applications.
Motivated by the work above, we define two new graph operations based on subdivision graphs as follows.
The subdivision graph S(G) of a graph G is the graph obtained by inserting a new vertex into every edge of G [19]. We denote the set of such new vertices by I(G). In [15, 20], some new graph operations based on subdivision graphs were defined and the A-, L-, and Q-spectrum were computed in terms of those of the two graphs.
Let G1 and G2 be two vertex disjoint graphs. The subdivision-vertex-vertex join of G1 and G2 , denoted by G1 [ecedil]a;G2 , is the graph obtained from S(G1 ) and S(G2 ) by joining every vertex in V(G1 ) to every vertex in V(G2 ). The subdivision-edge-edge join of G1 and G2 , denoted by G1 [ecedil]d;G2 , is the graph obtained from S(G1 ) and S(G2 ) by joining every vertex of I(G1 ) to every vertex in I(G2 ).
Note that if G1 is a graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 is a graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges, then G1 [ecedil]a;G2 has n1 +m1 +n2 +m2 vertices and 2m1 +2m2 +n1n2 edges and G1 [ecedil]d;G2 has n1 +m1 +n2 +m2 vertices and 2m1 +2m2 +m1m2 edges.
Let Cn denote a cycle of order n and Pm denote a path of order m. Figure 1 depicts the subdivision-vertex-vertex join C5 [ecedil]a;P2 and subdivision-edge-edge join C5 [ecedil]d;P2 , respectively.
Figure 1: An example of subdivision-vertex-vertex join and subdivision-edge-edge join .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some useful lemmas are provided. In Section 3, we compute the generalized characteristic polynomial of the subdivision-vertex-vertex join and obtain the A-, L-, and Q-spectrum in terms of the corresponding spectrum of G1 and G2 when G1 and G2 are regular graphs. In Section 4, we compute the generalized characteristic polynomial of the subdivision-edge-edge join and obtain the A-, L-, and Q-spectrum in terms of the corresponding spectrum of G1 and G2 when G1 and G2 are regular graphs. In Section 5, as the applications, the number of spanning trees, Kirchhoff index, and LEL of the subdivision-vertex-vertex join and the subdivision-edge-edge join graphs are computed. In Section 6, we conclude the paper.
2. Preliminaries
The M-coronal ΓM (x) of an n×n matrix M is defined [16] to be the sum of entries of the matrix (xIn -M)-1 ; that is [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where 1n denotes the column vector of size n when all the entries are equal to one.
Lemma 1 (see [21]).
Let A be an n×n real matrix and let Js×t denote the s×t matrix with all entries equal to one. Then [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where α is a real number and adj(A) is the adjugate matrix of A. Moreover, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Lemma 2 (see [13]).
If M is an n×n matrix when each row sum is equal to a constant t; then, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Lemma 3 (see [22]).
Let M1 , M2 , M3 , and M4 be, respectively, p×p, p×q, q×p, and q×q matrices with M1 and M4 invertible. Then [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where M1 -M2M4-1M3 and M4 -M3M1-1M2 are called the Schur complements of M4 and M1 , respectively.
Lemma 4 (see [19]).
If G is a regular graph of degree r, with n vertices and m edges; then [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
If A=[aij ] is an m×n matrix and B is an r×s matrix, then the Kronecker product A[ecedil]7;B is defined as the mr×ns matrix with the block form [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
This is an associative operation with the property that (A[ecedil]7;B)T =AT [ecedil]7;BT and (A[ecedil]7;B)(C[ecedil]7;D)=AC[ecedil]7;BD whenever the products AC and BD exist. The latter implies (A[ecedil]7;B)-1 =A-1 [ecedil]7;B-1 for nonsingular matrices A and B. Moreover, if A and B are n×n and p×p matrices, then det[...](A[ecedil]7;B)=(det[...]A)p(det[...]B)n . The reader is referred to [23] for other properties of the Kronecker product not mentioned here.
3. Spectrum of Subdivision-Vertex-Vertex Join
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges, respectively. We first label the vertices of G1 [ecedil]a; G2 as follows. Let V(G1 )=(v1 ,v2 ,...,vn1 ), I(G1 )=(e1 ,e2 ,...,em1 ), V(G2 )=(u1 ,u2 ,...,un2 ), and I(G2 )=(e1 ,e2 ,...,em2 ). The adjacency matrix of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 can be written as follows: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where 0s×t denotes the s×t matrix with all entries equal to zero, R is the incidence matrix of G, In is the identity matrix of order n, and 1n is the column vector with all entries equal to 1. It is clear that the degrees of the vertices of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 are dG1 [ecedil]a; G2 (vi )=r1 +n2 for i=1,2,...,n1 , dG1 [ecedil]9; G2 (ei )=2 for i=1,2,...,m1 , dG1 [ecedil]a; G2 (ui )=r2 +n1 for i=1,2,...,n2 , and dG1 [ecedil]a; G2 (ei )=2 for i=1,2,...,m2 . Then the degree matrix of subdivision-vertex-vertex join can be written as follows: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
3.1. Generalized Characteristic Polynomial of G1 [ecedil]a;G2
Theorem 5.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 be an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges. Then the generalized characteristic polynomial of subdivision-vertex-vertex join of G1 and G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Proof.
Let R1 be the incidence matrix of G1 . Then, with respect to the adjacent matrix and degree matrix of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 , the generalized matrix of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 is given by [figure omitted; refer to PDF] Thus the generalized characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the Schur complement of (x+2t)Im1 . So, det[...](S)=(x+2t)m2 det[...](S1 ), where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the Schur complement of (x+2t)Im2 . So, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the Schur complement of (x+r1 t+n2 t)In1 -R1R1T /(x+2t). So, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] by Lemma 1, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Theorem 6.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges. Then
(1) the adjacency characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
(2) the Laplacian characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
(3) the signless Laplacian characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
4. Spectrum of Subdivision-Edge-Edge Join
The adjacency matrix of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 can be written as follows: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where 0s×t denotes the s×t matrix with all entries equal to zero, R is the incidence matrix of G, In is the identity matrix of order n, and 1n is the column vector with all entries equal to 1. It is clear that the degrees of the vertices of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 are dG1 [ecedil]d; G2 (vi )=r1 for i=1,2,...,n1 , dG1 [ecedil]d; G2 (ei )=m2 +2 for i=1,2,...,m1 , dG1 [ecedil]d; G2 (ui )=r2 for i=1,2,...,n2 , and dG1 [ecedil]d; G2 (ei )=m1 +2 for i=1,2,...,m2 . Then the degree matrix of subdivision-edge-edge join can be written as follows: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
4.1. Generalized Characteristic Polynomial of G1 [ecedil]d;G2
Theorem 7.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 be an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges. Then the generalized characteristic polynomial of subdivision-edge-edge join of G1 and G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Proof.
Let R1 be the incidence matrix of G1 . Then, with respect to the adjacent matrix and degree matrix of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 , the generalized matrix of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 is given by [figure omitted; refer to PDF] Thus the generalized characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the Schur complement of (x+r1 t)In1 . So, det[...](S)=(x+r2 t)n2 det[...](S1 ), where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the Schur complement of (x+r2 t)In2 . So, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the Schur complement of (x+m2 t+2t)Im1 -R1TR1 /(x+r1 t). So, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] by Lemma 4, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and by Lemma 1, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Theorem 8.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges. Then
(1) the adjacency characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
(2) the Laplacian characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
(3) the signless Laplacian characteristic polynomial of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
5. Applications
We give the number of spanning trees, the Kirchhoff index, and LEL of the two classes of join graphs, as the applications.
We can easily compute the L-spectrum of G1 [ecedil]a; G2 in terms of L-spectrum of G1 and G2 by (2) of Theorem 6.
Corollary 9.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges. Then the Laplacian spectrum of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 consists of
(1) 2, repeated m1 +m2 -n1 -n2 times;
(2) two roots of the equation x2 -(r1 +n2 +2)x+2n2 +μi (G1 )=0, for each i=2,...,n1 ;
(3) two roots of the equation x2 -(r2 +n1 +2)x+2n1 +μi (G2 )=0, for each i=2,...,n2 ;
(4) four roots of the equation x(x3 -(n1 +n2 +r1 +r2 +4)x2 + (4n1 +4n2 +2r1 +2r2 +4+r1r2 + r1n1 +r2n2 )x-4n1 -4n2 -2n1r1 -2n2r2 )=0, and the four roots are 0, ω1 , ω2 , and ω3 , respectively.
We can easily compute the L-spectrum of G1 [ecedil]d; G2 in terms of L-spectrum of G1 and G2 by (2) of Theorem 8.
Corollary 10.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges. Then the Laplacian spectrum of G1 [ecedil]d;G2 consists of
(1) m1 +2, repeated m2 -n2 times;
(2) m2 +2, repeated m1 -n1 times;
(3) two roots of the equation x2 -(m2 +2+r1 )x+r1m2 +μi (G1 )=0, for each i=2,...,n1 ;
(4) two roots of the equation x2 -(m1 +2+r2 )x+r2m1 +μi (G2 )=0, for each i=2,...,n2 ;
(5) four roots of the equation x(x3 -(m1 +m2 +r1 +r2 +4)x2 + (r1m2 +r2m1 +r2m2 +r1m1 +r1r2 + 2m1 +2m2 +2r1 +2r2 +4)x-m1r1r2 -m2r1r2 -2m1r2 -2m2r1 )=0, and the four roots are 0, γ1 , γ2 , and γ3 , respectively.
Let t(G) denote the number of spanning trees [1] of G. It is well known that if G is a connected graph on n vertices with Laplacian spectrum 0=μ1 (G)<=μ2 (G)<=[...]<=μn (G), then t(G)=(μ2 (G)[...]μn (G))/n.
Corollary 11.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges. The number of spanning trees of G1 [ecedil]a; G2 and G1 [ecedil]d; G2 are, respectively, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Proof.
For G1 [ecedil]a;G2 , the number of the vertices is n1 +m1 +n2 +m2 . By Corollary 9 and Vieta's formulas, we can obtain the following: for every μi (G1 ), ∏i=2n1 (x1x2 )=∏i=2n1 (2n2 +μi (G1 )); for every μi (G2 ), ∏i=2n2 (x1x2 )=∏i=2n2 (2n1 +μi (G2 )); for the equation x3 -(n1 +n2 +r1 +r2 +4)x2 + (4n1 +4n2 +2r1 +2r2 +4+r1r2 +r1n1 +r2n2 )x-4n1 -4n2 -2n1r1 -2n2r2 =0, ω1ω2ω3 =4n1 +4n2 +2r1n1 +2r2n2 . Therefore, we complete the proof of t(G1 [ecedil]a;G2 ) and we omit the proof of t(G1 [ecedil]d;G2 ).
The Kirchhoff index [24] Kf(G) is an important physical and chemical indicator. Let G be a connected graph of order n; then Kf(G)=n∑i=2n (1/μi ).
Corollary 12.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges; then the Kirchhoff index of G1 [ecedil]a; G2 and G1 [ecedil]d; G2 is, respectively, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Proof.
For G1 [ecedil]a;G2 , by Corollary 9 and Vieta's formulas, we can obtain the following: for every μi (G1 ), ∑i=2n1 (1/x1 +1/x2 )=∑i=2n1 [...]((x1 +x2 )/x1x2 )=∑i=2n1 [...]((r1 +n2 +2)/(2n2 +μi (G1 ))); for every μi (G2 ), ∑i=2n2 (1/x1 +1/x2 )=∑i=2n2 ((r2 +n1 +2)/(2n1 +μi (G2 ))); for the equation x3 -(n1 +n2 + r1 +r2 +4)x2 + (4n1 +4n2 +2r1 +2r2 +4+r1r2 +r1n1 +r2n2 )x-4n1 -4n2 -2n1r1 -2n2r2 =0, 1/ω1 +1/ω2 +1/ω3 = (ω1ω2 +ω2ω3 +ω1ω3 )/ω1ω2ω3 = (4n1 +4n2 +2r1 +2r2 +4+r1r2 +r1n1 +r2n2 )/(4n1 +4n2 +2r1n1 +2r2n2 ). Therefore, we complete the proof of Kf(G1 [ecedil]a;G2 ) and we omit the proof of Kf(G1 [ecedil]d;G2 ).
L E L ( G ) denotes Laplacian-Energy-Like Invariant [24]. Let G be a connected graph of order n with m edges; then LEL=LEL(G)=∑i=2nμi .
Corollary 13.
Let G1 be an r1 -regular graph on n1 vertices and m1 edges and G2 an r2 -regular graph on n2 vertices and m2 edges; then [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where Δ1 =(r1 +n2 +2)2 -4(2n2 +μi (G1 )), Δ2 =(r2 +n1 +2)2 -4(2n1 +μi (G2 )), and ω1 , ω2 , and ω3 are three roots of the equation x3 -(n1 +n2 +r1 +r2 +4)x2 + (4n1 +4n2 +2r1 +2r2 +4+r1r2 + r1n1 +r2n2 )x-4n1 -4n2 -2n1r1 -2n2r2 =0. [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where Δ3 =(m2 +2+r1 )2 -4(r1m2 +μi (G1 )), Δ4 =(m1 +2+r2 )2 -4(r2m1 +μi (G2 )), and γ1 , γ2 , and γ3 are three roots of the equation x3 -(m1 +m2 +r1 +r2 +4)x2 + (r1m2 +r2m1 +r2m2 +r1m1 +r1r2 +2m1 + 2m2 +2r1 +2r2 +4)x-m1r1r2 -m2r1r2 - 2m1r2 -2m2r1 =0.
6. Conclusions
In this paper, two classes of join graphs, G1 [ecedil]a; G2 and G1 [ecedil]d; G2 , are constructed by graph operations. The formulas of generalized characteristic polynomial of the two graphs are obtained by using block matrix and Schur complement. For regular graphs G1 and G2 , we characterize the A-, L-, and Q-spectrum of G1 [ecedil]a; G2 and G1 [ecedil]d; G2 in terms of the corresponding spectrum of G1 and G2 , and by the L-spectrum, we get the number of spanning trees, Kirchhoff index, and LEL. But for nonregular graphs G1 and G2 , we cannot determine the spectrum of G1 [ecedil]a;G2 and G1 [ecedil]d;G2 . The most difficult problem is that we cannot find the rule of the block matrices to deduce a simple result. Therefore, we should try to find new method to solve the problem.
Acknowledgments
This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11361033).
[1] D. S. Cvetkovi, M. Doob, H. Sachs, Spectra of Graphs. Theory and Applications , Johann Ambrosius Barth, Heidelberg, Germany, 1995. 3rd.
[2] D. J. Klein, M. Randic, "Resistance distance,", Journal of Mathematical Chemistry , vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 81-95, 1993.
[3] I. Gutman, B. Mohar, "The quasi-Wiener and the Kirchhoff indices coincide,", Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences , vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 982-985, 1996.
[4] R. B. Bapat, S. Gupta, "Resistance distance in wheels and fans,", Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics , vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2010.
[5] J.-B. Liu, X.-F. Pan, F.-T. Hu, "The {1}-inverse of the Laplacian of subdivision-vertex and subdivision-edge coronae with applications,", Linear and Multilinear Algebra , vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 178-191, 2017.
[6] Y. Yang, "The Kirchhoff index of subdivisions of graphs,", Discrete Applied Mathematics. The Journal of Combinatorial Algorithms, Informatics and Computational Sciences , vol. 171, pp. 153-157, 2014.
[7] Y. Yang, D. J. Klein, "A recursion formula for resistance distances and its applications,", Discrete Applied Mathematics , vol. 161, no. 16-17, pp. 2702-2715, 2013.
[8] Y. Yang, D. J. Klein, "Resistance distance-based graph invariants of subdivisions and triangulations of graphs,", Discrete Applied Mathematics , vol. 181, pp. 260-274, 2015.
[9] J. Liu, B. Liu, "A Laplacian-energy-like invariant of a graph,", MATCH. Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry , vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 355-372, 2008.
[10] I. Gutman, B. Zhou, B. Furtula, "The Laplacian-energy like invariant is an energy like invariant,", MATCH. Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry , vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 85-96, 2010.
[11] B. Arsi, I. Gutman, K. C. Das, K. Xu, "Relations between Kirchhoff index and Laplacian-energ-like invariant,", Bulletin de l'Académie Serbe des Sciences et des Arts, Classe des Sciences Médicales , vol. 144, pp. 61-72, 2012.
[12] K. C. Das, K. Xu, I. Gutman, "Comparison between Kirchhoff index and the Laplacian-energy-like invariant,", Linear Algebra and Its Applications , vol. 436, no. 9, pp. 3661-3671, 2012.
[13] S.-Y. Cui, G.-X. Tian, "The spectrum and the signless Laplacian spectrum of coronae,", Linear Algebra and Its Applications , vol. 437, no. 7, pp. 1692-1703, 2012.
[14] X. G. Liu, J. Zhou, C. J. Bu, "Resistance distance and Kirchhoff index of R-vertex join and R-edge join of two graphs,", Discrete Applied Mathematics , vol. 187, pp. 130-139, 2015.
[15] X. Liu, S. Zhou, "Spectra of the neighbourhood corona of two graphs,", Linear and Multilinear Algebra , vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1205-1219, 2014.
[16] C. McLeman, E. McNicholas, "Spectra of coronae,", Linear Algebra and its Applications , vol. 435, no. 5, pp. 998-1007, 2011.
[17] S. Wang, B. Zhou, "The signless Laplacian spectra of the corona and edge corona of two graphs,", Linear and Multilinear Algebra , vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 197-204, 2013.
[18] G. Wilkinson, M. Rosenblum, M. C. Whiting, R. B. Woodward, "The structure of iron bis-cyclopentadienyl,", Journal of the American Chemical Society , vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 2125-2126, 1952.
[19] D. M. Cvetkovi, P. Rowlinson, H. Simi, An Introduction to the Theory of Graph Spectra , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010.
[20] X. Liu, P. Lu, "Spectra of subdivision-vertex and subdivision-edge neighbourhood coronae,", Linear Algebra and Its Applications , vol. 438, no. 8, pp. 3547-3559, 2013.
[21] X. G. Liu, Z. H. Zhang, "Spectra of subdivision-vertex and subdivision-edge joins of graphs," https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0619v3
[22] F. Z. Zhang, The Schur Complement and Its Applications , of Numerical Methods and Algorithms, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[23] R. A. Horn, C. R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis , Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[24] S. Pirzada, H. A. Ganie, I. Gutman, "On Laplacian energy like invariant and Krichhoff index,", MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry , vol. 73, pp. 41-59, 2015.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2017 Pengli Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
The Kirchhoff index of G is the sum of resistance distances between all pairs of vertices of G in electrical networks. LEL(G) is the Laplacian-Energy-Like Invariant of G in chemistry. In this paper, we define two classes of join graphs: the subdivision-vertex-vertex join [subscript]G1[/subscript] [ecedil]a;[subscript]G2[/subscript] and the subdivision-edge-edge join [subscript]G1[/subscript] [ecedil]d;[subscript]G2[/subscript] . We determine the generalized characteristic polynomial of them. We deduce the adjacency (Laplacian and signless Laplacian, resp.) characteristic polynomials of [subscript]G1[/subscript] [ecedil]a;[subscript]G2[/subscript] and [subscript]G1[/subscript] [ecedil]d;[subscript]G2[/subscript] when [subscript]G1[/subscript] is [subscript]r1[/subscript] -regular graph and [subscript]G2[/subscript] is [subscript]r2[/subscript] -regular graph. As applications, the Laplacian spectra enable us to get the formulas of the number of spanning trees, Kirchhoff index, and LEL of [subscript]G1[/subscript] [ecedil]a;[subscript]G2[/subscript] and [subscript]G1[/subscript] [ecedil]d;[subscript]G2[/subscript] in terms of the Laplacian spectra of [subscript]G1[/subscript] and [subscript]G2[/subscript] .
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer