Content area
Full Text
Advancing the study of transnational politics requires clarification or elaboration of key concepts, such as "globalization" and "transnational." Global feminism, as a particular aspect of transnational politics (or globalization) as well as a particular form of feminist organizing, presents new challenges and revives old problems for political science and women's studies scholarship: What is feminism? What are feminist movements? How do they relate to women's movements? Men's movements? What would it mean for a social movement to be "global"? How do movements fit into our conceptualizations of political actors? Are they interest groups? Nongovernmental organizations? Policy entrepreneurs? This conceptual terrain needs to be carefully charted in order to permit systematic investigation of the many intriguing empirical questions that the phenomenon of global feminism suggests: How can we account for the proliferation of women's organizing transnationally at a time when national and even local movements appear to be foundering on the shoals of "differences among women"? Has feminist mobilization always been increased by globalization, as Myra Marx Ferree (p. 4) suggests? What, if any, forms or aspects of feminist transnational mobilization are new? Is there any truly transnational or transregional activism, any such thing as global or transnational solidarity among women? Are all women's movements fundamentally national in character? Does feminist discourse share any similarities across national boundaries, so that the concept of "feminist movement" can be said to refer to sufficiently similar phenomena in different national contexts? Can conceptual language developed to apply to women's movements in the context of domestic (most often national) politics be applied to transnational or global forms of political organizing and...