It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This paper analyses the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America (US) in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS case (2007) and its possible influence on evolution of the European Community (EC) antitrust law concerning minimum resale price maintenance. The paper's goal is to find out whether a new approach in EC antitrust law after US Supreme Court's decision in Leegin case is needed. For these purposes the author focuses on several core related issues: first, on the assessment of the main principles of vertical restraints in US law, such as per se rule and rule of reason, before and after Leegin; second, on the regulation of vertical price-fixing in EC antitrust case-law, and finally - on the question whether the new approach to vertical price-fixing in EC law is necessary after US Leegin decision.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer