Content area
Full Text
CANE, Peter ed. The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Hart Publising, 2010. ix + 297 pp. Cloth, £50.00- H. L. A. Hart spent the 1956-57 academic year as a visiting professor at Harvard. He already had most of his path-breaking 1961 book, The Concept of Law, in draft from his lectures as Oxford's chair holder in jurisprudence. The year was exceptionally productive for Hart and included one of the most storied episodes in the history of Anglo-American legal philosophy. Hart was invited to deliver the Oliver Wendell Hohnes Lecture at Harvard Law School and devoted it to a defense of legal positivism, especially its insistence on the separation between law and morality. Lon L. Fuller, the Carter Professor of General Jurisprudence at Harvard, reportedly paced the back of the lecture hall "like a hungry Lion" and, later, Hart's lecture and Fuller's lengthy reply were published together in the Harvard Law Review. The Hart-Fuller Debate has since become one of the most famous exchanges in the history of jurisprudence, a staple of both law school and philosophy syllabi for half a century. The two articles have long been taken to encapsulate some central questions disputed by defenders of positivism and natural law including the relationship between legal validity and morality, the compatibility of the rule of law with tyranny, and the disposition of the famous Nazi-era grudge informer cases. The fiftieth anniversary of the debate was commemorated by conferences at the Australian National University and New York University, and it is the proceedings of the former meeting that make up the volume under review. (Papers from the latter were published in the 2008 volume of the New York University Law Review.)