Content area

Abstract

In this study, we describe a method to predict 6-axis ground reaction forces based solely on plantar pressure (PP) data obtained from insole type measurement devices free of space limitations. Because only vertical force is calculable from PP data, a wavelet neural network derived from a non-linear mapping function was used to obtain 3-axis ground reaction force in medial-lateral (GRFML), anterior-posterior (GRFAP) and vertical (GRFV) and 3-axis ground reaction moment in sagittal (GRFS), frontal (GRFF) and transverse (GRFT) data for the remaining axes and planes. As the prediction performance of nonlinear models depends strongly on input variables, in this study, three input variables - accumulated PP with respect to time, center of pressure (COP) pattern, and measurements of the opposite foot, which are calculable only with a PP device - were considered in order to improve prediction performance. To conduct this study, the golf swing motions of 80 subjects were characterized as unilateral movement and GRF patterns as functions of individual characteristics. The prediction model was verified with 5-fold cross-validation utilizing the measured values of two force plates. As a result, prediction model (correlation coefficient,r=0.73-0.97) utilized accumulated PP and PP data of the opposite foot and showed the highest prediction accuracy in left-foot GRFV, GRMF, GRMTand right-foot GRFAP, GRFML, GRMF, GRMT. Likewise, another prediction model (r=0.83-0.98) utilized accumulated PP and COP patterns as input and showed the best accuracy in left-foot GRFAP, GRFML, GRMSand right-foot GRFV, GRMS. New methods based on the findings of the present study are expected to help resolve problems such as spatial limitation and limited analyzable motions in existing GRF measurement processes.

Details

Title
Improving the ground reaction force prediction accuracy using one-axis plantar pressure: Expansion of input variable for neural network
Author
Joo, Su-Bin; Oh, Seung Eel; Mun, Joung Hwan
Pages
3153-3161
Publication year
2016
Publication date
2016
Publisher
Elsevier Limited
ISSN
00219290
e-ISSN
18732380
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1831318596
Copyright
Copyright Elsevier Limited 2016