It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The article dicusses about the issue regarding the element of taṣdīq either dārūrī or naẓarī to identify more advance about the good intelect’s observation towards something. This is because not all of the human mind requires argument and evidence in a case involving the khowledge that must be known usually. This qualitative research applied the method of documentation and data analysis to indentify and definite taṣdīq via the works of ancient scholars and convicts the methodology of taṣdīq through ḍarūrī where is not applying any argumentation to determind the understanding of debate and naẓarī where is applying the evidence deeply in understanding the debates . The scope of this research will focus on the topic of taṣdīq’s element for detail via the view of scholars such as al-Damanhūrī, al-Bayjūrī and so on. Then, the researcher concludes out the methodology of taṣdīq that geared towards ḍarūrī and naẓarī that cause the needful of healthy mind in solving a problem. As a result, it can be proved precisely that the reason that aquires the argument is just taṣdīq of naẓarī only after having the good taṣawwur in mind. As for the the taṣdīq that categorized as ḍarūrī can be accepted by the human mind generally without a long process of thinking for undestanding an issue.
Makalah ini membincangkan isu yang membabitkan elemen taṣdīq sama ada secara ḍarūrī mahupun secara naẓarī supaya dapat mengenal pasti dengan lebih lanjut tilikan akal yang sihat kepada sesuatu perkara. Hal ini demikian kerana tidak semua akal manusia memerlukan hujah dan dalil dalam mengkonklusikan sesuatu perkara yang membabitkan pengetahuan yang mesti diketahui umum. Kajian berbentuk kualitatif ini mengaplikasikan kaedah dokumentasi dan analisis data dalam mengenal pasti takrifan taṣdīq yang tepat melalui karya-karya ulama silam serta mensabitkan kaedah taṣdīq yang bersifat ḍarūrī di mana tidak mengaplikasikan hujah akal secara sistematik dan yang bersifat naẓarī di mana menggunakan dalil secara tafṣīlī dalam memahami sesuatu perbahasan. Skop perbahasan akan berfokus kepada perbahasan elemen taṣdīq secara terperinci menurut pandangan para ulama seperti al-Damanhūrī, al-Bayjūrī dan sebagainya. Kemudian, pengkaji menyatakan kaedah-kaedah taṣdīq yang menjurus ke arah ḍarūrī dan naẓarī yang menyebabkan perlunya akal yang sihat dalam menyelesaikan sesuatu masalah. Hasilnya, dapat dibuktikan secara tepat bahawa akal yang memerlukan hujah hanyalah taṣdīq yang bersifat naẓarī sahaja setelah memiliki taṣawwur yang kemas di dalam akal. Manakala taṣdīq yang berkriteriakan ḍarūri dapat diterima oleh akal manusia secara umumnya tanpa memerlukan proses pemikiran akal yang panjang dalam memahami sesuatu isu.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer