Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

Copyright University of Nebraska at Omaha, Department of Philosophy and Religion 2016

Abstract

The Philippine Muslims I am focusing on are the "Moros," born Muslims who trace their lineages to pre-colonial families in Mindanao and Sulu who are also identified with thirteen ethnic groups in the Philippines.4 The Spaniards called the Muslims "Moros" (Moors) in a derogatory way but in the course of the Muslim rebellion in the 1970s, members of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) began to transcode (Hall 1997) the word to connote the courage, bravery and heroism of the Moros whose rich political and cultural heritage was not diluted by colonialism. By the time the United States granted political independence to the Philippines in 1946, multiple binaries reflecting both institutional and individual Islamophobia were already in place, describing Christians and Muslims in the country in terms of: us/them; good/bad; believers/heathens; civilized/savage; rational/fanatic; trustworthy/deceitful, and other opposing combinations, with the positives used for the Christian Filipinos and the negatives for the Moros. In 1996, the MNLF and the Philippine government signed the Final Peace Agreement but other groups like the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), refused to recognize the agreement, and continued to demand secession from the republic through armed conflict. The sight of Abu Sayyaf on screen, shouting Allahu Akbar after shooting or beheading, reading the Qur'an, praying, telling the captives how Islam honors women yet manipulating them and inflicting violence on the innocent captives reinforce the negative views created by the colonial powers and perpetuated through time.

Details

Title
Philippine Muslims on Screen: From Villains to Heroes
Author
Angeles, Vivienne
Pages
I,II,1-19
Publication year
2016
Publication date
2016
Publisher
University of Nebraska at Omaha, Department of Philosophy and Religion
ISSN
10921311
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1768593192
Copyright
Copyright University of Nebraska at Omaha, Department of Philosophy and Religion 2016