Content area
Full Text
When I decided to write about edgework over twenty-five years ago, I had no idea that I had put myself on a pathway of sustained engagement with one of the most important sociologists of the twentieth century. As an academic sociologist in the early stages of my career, I felt that I had a good general understanding of Erving Goffman's most important ideas and a proper appreciation of his unique contributions to my discipline. Although I had a certain affinity for Goffman's brand of sociology, I deliberately avoided pressure from close friends and colleagues to become a "Goffmaniac," the kind of disciple that Goffman's work often seems to inspire. However, when I took up the task of formulating a theoretical explanation of volitional risk taking, I had no choice but to dig more deeply into Goffman's work, in particular, his famous essay entitled Where the Action Is (1967), which at that time was one of the very few sociological theories of risktaking behavior. The most immediate result of this excavation was a better understanding of the theoretical differences between my concept of edgework and Goffman's notion of action, but the long term consequence was a profound appreciation of the power and relevance of Goffman's ideas for making sense of the contemporary social world.
This appreciation of Goffman's work has been enhanced in recent years by my emersion in a body of theory and research that offers a unique perspective on the emerging social conditions that account for the growing relevance of Goffman's theory of action. The work of Anthony Giddens, Ulrich Beck, and their collaborators on risk society and reflexive modernization has given me a deeper understanding of the importance of risk and uncertainty as central problems faced by members of twenty-first century global society. Moreover, the risk society perspective has directly impacted my own research by raising an intriguing question: In a world in which everyone is forced to contend with new global risks and expanding uncertainties in everyday life, why do increasing numbers of people seem to find pleasure and satisfaction in taking unnecessary risks? In accordance with the organizing theme of the Special Issue, my paper addresses this question by exploring potentially useful links between Goffman's ideas on risk and fatefulness...