It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) is a urodele amphibian endowed with remarkable regenerative capacities manifested in scarless wound healing and restoration of amputated limbs, which makes it a powerful experimental model for regenerative biology and medicine. Previous studies have utilized microarrays and RNA-Seq technologies for detecting differentially expressed (DE) genes in different phases of the axolotl limb regeneration. However, sufficient consistency may be lacking due to statistical limitations arising from intra-laboratory analyses. This study aims to bridge such gaps by performing an integrative analysis of publicly available microarray and RNA-Seq data from axolotl limb samples having comparable study designs using the “merging” method. A total of 351 genes were found DE in regenerative samples compared to the control in data of both technologies, showing an adjusted p-value < 0.01 and log fold change magnitudes >1. Downstream analyses illustrated consistent correlations of the directionality of DE genes within and between data of both technologies, as well as concordance with the literature on regeneration related biological processes. qRT-PCR analysis validated the observed expression level differences of five of the top DE genes. Future studies may benefit from the utilized concept and approach for enhanced statistical power and robust discovery of biomarkers of regeneration.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Graduate School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center, REMER, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, İstanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center, REMER, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
4 Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center, REMER, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Physiology, International School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
5 Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center, REMER, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey