1. Introduction
Obesity is a serious health issue that is prevalent worldwide. It currently affects over 396 million individuals across the globe, and this figure is expected to climb to over 573 million by 2030 [1]. Insulin resistance is characterized as the most critical factor that contributes to the development of obesity among patients afflicted with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Thus, reduction of insulin resistance is an important clinical goal today.
In mammals, Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is one of the seven homologs of silent information regulator 2 (Sir2). It plays a critical role in DNA damage response, metabolism, and longevity [2]. Recent studies suggest an association between SIRT1 and insulin sensitivity [3]. SIRT1 augments insulin sensitivity by repressing inflammation and having a direct or indirect involvement in the insulin-signaling pathway [3–5]. Remarkably, SIRT1 activators enhance insulin sensitivity in vitro and ameliorate insulin resistance in vivo in a SIRT1-dependent manner [4, 6]. Moreover, overexpression of SIRT1 protects against insulin resistance in diabetic models [7] and high-fat-diet-induced metabolic disorder [8]. Taken collectively, these findings implicate SIRT1 activation as a potential therapeutic target in overcoming insulin resistance.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR
In experimental research and clinical studies, acupuncture has been observed to reduce obesity-related insulin resistance [13–15]. However, though acupuncture has the potential to improve pathological changes in the mitochondria [16], the biochemical mechanism underlying its effect on insulin resistance remains elusive. Meanwhile, electric stimulation such as exercise induces muscle contraction, which has been observed to activate SIRT1/PGC-1α [17, 18]. It is interesting to examine if the combination of acupuncture and electric stimulation will yield merits for the improvement of insulin sensitivity.
The present study tested the hypothesis that electroacupuncture (EA) ameliorates insulin sensitivity via regulation of SIRT1/PGC-1α and improving mitochondrial function. EA is a type of acupuncture wherein needles are attached to an apparatus that produces continuous electric pulses. To investigate the effect of EA on insulin resistance, this study was conducted on db/db mice, a genetic model of insulin resistance and T2DM. Low-frequency EA produced insulin-sensitizing effects and modulated free fatty acid (FFA) levels in db/db mice. Strikingly, EA likewise induced SIRT1 protein expression, which was concordant with increased PGC-1α, nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1), and acyl-CoA oxidase (ACOX) gene expression in the skeletal muscle of db/db mice. Based on these findings, EA is proposed to improve insulin sensitivity in db/db mice, at least partly, via stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and lipid oxidation involving SIRT1/PGC-1α activation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
Male, seven-week-old, C57BL/KsJ-Lep
2.2. Experimental-Design
After two weeks of acclimatization, the samples were randomly divided into four groups: db/m
2.3. Body Mass, Food Intake, Fasting Blood Glucose, Plasma Insulin, and HbA1c
Body mass, food intake, and fasting blood glucose (FBG) were analyzed at zero, two, four, six, and eight weeks after commencement of EA treatment. Tail-snip fasting glucose levels were measured using a glucose testing machine and corresponding cartridge (Antesense III from Horiba, Japan). After two and eight weeks of treatment, tail blood was collected to assay plasma fasting insulin (1,000 g for 15 min at 4
2.4. Intraperitoneal Insulin Tolerance Test and Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Test
Intraperitoneal insulin tolerance tests (IPITTs) were performed after six weeks of EA treatment. After 12 h of fasting, an insulin solution of 2 U/kg of body mass was injected intraperitoneally into the mice; blood samples were collected for glucose determination prior to insulin administration and after 15, 30, 60, and 90 min. Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (IPGTTs) were performed seven weeks following the series of treatments. Meanwhile, mice that were allowed to fast for 12 h received an intraperitoneal injection of glucose (1 mg glucose/g body mass), and blood samples were collected for glucose level determination at zero, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min following glucose injection. After insulin or glucose administration, blood glucose was assayed from 10
2.5. Serum FFA, Triglyceride, Total Cholesterol, and Corticosterone
After the treatment, blood was collected from the inner canthus using a capillary, and it was centrifuged at 1,000 g for 15 min at 4
2.6. Real-Time Reverse Transcriptional Polymerase Chain Reaction
Mice were sacrificed at the end of the treatment. Excised quadriceps muscle tissues were stored overnight at 4
RNA concentrations were determined at the 260/280 nm absorbance ratio. An aliquot (1
Real-time reverse transcriptional polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed with a 7700 Real-Time RT-PCR system (ABI PRISM, 7700 Sequence Detector) using the DNA-binding dye SYBR green to detect PCR products. The reaction mixture contained SYBR Green Master Mix 10
Table 1
Primers used in PCR.
Gene | Primer sequence | Gene number | Product length |
---|---|---|---|
SIRT1 (mouse, rat) | Fw 5 |
AF214646 | 104 bp |
Rv 5 |
|||
|
|||
PGC-1alpha (mouse, rat) | Fw 5 |
AF049330 | 174 bp |
Rv 5 |
|||
|
|||
NRF1 (mouse) | Fw 5 |
NM010938 | 143 bp |
Rv 5 |
|||
|
|||
ACOX (mouse) | Fw 5 |
NM015729.2 | 296 bp |
Rv 5 |
|||
|
|||
GAPDH (mouse, rat) | Fw 5 |
BC082592 | 226 bp |
Rv 5 |
2.7. Western Blotting
A total of 100 mg quadriceps tissue sample was homogenized in 1 mL ice-cold lysis buffer (2% lithium lauryl sulfate (LDS), 1 v/v% 1.7 mg/mL aprotinin, 1 v/v% 10 mg/mL phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4
Equivalent amounts of protein for each sample were incubated at 95
Stabilized goat antirabbit IgG HRP-linked antibody (no. 7074, Cell Signaling Technology) or antimouse IgG HRP-linked antibody (no. 7076, Cell Signaling Technology) was used as secondary antibody. Bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting analysis system (no. 34095, PIERCE) and luminescent image analyzer (LAS-4000, Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Densitometry was performed using NIH Image J software. SIRT1 immunoreactivity was normalized against the α/β-tubulin result. The experiment was repeated at least thrice for each protein in each sample.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SE. Trapezoidal rule was used to determine area under the IPGTT curve (AUCg). Meanwhile, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with subsequent Bonferroni’s test was employed to determine the significance of differences in multiple comparisons. A
3. Results
3.1. FBG Decreased and Fasting Plasma Insulin Levels Were Maintained by EA
At nine weeks of age, the db/db mice exhibited hyperglycemia compared to their db/m littermates. It was observed that EA treatment lasting two weeks was suitable for lowering FBG of db/db mice. After six weeks of treatment, FBG levels decreased significantly in EA-treated db/db mice compared with untreated db/db littermates; the effect became more significant after eight weeks of treatment (Table 2). EA produced no significant effect on the FBG of db/m mice compared with untreated db/m mice.
Table 2
Animal characteristics and blood analyses.
Parameter (unit) | db/m |
db/m+EA |
db/db |
db/db+EA |
---|---|---|---|---|
FBG (mg/dl) | ||||
|
||||
0w | 78.8 ± 2.8 | 75.2 ± 2.7 | 149.2 ± 13.8* | 156 ± 21.6* |
2w | 72.5 ± 2.02 | 64.75 ± 2.06 | 406.5 ± 25.40* | 365.5 ± 19.25* |
4w | 167 ± 19.7 | 141.8 ± 6.2 | 507.8 ± 88.5* | 371 ± 32.3* |
6w | 114.5 ± 9.1 | 108.2 ± 5.9 | 466 ± 44.1* | 330 ± 28.8*† |
8w | 105.5 ± 5.07 | 83.5 ± 7.5 | 385 ± 34.15* | 282 ± 31.5*§ |
|
||||
Insulin (ng/ml) | ||||
|
||||
2w | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 3.69 ± 0.40* | 2.05 ± 0.24*† |
8w | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 2.07 ± 0.31* | 3.78 ± 0.53*† |
|
||||
Body mass (g) | ||||
|
||||
0w | 26.46 ± 0.36 | 26.70 ± 0.28 | 37.90 ± 0.68* | 37.59 ± 0.14* |
2w | 27.78 ± 0.45 | 26.32 ± 0.40 | 42.90 ± 0.56* | 40.95 ± 0.82* |
4w | 28.35 ± 0.57 | 27.65 ± 0.34 | 45.31 ± 0.52* | 43.80 ± 0.82* |
6w | 29.37 ± 0.80 | 28.79 ± 0.78 | 49.01 ± 0.60* | 45.21 ± 1.16*† |
8w | 30.7 ± 0.55 | 28.28 ± 0.46 | 49.12 ± 0.63* | 44.95 ± 1.45*† |
|
||||
Food intake (g/day) | ||||
|
||||
0w | 4.27 ± 0.13 | 4.81 ± 0.17 | 8.27 ± 0.72* | 7.51 ± 1.02* |
2w | 3.94 ± 0.11 | 4.19 ± 0.09 | 7.93 ± 0.62* | 7.41 ± 0.63* |
4w | 4.38 ± 0.12 | 3.91 ± 0.08 | 7.72 ± 0.35* | 7.08 ± 0.38* |
6w | 3.97 ± 0.13 | 4.06 ± 0.12 | 7.27 ± 0.24* | 6.45 ± 0.25*† |
8w | 4.42 ± 0.13 | 4.41 ± 0.12 | 7.60 ± 0.23* | 6.37 ± 0.30*† |
HbA1c (%) | 3.56 ± 0.09 | 3.73 ± 0.12 | 7.55 ± 0.57* | 7.03 ± 0.56* |
FFA ( |
0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.04* | 0.59 ± 0.03*† |
Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 73.1 ± 14.2 | 66.3 ± 4.1 | 120.6 ± 21.9* | 96.2 ± 8.3* |
Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 98.3 ± 3.9 | 90.4 ± 5.4 | 147.3 ± 15.15* | 131.1 ± 2.8* |
Corticosterone (ng/mL) | 640.3 ± 137.8 | 773.7 ± 92.0 | 1154.7 ± 153.8* | 1293.7 ± 81.8* |
AUCg | 902 ± 64.7 | 832 ± 24.6 | 2205 ± 156* | 2069 ± 140* |
Data are mean ± SE.
Compared to their db/m littermates, db/db mice exhibited hyperinsulinemia at 11 weeks of age (Table 2). After two weeks of treatment, improved insulin sensitivity following EA treatment was demonstrated by reduced insulin levels in EA-treated mice that were subjected to overnight fasting. However, after eight weeks of treatment, plasma insulin levels in EA-treated db/db mice that experienced fasting were significantly higher than those of untreated db/db mice. Further, plasma fasting insulin levels in 17-week-old untreated db/db mice were significantly decreased compared with untreated db/db mice at 11 weeks of age.
3.2. Body Mass Gain and Food Intake Were Reduced
Body mass of db/db mice was higher than their db/m littermates at nine weeks of age. This continued to increase to nearly twice that of db/m mice by 17 weeks (Table 2). Low-frequency EA induced a significantly reduced body mass gain among db/db mice after six weeks of treatment.
Food intake of db/db mice was higher by 1.4 folds to two folds compared with that of db/m mice throughout the experiment period. EA reduced food intake of db/db mice significantly after six weeks of treatment (Table 2).
3.3. Plasma HbA1c Levels Were Not Affected
Plasma HbA1c levels were measured to investigate the long-term effect of EA on glucose metabolism. At 17 weeks, db/db mice displayed markedly higher plasma HbA1c levels compared with db/m mice. EA treatment induced a decrease in plasma HbA1c levels in db/db mice compared with non-EA-treated db/db mice (Table 2), through in the absence of statistical significance
3.4. EA Decreased Serum FFA, with No Significant Effect on TC, TG, or Corticosterone Levels
Blood glucose control may be attributed to improved insulin sensitivity; this may result in reduced blood lipid levels as well. Serum FFA, TC, and TG levels were elevated in db/db mice compared with db/m mice. EA treatment caused a significant decrease in FFA concentrations in db/db mice compared with untreated littermates (Table 2). A slight, though insignificant, decrease in TC and TG was observed as well (Table 2). EA produced no effect on FFA, TC, or TG in db/m mice compared with untreated db/m controls.
At the end of treatment, serum corticosterone levels were measured to evaluate potential stress induced by treatment. As demonstrated in a previous study [20], db/db mice displayed higher corticosterone levels than their littermates (Table 2). EA treatment did not affect serum corticosterone of db/m or db/db mice, indicating that handling and treatment were not stressful for the subjects.
3.5. EA Improved IPITT, with No Significant Impact on IPGTTs and AUCg
Based on insulin tolerance testing, it was observed that the glucose-lowering effects of insulin were higher in EA-treated db/db mice compared with untreated littermates (Figure 1(a)). IPGTTs suggested that glucose tolerance did not differ significantly between EA-treated and -untreated db/db mice (Figure 1(b)). AUCg data revealed a slight decrease, without significance, in EA-treated db/db mice compared with untreated controls (Table 2).
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
3.6. EA Increased SIRT1 Protein Expression, Producing No Effect on SIRT1 mRNA Expression
The effect of EA on SIRT1 gene expression and protein levels was investigated in view of SIRT1’s association with metabolic activity and its critical role in insulin sensitivity. EA significantly increased SIRT1 protein levels in db/db and db/m mice (Figure 2), but it produced no significant effect on SIRT1 mRNA levels (Figure 3(a)). This indicates that SIRT1 may be regulated posttranscriptionally. This is supported by a recent demonstration that SIRT1 levels were posttranscriptionally modified by phosphorylation of cell cycle-dependent kinase Cdk1 [21].
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
3.7. PGC-1α, NRF1, and ACOX mRNA Expressions Were Upregulated
Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α is crucial for mitochondrial biogenesis and fatty acid oxidation. To detect the effect of EA on mitochondrial biogenesis, PGC-1α gene expression in skeletal muscle was analyzed. The db/db mice exhibited significantly increased PGC-1α mRNA expressions compared with the db/m controls (Figure 3(b)); this observation is in agreement with a previous study [22]. EA resulted in modest upregulation of PGC-1α mRNA (2-3-fold), which is similar to the effect of Pioglitazone on the induction of skeletal muscle PGC-1α in db/db mice [23].
NRF1 is a key target of PGC-1 during mitochondrial biogenesis [24]. NRF1 gene expression in the skeletal muscle of db/db mice decreased significantly compared with db/m mice, whereas it increased by two folds to four folds in EA-treated db/db mice compared with the expression in untreated littermates (Figure 3(c)).
ACOX, an enzyme involved in the first step of peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation pathway, was analyzed to determine the fatty acid oxidation capability of skeletal muscle. In db/db mice, it was observed that EA significantly increased ACOX gene expression (Figure 3(d)).
4. Discussion
Originating from China thousands of years ago, acupuncture is now widely practiced in both Eastern Asia and Western countries for treatment of a variety of human diseases, including dental pain, fibromyalgia, and knee osteoarthritis. Recently, numerous reports have proposed its application on diseases related to insulin resistance such as obesity and diabetes [13–15].
This study extended such previous investigations, demonstrating that low-frequency electroacupuncture could improve insulin sensitivity in db/db mice, a genetically obese diabetic animal. More importantly, this study suggested a potential molecular mechanism whereby EA treatment ameliorates insulin resistance in db/db mice. EA increased SIRT1 protein expression and upregulated PGC-1α, NRF1, and ACOX gene expression. In turn, this could enhance mitochondrial biogenesis and fatty acid oxidation and upregulate insulin-associated signal transduction with subsequent improvement in insulin resistance.
Stimulation with needles from different point locations activates muscle afferents to the spinal cord and the central nervous system. EA induces the frequency-dependent release of neuropeptides [25]. Low-frequency EA (1–15 Hz) releases a sizeable number of neuropeptides, and this appears to be essential for inducing functional changes in different organ systems. More importantly, low-frequency EA is applied more frequently for the treatment of insulin resistance with beneficial results [14, 15]. Indeed, early insulin resistance in obesity is closely associated with overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system, which induces a proinflammatory state and thus contributes to the development of T2DM [26].
Low-frequency EA at the points of abdomen and/or hindlimb attenuates sympathetic nerve activity [27, 28], whereas EA at the points of upper limbs induces sympathetic nerve activity [29]. Therefore, this study targeted ST36 points in the hindlimb and CV4 points in the abdomen and stimulated these with low-frequency EA.
Lines of evidence have demonstrated that EA is capable of improving hyperglycemia in the fasting stage, with a marked increase in plasma insulin levels in diabetic rats [14, 30]. In accordance with these studies, the present work has demonstrated that eight-week EA treatment decreased FBG levels and maintained insulin levels. This supports the suggestion that the effect of EA in regulating BG may be insulin dependent.
Ameliorated insulin sensitivity after EA was established by IPITT, which may be attributed to improvement of responsiveness to insulin via excitation of somatic afferent fibers by EA [31]. Additionally, this study indicated that EA decreased HbA1c in the absence of statistical significance, which may be ascribed to insufficient course of treatment or limited quantity of subjects. Further, long-term study is necessary to warrant the effect of EA on HbA1c in more experimental animals.
SIRT1 levels may increase in rodent and human tissues in response to calorie restriction and exercise [2]. This increase is assumed to cause favorable changes in metabolism. Indeed, activation of SIRT1 has been implicated as potential therapy to protect against insulin resistance [6, 32]. The present study revealed that EA activated SIRT1, indicating that improved insulin resistance by EA may be attributed to enhanced SIRT1 expression. Further, SIRT1 can protect against insulin resistance by deacetylating the substrate PGC-1α and increasing PGC-1α activity [33]. PGC-1α was recently demonstrated to integrate insulin signaling, mitochondrial regulation, and bioenergetic function in skeletal muscle [23]. Overexpression of PGC-1α rescued insulin signaling and mitochondrial bioenergetics, and its silencing concordantly disrupted these activities [23]. Collectively, these studies support the possibility that EA improves insulin sensitivity, at least partially, because of increasing SIRT1/PGC-1α in skeletal muscle.
Intriguingly, PGC-1α gene expression levels of db/db mice were higher than those of db/m mice. It is possible that elevated PGC-1α was a compensatory response to elevated fatty acid substrate availability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) stimulation under the oxidative stress of diabetes. Alternatively, the effect may reflect the posttranslational regulation of PGC-1α, in which case gene expression may not always correlate with protein levels [34]. To support this, db/db mice that develop hyperglycemia have recorded lower skeletal muscle PGC-1α levels [23] and high PGC-1α mRNA levels [20] compared with strain-matched C57BL/6J mice. In this respect, the effect of EA on PGC-1α protein expression requires further investigation.
As PGC-1α is a coactivator for NRF1 expression [24], discrepancy between induced PGC-1α and reduced NRF1 gene levels in db/db mice may indicate that mitochondrial function was improved by EA [34]. The resultant increase in expression of mitochondrial genes, including NRF1, may exert positive effects on insulin signaling [12] (Figure 4).
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
This study has its share of limitations. There is no definite confirmation that EA improves glucose clearance and uptake into skeletal muscle to account for ITT data. Therefore, it remains a possibility that the liver, adipose tissues, or certain tissues are responsible for ITT improvement (e.g., electroacupuncture improved P-AMPK in white adipose tissue and liver; P-Akt improved P-AMPK in white adipose tissue but not in liver; data not shown).
This study suggested a preliminary mechanism of electroacupuncture. Specifically, low-frequency EA improved insulin sensitivity in a mouse model of genetic insulin resistance and diabetes, at least in part, via stimulation of SIRT1/PGC-1α in the skeletal muscle. Events involved in this mechanism are presented in Figure 4. This effect leads to a net switch in the metabolic program of the organism to an adaptation that may be of benefit in the face of disorders characterized by insulin resistance. The study introduces an effective and safe activator (electroacupuncture) for SIRT1, offering a basis for applying acupuncture in clinical practice in the treatment of diseases related to insulin resistance.
Conflict of Interests
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere thanks to Dr. Munehiro Kitada for his advice and Noriko Imaizumi for her technology assistance. F. Liang and R. Chen contributed equally to this work.
[1] T. Kelly, W. Yang, C.-S. Chen, K. Reynolds, J. He, "Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030," International Journal of Obesity, vol. 32 no. 9, pp. 1431-1437, DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2008.102, 2008.
[2] M. Fulco, V. Sartorelli, "Comparing and contrasting the roles of AMPK and SIRT1 in metabolic tissues," Cell Cycle, vol. 7 no. 23, pp. 3669-3679, 2008.
[3] F. Liang, S. Kume, D. Koya, "SIRT1 and insulin resistance," Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 5 no. 7, pp. 367-373, DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.101, 2009.
[4] C. Sun, F. Zhang, X. Ge, T. Yan, X. Chen, X. Shi, Q. Zhai, "SIRT1 improves insulin sensitivity under insulin-resistant conditions by repressing PTP1B," Cell Metabolism, vol. 6 no. 4, pp. 307-319, DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.08.014, 2007.
[5] J. Zhang, "The direct involvement of SirT1 in insulin-induced insulin receptor substrate-2 tyrosine phosphorylation," Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282 no. 47, pp. 34356-34364, DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M706644200, 2007.
[6] J. C. Milne, P. D. Lambert, S. Schenk, D. P. Carney, J. J. Smith, D. J. Gagne, L. Jin, O. Boss, R. B. Perni, C. B. Vu, J. E. Bemis, R. Xie, J. S. Disch, P. Y. Ng, J. J. Nunes, A. V. Lynch, H. Yang, H. Galonek, K. Israelian, W. Choy, A. Iffland, S. Lavu, O. Medvedik, D. A. Sinclair, J. M. Olefsky, M. R. Jirousek, P. J. Elliott, C. H. Westphal, "Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes," Nature, vol. 450 no. 7170, pp. 712-716, DOI: 10.1038/nature06261, 2007.
[7] A. S. Banks, N. Kon, C. Knight, M. Matsumoto, R. Gutiérrez-Juárez, L. Rossetti, W. Gu, D. Accili, "SirT1 gain of function increases energy efficiency and prevents diabetes in mice," Cell Metabolism, vol. 8 no. 4, pp. 333-341, DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.08.014, 2008.
[8] P. T. Pfluger, D. Herranz, S. Velasco-Miguel, M. Serrano, M. H. Tschöp, "Sirt1 protects against high-fat diet-induced metabolic damage," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105 no. 28, pp. 9793-9798, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802917105, 2008.
[9] B. N. Finck, D. P. Kelly, "PGC-1 coactivators: inducible regulators of energy metabolism in health and disease," Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116 no. 3, pp. 615-622, DOI: 10.1172/JCI27794, 2006.
[10] L. K. Heilbronn, K. G. Seng, N. Turner, L. V. Campbell, D. J. Chisholm, "Markers of mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolism are lower in overweight and obese insulin-resistant subjects," Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 92 no. 4, pp. 1467-1473, DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-2210, 2007.
[11] T. R. Koves, P. Li, J. An, T. Akimoto, D. Slentz, O. Ilkayeva, G. L. Dohm, Z. Yan, C. B. Newgard, D. M. Muoio, "Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- γ co-activator 1 α -mediated metabolic remodeling of skeletal myocytes mimics exercise training and reverses lipid-induced mitochondrial inefficiency," Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280 no. 39, pp. 33588-33598, DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M507621200, 2005.
[12] Z. Gerhart-Hines, J. T. Rodgers, O. Bare, C. Lerin, S.-H. Kim, R. Mostoslavsky, F. W. Alt, Z. Wu, P. Puigserver, "Metabolic control of muscle mitochondrial function and fatty acid oxidation through SIRT1/PGC-1 α," EMBO Journal, vol. 26 no. 7, pp. 1913-1923, DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601633, 2007.
[13] F. Wang, D.-R. Tian, J.-S. Han, "Electroacupuncture in the treatment of obesity," Neurochemical Research, vol. 33 no. 10, pp. 2023-2027, DOI: 10.1007/s11064-008-9822-6, 2008.
[14] N. Ishizaki, N. Okushi, T. Yano, Y. Yamamura, "Improvement in glucose tolerance as a result of enhanced insulin sensitivity during electroacupuncture in spontaneously diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats," Metabolism, vol. 58 no. 10, pp. 1372-1378, DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.05.001, 2009.
[15] Y. Lee, T. Li, C. Tzeng, "Electroacupuncture at the Zusanli (ST-36) acupoint induces a hypoglycemic effect by stimulating the cholinergic nerve in a rat model of streptozotocine-induced insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus," ,DOI: 10.1093/ecam/neq068, .
[16] N.-N. Chu, W. Xia, P. Yu, L. Hu, R. Zhang, C.-L. Cui, "Chronic morphine-induced neuronal morphological changes in the ventral tegmental area in rats are reversed by electroacupuncture treatment," Addiction Biology, vol. 13 no. 1, pp. 47-51, DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00092.x, 2008.
[17] P. J. Atherton, J. Babraj, K. Smith, J. Singh, M. J. Rennie, H. Wackerhage, "Selective activation of AMPK-PGC-1 α or PKB-TSC2-mTOR signaling can explain specific adaptive responses to endurance or resistance training-like electrical muscle stimulation," FASEB Journal, vol. 19 no. 7, pp. 786-788, DOI: 10.1096/04-2179fje, 2005.
[18] M. Suwa, H. Nakano, Z. Radak, S. Kumagai, "Endurance exercise increases the SIRT1 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1 α protein expressions in rat skeletal muscle," Metabolism, vol. 57 no. 7, pp. 986-998, DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.02.017, 2008.
[19] M. Ikarashi, T. Toda, T. Okaniwa, K. Ito, W. Ochiai, K. Sugiyama, "Anti-obesity and anti-diabetic effects of acacia polyphenol in obese diabetic KKAy mice fed high-fat diet," ,DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep241, .
[20] N. Takeshita, T. Yoshino, S. Mutoh, "Possible involvement of corticosterone in bone loss of genetically diabetic db/db mice," Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 32 no. 4, pp. 147-151, 2000.
[21] T. Sasaki, B. Maier, K. D. Koclega, M. Chruszcz, W. Gluba, P. T. Stukenberg, W. Minor, H. Scrable, "Phosphorylation regulates SIRT1 function," PLoS ONE, vol. 3 no. 12, article e4020,DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004020, 2008.
[22] N. Turner, C. R. Bruce, S. M. Beale, K. L. Hoehn, T. So, M. S. Rolph, G. J. Cooney, "Excess lipid availability increases mitochondrial fatty acid oxidative capacity in muscle: evidence against a role for reduced fatty acid oxidation in lipid-induced insulin resistance in rodents," Diabetes, vol. 56 no. 8, pp. 2085-2092, DOI: 10.2337/db07-0093, 2007.
[23] I. Pagel-Langenickel, J. Bao, J. J. Joseph, D. R. Schwartz, B. S. Mantell, X. Xu, N. Raghavachari, M. N. Sack, "PGC-1 α integrates insulin signaling, mitochondrial regulation, and bioenergetic function in skeletal muscle," Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283 no. 33, pp. 22464-22472, DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M800842200, 2008.
[24] Z. Wu, P. Puigserver, U. Andersson, C. Zhang, G. Adelmant, V. Mootha, A. Troy, S. Cinti, B. Lowell, R. C. Scarpulla, B. M. Spiegelman, "Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1," Cell, vol. 98 no. 1, pp. 115-124, DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80611-X, 1999.
[25] J.-S. Han, "Acupuncture: neuropeptide release produced by electrical stimulation of different frequencies," Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 26 no. 1, pp. 17-22, DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00006-1, 2003.
[26] J. R. Greenfield, L. V. Campbell, "Role of the autonomic nervous system and neuropeptides in the development of obesity in humans: targets for therapy?," Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 14 no. 18, pp. 1815-1820, DOI: 10.2174/138161208784746716, 2008.
[27] M. Sugimachi, T. Kawada, A. Kamiya, M. Li, C. Zheng, K. Sunagawa, "Electrical acupuncture modifies autonomic balance by resetting the neural arc of arterial baroreflex system," Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of IEEE-EMBS, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '07), pp. 5334-5337, DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353546, .
[28] E. Stener-Victorin, E. Jedel, P. O. Janson, Y. B. Sverrisdottir, "Low-frequency electroacupuncture and physical exercise decrease high muscle sympathetic nerve activity in polycystic ovary syndrome," American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 297 no. 2, pp. R387-R395, DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00197.2009, 2009.
[29] T.-B. Lin, T.-C. Fu, C.-F. Chen, Y.-J. Lin, C.-T. Chien, "Low and high frequency electroacupuncture at Hoku elicits a distinct mechanism to activate sympathetic nervous system in anesthetized rats," Neuroscience Letters, vol. 247 no. 2-3, pp. 155-158, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00298-5, 1998.
[30] S. L. Chang, J. G. Lin, T. C. Chi, I. M. Liu, J. T. Cheng, "An insulin-dependent hypoglycaemia induced by electroacupuncture at the Zhongwan (CV12) acupoint in diabetic rats," Diabetologia, vol. 42 no. 2, pp. 250-255, DOI: 10.1007/s001250051146, 1999.
[31] Y. Higashimura, R. Shimoju, H. Maruyama, M. Kurosawa, "Electro-acupuncture improves responsiveness to insulin via excitation of somatic afferent fibers in diabetic rats," Autonomic Neuroscience, vol. 150 no. 1-2, pp. 100-103, DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2009.06.003, 2009.
[32] J. N. Feige, M. Lagouge, C. Canto, A. Strehle, S. M. Houten, J. C. Milne, P. D. Lambert, C. Mataki, P. J. Elliott, J. Auwerx, "Specific SIRT1 activation mimics low energy levels and protects against diet-induced metabolic disorders by enhancing fat oxidation," Cell Metabolism, vol. 8 no. 5, pp. 347-358, DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.08.017, 2008.
[33] M. Lagouge, C. Argmann, Z. Gerhart-Hines, H. Meziane, C. Lerin, F. Daussin, N. Messadeq, J. Milne, P. Lambert, P. Elliott, B. Geny, M. Laakso, P. Puigserver, J. Auwerx, "Resveratrol improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC-1 α," Cell, vol. 127 no. 6, pp. 1109-1122, DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.013, 2006.
[34] P. Puigserver, J. Rhee, J. Lin, Z. Wu, J. C. Yoon, C.-Y. Zhang, S. Krauss, V. K. Mootha, B. B. Lowell, B. M. Spiegelman, "Cytokine stimulation of energy expenditure through p38 MAP kinase activation of PPAR γ coactivator-1," Molecular Cell, vol. 8 no. 5, pp. 971-982, DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00390-2, 2001.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2011 Fengxia Liang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Electroacupuncture (EA) has been observed to reduce insulin resistance in obesity and diabetes. However, the biochemical mechanism underlying this effect remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of low-frequency EA on metabolic action in genetically obese and type 2 diabetic db/db mice. Nine-week-old db/m and db/db mice were randomly divided into four groups, namely, db/m, db/m + EA, db/db, and db/db + EA. db/m + EA and db/db + EA mice received 3-Hz electroacupuncture five times weekly for eight consecutive weeks. In db/db mice, EA tempered the increase in fasting blood glucose, food intake, and body mass and maintained insulin levels. In EA-treated db/db mice, improved insulin sensitivity was established through intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test. EA was likewise observed to decrease free fatty acid levels in db/db mice; it increased protein expression in skeletal muscle Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and induced gene expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China; Endocrinology and Metabolism Division, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Kahoku-Gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan
2 Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
3 Endocrinology and Metabolism Division, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Kahoku-Gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan
4 Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China