Content area
Full Text
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging (2006) 22: 111118 Springer 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10554-005-6535-7A novel model to test accuracy and reproducibility of MDCT scan protocols
for coronary calcium in vivoMichael Rosol1,4, Karina Sachdev1, Christian N. Enzweiler1, Dylan C. Kwait1, Ryan
Millea2, James Titus2, Jason Handwerker1, Stephan Wicky1, Stephen Achenbach1,3,
Thomas J. Brady1 & Udo Homann11Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;2Department of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,
USA;3Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Erlangen, Germany; 4Department of Radiology,
Childrens Hospital Los Angeles and the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles,
CA, USAReceived 8 February 2005; accepted in revised form 27 April 2005Key words: artery imaging, calcium scoring, coronary artery imaging, MDCTAbstractObjectives: We compared the accuracy and reliability of prospectively triggered, retrospectively ECG gated,
and non-gated CT image reconstruction for measurements of coronary artery calcication (CAC) in vivo
using a novel animal model. Materials and Methods: In six Yorkshire farm pigs, prefabricated chains of
cortical bone fragments were sutured over the epicardial bed of the major coronary arteries. Using a 4-slice
MDCT scanner, each animal was imaged with two dierent protocols: sequential acquisition with
prospective ECG triggering, and spiral acquisition with retrospectively ECG gated image reconstructionnon-gated reconstructions were also generated from these latter scans. Two independent observers measured the Agatston score (AS), the calcied volume (CV), and mineral mass (MM). To calculate accuracy
of MM measurements the ash weight of the burned bone fragments was compared to MDCT derived MM.
Results: Six pigs successfully underwent surgery and CT imaging (mean heart rate: 86 12 bpm). MM
measurements from prospectively ECG triggered CT sequential scans were more accurate ( p<0.02) and
reproducible ( p=0.05) than sequential CT scans without ECG triggering or spiral acquisition using
retrospective ECG gating. Conclusions: At high heart rates prospective ECG triggered image reconstruction is more accurate and reproducible for CAC scoring than retrospective ECG gated reconstruction and
non-gated reconstruction.IntroductionCoronary artery calcium (CAC) may improve risk
prediction for coronary artery disease (CAD) [13]
and has the potential to track the progression of
CAD [46]. Despite the unique opportunity to
directly image and quantify coronary atherosclerosis, considerable controversy concerning the use
of CAC for clinical decision-making remains [7].