It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Propagation of an epidemic across a spatial network of communities is described by a variant of the SIR model accompanied by an intercommunity infectivity matrix. This matrix is estimated from fluxes between communities, obtained from cell-phone tracking data recorded in the USA between March 2020 and February 2021. We apply this model to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by fitting just one global parameter representing the frequency of interaction between individuals. We find that the predicted infections agree reasonably well with the reported cases. We clearly see the effect of “shelter-in-place” policies introduced at the onset of the pandemic. Interestingly, a model with uniform transmission rates produces similar results, suggesting that the epidemic transmission was deeply influenced by air travel. We then study the effect of alternative mitigation policies, in particular restricting long-range travel. We find that this policy is successful in decreasing the epidemic size and slowing down the spread, but less effective than the shelter-in-place policy. This policy can result in a pulled wave of infections. We express its velocity and characterize the shape of the traveling front as a function of the epidemiological parameters. Finally, we discuss a policy of selectively constraining travel based on an edge-betweenness criterion.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.499295.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 9234 0175)
2 University of Chicago, Department of Physics, Kadanoff Center for Theoretical Physics, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)
3 Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna-son, Japan (GRID:grid.250464.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9805 2626)
4 Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Redwood City, USA (GRID:grid.507326.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 6090 4941); George Mason University, School of Systems Biology, Fairfax, USA (GRID:grid.22448.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8032)
5 Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.499295.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 9234 0175); Instituto de Biocomputación y Física de Sistemas Complejos (BIFI), Zaragoza, Spain (GRID:grid.11205.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 8769)