Content area
Full Text
It is a truth that should be universally acknowledged: canons are not expandable, and every new author added means an author subtracted. In the great canon shift of the past four decades, Oliver Goldsmith has been a casualty, less read and less written about. Hence, for someone who still believes Vicar of Wakefield one of the finest novels of the era, She Stoops to Conquer the best comedy written between Congreve and Shaw, and The Deserted Village, a brilliant socio-economic poem, it was most encouraging to see two new studies devoted to him in recent years. First was Norma Clarke's Brothers of the Quill: Oliver Goldsmith in Grub Street (Harvard, 2016), a well-wrought account of the author and the publishing world in which he struggled and survived. Second was this new edition of Goldsmith's correspondence.
One of Goldsmith's earliest literary chores was to write a review of a new edition of Van Egmont's Travels (1759), which he concluded by posing the question, "To what purpose then a new publication, which contains accounts neither so accurate or so modern as those which have preceded it?" This new edition of Goldsmith's correspondence supersedes Katharine C. Balderston's 1928 Cambridge edition, to which the editors pay an opening tribute, noting that their edition is built on her "remarkable endeavours" and hoping that it will be "an appropriate advancement on her pioneering scholarship." Unfortunately, it is not.
I identify four problems. 1. In dealing with the texts of the letters, almost all of which have been previously published, there is no textual apparatus accounting for different readings in Balderston or any other previous printing. Often the editors are looking at the same copy-text but we cannot tell if the variance is deliberate or accidental. 2. The quantity of typographical, citational, and copying errors indicates that differences between the texts of Balderston and Cambridge cannot establish this later edition as more accurate than hers; copy-texts would have to be reexamined. 3. The primary scholarly events between Balderston and Cambridge were Arthur Friedman's five-volume Collected Works (Oxford, 1966), and ninety years of commentary on Goldsmith. These new materials find little place in the annotations, which consist primarily of Balderston's notes, elaborated with biographical and bibliographical information often of little relevance...