Content area
Full text
Henry James's preference for the work of Jacopo Tintoretto (1519-94) over that of Titian (c. 1490-1576) may seem at first sight surprising. Among the masters of the Venetian Renaissance tradition, Titian had long held sway in the canon of educated taste across Europe. In his Lives of the Artists, Giorgio Vasari had carefully distinguished between the two painters, describing Titian's manner of painting as "judicious, beautiful and astonishing" in contrast to Tintoretto's "fantastic and extravagant" works, and classical-academic art critics of the succeeding centuries tended to follow Vasari's distinction (Artists 458, Painters 509). For Sir Joshua Reynolds, writing late in the eighteenth century, Titian possessed "a sort of senatorial dignity" which exempted him from the crude display of the "mechanism of painting" he saw as characteristic of Tintoretto (6667). It is no accident, of course, that Reynolds appealed to social categories in making this aesthetic distinction. The identification of Titian with the royal houses and aristocracies of Europe who had so often patronized him as a painter was a long-standing one, while Tintoretto's very different status was proclaimed in his professional nickname. As "Il Tintoretto"-"the little dyer"-Jacopo Robusti took on and promoted a kind of "democratic" persona; the son of a simple cloth dyer, he presented himself as the embodiment of a popular Venetian identity very different from Titian's international and aristocratic profile (Nichols 13-27).
James's preference for the works of "the little dyer" emerged on his very first trip to Venice in the autumn of 1869.' After visits to the Ducal Palace and the Accademia, he wrote to his brother proclaiming Tintoretto "the greatest of them all," and on his return to the city in 1872 his preference was confirmed in an essay, "Venice: An Early Impression." "I had the satisfaction of finding at least [. I that none of my early memories were likely to change places and that I could take up my admirations where I had left them. I still found Carpaccio delightful, Veronese magnificent, Titian supremely beautiful and Tintoret scarce to be appraised" (IH 57). In front of Tintoretto's Crucifixion in San Cassiano (fig. 1)2 he felt that he had been "advanced to the uttermost limit of painting; that beyond this another art-inspired poetry-begins, and that Bellini, Veronese, Giorgione, and...