Content area
Full Text
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to establish if office occupiers, who adopt different work patterns, can be segmented based on differences of perceived productivity with regards to the physical environment and the behavioural environment.
Design/methodology/approach - Components of office productivity were used in an office productivity model with categorical data enabling a unique opportunity to undertake an analysis of office occupiers by work process type.
Findings - The four distinct evaluative components used were comfort, office layout, interaction and distraction. The components were subsequently used for more detailed statistical analysis. This study establishes that statistical differences exist between the work styles under investigation.
Research limitations/implications - This research establishes that to truly appreciate office productivity there is a need to further understand the way that people work in offices and their specific requirements. The matching of office occupier need with space provision can only be achieved if the office occupier is involved in the creation of the office solution.
Originality/value - This study demonstrates that there is a need to consider how the office environment matches the work patterns of the office occupiers. This understanding of how the office works could be considered as establishing the office landscape or "officescape".
Keywords Office layout, Workplace, Productivity rate, Work design, Personal needs
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
This paper aims to establish that measurement of office productivity should include components to represent both the physical and the behavioural environment It is proposed that by adopting such an approach, insights into the dynamic nature, or connectivity, of office environments can be established.
This study aims to segment office occupiers based on their work style. The work styles adopted are individual process work, group process work, concentrated study work and transactional knowledge work (Laing et aL, 1998):
* individual process workers are largely required to be at their desk and have a low degree of interaction with their work colleagues;
* group process workers are largely required to be at their desks but have a high degree of interaction with work colleagues;
* concentrated study workers have a high degree of flexibility in where they work and have a low degree of interaction with their work colleagues; and
* transactional knowledge workers have a high...