It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In 2017–2019 a surge of Shispare Glacier, a former tributary of the once larger Hasanabad Glacier (Hunza region), dammed the proglacial river of Muchuhar Glacier, which formed an ice-dammed lake and generated a small Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF). Surge movement produced the highest recorded Karakoram glacier surface flow rate using feature tracking (~18 ± 0.5 m d−1) and resulted in a glacier frontal advance of 1495 ± 47 m. The surge speed was less than reports of earlier Hasanabad advances during 1892/93 (9.3 km) and 1903 (9.7 km). Surges also occurred in 1973 and 2000–2001. Recent surges and lake evolution are examined using feature tracking in satellite images (1990–2019), DEM differencing (1973–2019), and thermal satellite data (2000–2019). The recent active phase of Shispare surge began in April 2018, showed two surface flow maxima in June 2018 and May 2019, and terminated following a GLOF on 22–23 June 2019. The surge likely had hydrological controls influenced in winter by compromised subglacial flow and low meltwater production. It terminated during summer probably because increased meltwater restored efficient channelized flow. We also identify considerable heterogeneity of movement, including spring/summer accelerations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Centre for Glaciology, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehradun, India (GRID:grid.470038.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0701 1755)
2 COMET, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); University of Arizona, Department of Hydrology & Atmospheric Sciences, Arizona, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X)
3 Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Waterloo, Canada (GRID:grid.268252.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 1958 9263)
4 University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Department of Geology, Dayton, USA (GRID:grid.266231.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2175 167X)
5 Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.423138.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 3991)
6 National Institute of Technology, Department of Applied Geology, Raipur, India (GRID:grid.444688.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1775 3076)
7 Department of Geography, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India (GRID:grid.428366.d)