1. Introduction
Cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) is a native fruit of South America that has gained relevance in recent years worldwide. It is characterized as a pulpy and very aromatic fruit, which makes it highly appreciated in international markets. The Annonaceae family features more than 100 genera and more than 2000 species [1,2,3], and it has been cultivated since 3400 B.C.
During recent years, cherimoya production has increased all over the world, and it is mainly consumed fresh. In addition, it has been used in traditional medicine to treat dysentery, inflammation, and rheumatism and as anticonvulsant [4,5,6,7]; several authors have studied the properties of different species of Annona and its application in medicine and food and as an alternative crop [8,9,10].
Cherimoya needs temperate climatic conditions and it is cultivated mainly in Spain, the United States, Mexico, Guatemala, and Peru [10]. It is characterized by having high contents of ascorbic acid, potassium, and minerals; when the cherimoya fruits are maturating, the pulp loses its firmness due to the enzyme action, mainly cellulases and polygalacturonases [2,10,11,12]. After harvest, fruits and vegetables continue the respiration process and thus the maturing process [13].
The consumption of ready-to-eat foods has increased in the last years due to the current lifestyles. Ready-to-eat cherimoya can be found in supermarkets, but the fruits have a low shelf life. An alternative that has been developed to solve this problem is the application of edible coatings based on natural polymers [14,15,16]. Edible coatings are applied as a monolayer and can be made from proteins [17,18,19], carbohydrates [20,21], oils, or a mixture of them [22,23]. It can be applied by immersion, spraying, or brushing and is considered fit for use to extend fresh fruit shelf-life without causing anaerobiosis and reducing decay without affecting their quality. The edible coating must have special requirements such as gas and moisture barrier, color, mechanical properties, and being non-toxic, among other characteristics [13].
Edible coatings have demonstrated their ability to protect foods [19,24,25,26], but in recent years, the application of multilayered coatings have demonstrated the improvement of fresh fruit shelf life. In this technique, oppositely charged solutions are used to dip the fruit, creating a layer-by-layer coating that enhances fruit properties [27,28,29,30].
Multilayer coatings have demonstrated their ability to improve or extend the performance of a monolayer material [31] and can improve their mechanical properties [32]. Moreover, taking in consideration the physicochemical characteristics of each layer, the adherence can be improve and thus the product shelf life as well [33]. Unfortunately, there are few studies about the improvement of shelf life in cherimoya. For example, Liu et al. [30] reported the use of a chitosan coating, which preserved some properties such as fruit firmness and membrane integrity of the fruit for a longer time compared with the control sample. Similar results were reported by Arnon [34] by applying polysaccharide-based edible multicoating on citrus fruit, improving the product shelf life. In addition, Martiñon [35] applied a multilayer coating based on chitosan and/or pectin on fresh cantaloupe, achieving an improvement in the characteristics of the fruit and in its shelf life. Moreover, Treviño-Garza [36] developed a layer-by-layer edible coating based on mucilages and chitosan and demonstrated their ability to maintain the quality and preservation of fresh pineapple.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the shelf-life-enhancing ability of fresh-cut, ready-to-eat cherimoya using multilayer, edible coatings based on proteins and carbohydrates.
2. Materials and Methods
Reagents and cherimoya fruits:
Commercial whey protein isolate (WPI) was obtained by Nature’s Best (Hauppauge, NY, USA). Chitosan reagent (≥90% deacetylation; medium molecular weight) was obtained from Chemsavers (Bluefield, VA, USA); sorbitol and all other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Fresh cherimoyas were purchased from a local market. Fruits were prepared as described by Rossi-Márquez et al. [14]. Briefly, cherimoya samples were washed with distilled water and peeled. After, they were cut into 2 cm squares pieces. All samples were washed using a chlorinated solution (0.01 g/100 mL) for 5 min and then left to dry out for 5 min. Control and coated samples were chosen randomly.
Film forming solutions preparation:
Two different coating solutions were prepared. Solution A was prepared by dissolving 5 g of whey protein isolate (WPI) and 7 g of sorbitol in 100 mL of distilled water, and after, the pH was adjusted to pH 7.0. The solution was heated to 90 °C for 25 min to favor the protein denaturation. Then, the solution was allowed to cool at room temperature until use. Solution B was prepared to obtain 0.8 % w/v chitosan solution (CH) using 0.1 N HCl.
Coating application:
Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of whey protein films and/or chitosan to enhance the shelf life of fresh-cut fruits or vegetables [37,38,39]. Rossi et al. [14] showed that the presence of a whey-protein-based coating reduced the water loss of different vegetables and apples, improving the shelf life of the product. Moreover, due to the different charges of the molecules, it was decided to apply the protein solution first and the chitosan solution in a second stage.
To evaluate the effect of coating application, the fruit pieces previously prepared were divided in four groups and subjected to the follow treatments. Single-layered coating (SC) was obtained by dipping the fruit pieces into solution A (SC-A) or solution B (SC-B) for 5 min, draining, for 10 min and then dipping again in the same solution for 5 min and finally draining again for 10 min. For multilayered coating samples (MC) fruit pieces were immersed into solution A for 5 min and then drained for 10 min. After, they were immersed into solution B for 5 min and then drained for 10 min. For uncoated samples (UC), samples were immersed in distilled water with the same procedure used for SC samples. Samples were stored at 5 °C for either two, seven, or ten days in sealed, low-density polyethylene bags (5 pieces/bag) before they were analyzed (1 bag by each treatment).
Quality parameters:
Hardness:
Hardness was evaluated as described by Rossi-Marquez [14]. The methodology includes the use of an Instron universal testing machine model no. 5543A (Instron Engineering Corp., Norwood, MA, USA) rigged with a 2 kN load cell for compression mode with a cylindrical probe (55 mm in diameter). Samples were compressed to 50% of deformation. Analyses were performed with at least five samples per treatment.
Weight loss and pH:
The pH was determined using the AOAC method 981.12 [40] using a digital pH-meter (LAQUA pH 1100, Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan). For weight loss, samples were weighted using a digital balance, and then, calculation was performed using the following equation:
(1)
Total phenolic content:
Uncoated and coated cherimoya samples were analyzed by their phenolic contents using a modification of the Folin–Ciocalteu method [41] described by Rossi-Márquez et al. [14]. First, 10 g of each sample was homogenized in 80 mL of water, then centrifuged at 200× g and 4 °C for 10 min. After, 0.5 mL of supernatant was mixed with 2.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent (100 g/L), and subsequently, 2 mL of sodium bicarbonate solution (75 g/L) was added. Samples were incubated for 1 h at 30 °C and after again for an additional 1 h at 4 °C. Finally, absorbance was measured at 760 nm. Total phenolic content is expressed as g of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/kg of each sample (fresh weight).
Total Soluble Solids (°Brix) and Protein Content:
Total soluble solids (TSS) expressed in °Brix was determined to 25 °C by using the RHB-32ATC refractometer (Yhequipment CO., LIMITED, Shenzhen City, China). Protein content was measured using Kjedahl’s method ASTM E258-07.
Statistical Analysis:
Results were analyzed using the JMP 8.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), applying the Tukey–Kramer test (p < 0.05) to determine the differences.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Hardness (N)
A hardness test can indicate that the senescence process has occurred, and it is related to the fruit freshness as perceived by the consumer [42]. As shown in Figure 1, for the uncoated samples, there was a reduction on the hardness value over time, and this can be attributed to an enzymatic degradation of cell walls [13]. The coatings slightly increase the hardness of the fruit due to the thin layer generated on the fruit surface and help retain its texture for up to 2 days of storage. After 7 days of storage, a linear decrease in hardness was observed even in the coated fruits, which, in any case, remained harder than the uncoated fruits. This result can be attributed to the low-O2 atmosphere created on the surface because of the presence of a barrier that can inhibit the activity of the enzymes associated in the cell wall degradation mechanism and solubilization of pectins [43]. Nevertheless, at 7 and 10 days of storage, the multilayer coating achieved a hardness of the fruit comparable with fresh fruits. These results may be due to the increased deposition of the acidic chitosan solution on the negative surface of the protein coating that improved the barrier properties, creating a modified atmosphere with high CO2 and low O2, which reduced the respiration rate, as shown previously in mangoes [44] and papaya [45]. Moreover, the antibacterial properties of the chitosan coating could have a role in the improvement of shelf life [46], as our results indicated that the of the multilayer coating could promote the shelf life of fresh cut fruits using natural ingredients.
3.2. Weight Loss and pH
As expected, there was a weight loss over time in all samples. Once the vegetable or fruit has been harvested, it loses weight due to the respiration process and begins a process of deterioration. As shown in Figure 2, the presence of a single coating reduced the weight loss of cherimoya samples, but the presence of multilayered coating significatively decreased the weight loss. This effect can be attributed to the creation of a wall on the cherimoya exterior that can reduce the respiration rate of the fruit. Yonemoto et al. [47] applied a wax coating on cherimoya fruit, reducing the weight loss, achieving a better fruit appearance, and reducing fruit spoilage.
The presence of a multilayered coating reduced the variability of the pH value and kept it constant over time (Figure 3). Several authors reported a pH decrease during cherimoya ripening [48,49] although, in this study, the pH did not undergo a significant change during the 10 days that the experiment lasted.
3.3. Total Phenolic Content
Edible coatings can act as a barrier to prevent the gas transfer and protect the fruits against the oxidation process. Phenolics have a chemoprotective effect and can positively affect human health [50,51,52]. The presence of single-layer or multi-layer coating prevents phenolic loss.
Moreover, the multilayer coating on samples keeps the total phenolic values constant over time (Figure 4). These results are in agreement with different authors who demonstrated the ability of edible coatings to reduce the loss of phenolic content in fresh fruit [14,53,54].
3.4. Brix Percentage and Protein Content
The ripening process can be associated with an increase of soluble solids in cherimoya [55]. As was shown in Table 1, uncoated samples increased their °Brix over time, an effect that can be attributed to increases of glucose and fructose content, while the presence of the multilayer coating reduced the value and kept it at a proper level until the tenth day. These results are similar to those reported by Palma [56], who mentioned that ripened cherimoya fruits should have 18–24 °Brix values among varieties.
For protein contents, similar results were observed (Table 1), where the presence of the multilayer coating reduced the protein content loss over time. This may be due to a barrier effect of the coating, which can reduce the gas and liquid migrations, preventing the loss of the proteins. These results are comparable to those reported by Hernández-Fuentes et al. [10], who studied the bioactive components of cherimoya grown in Mexico.
In line with the results of this study, the use of multilayered coating made by using whey proteins and chitosan showed a positive effect during the storage days on the color retention and the visual appearance of MC-coated fruit pieces with respect to the other samples (Figure 5).
4. Conclusions
The progress of ripening is generally determined by several physicochemical changes. For cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) fruit, ethylene production is a late event, where ripening is associated with a decrease in pulp firmness and a large increase in both soluble solids contents and titratable acidity [55]. Moreover, fresh-cut fruit continues to lose moisture due to transpiration after the skin is removed; therefore, the weight loss continues to increase during the storage, and the fruit turgidity decreases. Edible coatings are able to create a barrier on the fruit surface, creating a natural and transparent skin able to inhibit the respiration rate affecting the enzymatic degradation of the cell wall and to decrease the water loss, preserving the turgidity of fruit structure. These characteristics can be improved by the application of a multilayered coating that can be prepared using natural components such as proteins, carbohydrates, or a mix of them. The presence of the multilayer coating is able to counteract the increase of acidity and soluble solids and protein degradation, slowing down maturation process. In addition, preserving the total phenolic content of cherimoya fruit can be a useful tool to maintain their nutraceutical properties.
Conceptualization, G.R.-M., P.D.P. and N.M.-P.; methodology, P.D.P., G.R.-M. and N.M.-P.; validation, G.R.-M., C.A.D.-S. and N.M.-P.; formal analysis, C.A.D.-S., P.D.P., G.R.-M. and N.M.-P.; investigation, C.A.D.-S., G.R.-M. and P.D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A.D.-S. and G.R.-M.; writing—review and editing, P.D.P., G.R.-M., N.M.-P. and C.A.D.-S.; project administration, P.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Data is contained within the article.
C.A.D.S. and G.R.-M. would like to thank the Instituto Tecnológico José Mario Molina Pasquel y Henríquez for the use of the facilities.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Hardness values for uncoated sample and for single-layer and multilayer coating treatment. N = 3; data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 2. Weight loss of sliced cherimoya with different treatments: uncoated samples (UC), single coating A (SC-A), single coating B (SC-B), and multilayered coating (MC). N = 3; data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 3. pH values of sliced cherimoya with different treatments: uncoated samples (UC), single coating A (SC-A), single coating B (SC-B), and multilayered coating (MC). N = 3; data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4. Coatings’ effect on cherimoya phenolic content over time. Total phenolic content was detected in uncoated, single-layer, and multilayer coating on cherimoya at 0 and 10 days of their storage. N = 3; data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 5. The visual appearance of cherimoya pieces after coating treatments during storage at 0 (panel A), 7 (panel B), and 10 days (panel C). 1, UC; 2, SC-A; 3, SC-B; 4, MC.
Total soluble solid and protein content in uncoated and differently coated cherimoya samples during 10 days of preservation.
Samples | Days | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | |||||
Prot. | Brix | Prot. | Brix | Prot. | Brix | Prot. | Brix | |
UC | 1.42 ± 0.21 | 23.2 ± 1.2 | 1.03 ± 0.13 | 25.3 ± 0.9 | 0.77 ± 0.1 | 28.5 ± 1.2 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 30.9 ± 1.2 |
SC-A | 1.44 ± 0.11 | 22.7 ± 1.4 | 1.35 ± 0.32 | 23.8 ± 1.2 | 0.85 ± 0.2 | 26.2± 1.0 | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 28.7 ± 0.9 |
SC-B | 1.38 ± 0.11 | 23.6 ± 1.1 | 1.25 ± 0.12 | 24.5 ± 1.2 | 0.85 ± 0.2 | 25.2 ± 1.2 | 0.81 ± 0.2 | 27.4 ± 1.2 |
MC | 1.42 ± 0.23 | 23.1 ± 1.5 | 1.32 ± 0.38 | 24.1 ± 1.3 | 1.16 ± 0.09 | 25.1 ± 1.5 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 26.23± 1.2 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (N = 5).
References
1. Chatrou, L.W.; Pirie, M.D.; Erkens, R.H.; Couvreur, T.L.; Neubig, K.M.; Abbott, J.R.; Mols, J.B.; Maas, J.W.; Saunders, R.M.; Chase, M.W. A new sub-familial and tribal classification of the pantropical flowering plant family Annonaceae informed by molecular phylogenetics. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.; 2012; 169, pp. 5-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01235.x]
2. Campos-Vargas, R.; Olmedo, P. Subtropical fruits: Cherimoyas. Controlled and Modified Atmospheres for Fresh and Fresh-Cut Produce; Gil, M.I.; Beaudry, R. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 399-409.
3. Rodríguez-Núñez, J.R.; Campos-Rojas, E.; Andrés-Agustín, J.; Alia-Tejacal, I.; Peña-Caballero, V.; Madera-Santana, T.J.; Núñez-Colín, C.A. Distribution, eco-climatic characterisation, and potential growing regions of Annona cherimola Mill. (Annonaceae) in Mexico. Ethnobiol. Conserv.; 2021; 10, pp. 1-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15451/ec2020-10-10.05-1-17]
4. Calzada, F.; Correa-Basurto, J.; Barbosa, E.; Mendez-Luna, D.; Yepez-Mulia, L. Antiprotozoal constituents from Annona cherimola Miller, a plant used in Mexican traditional medicine for the treatment of diarrhea and dysentery. Pharmacogn. Mag.; 2017; 13, 148. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216899]
5. Coria-Téllez, A.V.; Montalvo-Gónzalez, E.; Yahia, E.M.; Obledo-Vázquez, E.N. Annona muricata: A comprehensive review on its traditional medicinal uses, phytochemicals, pharmacological activities, mechanisms of action and toxicity. Arab. J. Chem.; 2018; 11, pp. 662-691. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.01.004]
6. Hamid, R.A.; Foong, C.P.; Ahmad, Z.; Hussain, M.K. Antinociceptive and antiulcerogenic activities of the ethanolic extract of Annona muricata leaf. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn.; 2012; 22, pp. 630-641. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2012005000001]
7. Konate, A.; Sawadogo, W.R.; Dubruc, F.; Caillard, O.; Ouedraogo, M.; Guissou, I.P. Phytochemical and Anticonvulsant Properties of “Annona senegalensis” Pers. (Annonaceae), Plant Used in Burkina Folk Medicine to Treat Epilepsy and Convulsions. Br. J. Pharm. Tox.; 2012; 3, pp. 245-250.
8. Errayes, A.O.; Abdussalam-Mohammed, W.; Darwish, M.O. Review of phytochemical and medical applications of Annona muricata Fruits. J. Chem. Rev.; 2020; 2, pp. 70-79.
9. Bhattacharya, A.; Chakraverty, R. The pharmacological properties of Annona squamosa Linn: A Review. Int. J. Pharm. Eng.; 2016; 4, pp. 692-699.
10. Hernández Fuentes, L.M.; Montalvo González, E.; García Magaña, M.D.L.; Anaya Esparza, L.M.; Nolasco González, Y.; Villagrán, Z.; González Torres, S.; Velázquez Monreal, J.J.; Morelos Flores, D.A. Current Situation and Perspectives of Fruit Annonaceae in Mexico: Biological and Agronomic Importance and Bioactive Properties. Plants; 2021; 11, 7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11010007]
11. Pareek, S.; Yahia, E.M.; Pareek, O.P.; Kaushik, R.A. Postharvest physiology and technology of Annona fruit. Food Res. Int.; 2011; 44, pp. 1741-1751. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.016]
12. Cordeiro, N.; Sousa, L.; Freitas, N.; Gouveia, M. Changes in the mesocarp of Annona cherimola Mill. ‘Madeira’ during postharvest ripening. Postharvest Biol. Technol.; 2013; 85, pp. 179-184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.05.014]
13. Dhall, R.K. Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.; 2013; 53, pp. 435-450. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.541568] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391012]
14. Rossi-Marquez, G.; Di Pierro, P.; Mariniello, L.; Esposito, M.; Giosafatto, C.V.; Porta, R. Fresh-cut fruit and vegetable coatings by transglutaminase-crosslinked whey protein/pectin edible films. LWT; 2017; 75, pp. 124-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.017]
15. Karagöz, Ş.; Demirdöven, A. Effect of chitosan coatings with and without Stevia rebaudiana and modified atmosphere packaging on quality of cold stored fresh-cut apples. LWT; 2019; 108, pp. 332-337. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.03.040]
16. Nayak, S.L.; Sethi, S.; Sharma, R.R.; Prajapati, U. Active Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. Polymers for Agri-Food Applications; Gutiérrez, T.J. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 417-432.
17. Perez-Gago, M.B.; Serra, M.; del Río, M.A. Color change of fresh-cut apples coated with whey protein concentrate-based edible coatings. Postharvest Biol. Technol.; 2006; 39, pp. 84-92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.08.002]
18. Soazo, M.; Pérez, L.M.; Rubiolo, A.C.; Verdini, R.A. Pre-freezing application of whey protein-based edible coating to maintain quality attributes of strawberries. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol.; 2015; 50, pp. 605-611. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12667]
19. Zhang, L.; Chen, F.; Lai, S.; Wang, H.; Yang, H. Impact of soybean protein isolate-chitosan edible coating on the softening of apricot fruit during storage. LWT; 2018; 96, pp. 604-611. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.011]
20. Moalemiyan, M.; Ramaswamy, H.S.; Maftoonazad, N. Pectin-based edible coating for shelf-life extension of Ataulfo mango. J. Food Process Eng.; 2012; 35, pp. 572-600. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2010.00609.x]
21. Aghaei, K.; Ghajarbeygi, P. The Effect of Edible Chitosan Coatings with Cinnamon Essential Oil on the Shelf Life of Strawberry. Doctoral Dissertation; Gazvin University of Medical Sciences: Gazvin, Iran, 2019; Available online: http://eprints.qums.ac.ir/8730/ (accessed on 20 September 2022).
22. Araújo, J.M.S.; de Siqueira, A.C.P.; Blank, A.F.; Narain, N.; de Aquino Santana, L.C.L. A cassava starch–chitosan edible coating enriched with Lippia sidoides Cham. essential oil and pomegranate peel extract for preservation of italian tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) stored at room temperature. Food Bioprocess Technol.; 2018; 11, pp. 1750-1760. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-018-2139-9]
23. Minh, N.P.; Vo, T.T.; Dung, H.T.B.; Ngoc, T.T.B.; Duong, L.C.; Nghi, T.T.T. Preservation of Jackfruit Bulb by Transglutaminase Crosslinked Whey Protein/Pectin As Edible Film Coating. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. Res.; 2019; 11, pp. 1401-1405.
24. Shiekh, R.A.; Malik, M.A.; Al-Thabaiti, S.A.; Shiekh, M.A. Chitosan as a novel edible coating for fresh fruits. Food Sci. Technol. Res.; 2013; 19, pp. 139-155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3136/fstr.19.139]
25. Abedi, A.; Lakzadeh, L.; Amouheydari, M. Effect of an edible coating composed of whey protein concentrate and rosemary essential oil on the shelf life of fresh spinach. J. Food Process. Preserv.; 2021; 45, e15284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15284]
26. Nicolau-Lapena, I.; Colas-Meda, P.; Alegre, I.; Aguilo-Aguayo, I.; Muranyi, P.; Vinas, I. Aloe vera gel: An update on its use as a functional edible coating to preserve fruits and vegetables. Prog. Org. Coat.; 2021; 151, 106007. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.106007]
27. Mantilla, N.; Castell-Perez, M.E.; Gomes, C.; Moreira, R.G. Multilayered antimicrobial edible coating and its effect on quality and shelf-life of fresh-cut pineapple (Ananas comosus). LWT-Food Sci. Technol.; 2013; 51, pp. 37-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.10.010]
28. Sipahi, R.E.; Castell-Perez, M.E.; Moreira, R.G.; Gomes, C.; Castillo, A. Improved multilayered antimicrobial alginate-based edible coating extends the shelf life of fresh-cut watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). LWT; 2013; 51, pp. 9-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.11.013]
29. Zhang, W.; Shu, C.; Chen, Q.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. The multi-layer film system improved the release and retention properties of cinnamon essential oil and its application as coating in inhibition to penicillium expansion of apple fruit. Food Chem.; 2019; 299, 125109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125109]
30. Liu, K.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Yuan, C.; Zhong, J.; Chen, Y. Influence of postharvest citric acid and chitosan coating treatment on ripening attributes and expression of cell wall related genes in cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) fruit. Sci. Hortic.; 2016; 198, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.008]
31. Anukiruthika, T.; Sethupathy, P.; Wilson, A.; Kashampur, K.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Multilayer packaging: Advances in preparation techniques and emerging food applications. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.; 2020; 19, pp. 1156-1186. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12556]
32. Meyers, M.A.; Chen, P.Y.; Lin, A.Y.M.; Seki, Y. Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties. Prog. Mater. Sci.; 2008; 53, pp. 1-206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002]
33. Wang, Q.; Chen, W.; Zhu, W.; McClements, D.J.; Liu, X.; Liu, F. A review of multilayer and composite films and coatings for active biodegradable packaging. NPJ Sci. Food; 2022; 6, pp. 1-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41538-022-00132-8]
34. Arnon, H.; Granit, R.; Porat, R.; Poverenov, E. Development of polysaccharides-based edible coatings for citrus fruits: A layer-by-layer approach. Food Chem.; 2015; 166, pp. 465-472. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.061] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25053081]
35. Martiñon, M.E.; Moreira, R.G.; Castell-Perez, M.E.; Gomes, C. Development of a multilayered antimicrobial edible coating for shelf-life extension of fresh-cut cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.) stored at 4 C. LWT-Food Sci. Technol.; 2014; 56, pp. 341-350. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.043]
36. Treviño-Garza, M.Z.; García, S.; Heredia, N.; Alanís-Guzmán, M.G.; Arévalo-Niño, K. Layer-by-layer edible coatings based on mucilages, pullulan and chitosan and its effect on quality and preservation of fresh-cut pineapple (Ananas comosus). Postharvest Biol. Technol.; 2017; 128, pp. 63-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.01.007]
37. Kandasamy, S.; Yoo, J.; Yun, J.; Kang, H.B.; Seol, K.H.; Kim, H.W.; Ham, J.S. Application of whey protein-based edible films and coatings in food industries: An updated overview. Coatings; 2021; 11, 1056. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11091056]
38. Rossi-Márquez, G.; Helguera, M.; Briones, M.; Dávalos-Saucedo, C.A.; Di Pierro, P. Edible coating from enzymatically reticulated whey protein-pectin to improve shelf life of roasted peanuts. Coatings; 2021; 11, 329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030329]
39. Moreira, M.D.R.; Roura, S.I.; Ponce, A. Effectiveness of chitosan edible coatings to improve microbiological and sensory quality of fresh cut broccoli. LWT-Food Sci. Technol.; 2011; 44, pp. 2335-2341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.04.009]
40. AOAC Method 981. 12. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16 ed.; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 1996.
41. Rocha, A.M.C.N.; Morais, A.M.B.B. Polyphenoloxidase activity and total phenolic content as related to browning of minimally processed ‘Jonagored’ apple. J. Sci. Food Agric.; 2002; 82, pp. 120-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1006]
42. Lamikanra, O. Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: Science, Technology, and Market; CRC Press: Boca Ratón, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 12-19.
43. Allanigue, D.K.A.; Sabularse, V.C.; Hernandez, H.P.; Serrano, E.P. The effect of chitosan-based nanocomposite coating on the postharvest life of papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruits. Philipp. Agric. Sci.; 2017; 100, pp. 233-242.
44. Yin, C.; Huang, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Lu, P.; Huang, L. Effect of chitosan- and alginate-based coatings enriched with cinnamon essential oil microcapsules to improve the postharvest quality of mangoes. Materials; 2019; 12, 2039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12132039]
45. Zhang, L.; Huang, C.; Zhao, H. Application of pullulan and chitosan multilayer coatings in fresh papayas. Coatings; 2019; 9, 745. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings9110745]
46. Zhang, W.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, J.; Sheng, Z.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. Different molecular weights chitosan coatings delay the senescence of postharvest nectarine fruit in relation to changes of redox state and respiratory pathway metabolism. Food Chem.; 2019; 289, pp. 160-168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.047] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955599]
47. Yonemoto, Y.; Higuchi, H.; Kitano, Y. Effects of storage temperature and wax coating on ethylene production, respiration, and shelf-life in cherimoya fruit. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci.; 2002; 71, pp. 643-650. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.71.643]
48. Paull, R.E.; Deputy, J.; Chen, N.J. Changes in organic acids, sugars, and headspace volatiles during fruit ripening of soursop (Annona muricata L.). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.; 1983; 108, pp. 931-934. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.108.6.931]
49. Gutiérrez, M.; Lahoz, J.M.; Sola, M.; Pascual, L.; Vargas, A.M. Postharvest changes in total soluble solids and tissue pH of cherimoya fruit stored at chilling and non-chilling temperatures. J. Hortic. Sci.; 1994; 69, pp. 459-463. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1994.11516475]
50. Jiménez-Moreno, N.; Esparza, I.; Bimbela, F.; Gandía, L.M.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. Valorization of selected fruit and vegetable wastes as bioactive compounds: Opportunities and challenges. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2020; 50, pp. 2061-2108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1694819]
51. Quero, J.; Mármol, I.; Cerrada, E.; Rodríguez-Yoldi, M.J. Insight into the potential application of polyphenol-rich dietary intervention in degenerative disease management. Food Funct.; 2020; 11, pp. 2805-2825. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0FO00216J]
52. Mármol, I.; Quero, J.; Ibarz, R.; Ferreira-Santos, P.; Teixeira, J.A.; Rocha, C.M.R.; Pérez-Fernández, M.; García-Juiz, S.; Osada, J.; Martín-Belloso, O. et al. Valorization of agro-food by-products and their potential therapeutic applications. Food Bioprod. Process.; 2021; 128, pp. 247-258. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2021.06.003]
53. Kerch, G. Chitosan films and coatings prevent losses of fresh fruit nutritional quality: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol; 2015; 46, pp. 159-166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.10.010]
54. Li, H.; Shui, Y.; Li, S.; Xing, Y.; Xu, Q.; Li, X.; Lin, H.; Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Li, W. et al. Quality of fresh cut lemon during different temperature as affected by chitosan coating with clove oil. Int. J. Food Prop.; 2020; 23, pp. 1214-1230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1792924]
55. Merodio, C.; De La Plaza, J.L. Cherimoya. Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits; Mitra, S.K. CAB International: Boston, MA, USA, 1997; pp. 269-293.
56. Palma, T.; Aguilera, J.M.; Stanley, D.W. A review of postharvest events in cherimoya. Postharvest Biol. Technol.; 1993; 2, pp. 187-208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-5214(93)90047-7]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Multilayer coating can be applied on fresh fruit to protect and enhance its shelf life. This study evaluated the application of a multilayer protein and chitosan coating on fresh cherimoya. To determinate the effect of the multilayer coating on the shelf life on the fruit, total phenolic content, pH, °Brix, weight loss, and hardness values were tested. The ripening process is associated with an increase of soluble solids, and results showed that the presence of the multilayered coating maintains the total phenolic content, pH, and °Brix values over time while reducing the water loss. This effect is probably due to the presence of the coating that creates a barrier on the food surface that reduces the respiration rate and affects the ripening process, demonstrating the method’s feasibility to be used to enhance the shelf life of fresh-cut cherimoya.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Instituto Tecnológico “José Mario Molina Pasquel y Henríquez”, Unidad Académica Lagos de Moreno, Libramiento Tecnológico 5000, Col. Portugalejo de los Romanes, Lagos de Moreno C.P. 47480, Mexico
2 Unidad Académica Multidisciplinaria Reynosa–Rodhe, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Reynosa-San Fernando, Col. Arcoíris, Reynosa C.P. 88779, Mexico
3 Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy; Centre for Food Innovation and Development in the Food Industry, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy