It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The paper confronts Kant’s grounding of public Right and of the State of Right with the dynamics of society according to the postmodernist approaches that G. Deleuze and F. Guattari have laid out in several of theirs writings. The main aim of this work is arguing for the claim that Kant’s theory of Right might be read from the point of view of a history of normativity, inasmuch as the constitutive tenet of norms and rules would not be the collective desire of a community, but rather the subjective demands of the faculty of reason. I analyze the exam of G. Deleuze on the connection between instincts and institutions from the empirical tradition, the concept of norm and normativity framed by G. Canguilhem and the distinction between society and civil union argued in the Doctrine of Right of Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer