Content area

Abstract

Although more than thirty years of intensive investigation have passed since McClintock first published results on menstrual synchrony, there is still no conclusive evidence for the existence of this phenomenon. Indeed, a growing body of nullresult studies, critiques of menstrual synchrony studies, and the lack of convincing evolutionary explanations bring into question the existence of this phenomenon. This paper presents results of a study conducted over five consecutive months in Polish student dormitories. In 18 pairs and 21 triples of college-age women, menstrual synchrony was not found. Social interactions, considered the most important factor mediating the effect of menstrual synchrony, was unrelated to any difference in menstrual cycle onsets. Initial menstrual onset difference was influenced by woman's body mass and menstrual cycle irregularity. These results provide further evidence that women do not synchronize their menstrual cycles.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Details

Title
Menstrual synchrony: Fact or artifact?
Author
Ziomkiewicz, Anna
Pages
419-432
Publication year
2006
Publication date
Dec 2006
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
10456767
e-ISSN
19364776
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
821840191
Copyright
Springer 2006