High fructose corn syrup induces metabolic dysregulation and altered dopamine signaling in the absence of obesity

Abstract

The contribution of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) to metabolic disorder and obesity, independent of high fat, energy-rich diets, is controversial. While high-fat diets are widely accepted as a rodent model of diet-induced obesity (DIO) and metabolic disorder, the value of HFCS alone as a rodent model of DIO is unclear. Impaired dopamine function is associated with obesity and high fat diet, but the effect of HFCS on the dopamine system has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to test the effect of HFCS on weight gain, glucose regulation, and evoked dopamine release using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. Mice (C57BL/6) received either water or 10% HFCS solution in combination with ad libitum chow for 15 weeks. HFCS consumption with chow diet did not induce weight gain compared to water, chow-only controls but did induce glucose dysregulation and reduced evoked dopamine release in the dorsolateral striatum. These data show that HFCS can contribute to metabolic disorder and altered dopamine function independent of weight gain and high-fat diets.

About the Authors:

Allison M. Meyers

Contributed equally to this work with: Allison M. Meyers, Devry Mourra

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University New York, Flushing, New York, United States of America, Department of Psychology, CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative, City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America

Devry Mourra

Contributed equally to this work with: Allison M. Meyers, Devry Mourra

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University New York, Flushing, New York, United States of America, Department of Psychology, CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative, City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America

Jeff A. Beeler

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University New York, Flushing, New York, United States of America, Department of Psychology, CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative, City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America

ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1344-1337

Introduction

Obesity has increased dramatically in recent decades [1], a phenomenon widely associated with the so-called ‘western diet’: energy-dense, highly palatable foods with high fat and sugar content [2]. More recently, there has been an interest in the possible contribution of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) to the rise in obesity. Used widely in nearly all commercial foods, from bread to beverages [3], HFCS consumption has risen in parallel with increasing body weights and rates of obesity [4]. While evidence suggests links between increased sugar consumption and the rising prevalence of obesity and metabolic disorder [5–7], the contribution of HFCS per se, because of its higher fructose content, has been controversial with arguments for [4,8–11] and against [12–15] HFCS constituting a specific liability beyond increased sugar consumption generally.

HFCS-55, containing 55% fructose, 42% glucose, and 3% other saccharides, is primarily used in liquid products [3]. Fructose, including HFCS with its higher fructose content, is more lipogenic compared to other sugars [11,16] and is metabolized differently [17]. Where glucose can enter the cells through GLUT4 (various tissues), GLUT3 (neurons), GLUT2 (homeostasis though uptake in intestine), and GLUT1 (astrocytes and insulin-independent), fructose primarily uses GLUT5, which is not found in pancreatic beta cells, is specific for fructose, and not responsive to insulin [18]. GLUT2 also transports fructose non-selectively, though this low-affinity transporter is involved in transport primarily in the liver, intestine and kidneys [19].

While evidence suggests that fructose [7,11,20,21], and possibly HFCS [22,23] can contribute to the development of metabolic disorder, whether it contributes to weight gain is controversial. Some studies have reported weight gain with fructose or HFCS consumption [23,24] while others have not [21,25,26]. Furthermore, obesity has been associated with altered dopamine (DA) signaling in both human [27–29] and animal studies [30–32]. Reduced dopamine signaling has been suggested to promote compulsive overeating, likening obesity to a dopamine-mediated addiction to food [33,34]. When alterations in dopamine function are observed under high fat diet (HFD), it is difficult to disentangle the potential contribution of increased weight, altered macromolecule composition of the diet per se, and effects secondary of metabolic disorder, including altered insulin and leptin signaling and resistance. Here, we examine whether prolonged consumption of HFCS alters dopamine signaling in the dorsal striatum, a region implicated in reinforcement learning, habit and motivated behaviors, including critical for regulating feeding [35–37].

Materials and methods

Animals

Male and female C57BL/6 mice (3–4 months at start of feeding protocol) were used for all experiments. Housing for mice was maintained in a 12:12-hour light-dark cycle. All experiments performed during light cycle. All mice were group housed in cages containing 2–4 mice per cage. Mice were not singly housed to avoid inducing stress that could affect both feeding behaviors and dopamine function. All animal experiments were approved by the Queens College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines for the responsible use of animals in research.

Diet protocol

Mice were placed into either a control group (n = 20) receiving chow diet and water or a high fructose corn syrup (HFCS-chow) group (n = 25) receiving chow diet and a 10% solution of HFCS-55 (55% fructose, 42% glucose, 3% other saccharides, Best Flavors, CA) in their drinking water. Body weight was measured weekly. Water/HFCS was changed and measured twice weekly, total consumption was divided by number of mice in the cage to estimate individual consumption. Sufficient HFCS was available such that it was not a limited, competitive resource. HFCS was kept refrigerated during storage. Food was changed twice weekly, but consumption among group housed mice could not reliably be measured. Though single housing facilitates accurate individual measurement of consumption, it also induces stress, which could alter consumption, metabolism and induce stress-related changes in dopamine and insulin function.

Glucose challenge

Prior to glucose challenge (at week 15), mice were food and water deprived for 6 hours. Blood glucose was measured with a glucometer (One Touch Ultra 2, Johnson & Johnson) using tail blood. After measuring baseline fasting glucose, dextrose (1 g/kg) was administered via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection and blood glucose measured at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following injection.

Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry

Following the glucose challenge at week 15, a subset of HFCS+Chow mice (n = 8) and Chow mice (n = 11) were used for fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) and reuptake analysis. Mice were anesthetized with urethane (1.8 g/kg i.p.) and placed into a stereotaxic frame. A carbon-fiber microelectrode (CFMEs, constructed as in [38]) was lowered into the dorsolateral striatum (DLS: AP, +1.1 mm; lat, 2.0 mm; DV, 2.5mm, from the cortical surface) and stimulated dopamine release was measured as described previously [38,39]. Briefly, a bipolar stimulating electrode was lowered into the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNC, AP, -3.16 mm; lat, 0.8 mm; DV, 4.3 mm). A chloride-coated silver wire (Ag/AgCl) reference electrode was implanted contralateral to the CFME and secured with a stainless-steel screw and dental cement. A potential applied to the CFME at -.4 V was ramped up to 1.3 V and back, compared to the reference (Ag/AgCl) electrode, with a scan rate of 400 V/s held at -0.4V between scans. CFMEs were cycled at 60 Hz for 15 minutes and then returned to 10 Hz for ten minutes to stabilize background current. Experimental measurements were made at a scan rate of 10Hz. During stimulation protocols, for each 15s recording, background was digitally subtracted by averaging the background current obtained from ten scans selected from prior to stimulation onset [38]. To optimize dopamine signals, both the CFMEs and stimulating electrodes were systemically lowered in .1 mm increments. At each increment, a train of current (24 pulses, 4 ms per pulse, 60 Hz, 150 μA) were used to evoke a reproducible dopamine release. After optimization, dopamine was evoked using 5 pulses of stimulation administered at 5, 20, and 60 Hz, with 2 minutes between stimulations. A cyclic voltammogram electrochemically identified dopamine with a peak oxidation at .6 V and a reduction peak at .2 V. Following recording, recording site was marked with trypan blue (80 nL) and histology performed to determine placement of working electrodes. The CFMEs were calibrated following the experiment using a micro flow cell and 1 μM dopamine solution.

Dopamine reuptake

Demon Voltammetry Analysis Software was used to model dopamine reuptake kinetics ([40]; Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem NC). The decay constant tau was used as a measure of dopamine reuptake and area under the curve (AUC) was used as a measure of overall DA signaling. Tau was calculated from an exponential curve fit and is highly correlated with changes in Km (r = .9899), suggesting tau is an accurate measure of DA clearance [40]. The area under the curve was calculated using trapezoid method.

Statistical analysis

Mixed ANOVAs were used to test for statistical significance for both the glucose challenge (group x sex x timepoint) and FSCV (group x sex x frequency) data. For FSCV data, post-hoc tests were used to determine significant group differences at individual frequencies tested, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (aov, R version 3.2.3 (2015-12-10); The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.r-project.org).

Results

High fructose corn syrup did not increase body weight

Mice in the HFCS-chow condition consumed significantly more liquid (F(1,11) = 82.63, p < .001) compared to controls. HFCS-chow mice consumed an average of 13.5 mL/day per mouse of HFCS solution compared to 3.5 mL/day of water consumption in chow mice, contributing approximately 4 kcal to each mouse's daily caloric intake. The HFCS-chow fed mice did not gain more weight compared to chow controls (Fig 1A, F(1,41) = .24, p = .63). There were no significant sex by group differences (F(1,41) = 1.99, p = .16) so the male and female data were combined.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Body weight and glucose challenge.

(A) Average weekly body weight across 15 weeks of experiment. (B) Glucose challenge (1 g/kg dextrose) at week 15. (C) Area under the curve for the glucose challenge. N = 20 (chow), 25 (HFCS-chow); ANOVA (panels A/B, repeated measures: group * sex * measurement timepoint; panel C: group * sex), * < .05, ** < .01, *** < .001, error bars S.E.M.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190206.g001

HFCS-chow induced glucose dysregulation

Glucose levels were tested at week 15. There was no difference in fasting glucose between groups (F(1,41) = 2.57, p = .12), but the HFCS-chow group exhibited a higher peak glucose and reduced clearance compared to chow controls (Fig 1B, F(1,41) = 8.100, p < .01), again with no group by sex differences observed (F(1,41) = .56, p = .46). The mean area under the curve (AUC) for each group is shown in Fig 2C (F(1,41) = 8.26, p < .01). Though sex differences were not statistically significant, the effects of HFCS on glucose handling appeared more pronounced in males. As our study may be underpowered to reliably detect sex differences, the AUC means for the glucose challenge is shown broken down by diet and sex in Table 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. HFCS attenuates evoked dopamine release in the dorsolateral striatum.

(A) Average color plots for Chow and HFCS+Chow at 60 Hz, 5 pulses. (B) Average dopamine release by group across frequencies, showing: top, raw data (HFCS, red; Chow, blue); bottom, HFCS group (red) normalized to controls (normalized controls, gray trace). (C) Average voltammograms for Chow (blue) and HFCS+Chow (red) across frequencies. (D) Average peak DA concentration across frequencies. (E) Average tau (decay rate) for Chow (blue) and HFCS-Chow (red) at 60Hz, 24 pulses. (F) Average AUC for Chow (blue) and HFCS-chow (red) at 60Hz, 24 pulses (G) Percent decrease normalized to Chow (gray) across frequencies (red). N = 11/8, Chow, HFCS+Chow, respectively. ANOVA (panels D/G, repeated measures, group * sex * frequency; panels E/F, group * sex), * p < .05, error bars S.E.M.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190206.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Area under the curve for glucose challenge (at 15 weeks).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190206.t001

HFCS attenuates evoked dopamine release in the dorsolateral striatum

To assess whether HFCS induces impairments in evoked DA release, FSCV was used to measure evoked DA release in the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). A stimulation train of 5 pulses was administered to the substantia nigra pars compacta in descending order at 60, 20, and 5 Hz, with 2 minutes intervals between scans at different frequencies. Evoked peak dopamine release was significantly lower in HFCS-chow mice compared to chow controls (Fig 2A–2D, F(1,15) = 8.079, p < .05), with reduced responsiveness to increasing frequency compared to controls (group x frequency, F(1,15) = 8.167, p < .05); that is, the percent decrease in evoked release in HFCS-chow mice relative to controls is greater at higher frequencies (Fig 2G, F(1,15) = 5.535, p < .05). Post-hoc tests to assess group differences at each frequency tested indicated significant effects of HFCS at 60 and 20 (p < .01, .05, respectively), but not at 5 Hz (p = .39), suggesting that higher frequency dopamine cell activity, associated with phasic dopamine cell activity, may be more affected than lower frequency, tonic activity.

In the presence of attenuated evoked DA release, prolonged DA clearance may act as a compensatory mechanism to increase DA signaling [41]. Reduced DAT expression and function are often observed in rodent DIO model, both with and without concomitant reductions in released dopamine [42]. We observe no decrease in clearance assessed by tau (time to half peak, Fig 2E, F(1,15) = 1.57, p = 0.23). To assess total DA signaling we calculated the area under the curve for DA traces. Consistent with reduced peak release, HFCS-Chow show significantly reduced AUC, suggesting a decrease in total dopamine signaling in HFCS-Chow mice relative to chow controls (Fig 2F, F(1,15) = 5.96, p = .05). Although obesogenic diets have been shown to reduce DAT surface expression/function in the mesolimbic pathway [31,32,43–45], reduced DAT has not been consistently reported in the absence of weight gain [45].

Dopamine was electrochemically identified through its voltammogram signature (Fig 2C) and recoding sites were histologically verified (Fig 3). There were no significant sex or group x sex differences in evoked DA release (sex, F(1,15) = .513, p = .484; interaction, F(1,15) = .000, p = .993), AUC (Fig 2F, F(1,15) = .278, P = .606) and uptake kinetics (F(1,15) = .459, p = .509), thus sexes were combined for analysis and figures.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Recording sites for fast scan cyclic voltammetry recording.

Blue circles are recording sites for Chow and red circles are recording sites of HFCS+Chow. Chow, n = 11; HFCS-Chow = 8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190206.g003

Discussion

Evidence suggest that increased consumption of fructose, possibly via HFCS, can induce metabolic dysregulation [7,11,20–23], though whether this is associated with weight gain has been controversial. Here we demonstrate that mice maintained on standard chow with ad libitum access to HFCS exhibit altered glucose regulation compared to chow controls in the absence of any significant weight gain. These data indicate that HFCS-induced metabolic dysregulation can arise independently of obesity associated with increased fat consumption. The HFCS induced glucose dysregulation observed here is consistent with previous studies of fructose and HFCS [17,20,21,23]. Several studies have observed metabolic abnormalities with fructose or HFCS in the absence of weight gain. For example, Blakely et al demonstrated that a diet of 15% d-fructose did not significantly alter body weight or food intake, but elevated fasting insulin [46]. Similarly, a study by Huang et al [21] showed that both the HFD and high fructose increased fasting insulin, though only mice on HFD exhibited obesity.

Here we use both males and females, providing evidence in rodents that the effects of HFCS on metabolism and dopamine can be observed in both sexes. Though we observe some indication that the metabolic effects may be more pronounced in males than females (Table 1), these differences were not statistically significant, likely due to a lack of power as our study was not designed specifically to assess sex differences. The human literature on sex differences in fructose-related metabolic effects is complex and varies depending upon the measure (e.g. [47]). With respect to glucose regulation specifically, earlier findings suggested that men were selectively susceptible to fructose-induced glucose dysregulation [48]; however, subsequent studies have found contrary results and suggest that sex differences in response to fructose may be age-dependent [49]. As metabolic studies can be conducted in humans, the primary importance in observing HFCS effects in both sexes here is to lend support to the appropriateness of the rodent model than to make inferences from rodents about sex differences in humans.

The mechanism by which HFCS induces metabolic disorder is likely related to fructose metabolism. Fructose bypasses the phosphofructokinase regulatory step in glycolysis, unlike glucose, and has a rapid uptake into the liver [50]. Fructose also has critical effects on lipid metabolism. The cause for hypertriglyceridemia is proposed to be increased hepatic de novo lipogenesis, which leads to hepatic insulin resistance [14,16,51]. This may occur due to increased diacylglycerol, an activator of protein kinase C (PKC) which causes decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor, increased glucose production, and impaired glucose tolerance [11].

The nigrostriatal and mesolimbic DA pathways are important modulators of feeding behaviors and obesity [36,52–56]. Reduced dopamine function has been consistently associated with obesity, though the exact cause is not clear [57,58]. Three potential causal factors have been identified: diet composition per se (increased fat, independent of caloric intake and body weight), insulin resistance associated with obesity and HFD, and increased body weight and adiposity [42,53]. An increased ratio of fat macromolecules in the diet can induce changes in the DA system independent of total caloric intake or body weight [59]; specifically, a downregulation in D2/D3 receptors has been observed, although evoked DA release has not been tested under these conditions. In the present study, DA attenuation was observed with HFCS added to the diet in the absence of increased fat consumption or increased body weight, indicating that neither is necessary for dietary induced changes in DA function.

Our data shows HFCS induces glucose dysregulation in parallel with reduced evoked DA release. Reduced DAT function in response to HFD is one of the most robust findings in the rodent DIO literature. Rodents with access to HFD at 6 weeks or more have slower DA clearance and reduced surface expression of DAT [31,32,43–45]. This altered DA clearance is likely a consequence of insulin resistance [44]. Insulin resistance disrupts PI3K/Akt signaling, known to regulate DAT [31], causing reduced DAT expression on the plasma membrane [60]. Interestingly, despite reduced evoked dopamine release, we did not observe any evidence of altered reuptake kinetics in mice with access to HFCS and observed reduced total dopamine (AUC), suggesting that HFCS is not downregulating DAT, in contrast to high fat diets. This may suggest a different underlying mechanism or reflect an early stage in progressive diminution of dopamine function where increased DAT appears later as a compensatory mechanism.

Finally, we tested HFCS because it is ubiquitous in Western diets [3,6,61]. Moreover, because of differences in metabolic handling of fructose, there have been suggestions that HFCS per se, versus other sugars, may particularly contribute to increased obesity [4,8–11,24]. A review of this literature is beyond this scope of this discussion; however, accumulating evidence suggests the metabolic effects of HFCS are likely not substantially different from sucrose, at least acutely [12,13,15,25,62]. This does not diminish the significance of the present data, but does suggest the reduced evoked dopamine observed here might not be unique to HFCS. That said, in comparing access to HFCS vs. sucrose, Levy et al [63] suggest that HFCS has a greater effect in altering reward related gene expression compared to sucrose. While many FSCV studies have examined dopamine activation in response to sugar ingestion (e.g., [56,64,65]), here we assess more global changes in dopamine function after extended access to HFCS, analogous to studies of the effect of high fat diet on dopamine physiology. Future studies might include both HFCS and sucrose to assess whether the increased sugar consumption more broadly, in the absence of weight gain or increased fats, can alter dopamine physiology.

Conclusion

We confirm prior studies demonstrating that HFCS can induce metabolic dysregulation and add to accumulating data that this can arise in the absence of obesity. Reduced dopamine is associated with obesity (for review, [57]) and may contribute to compulsive eating [33,34,54,66]. We demonstrate that HFCS can impair dopamine function in the absence of weight gain or increased fat consumption. As reduced dopamine function has been implicated in compulsive behaviors [67,68] and reduced energy expenditure [57,69,70] and insulin dysregulation incurs increased obesity risk [71], changes in glucose regulation and dopamine function induced by HFCS may precede and contribute to obesity in the long-run.

Increased consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks has been associated with increased rates of obesity and metabolic disorder, especially in developed countries that consume a ‘Western’ diet when compared to those countries with lower access [9]. Although most softdrinks are sweetened with HFCS [3], whether it is HFCS per se that contributes to this risk has been controversial [12,13,15]. The addition of HFCS to current rodent DIO models may better recapitulate modern, Western diets associated with increased rates of obesity, allowing for better characterization of both dietary-induced obesity and underlying mechanisms.

Citation: Meyers AM, Mourra D, Beeler JA (2017) High fructose corn syrup induces metabolic dysregulation and altered dopamine signaling in the absence of obesity. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0190206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190206

References

1. Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016;315: 2284. pmid:27272580

2. Kearney J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;365: 2793–2807. pmid:20713385

3. Parker K, Salas M, Nwosu VC. High fructose corn syrup: production, uses and public health concerns. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;5: 71–78.

4. Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79: 537–543. pmid:15051594

5. Basu S, Yoffe P, Hills N, Lustig RH. The Relationship of Sugar to Population-Level Diabetes Prevalence: An Econometric Analysis of Repeated Cross-Sectional Data. Wagner B, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e57873. pmid:23460912

6. Popkin BM, Nielsen SJ. The sweetening of the world’s diet. Obesity. 2003;11: 1325–1332.

7. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres J-P, Hu FB. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Circulation. 2010;121: 1356–1364. pmid:20308626

8. Ferder L, Ferder MD, Inserra F. The Role of High-Fructose Corn Syrup in Metabolic Syndrome and Hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010;12: 105–112. pmid:20424937

9. Goran MI, Ulijaszek SJ, Ventura EE. High fructose corn syrup and diabetes prevalence: A global perspective. Glob Public Health. 2013;8: 55–64. pmid:23181629

10. Bray GA. Energy and Fructose From Beverages Sweetened With Sugar or High-Fructose Corn Syrup Pose a Health Risk for Some People. Adv Nutr Int Rev J. 2013;4: 220–225. pmid:23493538

11. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, Graham JL, et al. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest. 2009;119: 1322–1334. pmid:19381015

12. Rippe JM, Angelopoulos TJ. Sucrose, High-Fructose Corn Syrup, and Fructose, Their Metabolism and Potential Health Effects: What Do We Really Know? Adv Nutr Int Rev J. 2013;4: 236–245. pmid:23493540

13. Kuzma JN, Cromer G, Hagman DK, Breymeyer KL, Roth CL, Foster-Schubert KE, et al. No differential effect of beverages sweetened with fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, or glucose on systemic or adipose tissue inflammation in normal-weight to obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104: 306–314. pmid:27357093

14. Stanhope KL, Havel PJ. Endocrine and metabolic effects of consuming beverages sweetened with fructose, glucose, sucrose, or high-fructose corn syrup. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88: 1733S–1737S. pmid:19064538

15. Klurfeld DM, Foreyt J, Angelopoulos TJ, Rippe JM. Lack of evidence for high fructose corn syrup as the cause of the obesity epidemic. Int J Obes 2005. 2013;37: 771.

16. Mock K, Lateef S, Benedito VA, Tou JC. High-fructose corn syrup-55 consumption alters hepatic lipid metabolism and promotes triglyceride accumulation. J Nutr Biochem. 2017;39: 32–39. pmid:27768909

17. Maiztegui B, Borelli MI, Raschia MA, Del Zotto H, Gagliardino JJ. Islet adaptive changes to fructose-induced insulin resistance: -cell mass, glucokinase, glucose metabolism, and insulin secretion. J Endocrinol. 2008;200: 139–149. pmid:19039094

18. Brown GK. Glucose transporters: structure, function and consequences of deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2000;23: 237–246. pmid:10863940

19. Douard V, Ferraris RP. Regulation of the fructose transporter GLUT5 in health and disease. AJP Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295: E227–E237. pmid:18398011

20. Cummings BP, Stanhope KL, Graham JL, Evans JL, Baskin DG, Griffen SC, et al. Dietary fructose accelerates the development of diabetes in UCD-T2DM rats: amelioration by the antioxidant, -lipoic acid. AJP Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298: R1343–R1350. pmid:20147607

21. Huang B-W, Chiang M-T, Yao H-T, Chiang W. The effect of high-fat and high-fructose diets on glucose tolerance and plasma lipid and leptin levels in rats. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2004;6: 120–126. pmid:14746577

22. Angelopoulos TJ, Lowndes J, Zukley L, Melanson KJ, Nguyen V, Huffman A, et al. The Effect of High-Fructose Corn Syrup Consumption on Triglycerides and Uric Acid. J Nutr. 2009;139: 1242S–1245S. pmid:19403709

23. Bocarsly M. High-fructose corn syrup causes characteristics of obesity in rats: Increased body weight, body fat and triglyceride levels. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010;97: 101–106. pmid:20219526

24. Jurgens Hella, Haas Wiltrud, Castaneda Tamara R., Schurmann Annette, Koebnick Corinna, Dombrowski Frank, et al. Consuming fructose-sweetened beverages increases body adiposity in mice. Obesity. 2005;13: 1146–1156.

25. Messier C, Whately K, Liang J, Du L, Puissant D. The effects of a high-fat, high-fructose, and combination diet on learning, weight, and glucose regulation in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res. 2007;178: 139–145. pmid:17222919

26. Tillman EJ, Morgan DA, Rahmouni K, Swoap SJ. Three Months of High-Fructose Feeding Fails to Induce Excessive Weight Gain or Leptin Resistance in Mice. Chowen JA, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e107206. pmid:25211467

27. Wang G-J, Volkow ND, Logan J, Pappas NR, Wong CT, Zhu W, et al. Brain dopamine and obesity. The Lancet. 2001;357: 354–357.

28. Stice E, Spoor S, Bohon C, Small DM. Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele. Sci N Y NY. 2008;322: 449–452.

29. de Weijer BA, van de Giessen E, van Amelsvoort TA, Boot E, Braak B, Janssen IM, et al. Lower striatal dopamine D2/3 receptor availability in obese compared with non-obese subjects. EJNMMI Res. 2011;1: 37. pmid:22214469

30. Geiger BM, Haburcak M, Avena NM, Moyer MC, Hoebel BG, Pothos EN. Deficits of mesolimbic dopamine neurotransmission in rat dietary obesity. Neuroscience. 2009;159: 1193–1199. pmid:19409204

31. Speed N, Saunders C, Davis AR, Owens WA, Matthies HJG, Saadat S, et al. Impaired Striatal Akt Signaling Disrupts Dopamine Homeostasis and Increases Feeding. Lu X-Y, editor. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e25169. pmid:21969871

32. Morris JK, Bomhoff GL, Gorres BK, Davis VA, Kim J, Lee P-P, et al. Insulin resistance impairs nigrostriatal dopamine function. Exp Neurol. 2011;231: 171–180. pmid:21703262

33. Volkow ND, Wise RA. How can drug addiction help us understand obesity? Nat Neurosci. 2005;8: 555–560. pmid:15856062

34. Kenny PJ. Reward Mechanisms in Obesity: New Insights and Future Directions. Neuron. 2011;69: 664–679. pmid:21338878

35. Volkow ND, Wise RA, Baler R. The dopamine motive system: implications for drug and food addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18: 741–752. pmid:29142296

36. Palmiter RD. Dopamine signaling in the dorsal striatum is essential for motivated behaviors: lessons from dopamine-deficient mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1129: 35–46. pmid:18591467

37. Sotak BN, Hnasko TS, Robinson S, Kremer EJ, Palmiter RD. Dysregulation of dopamine signaling in the dorsal striatum inhibits feeding. Brain Res. 2005;1061: 88–96. pmid:16226228

38. Koranda JL, Cone JJ, McGehee DS, Roitman MF, Beeler JA, Zhuang X. Nicotinic receptors regulate the dynamic range of dopamine release in vivo. J Neurophysiol. 2014;111: 103–111. pmid:24089398

39. Koranda JL, Krok AC, Xu J, Contractor A, McGehee DS, Beeler JA, et al. Chronic Nicotine Mitigates Aberrant Inhibitory Motor Learning Induced by Motor Experience under Dopamine Deficiency. J Neurosci. 2016;36: 5228–5240. pmid:27170121

40. Yorgason JT, España RA, Jones SR. Demon Voltammetry and Analysis software: Analysis of cocaine-induced alterations in dopamine signaling using multiple kinetic measures. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;202: 158–164. pmid:21392532

41. Hebert MA, Gerhardt GA. Age-related changes in the capacity, rate, and modulation of dopamine uptake within the striatum and nucleus accumbens of Fischer 344 rats: an in vivo electrochemical study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288: 879–887. pmid:9918602

42. Décarie-Spain L, Hryhorczuk C, Fulton S. Dopamine signalling adaptations by prolonged high-fat feeding. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016;9: 136–143.

43. Cone JJ, Chartoff EH, Potter DN, Ebner SR, Roitman MF. Prolonged High Fat Diet Reduces Dopamine Reuptake without Altering DAT Gene Expression. Simon SA, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e58251. pmid:23516454

44. Fordahl SC, Jones SR. High-Fat-Diet-Induced Deficits in Dopamine Terminal Function Are Reversed by Restoring Insulin Signaling. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017; pmid:27966885

45. Jones KT, Woods C, Zhen J, Antonio T, Carr KD, Reith MEA. Effects of diet and insulin on dopamine transporter activity and expression in rat caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, and midbrain. J Neurochem. 2017;140: 728–740. pmid:27973691

46. Shirley R Blakely, Judith Hallfrisch, Sheldon Reiser, Elizabeth S. Prather. Long-term effects of moderate fructose feeding on glucose tolerance parameters in rats. J Nutr. 1981;111: 307–314. pmid:7007594

47. Sharma N, Li L, Ecelbarger CM. Sex differences in renal and metabolic responses to a high-fructose diet in mice. Am J Physiol—Ren Physiol. 2015;308: F400–F410. pmid:25537743

48. Couchepin C, Le K-A, Bortolotti M, da Encarnacao JA, Oboni J-B, Tran C, et al. Markedly Blunted Metabolic Effects of Fructose in Healthy Young Female Subjects Compared With Male Subjects. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: 1254–1256. pmid:18332156

49. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, Graham JL, et al. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest. 2009;119: 1322–1334. pmid:19381015

50. Mayes PA. Intermediary metabolism of fructose. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;58: 754S–765S. pmid:8213607

51. Stanhope KL, Medici V, Bremer AA, Lee V, Lam HD, Nunez MV, et al. A dose-response study of consuming high-fructose corn syrup-sweetened beverages on lipid/lipoprotein risk factors for cardiovascular disease in young adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101: 1144–1154. pmid:25904601

52. Berridge K. Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20: 1–25. pmid:8622814

53. Naef L, Pitman KA, Borgland SL. Mesolimbic dopamine and its neuromodulators in obesity and binge eating. CNS Spectr. 2015;20: 574–583. pmid:26514168

54. Berthoud H-R. The neurobiology of food intake in an obesogenic environment. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012;71: 478–487. pmid:22800810

55. Roitman MF. Dopamine Operates as a Subsecond Modulator of Food Seeking. J Neurosci. 2004;24: 1265–1271. pmid:14960596

56. Beeler JA, McCutcheon JE, Cao ZFH, Murakami M, Alexander E, Roitman MF, et al. Taste uncoupled from nutrition fails to sustain the reinforcing properties of food. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;

57. Beeler JA, Frazier CRM, Zhuang X. Putting desire on a budget: dopamine and energy expenditure, reconciling reward and resources. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012;6. pmid:22833718

58. Figlewicz DP, Sipols AJ. Energy regulatory signals and food reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010;97: 15–24. pmid:20230849

59. Van de Giessen E, La Fleur SE, Eggels L, De Bruin K, Van Den Brink W, Booij J. High fat/carbohydrate ratio but not total energy intake induces lower striatal dopamine D2/3 receptor availability in diet-induced obesity. Int J Obes. 2013;37: 754.

60. Carvelli L, Morón JA, Kahlig KM, Ferrer JV, Sen N, Lechleiter JD, et al. PI 3-kinase regulation of dopamine uptake. J Neurochem. 2002;81: 859–869. pmid:12065645

61. Cordain L, Eaton SB, Sebastian A, Mann N, Lindeberg S, Watkins BA, et al. Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81: 341–354. pmid:15699220

62. Raatz SK, Johnson LK, Picklo MJ. Consumption of Honey, Sucrose, and High-Fructose Corn Syrup Produces Similar Metabolic Effects in Glucose-Tolerant and -Intolerant Individuals. J Nutr. 2015;145: 2265–2272. pmid:26338891

63. Levy A, Marshall P, Zhou Y, Kreek M, Kent K, Daniels S, et al. Fructose:Glucose Ratios—A Study of Sugar Self-Administration and Associated Neural and Physiological Responses in the Rat. Nutrients. 2015;7: 3869–3890. pmid:26007337

64. Mccutcheon JE, Beeler J a., Roitman MF. Sucrose-predictive cues evoke greater phasic dopamine release than saccharin-predictive cues. Synapse. 2012;66: 346–351. pmid:22170625

65. Avena NM, Rada P, Moise N, Hoebel BG. Sucrose sham feeding on a binge schedule releases accumbens dopamine repeatedly and eliminates the acetylcholine satiety response. Neuroscience. 2006;139: 813–820. pmid:16460879

66. Stice E, Yokum S, Blum K, Bohon C. Weight gain is associated with reduced striatal response to palatable food. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2010;30: 13105–13109.

67. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Telang F. Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: evidence of systems pathology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363: 3191–3200. pmid:18640912

68. Willuhn I, Burgeno LM, Groblewski PA, Phillips PEM. Excessive cocaine use results from decreased phasic dopamine signaling in the striatum. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17: 704–709. pmid:24705184

69. Beeler JA, Faust RP, Turkson S, Ye H, Zhuang X. Low Dopamine D2 Receptor Increases Vulnerability to Obesity Via Reduced Physical Activity, Not Increased Appetitive Motivation. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79: 887–897. pmid:26281715

70. Friend DM, Devarakonda K, O’Neal TJ, Skirzewski M, Papazoglou I, Kaplan AR, et al. Basal Ganglia Dysfunction Contributes to Physical Inactivity in Obesity. Cell Metab. 2016; pmid:28041956

71. Michael W. Schwartz, Porte D Jr.. Diabetes, obesity, and the brain. Science. 2005;307: 375–379. pmid:15662002