INTRODUCTION
The
Koalas (
A case cluster of cryptococcosis largely attributed to
FIG 1
(A) Map of Australia showing the approximate location of the four wildlife parks (parks 1 to 4) studied. The red arrow indicates the movement of a koala from park 4 to park 2 approximately 10 years prior to this study. (B) Map showing the location of parks 1 to 3 within the Cairns region of Queensland, Australia. Green arrows indicate the movement of 20 koalas from park 2 to parks 1 and 3 in 2016 (approximately 10 koalas to each park).
TABLE 1
Koalas (n = 5) at co-owned captive facilities in the Cairns region of Queensland, Australia, with confirmed clinical cryptococcosis attributed to infection with the
Koala | Year | Antigenemia (LCAT titer)a | Primary lesionb | Molecular type | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2013 | Uc | Thoracic | VGIIb | Death |
2 | 2014 | + (1:256) | Nasal | VGIIb | Death |
3 | 2014 | +d | CNS | VGI | Death |
4 | 2016 | + (1:128) | Inguinal LN | VGIIb | Survival |
5 | 2016 | + (1:512) | Nasal | VGIIb | Survival |
a
LCAT, latex cryptococcal antigen agglutination test.
b
CNS, central nervous system; LN, lymph node.
c
U, unknown.
d
LCAT titer unavailable, cryptococcal antigen lateral flow immunoassay positive.
RESULTS
Koala nasal swabs.
Cryptococcal nasal colonization was identified in 14 of 44 (32%) koalas on at least one occasion (Table 2). Of the colonized koalas, 9/14 were tested twice, with 5/9 progressing from negative to positive on nasal swab culture, 3/9 remaining consistently positive, and 1/9 progressing from positive to negative (Table 2). This resulted in a total of 17 positive culture result events among the 14 koalas. Low, moderate, and heavy cryptococcal colonization burdens were reported on five, three, and nine occasions, respectively. Among the three consistently positive koalas, one exhibited a heavy cryptococcal burden on both occasions, while the other two progressed from moderate to heavy.
TABLE 2
Koalas (n = 14), ordered by identification number, at three co-owned captive facilities in the Cairns region of Queensland, Australia, that tested positive for
Koala number | 2015 | 2017 | Antigenemia (titer)c | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parka | Nasal colonizationb (molecular type) | Parka | Nasal colonizationb (molecular type) | ||
LS40 | 1 | + (VGIIb) | 1 | NTd | + (1:8) |
LS49 | 2 | +++ (VGI) | 3 | +++ (VGI) | +e |
LS55 | 2 | ++ (VGIIb) | 3 | NT | + (1:512) |
LS56 | 2 | ++ (VGIIb) | 3 | +++ (VGI, VGIIb) | + (1:8) |
LS67 | 3 | +++ (VGI) | 3 | NT | − |
LS69 | 3 | +++ (VGI) | 3 | NT | + (1:8) |
LS73 | 3 | + (VGI) | 3 | − | − |
LS75 | 3 | + (VGI) | 3 | NT | − |
LS77 | 3 | ++f | 3 | +++ (VGI) | + (1:4) |
LS291 | 2 | − | 1 | +f | − |
LS292 | 2 | − | 1 | +++ (VGI) | − |
LS298 | 2 | − | 1 | + (VGIIb) | − |
LS307 | 2 | − | 3 | +++ (VGIIb) | +e |
LS311 | 2 | − | 3 | +++ (VGI, VGIIb) | − |
a
Park 1 is located at 16°39′47.1′′S 145°33′51.9′′E, park 2 at 16°45′28.9′′S 145°39′46.4′′E, and park 3 at 16°49'′07.9′′S 145°37′58.3′′E (see Fig. 1).
b
+, low degree of cryptococcal growth (1 to 10 colonies); ++, moderate (11 to 100 colonies); +++, heavy (>100 colonies).
c
Antigenemia results reflect if these koalas tested positive (+) at any time between 2014 and 2018 and the highest recorded latex agglutination cryptococcal antigen test titer.
d
NT, not tested.
e
Lateral flow immunoassay only.
f
No isolate available.
In 2015, 14% (1/7), 14% (3/22), and 45% (5/11) of koalas were positive for nasal colonization at parks 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The single positive individual located at park 1 had recently been transferred from park 2. In 2017, following the closure of park 2 and transfer of all koalas to parks 1 and 3, 19% (3/16) and 33% (5/15) of koalas were positive at parks 1 and 3, respectively.
Environmental samples.
In 2015, 56% (9/16) of all enclosures cultured positive for Cryptococcus spp. (colonies exhibiting the brown color effect were observed). At park 2, 86% (6/7) of enclosures were positive, while at park 3, 60% (3/5) were positive (Fig. 2). No enclosures at park 1 cultured positive for Cryptococcus spp. in 2015 (Table 3). Of the nine positive enclosures, six had heavy and three had low cryptococcal burdens. An isolate could not be obtained from one of the low-positive enclosures at park 3 due to overgrowth of filamentous fungi on the culture plate.
FIG 2
Proportions of koalas and enclosures colonized by members of the
TABLE 3
Environmental sampling results for Cryptococcus spp., using bird seed agar culture and URA5 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing, at three co-owned wildlife parks in the Cairns region of Queensland, Australia, across two sampling occasions
Parka | Year | No. of enclosures | No. (%) of enclosures culture positive for Cryptococcus spp. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2015 | 4 | 0 | NAb |
2017 | 13 | 2 (15) | VGII (2) | |
2 | 2015 | 7 | 6 (86) | VGI (2); VGII (2); both VGI and VGII (2) |
3 | 2015 | 5 | 3 (60) | VGI (3) |
2017 | 10 | 3 (30) | VGI (2); VGII (1) |
a
Park 2 closed in 2016, and parks 1 and 3 subsequently expanded (increased the number of enclosures) to accommodate koalas from park 2.
b
NA, not applicable.
In 2017, 22% (5/23) of all enclosures tested positive for Cryptococcus spp., comprising two enclosures at park 1 and three at park 3. This meant that at parks 1 and 3, Cryptococcus spp. were cultured from 15% (2/13) and 30% (3/10) of enclosures, respectively (Table 3). The degree of cryptococcal growth was classified as low for two positive enclosures, moderate for two, and heavy for one. Isolates were obtained from all five positive enclosures. The change in enclosure numbers from 2015 (16) to 2017 (23) was due to the expansion of parks 1 and 3 (and sometimes the division of previously larger enclosures into several small enclosures) due to the transfer of all koalas from park 2.
Cryptococcal antigenemia was detected in 20 of 58 (34%) koalas on at least one occasion during this study, with two testing positive by a lateral flow assay (LFA) only (including one case where a confirmatory latex cryptococcal antigen agglutination test [LCAT] could not be run due to insufficient sample), and the remaining 18 were positive using both tests (36). Confirmed clinical cases accounted for four koalas (with LCAT titers of 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, and one unknown). A further two were presumptive clinical cases, based on LCAT titers of 1:128 in both cases and their sudden deaths. Thus, six antigen-positive cases (10% of the 58 koalas sampled) were symptomatic. The remaining 14 exhibited asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia, resulting in a subclinical disease prevalence of 24% (14/58). One koala (koala 1) (Table 1) with confirmed clinical cryptococcosis (based on postmortem findings) was not tested for antigenemia. Among the 14 koalas with subclinical cryptococcosis, two were LFA positive only, while the remaining 12 returned positive LCAT results with titers of 1:2 (3/12), 1:4 (3/12), 1:8 (3/12), and 1:16 (3/12).
Nasal colonization results were available from 16/20 koalas with cryptococcal antigenemia (excluding two confirmed clinical cases, one suspected case, and one other individual). Of these 16 koalas, 9 were negative for nasal colonization on all occasions tested, while 7 were positive on at least one occasion (Table 2).
Molecular and mating type determination.
A total of 71 Cryptococcus species strains were obtained, with 5 disease-associated, 33 nasal colonizing, and 33 environmental isolates.
At park 1, in 2015, two
At park 2, one disease isolate was identified as
At park 3,
A total of 34
Multilocus sequence typing.
Among the 32
At park 4, 30/34 isolates were ST 7. The remainder were ST 38 and ST 48, accounting for one and three isolates, respectively. Allele type differences were observed at all seven MLST loci. Two unique allele types each were observed at the GPD1, LAC1, and URA5, whereas three allele types each were observed at CAP59, IGS1, PLB1, and SOD1.
The maximum likelihood analysis of concatenated MLST sequences revealed a highly limited genetic diversity among isolates from parks 1 to 3, with ST 539 settling in the
FIG 3
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree, using the Kimura 2-parameter model with gamma distribution, of the concatenated multilocus sequence typing sequences from four sequence types (STs) identified among koala disease, colonizing, and environmental isolates at three captive facilities in northern Queensland, Australia (blue circles), and a facility in Perth, Western Australia (red circles). STs found in koalas (as either disease or colonizing isolates) are identified by the koala silhouette.
Whole-genome sequencing.
The phylogeny of the isolates based on whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data separated the isolates into two major clades, with isolates from all parks present in both clades (Fig. 4). An overall low genetic diversity is seen across the entire tree, with each clade exhibiting few differences between isolates from parks 1 to 3. In both clades, isolates from park 4 are relatively basal.
FIG 4
Maximum parsimony tree constructed with 95% consensus of 40 most parsimonious trees using whole-genome SNP data from 19
A phylogenetic tree with additional relevant genomes from veterinary and environmental isolates displays the same overall topology with two major clades of VGIIb (Fig. 5). The isolates sampled from the koalas and enclosures at parks 1 to 3 remain clustered together within their respective clades, and all koala isolates demonstrate the same relationships as in Fig. 4.
FIG 5
Maximum parsimony population tree for 32 environmental and veterinary isolates of
DISCUSSION
This study provides evidence in support of the notion that koalas can seed environments with
The ability of koalas to translocate
In 2016, approximately 20 koalas from park 2 were transferred to parks 1 and 3, with roughly 10 individuals going to each of the two facilities, in short succession. This provided an opportunity for a mass introduction of
MLST analysis showed that the
The recent evolutionary histories of the two clades seen in Fig. 4 appear to be dissimilar. The top clade has splits with ≥95% consensus, indicating a more gradual formation of its population structure, whereas the polytomy of the bottom clade indicates a more radial spread of the fungus from this lineage. The inclusion of two other unrelated isolates (WM 03.27 and WM 04.71) for comparative purposes in the phylogenetic tree has also suggested a relative overall clonality for
These results support a prior study that showed enclosures previously culturing negative for
Given the evidence that
Environmental decontamination as a means of managing koala cryptococcosis has long been recommended (5), but its effectiveness remains largely anecdotal. A prior study found that quaternary ammonium compounds effectively killed all
The current Australian requirement for koalas prior to travel or export is to test only for cryptococcal antigenemia (45). In the event of a positive result, further testing should be performed in an attempt to locate lesions and treatment should be considered, depending on the antigen titer and its persistence (21, 46). The present study brings into question whether koalas should also be tested for nasal and/or skin colonization prior to travel to attempt to prevent the introduction of novel
This study offers valuable insights into the management of captive koala cryptococcosis and the composition of the
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Locations.
All samples originated from four captive animal facilities in Australia: three related wildlife parks (under the same ownership) in the vicinity of Cairns, Queensland (park 1, 16°39′47.1′′S 145°33′51.9′′E; park 2, 16°45′28.9′′S 145°39′46.4′′E; and park 3, 16°49′07.9′′S 145°37′58.3′′E) and one near Perth, WA (park 4, 31°50′03.6′′S 115°57′01.2′′E) (Fig. 1). Koalas were regularly transferred between parks 1 to 3. Environmental samples and nasal swabs were collected from parks 1 to 3 on two occasions: December 2015 and September 2017. Four of the koalas with clinical cryptococcosis were diagnosed while domiciled at park 3 (koalas 1, 2, 4, and 5) (Table 1), with all four having a history of recent transfer from park 2. The fifth koala was diagnosed while residing in park 2 and had been located there for several years. A male koala from park 4 was translocated to park 2 approximately 10 years prior to this study (Fig. 1), and
The enclosure environment, including furniture and leaf browse, was similar across parks 1 to 3. All three parks also had similar protocols in place, enacted in March 2015, for the management of environmental
Koala nasal swabs.
Nasal swabs from parks 1 to 3 were submitted to Veterinary Pathology Diagnostic Services (VPDS), The University of Sydney, for culture. A sterile, moistened cotton-tipped swab was inserted into the nasal vestibule on both sides and rotated gently, as per methods of prior studies (16, 18). This procedure was performed by a veterinarian as part of a systematic disease control and management plan instigated at these facilities. In December 2015, 40 koalas were sampled at parks 1, 2, and 3 (7, 22, and 11 koalas at each park, respectively). In September 2017, 31 koalas were sampled at parks 1 and 3 (16 and 15 koalas, respectively). Across both sampling occasions, a total of 44 individuals were swabbed, with 27 swabbed on both occasions and 17 on one occasion only. The sampling of 17 koalas once only was attributable to either external transfers (koala no longer at any of the co-owned facilities or newly introduced in the time between the first and second samplings) or concerns regarding the stress of sampling from an individual (for example, mothers with young joeys).
Environmental samples.
Samples were collected by moistening a sterile swab with sterile saline and running the tip thoroughly over the surface of perches and enclosure furniture, similar to previously described methods (16). In December 2015, samples were collected from all enclosures (16) at parks 1, 2, and 3 (4, 7, and 5 enclosures at each park, respectively). In September 2017, after the closure of park 2, 23 enclosures at parks 1 and 3 were sampled (13 and 10 at each park, respectively).
Culture.
All swabs (koala nasal and environmental) were initially cultured on Staib’s bird seed agar containing antibiotics (penicillin and gentamicin) by rolling the swabs gently across the agar. Plates were incubated at 27°C and examined at least once daily for 7 to 10 days. Samples were considered positive if yeast-like colonies exhibiting the brown color effect (consistent with Cryptococcus spp.) were observed. If no growth was observed by 7 to 10 days, the plates were considered negative and discarded. Positive samples were classified according to the number of cryptococcal colonies counted on the agar plates as exhibiting either a low (1 to 10 colonies), moderate (11 to 100 colonies), or heavy (>100 colonies) extent of growth. A minimum of one cryptococcal colony from each positive plate was subcultured onto Sabouraud’s agar and incubated at 37°C for isolation and DNA extraction.
Cryptococcal antigenemia testing.
Serum samples from 58 koalas were collected by veterinarians at the three facilities by cephalic venipuncture with the koalas gently restrained. Samples were collected at various time points between December 2014 and August 2018 as part of the ongoing disease investigation and surveillance program and submitted to VPDS. All samples underwent cryptococcal antigen testing using an LFA (CrAg LFA; IMMY, Norman, OK, USA). If the LFA was positive, an LCAT (CALAS; Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) was performed to confirm the result and establish a reciprocal antigen titer (36). Both procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions by experienced staff and in the same laboratory.
Molecular and mating type determination.
DNA was extracted from all isolates using an established protocol for fungi (48). PCR amplification of the URA5 gene was then performed, with the resulting product undergoing RFLP analysis and comparison to known standards (VGI, WM 179; VGII, WM 178; VGIII; WM 175; VGIV, WM 779; VNI, WM 148; VNII, WM 626; VNIII, WM 628; VNIV, WM 629) as described previously (49). This was to provide molecular confirmation that all isolates were
Determination of the mating type of all
Multilocus sequence typing.
MLST of all
Multilocus phylogenetic analysis.
Concatenated MLST sequences were aligned (MUSCLE), and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis was performed (Kimura 2-parameter model [53] with gamma distribution) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using the MEGA7 program (54). The following
Whole-genome sequencing.
A representative group of 14
DNA for WGS was extracted using the Quick-DNA Fungal/Bacterial Miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA then was fragmented using a Q800R2 sonicator (QSonica, Newtown, CT, USA) to approximately 500 bp, and genome libraries were prepared for paired-end sequencing using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and quantified using the SequalPrep Normalization Plate kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Libraries were pooled and sequenced at 2 × 150 bp on a NextSeq (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Genomic data analysis.
Read data from 19
The phylogenetic analyses of the whole-genome read data were conducted as described previously (42), with minor modifications. In short, we identified high-certainty SNPs in the samples using the NASP pipeline (v. 1.1.2) (56) against a de novo assembly created with read data from isolate WM 18.93 using SPAdes (v3.10.1) (57) with “careful” setting enabled. The pipeline was set to use BWA (v 0.7.15) (58) as the read aligner and GATK (3.7) (59) as the SNP caller. The pipeline also filtered out positions with coverage below 10×, those with base concordance below 90% among the aligned reads, and any positions that were not present in all samples of the set.
Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA7 (54). Tree structure was inferred using maximum parsimony and calculating a 95% consensus of 40 most parsimonious trees from the whole-genome SNP data of the 19
Data availability.
Each unique MLST allele type was submitted to GenBank (accession numbers MK133807 to MK133825). WGS data are available as BioProject PRJNA524387. All
b The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
c Molecular Mycology Research Laboratory, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, The University of Sydney—Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
d Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy
e Translational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
f Centre for Veterinary Education, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
g Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
h Veterinary Pathology Diagnostic Services, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Duke University Medical Center
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2019 Schmertmann et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer