1. Introduction
Rapidly expanding new technologies, video services, artificial intelligence [1], and cloud applications have caused a relentless growth in IP traffic. Predictions indicate that by the end of 2021, the annual global datacenter IP traffic will exceed 20.5 ZB, a threefold increase from 2016 [2]. Moreover, the nature of these applications and the intrinsic characteristics of networks mean that an enormous proportion of this traffic stays within the datacenter, accounting for 71.5% of the total. In such a challenging landscape, operators struggle to keep pace with the increasing demand for speed, cost, and energy efficiency [3,4].
Optical interconnects are in the spotlight as an enabling technology that will accommodate the leap forward to the next decade. While shipments of 100 GbE devices are growing exponentially and will continue to proliferate until 2023 [5,6], replacing the respective 40 GbE in datacenters, the next upgrade step is nearby [7]. For this reason, different techniques (space division multiplexing, polarization multiplexing, advanced modulation formats) and technologies (modulator-based transmitters, vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL)-based transmitters) are used to meet these requirements for intra-datacenter connectivity. Augmenting the number of parallel optical lanes offers a straightforward path towards scaling the link capacity but lacks in power efficiency and footprint [8]. Polarization multiplexing as a means of generating four-level signals in the optical domain was shown to achieve a 28 Gb/s transmission rate [9]. A four-channel compact and a low power transmitter module were reported in [10] to exhibit a limited bitrate of 25 Gb/s per lane. An eight-channel hybrid transmitter based on InP lasers, SiP modulators, and parallel single-mode fibers was shown in [11] to reach 56 Gb/s per lane. In [12], the hybrid integration of electronics and SiP integrated circuits resulted in the realization of a 56 Gb/s transceiver for a transmission distance of up to 2.2 km. Scaling the bitrate of each optical lane has also been demonstrated using discrete multitone formatting and complex digital signal processing [13].
Especially in the field of short-reach optical interconnects, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) over multimode fiber (MMF) links are a dominant technology in the market since they have several beneficial characteristics, namely, low manufacturing and packaging costs, small footprint, low power consumption, high reliability, and high bandwidth density [14,15]. Several attempts have been made to use VCSEL-based transmitters that operate at 850 nm in combination with MMF to achieve bitrates of up to 60 Gb/s [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. High-speed transmitters of up to 71 Gb/s were demonstrated but with a small bit-rate-distance product [23,24]. Single-mode VCSELs reduce the effect of modal and chromatic dispersion in the link and, as a result, extend the reach capability of the transmitter. Besides, datacenter operators have already started to replace multimode fibers with single-mode fibers in their datacenter environments, shifting from parallel optics to WDM (Wavelength-Division Multiplexing) solutions. The driving force for this trend is the continuous requirement to upgrade the type of installed multimode fibers to support higher bandwidth and longer reach as the datacenter grows in both size and traffic. Facebook is a prominent example that has come up with using low-cost single-mode fibers for short distances in the datacenter environment, a trend supported by other hyper-scale datacenter operators like Microsoft and Amazon [25]. Data rates of 30 Gb/s at 1270 nm and 40 Gb/s at 1525 nm were reported to obviate the need for equalization [26,27]. Using the transmitter- and receiver-side equalization, a 56 Gb/s C-band VCSEL was showcased to have the ability to transmit only NRZ (Non-Return-to-Zero) signals [28]. A 56 Gb/s driver-integrated circuit for VCSEL transmitters with on-chip equalization functionalities was reported in [29]. Although the device exploited more advanced modulation formats and thus augmented the overall capacity, it does not constitute a complete transceiver solution.
In this paper, we present a high-speed VCSEL-based optical transceiver tailored for intra-datacenter connectivity. We describe the architectures and assembly processes of all the modules that comprise the optical transceiver, namely (1) high-speed single-mode VCSELs, (2) the high-speed VCSEL driver, and (3) the linear receiver. Moreover, we provide the experimental results from (1) a high-speed single-mode VCSEL able to transmit data at 80 Gb/s for up to 500 m of a standard single-mode fiber (SSFM) and (2) a high-speed optical transceiver with a 64 Gb/s per lane capacity suitable for high-speed intra-datacenter interconnects. Materials, methods, and processes used for the development of the structures along with the respective experimental setups are described in Section 2. In Section 3, we present the experimental results that were acquired and in Section 4, we summarize the key points of the manuscript.
2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Materials and Architecture of the Devices
The following subsections describe the structure of the devices (the high-speed VCSEL, transmitter, the VCSEL driver, and the linear receiver) and the fabrication processes that were used.
2.1.1. High-Speed Single-Mode VCSELs’ Structure and Fabrication Process
The single-polarization, single-mode VCSELs described in this manuscript operate at the 1.5 μm wavelength window [9,30]. The structures were based on a double-mesa short-cavity design with a length threefold the laser’s emission wavelength, permitting the minimization of the photon lifetime. To reduce parasitic limitations, the double-mesa VCSEL module was fully encapsulated in benzocyclobutene (BCB). A highly strained active region embedded between an n-doped InP layer and a highly doped AlInAs cladding (Figure 1a) enhanced the intrinsic dynamic performance of the structure. The optical gain was provided by six AlGaInAs quantum wells with a 5.0 nm thickness, grown with a 1.7% compressive strain. The dielectric distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) at the top (outcoupling) and the bottom (hybrid) of the design had reflectivity percentages of 99.3% and 99.9% respectively. A circular p+-AlGaInAs/n+-GaInAs buried tunnel junction (BTJ) with a diameter of dbtj = 5 μm confined the current within the structure. A p+n junction with a reversed bias expanded over the bottom mesa diameter dbm to achieve current blocking outside the aforementioned area, whereas the BTJ was overgrown by an n-type doped indium phosphide layer to counterpart the length of the cavity. The capacitance of the structure Cbm was proportional to (d2bm − d2btj) and was associated with the depleted region due to the steep change in the concentration of the reverse-biased junction impurities. The double-mesa architecture proposed in this manuscript allowed the construction of 16 μm bottom mesas, which limited the capacitance of the VCSEL and enhanced its overall response.
Figure 1b shows the power, current, and voltage characteristics of the double-mesa VCSEL; the inset shows its optical spectrum at 9 mA. At standard temperature conditions, the lasing threshold was achieved at around 1.0 mA whilst the peak output power was met at approximately 4 mW. To measure the small-signal modulation response of the VCSEL (Figure 1c), an HP 8519C network analyzer was used. The maximum modulation bandwidth was achieved at 10.4 mA and measured to be 20.6 GHz.
2.1.2. VCSEL-Driver Architecture and Transmitter Assembly
The single-channel block diagram of the PAM-4 VCSEL driver is shown Figure 2.a and is thoroughly described in [31]. It comprised a four-tap symbol-spaced feed-forward equalizer (FFE) and a selective falling-edge pre-emphasis (SFEP). The equalizer’s taps were independently controlled, which allowed the driver to be optimally configured according to the specific transmission scenario, whereas the SFEP module was used to reduce the effect of pulse width distortion on the generated PAM-4 signal. The VCSEL driver chip was fabricated in 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS technology and exhibited a footprint of 1 × 2.8 mm. The transmitter board comprised a two-channel VCSEL driver and a respective array of single-mode VCSELs described in Section 2.1.1. Initially, the development of a four-channel VCSEL driver was targeted but the mismatch between the channel width of the VCSEL driver (>1 mm due to the on-chip PAM-4 generation and equalization) and the cathode pitch of the VCSELs (350 μm) prohibited such a design. The limitation in the channel pitch of the VCSEL driver mainly derived from the bond pad spacing of its data inputs (MSB (most significant Bit) and LSB (least significant Bit)). The assembly rested on a PCB (Printed Circuit Board), designed to simultaneously drive two VCSEL driver chips. To reduce the parasitic inductance between the VCSEL and the driver, the VCSEL anode voltage was supplied by the driver chip. A second technique used to reduce the parasitic inductance was to place the decoupling capacitors directly underneath the VCSELs, omitting additional bond wires, while using the thickness of the capacitors to put the VCSEL and driver surface at the same height.
2.1.3. Linear Receiver Architecture and Assembly
The linear receiver board was based on previously reported designs [31,32,33], which comprised a two-channel linear TIA (Transimpedance Amplifier) array (Figure 3a) that operates in tandem with a surface-illuminated photodiode array. Commercial 25 Gb/s photodiodes were used for the assembly. The TIA exploited a multi-stage low-noise linear data path architecture that converted the photocurrent to the respective voltage value, amplified it, and fed it to a 50 Ω output buffer. The saturation between the different amplifier stages was obviated by using an event-driven gain–bandwidth control loop that provided the necessary linearity and bandwidth for PAM-4 detection. The fabrication of the TIA chip was based on 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS technology and had a footprint of 1 × 3.7 mm. The assembly rested on a PCB that featured a cavity to align the top of the TIA with the top of the PCB to minimize the bond wire length.
2.2. Experimental Setups
The experimental setups used to test the proposed modules are described in the following subsections.
2.2.1. Experimental Setup Used for the Single-Mode High-Speed VCSEL Experiment
The experimental setup used for the high-speed single-mode VCSEL experiment is shown in Figure 4.
The single-ended output of an 8 bit, 65 GSa/s keysight arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) was used to generate the respective PAM-4 electrical test signals with a repeating pattern length of 210 symbols. Digital pulse shaping was implemented by exploiting a raised cosine (RC) filter with a roll-off factor of a = 1 to restrict the bandwidth of the transmitted signal to the main lobe. A high-precision voltage source was used to drive the VCSEL above its lasing threshold. The generated electrical PAM-4 signal, with a voltage swing of 550 mVP-P, was superimposed on the DC signal by means of a Bias-T and modulated the VCSEL directly, which resulted in a generated optical PAM-4 signal that exhibited 1.5 dBm output optical power. The light from the VCSEL was coupled to a cleaved standard single-mode fiber (SSMF) using a vertical-probing arrangement and was fed to an off-the-shelf, limiting 40 Gb/s photoreceiver, with a 35 GHz 3-dB bandwidth, a 0.6 A/W responsivity, and a 500 V/W conversion gain. A variable optical attenuator (VOA) was used to adjust the launched optical power in the receiver for bit error rate (BER) measurements. Alternatively, a spool of 500 m of the standard single-mode fiber (SMF) was utilized to evaluate the received optical signals in a transmission scenario.
The received signal was digitized by a 33 GHz, 80 GSa/s Agilent Infinium DSO-X 93304 real-time oscilloscope for BER assessment. Offline processing was applied to the digitized signal and more specifically to resampling, symbol timing recovery, and static equalization, to compensate for the bandwidth limitations of the channel. To enable symbol detection, automatic thresholding was used and subsequently the received PAM-4 signals were evaluated in terms of BER for back-to-back configuration after transmission over a 500 m spool of SSMF. Comparison between the received sampled signal and the original bit sequence was made to count the actual erroneous bits and perform the BER measurements.
2.2.2. Experimental Setup for the Transceiver Link Experiment
The experimental setup used for evaluating the performance of the full link is shown in Figure 5.
Two single-ended outputs of an 8 bit, 65 GSa/s keysight AWG with a repeating pattern length of 29 − 1 symbols generated two identical NRZ electrical signals of 500 mV peak-to-peak to feed the respective MSB and LSB AC-coupled inputs of the VCSEL board. To decorrelate the NRZ tributaries used for generating PAM-4, a delay difference of 10 bits was introduced between the two AWG outputs. The baud rate was varied to investigate the link’s performance under different data transmission scenarios. Pulse shaping to restrict the bandwidth of the baseband signal was performed by implementing a raised cosine electrical filter with a roll-off factor of a = 1. A 40 GHz Anritsu signal generator phase locked to the AWG provided the full-rate clock reference for the transmitter board. The generated PAM-4 optical signal was transmitted through a 500 m and 2 km link of SSMF to the linear receiver board. To investigate the dependence of the BER to the incident optical power in the linear receiver, an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) with a 28 dB gain, a 13 dBm saturated output power, and a noise figure of approximately 3.8 dB was employed along with a variable optical attenuator (VOA). The BER assessment was performed by exploiting the equipment Infiniium DSO-X 93304 real-time oscilloscope (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) and the offline processing is described in Section 2.2.1.
3. Experimental Results and Discussion
Results from the two different experimental processes are discussed thoroughly in the following subsections. Moreover, overshoots can be observed in the case of 40 Gbaud, which derived from the VCSEL’s bandwidth limitations.
3.1. Transmission of 80 Gb/s up to 500 m Exploiting the High-Speed Single-Mode VCSEL Module
Figure 6 shows the indicative optical eye diagrams at 32 and 40 Gbaud in the back-to-back configuration that were acquired with a 70 GHz equivalent time oscilloscope. As expected, the increase at the symbol rate of the signal leads to the closure of the eye pattern since the effect of intersymbol interference (ISI) is more decisive.
Figure 7 presents the measured bathtub curves for the cases of 32 and 40 Gbaud input signals for both transmission scenarios, which were plotted against the average received optical power in the receiver. The green and red solid lines correspond to the obtained optical signal at 32 Gbaud in back-to-back configuration and after propagation over 500 m of SSMF, respectively. Following the same rationale, the dotted black and blue lines refer to the received optical signal at 40 Gbaud for the two different transmission scenarios. As observed, for the case of 32 Gbaud and within a power range of 10 dBm (between −10 dBm and 0 dBm), the acquired BER values lie well below the hard FEC (Forward Error Correction) limit for both transmission configurations. At 40 Gbaud, despite the reasonable degradation that is observed and is mainly caused by the 3 dB bandwidth of the VCSEL, the measured BER values lie below the hard FEC limit even after propagation over 500 m of SSMF. It should also be noted that the limiting operation of the commercial receiver used in the experimental setup imposed an additional penalty to the received signal. Especially for power values higher than 0 dBm, the BER values deteriorate since the device loses its linear response. The VCSEL’s excellent performance makes it an ideal module for implementation in high-speed short-reach optical interconnects.
3.2. Up to 64 Gb/s Experiment Employing a VCSEL-Based Transceiver
The acquired PAM-4 optical eye diagrams for different transmission speeds and distances are shown Figure 8. The diagrams were captured by a 70 GHz equivalent time oscilloscope. As expected, the eye diagrams exhibit better eye opening for lower baud rates. Moreover, propagation through the SSMF, especially in the case of a reach of 2 km, introduces degradation to the eye diagram of the multi-level signal as a result of fiber dispersion at 1550 nm.
The acquired BER values at 25, 28, and 32 Gbaud for the aforementioned transmission distances were plotted against the average received optical power that was calculated from the measured photocurrent (Figure 9). The BER curves depicted by the crosses correspond to the obtained 25 Gbaud signal in back-to-back configuration and after propagation over 500 m and 2 km. Following the same rationale, the black circles and the x-marks refer to the received signals at 28 and 32 Gbaud, respectively, according to the aforementioned transmission conditions (back-to-back configuration and after transmission over 500 m). It is evident that for lower baud rates, the received PAM-4 optical signal exhibits better performance in terms of BER. It is also clear that an extension in the transmission distance leads to the degradation of the obtained BER curves. As observed for cases of 25 Gbaud and 28 Gbaud, the achieved BER values lie well below the FEC limit for all the transmission scenarios. Moreover, the respective power penalties for transmission over 500 m and 2 km SSMF at 25 Gbaud were 0.2 dB and 0.6 dB for a BER equal to 6 × 10−4. Similarly, the received 28 Gbaud signal exhibited a power penalty of 1.8 dB for a BER in the order of 5 × 10−4. Finally, in the case of 32 Gbaud, only the back-to-back configuration achieved acceptable BER values, whereas propagation through 500 m of SSMF was severely affected by the effect of chromatic dispersion and, as a result, the signal failed to reach the FEC limit.
4. Conclusions
We have presented a high-speed VCSEL-based optical transceiver tailored for intra-datacenter connectivity. Architectures, assemblies, and experimental results from different modules that comprise the transceiver were demonstrated. The single-mode VCSEL was evaluated and exhibited a high-speed functionality of up to 80 Gb/s based on PAM-4 signaling over a 500 m link, whereas the optical transceiver demonstrated up to 64 Gb/s per lane capacity in a back-to-back configuration and 56 Gb/s per lane capacity in a full-link data transmission experiment over a 2 km link. The results prove that the device is suitable for 200 GbE intra-datacenter applications.
Figure 1.(a) The structure of a double-mesa vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL), (b) room-temperature LIV (Light-Current-Voltage) characteristics and optical spectrum (inset), (c) s21 graph of a 16 μm double-mesa VCSEL.
Figure 2.(a) Single-channel block diagram of a PAM-4 VCSEL driver, (b) annotated die photo of the VCSEL driver, (c) VCSEL driver board closeup.
Figure 3.(a) Block diagram of a 2 × 1 TIA array, (b) micrograph of the TIA array die, (c) dual-channel receiver board.
Figure 4. The experimental setup used for the high-speed single-mode VCSEL experiment.
Figure 6. PAM-4 optical eye diagrams at (a) 32 and (b) 40 Gbaud in back-to-back configuration.
Figure 7. Bit error rate (BER) curves at 32 and 40 Gbaud in back-to-back configuration and after propagation over 500 m.
Figure 8. PAM-4 optical eye diagrams at the output of the linear receiver at 25, 28, and 32 Gbaud for back-to-back configuration and propagation in 500 m and 2 km of SSMF.
Figure 9. BER curves at 25, 28, and 32 Gbaud for back-to-back configuration and propagation in 500 m and 2 km of a standard single-mode fiber.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.K., D.K., P.B., and H.A.; Investigation, G.K. and N.I.; Methodology, W.S., B.M., and S.S.; Project administration, H.A.; Software, N.A.; Supervision, H.A.; Validation, P.B.; Writing-original draft, G.K.
Funding
This research and the APC were funded by the H2020 project ICT-QAMeleon (Contract No. 780354).
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the European Commission through the FP7 project MIRAGE and through the H2020 projects ICT-QAMeleon (Contract No. 780354), an initiative of the Photonics Public Private Partnership (PPP) and 5GPPP Phase II 5G-PHOS (Contract No. 761989).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Artificial Intelligence and the Impact on Our Data Centers. Available online: https://www.corning.com/emea/en/products/communication-networks/applications/data-center/artificial-intelligence-impact-on-data-centers.html (accessed on 10 April 2019).
2. Networking, C.V. Cisco Global Cloud Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2016-2021; White Paper; Cisco Public: San Jose, CA, USA, 2016.
3. Top 20 Data Center Trends and Predictions to Watch for in 2019. Available online: https://www.upsite.com/blog/top-20-data-center-trends-and-predictions-to-watch-for-in-2019/ (accessed on 10 April 2019).
4. Aleksic, S. The future of optical interconnects for data centers: A review of technology trends. In Proceedings of the 2017 14th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL), Zagreb, Croatia, 28-30 June 2017; pp. 41-46.
5. The Year of 100GbE in Data Center Networks. Available online: https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/networks/year-100gbe-data-center-networks (accessed on 10 April 2019).
6. The Race to Higher Speed Optical Transceivers Is Starting to Feel Like a Marathon. Available online: https://www.lightcounting.com/News_100218.cfm (accessed on 10 April 2019).
7. New 2018 Ethernet Roadmap Looks to Future Speeds of 1.6 Terabits/s. Available online: https://insidehpc.com/2018/03/new-2018-ethernet-roadmap-looks-future-speeds-1-6-terabits-s/ (accessed on 10 April 2019).
8. Lyubomirsky, I.; Ling, W.A. Digital QAM Modulation and Equalization for High Performance 400 GbE Data Center Modules. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 9-13 March 2014.
9. Iliadis, N.; Kanakis, G.; Spatharakis, C.; Bakopoulos, P.; Avramopoulos, H.; Spiga, S.; Amann, M.-C.; Argyris, N. Optical PAM-4 generation through polarization multiplexing in single-polarization single-mode VCSELs. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS), Monte Carlo, Monaco, 11-14 December 2016; pp. 360-363.
10. Kishi, T.; Wakita, H.; Shikama, K.; Nagatani, M.; Kanazawa, S.; Fujii, T.; Nishi, H.; Ishikawa, H.; Kawajiri, Y.; Aratake, A.; et al. A 25-Gbps × 4 ch, Low-Power Compact Wire-Bond-Free 3D-Stacked Transmitter Module with 1.3-μm LD-Array-on-Si for On-Board Optics. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2019, San Diego, CA, USA, 3-7 March 2019.
11. Billah, M.R.; Blaicher, M.; Kemal, J.N.; Hoose, T.; Zwickel, H.; Dietrich, P.I.; Troppenz, U.; Moehrle, M.; Merget, F.; Hofmann, A.; et al. 8-Channel 448 Gbit/s Silicon Photonic Transmitter Enabled by Photonic Wire Bonding. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference Postdeadline Papers, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 19-23 March 2017.
12. Denoyer, G.; Chen, A.; Park, B.; Zhou, Y.; Santipo, A.; Russo, R. Hybrid silicon photonic circuits and transceiver for 56 Gb/s NRZ 2.2 km transmission over single mode fiber. In Proceedings of the 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Cannes, France, 21-25 September 2014; pp. 1-3.
13. Dong, P.; Lee, J.; Chen, Y.-K.; Buhl, L.L.; Chandrasekhar, S.; Sinsky, J.H.; Kim, K. Four-Channel 100-Gb/s per Channel Discrete Multitone Modulation Using Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuits. J. Light. Technol. 2016, 34, 79-84.
14. Mahgerefteh, D.; Thompson, C.; Cole, C.; DeNoyer, G.; Nguyen, T.; Lyubomirsky, I.; Kocot, C.; Tatum, J. Techno-Economic Comparison of Silicon Photonics and Multimode VCSELs. J. Light. Technol. 2016, 34, 233-242.
15. Kuchta, D.M. High Capacity VCSEL-based links. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 19-23 March 2017.
16. Lu, I.; Wei, C.-C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chen, K.-Z.; Huang, C.-H.; Chi, K.-L.; Shi, J.-W.; Lai, F.-I.; Hsieh, D.-H.; Kuo, H.-C.; et al. Very High Bit-Rate Distance Product Using High-Power Single-Mode 850-nm VCSEL with Discrete Multitone Modulation Formats through OM4 Multimode Fiber. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2015, 21, 444-452.
17. Kuchta, D.M.; Huynh, T.; Doany, F.; Rylyakov, A.; Schow, C.L.; Pepeljugoski, P.; Gazula, D.; Shaw, E.; Tatum, J. A 4-λ, 40 Gb/s/λ Bandwidth Extension of Multimode Fiber in the 850 nm range. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 22-26 March 2015.
18. Haglund, E.; Larsson, A.; Geen, M.; Gustavsson, J.; Haglund, E.; Joel, A.; Westbergh, P.; Haglund, E. 30 GHz bandwidth 850 nm VCSEL with sub-100 fJ/bit energy dissipation at 25-50 Gbit/s. Electron. Lett. 2015, 51, 1096-1098.
19. Safaisini, R.; Westbergh, P.; Larsson, A.; Haglund, E.; Gustavsson, J. 20 Gbit/s data transmission over 2 km multimode fibre using 850 nm mode filter VCSEL. Electron. Lett. 2014, 50, 40-42.
20. Stepniak, G.; Kropp, J.; Lewandowski, A.; Agustin, M.; Shchukin, V.; Turkiewicz, J.; Schaefer, G.; Ledentsov, N.; Ledentsov, N. 54 Gbit/s OOK transmission using single-mode VCSEL up to 2.2 km MMF. Electron. Lett. 2016, 52, 633-635.
21. Kuchta, D.M.; Schow, C.L.; Rylyakov, A.V.; Proesel, J.E.; Doany, F.E.; Baks, C.; Hamel-Bissell, B.H.; Kocot, C.; Graham, L.; Johnson, R.; et al. A 56.1 Gb/s NRZ modulated 850 nm VCSEL-based optical link. In Proceedings of the 2013 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC), Anaheim, CA, USA, 17-21 March 2013; pp. 1-3.
22. Castro, J.M.; Pimpinella, R.; Kose, B.; Huang, P.; Lane, B.; Szczerba, K.; Westbergh, P.; Lengyel, T.; Gustavsson, J.S.; Larsson, A.; et al. Investigation of 60 Gb/s 4-PAM Using an 850 nm VCSEL and Multimode Fiber. J. Light. Technol. 2016, 34, 3825-3836.
23. Tan, Z.; Yang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zou, K.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Z. A 70 Gbps NRZ optical link based on 850 nm band-limited VCSEL for data-center intra-connects. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2018, 61, 080406.
24. Kuchta, D.M.; Rylyakov, A.V.; Doany, F.E.; Schow, C.L.; Proesel, J.E.; Baks, C.W.; Westbergh, P.; Gustavsson, J.S.; Larsson, A.; Proesel, J. A 71-Gb/s NRZ Modulated 850-nm VCSEL-Based Optical Link. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 577-580.
25. Datacenters to Get a High Fiber Bandwidth Diet. Available online: https://www.nextplatform.com/2016/03/18/datacenters-get-high-fiber-bandwidth-diet/ (accessed on 10 April 2019).
26. Malacarne, A.; Sorianello, V.; Daly, A.; Kögel, B.; Ortsiefer, M.; Melo, S.; Neumeyr, C.; Romagnoli, M.; Bogoni, A. High speed long wavelength VCSELs for energy efficient 40 Gbps links up to 1 km without error correction. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 22-26 March 2015.
27. Müller, M.; Wolf, P.; Gründl, T.; Grasse, C.; Rosskopf, J.; Hofmann, W.; Bimberg, D.; Amann, M.-C. Energy efficient 13 μm short cavity VCSELs for 30 Gb/s error-free optical links. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Semiconductor Laser Conference (ISLC), San Diego, CA, USA, 7-10 October 2012.
28. Kuchta, D.M.; Huynh, T.N.; Doany, F.E.; Schares, L.; Baks, C.W.; Neumeyr, C.; Daly, A.; Kögel, B.; Rosskopf, J.; Ortsiefer, M. Error-free 56 Gb/s NRZ modulation of a 1530 nm VCSEL link. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Valencia, Spain, 27 September-1 October 2015.
29. Soenen, W.; Vaernewyck, R.; Yin, X.; Spiga, S.; Amann, M.C.; Van Steenberge, G.; Mentovich, E.; Bakopoulos, P.; Bauwelinck, J. 56 Gb/s PAM-4 Driver IC for Long-Wavelength VCSEL Transmitters. In Proceedings of the 42nd European Conference on Optical Communication, Dusseldorf, Germany, 18-22 September 2016; pp. 1-3.
30. Spiga, S.; Schoke, D.; Andrejew, A.; Boehm, G.; Amann, M. Enhancing the small-signal bandwidth of single-mode 1.5-μm VCSELs. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Optical Interconnects Conference (OI), San Diego, CA, USA, 9-11 May 2016; pp. 14-15.
31. Collaborative Project ICT-MIRAGE (GA Number 318228); Final Publishable Activity Report, September 2016.
32. Moeneclaey, B.; Kanakis, G.; Verbrugghe, J.; Iliadis, N.; Soenen, W.; Kalavrouziotis, D.; Spatharakis, C.; Dris, S.; Yin, X.; Bakopoulos, P.; et al. A 64 Gb/s PAM-4 linear optical receiver. In Proceedings of the 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 22-26 March 2015; pp. 1-3.
33. Moeneclaey, B.; Verbrugghe, J.; Blache, F.; Goix, M.; Lanteri, D.; Duval, B.; Achouche, M.; Bauwelinck, J.; Yin, X. A 40-Gb/s Transimpedance Amplifier for Optical Links. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 1375-1378.
1School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou Str., 15780 Athens, Greece
2IDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University/IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
3Mellanox Technologies Ltd., Hakidma 26, 2069200 Yokneam, Israel
4Walter Schottky Institut, TU München, Am Coulombwall 4, D-85748 Garching, Germany
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Predictions indicate that by the end of 2021, the annual global datacenter IP traffic will exceed 20.5 ZB, a threefold increase from 2016 [2]. [...]the nature of these applications and the intrinsic characteristics of networks mean that an enormous proportion of this traffic stays within the datacenter, accounting for 71.5% of the total. Especially in the field of short-reach optical interconnects, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) over multimode fiber (MMF) links are a dominant technology in the market since they have several beneficial characteristics, namely, low manufacturing and packaging costs, small footprint, low power consumption, high reliability, and high bandwidth density [14,15]. [...]datacenter operators have already started to replace multimode fibers with single-mode fibers in their datacenter environments, shifting from parallel optics to WDM (Wavelength-Division Multiplexing) solutions. [...]we provide the experimental results from (1) a high-speed single-mode VCSEL able to transmit data at 80 Gb/s for up to 500 m of a standard single-mode fiber (SSFM) and (2) a high-speed optical transceiver with a 64 Gb/s per lane capacity suitable for high-speed intra-datacenter interconnects.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer