1. Introduction
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important food crops, and more than half of the world’s population relies on rice as a staple food [1]. Especially in Southeast Asia, rice production directly affects social stability and national security [2]. However, the global rice production is falling far short of worldwide rice demand. Because of reductions in available land and the increasing global population, it has become particularly urgent to increase rice production [2]. This is the reason for the modern molecular breeding of rice based on diverse germplasm resources and genetic background, gathering known genes to improve rice breed [3,4,5]. It is well known that rice yield is mainly composed of four indicators: grains number per panicle (GNPP), seed setting rate (SSR), effective panicle number (EPN) and thousand grain weight (TGW). However, the crop yield as a typical quantitative trait is regulated by numerous genes. In addition, environmental factors can even overshadow the effect of genes, hindering research [6]. Nevertheless, about 2296 genes have been successively identified in rice in the past, of which 189 genes related to rice grain yield have been cloned and functionally validated [7]. These genes regulate the development and morphology of rice panicles, ultimately affecting rice yield [8]. Notably, there is a contradiction among the four indicators of rice yield hindering rice breeding; for example, increasing the grains number per panicle will lead to a decrease in the effective panicle number [9]. So, simply aggregating yield-enhancing genes may not yield the desired result [10]. However, in previous studies, we found that high-yielding rice varieties often have higher grain number per panicle, implying a significant positive correlation between grain number per panicle and yield. It is feasible to increase rice production by increasing the grain number per panicle, but the mechanisms underlying the interrelationships of GNPP-related genes are still not fully clarity [11].
Rice hybrids, especially indica–japonica hybrids, have shown a significant hybrid advantage, which are undoubtedly suitable materials for studying the mechanism of genotype combinations [12]. Previous works in our laboratory found that the progeny of the cross between indica LuoHui 9 (LH9, female) and japonica RPY geng (RPY, male) had an obvious hybrid advantage and showed a significant increase in GNPP and yield [13]. Unfortunately, as F1 is a temporary genetic population, the heterozygous F1 rice is difficult to preserve and limit due to the heterozygosity of the genome, which makes it difficult to identify gene combinations [4]. Therefore, in the present study, recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from LH9 and RPY were used to explore the gene combinations for high GNPP, and we observed that some lines in the RILs showing more suitable traits for agricultural production. Thus, we speculate that some genetic combination of the parents causes this phenomenon, which may be used in rice breeding and agricultural production.
The development and maturation of second-generation sequencing technologies lead to a decreased cost of resequencing. The generated genomic resources, resequencing of various diverse germplasm lines, would aid in identifying and exploring allelic/haplotype variations, thus harnessing genetic diversity [14,15]. Meanwhile, many databases containing rice phenotypes and genetic data have emerged, such as MBK [16], helping us to find out the association between traits and haplotypes and facilitating the utilization of genes regulatory networks. In the present study, we analyzed the superior haplotypes and the haplotype combination of many important genes affecting the GNPP using 272 RILs, which provide an insight into the yield enhancement mechanism of indica–japonica hybrid rice.
2. Results
2.1. GNPP Distribution of RILs Populations Cross from Indica LH9 and Japonica RPY
During the years 2016–2019, the GNPP traits of 272 RILs were relatively stable (Figure 1A), which indicated that most genes in the population existed in pure form. Comparing the GNPP of each year, there was a clear similarity in the RIL population (Figure 1A,B), indicating that there was not a significant difference in the characteristics of the GNPP in each year. Then, using the GNPP as a basis for hierarchical clustering of the RILs population, with similar individual clustering into the same group, we divided the population into three groups, respectively: the Low group (L), the Middle group (M) and the High group (H) (Figure 1C,D). It is generally believed that the indica–japonica hybrid rice yield is affected by its parental homology [15]. However, we did not find significant differences between the RIL groups when comparing the blood rate of the indica LH9 (Figure 1E), which implied that the genome fragments of the japonica RPY mixed between groups were similar. These results indicate that the differences between groups may be due to the differences in the alleles at the genomic level.
2.2. Significant Genetic Background Differences between Parents
We genotyped 31 genes related to the GNPP, retaining only those genes in which differed in protein sequence (Table 1). Previous studies reported that these 31 known genes affected the yield by influencing the formation and structure of primary and secondary branching peduncles in rice [3,16]. Based on the recently assembled high-quality genomes of LH9 and RPY, we characterized the sequence differences of these important genes in the parents [17]. Of these, all genes from the japonica RPY rice were genotypically identical to japonica Nipponbare, except for IPA1. Twenty genes showed differential genotypes between LH9 and RPY, with a difference rate of 67%, which contributes to the basis of significant heterozygous advantaging in the progeny of LH9 and RPY crosses. NOG1, LAX1, LP, An-1, LAX2, DTH7, GAD1, DEP1 and SP1 were all predicted to have severe amino acids changes that may affect protein function (Table 1). Although the remaining 11 genes also have missense mutations, their protein functions were predicted to be unaffected by amino acid substitutions.
2.3. Principal Component Analysis Reveals Superior Genotype Combinations
To determine the role of parental genotypes in GNPP of RILs, we screened and scored the RILs based on the mean of GNPP from 2016 to 2019 (Table 2). Moreover, these RILs were separately distributed using principal component analysis (Figure 2A), indicating that PC1 is an important factor contributing to the difference in GNPP in RILs. It is evident from the loadings that the main contributing genes are PLY1, LAX1, OSH1, SP1, DTH8, DST, PYL4 and GNP1 (Figure 2B). So, we speculate that some combination of these genes with specific genotypes may effectively increase the GNPP. The effects of LAX1 and GNP1 on GNPP were considered, as they were the largest and smallest loadings of PC1 and PC2, respectively (Figure 2B). Meanwhile, the effects of LAX1 and GNP1 on rice panicle development were both positively regulated (Table 1) and have been reported to have significant QTN within gene [18,19,20]. The effect of LAX1’s QTN on GNPP was inconsistent with previous findings, while GNP1 was consistent with previous studies (Figure 2C,D). The CA-QTN combination of LAX1 and GNP1 had a significant effect on GNPP (Figure 2E). Yield data of 533 rice materials from Huazhong Agricultural University also support our result (Figure 2F). This suggests that the combination of LAX1 of japonica genotype and GNP1 of indica genotype is expected to increase the number of grains per panicle, and finally increase the yield of rice.
2.4. Haplotype Analysis of Target Genes and Their Geographic Origin
The KnownGene MBK database was used for haplotype analysis, only considering SNPs in the gene region (Figure 3A,D). LAX1-T2 and GNP1-T1 are the haplotypes of the paternal japonica RPY, LAX1-T4 and GNP1-T3 are the maternal haplotypes of indica rice LH9. There is a clear indica/japonica tendency between LAX1 and GNP1 haplotypes (Figure 3B,E) and indica LH9 and japonica RPY are typical indica and japonica haplotypes, respectively. In the MBK data, the GNPP mean of the T4 haplotype of LAX1 was smaller than that of the other haplotypes (Figure 3C). This also supports our previous view that the C base of LAX1’s QTN (chr3-35558484) is superior to the A base, which is inconsistent with previous research results [21]. The haplotype analysis of GNP1 was as expected, with the T3 haplotype carrying the A base QTN (chr3-36150781) with the highest GNPP mean (Figure 3F). The T2 haplotype of LAX1 and the T3 haplotype of GNP1 have great differences in geographical distribution (Figure 3G,H), which explains why there are only six rice cultivars with both LAX1-T2 and GNP1-T3 in the MBK database, and the reason for the low percentage among 5000 rice cultivars.
2.5. Specific Combinations of Indica–japonica Alleles Increase the GNPP
In the present study, a high-resolution bin-based linkage map was based on sequencing from indica LuoHui9 (female), japonica RPYgeng (male) and 272 RILs. We analyzed 31 known genes associated with GNPP. Twenty genes with 10 deleterious mutations were predicted by PROVEAN assessing the effects of amino acid alterations (Table 1, Figure 4). The rest of the genes had no protein sequence differences. In previous studies [22], PROVEAN was shown to accurately predict the effect of amino acid changes on protein function. The missense mutation SNPs in the exon were used for genotyping, and it could be found that LH9 and RPY represented typical indica and japonica genotypes, respectively (Table 3). To identify the key genes for the difference in GNPP, we performed score statistics based on the mean GNPP each year of parental genotypes, and PCA’s result showed that eight genes, PLY1, LAX1, OSH1, SP1, DTH8, DST, PYL4 and GNP1, might be the main factors responsible for the difference in our RILs population. The grouping based on hierarchical clustering showed that the frequency of superior genotypes of candidate genes gradually increased in the Low, Middle, and High groups, confirming that these superior genotypes increased GNPP. As a complement, these genotypes were also verified using the MBK database, with PLY1, LAX1, DTH8 and OSH1 genotypes of RPY exhibiting higher GNPP, while PYL4, SP1, DST and GNP1 exhibited high GNPP for the genotype of LH9 (Table 3).
3. Discussion
Rice, one of the most important food crops, is used as a staple food by more than half of the world’s population. Although the breeding of new varieties with improved traits was hampered in the past by the lack of information on the origin of desirable alleles and the genetic background of donor lines, the genetic background of many rice varieties and their genotypes have now been identified with the development of second-generation sequencing technology and the advancement of the rice genome project [23]. With the advancement of rice research in recent years, many functional genes have been identified and used in rice breeding [24]. The emergence of rice genetic information resource databases has made it tremendously convenient to construct superior rice lines and has made the association between genes and traits increasingly clear [25]. Among these databases, the MBK Rice Resource Database, which contains genomic information of over 5000 rice lines, contains 127 types of traits with a total of over 4.8 million records [16].
Huang et al. proposed the idea of promoting rice breeding by aggregating superi-or genotypes through QTN [23]. As expected, GNP1 had the effect of enhancing GNPP with an A base at Chr3-36150781 QTN. But notably, rice carrying an A base at position Chr1-35558484 on the LAX1 gene had fewer GNPP than those carrying a C base, as verified in our RILs population and mean GNPP of haplotype from MBK database (Figure 2C, Figure 3C). Rice varieties with GNPP over 200 in MBK that LAX1 also corresponds to the T2 genotype, which carries a C base at Chr1-35558484 QTN (Table 4). We found that the T2 genotype of LAX1 may had a greater effect on increasing GNPP than the T4 genotype.
This paper presents an idea that rice GNPP, as a typical quantitative trait, is mainly influenced by the number of genes, but some combinations of superior genotypes also play a crucial role in enhancement. In our indica–japonica RILs population, the combination of PLY1, LAX1, DTH8 and OSH1 from the paternal japonica genotype with PYL4, SP1, DST and GNP1 from the maternal indica genotype can enhance rice GNPP. Furthermore, PCA revealed that LAX1-T2 and GNP1-T3 had the highest and lowest contributions to the loadings of PC1 and PC2, respectively (Figure 2B). LAX1, a floral meristem-specific gene encoding a plant-specific bHLH transcription factor, is a major regulator of axillary shoot primordium formation in rice [26]. Excellent allelic genotypes of GNP1 can increase cytokinin activity in rice spike cells, such as GNP1-T3 [27]. These genes affect the distribution and activity of phytohormones on rice spike primordia by respective signaling pathways, which in turn regulate the number of primary and secondary branching peduncles.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials
In 2016–2019, the 272 RILs and parents were planted in the experimental field of the Ezhou Experimental Base of Wuhan University (30° N, 114° E), Breeding Experimental Base of Wuhan University, Tianyuan Co., Ltd. in Hannan District (30° N, 114° E), Wuhan City, Hubei Province (from mid-May to October) or the Hybrid Rice Experimental Base of Wuhan University in Lingshui City (18° N, 110° E), Hainan Province (from December to April of the next year). All plants were under standard agricultural planting management.
4.2. SNP Variation and Effect Prediction
RiceVarMap v2.0 was utilized to check the impact of variations (SNPs and InDels) on gene function [28,29]. The distribution of variants was obtained in terms of intron, exon, splice region, 3 prime and 5 prime UTR variants. The Protein Variation Effect Analyzer (PROVEAN) tool was used to gauge the deleterious effect of SNPs. Prediction of the SNP impact on the biological function was obtained for the amino acid changes and PROVEAN score at threshold −2.5. If SNP scores ≤−2.5, it is predicted to be ‘deleterious’ to the protein function, whereas values > 2.5 predict ‘neutral’ effects of sequence variations [25].
4.3. Haplotype Variation in Genes Related to Grains Number per Panicle
For the MBK database, a total of 5280 samples were used to determine the locus genotype (allele), and the genotype with sample number >=10 was summarized [16]. For each locus, the number of genotypes can represent the number of alleles in the population. KnownGene of the MBK database was used to correspond to the genotypes of the parents, based on the SNPs obtained via resequencing.
4.4. Identify Superior Haplotypes of the Target Genes
Because of the limitation of genetic diversity in the RILs population, there will be a certain bias in identifying the superior allele, which may lead to a mistake. So, the phenotype data from MBK, the rice germplasm resource database, was used to determine which parent genotype is the superior allele in GNPP trait (Table 3). As expected, the genotypes of LH9 and RPY are indica type and japonica type, respectively. In addition to the GNPP, we also investigated other yield-related traits (Table 3) and the GNPP showed negative correlation with the EPN.
4.5. Hierarchical Clustering and Principal Component Analysis
All the recorded phenotypic data were from five crop seasons. The factoextra R package (
4.6. Statistical Analysis and Visualization
T-test analysis was performed to test statistical significance to understand the phenotypic performance of each haplotype. Different alphabets denote significant difference and vice versa. Furthermore, only the haplotypes validated in parents were considered for statistical analysis. The visualization of all statistical charts is based on the R 3.6.3 version, which was first completed by using the ggplot2 R package (
5. Conclusions
The grains number per panicle, seed setting rate, effective panicle number and thousand grain weight are important factors affecting rice yield, and there is a balance among these factors that hinders the improvement of rice yield. The hybrid progeny of indica LuoHui9 and japonica RPYgeng have obvious heterosis, such as a greater number of grains per panicle, and the improvement in the GNPP can effectively increase the yield of rice. To investigate the mechanism, we developed a high generation (>F15) of 272 RILs derived from LH9 and RPY. Using deep resequencing data, a high-density genetic map containing 4758 bin markers was constructed, with a total map distance of 2356.41 cM. We tracked and recorded the GNPP data of the five plantings of the RILs population and used bioinformatics methods for analysis, and it was found that eight genes influenced the GNPP with genotype differences: PLY1-T3, LAX1-T2, DTH8-T1 and OSH1-T3 from the paternal japonica genotype and PYL4-T6, SP1-T2, DST-T2 and GNP1-T3 from the maternal indica genotype. Among them, LAX1-T2 and GNP1-T3 had the greatest effect on the GNPP of the RILs population. The germplasm data from the MBK database were compared for further analysis, and we found that the LAX1 gene differed from the previous studies in affecting rice GNPP, while many materials emerged for high GNPP with the LAX1-T2 haplotype. Meanwhile, it was found that there is a natural geographical isolation between rice varieties carrying LAX1-T2 and rice varieties carrying GNP1-T3. Among the more than 5000 rice varieties in the MBK database, only 6 varieties have both LAX1-T2 and GNP1-T3, which also verifies the existence of this geographical isolation. Therefore, we speculate that the combination of LAX1-T2 and GNP1-T3 using rice hybridization technology can increase the GNPP and ultimately serve the purpose of increasing rice yield. This finding is valuable for improving rice varieties to increase the number of grains per panicle.
Conceptualization, Y.L. and X.L.; methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, data curation, X.L.; investigation, X.D.; writing—review and editing, Y.L., W.K. and T.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Distribution of Grain Number per Panicle of the RILs population. (A) Correlation analysis of the GNPP of rice in five times plantings of the RILs population; (B) distribution of GNPP of the RILs population; (C) the hierarchical clustering result of RILs population according to distribution of GNPP—blue indicates Low, red indicates Medium and green indicates High; (D) differences in the GNPP between L, M and H groups; (E) consanguinity rate of female indica LH9 rice in L, M and H groups. *** indicates p value < 0.001. Different alphabets denote significant difference and vice versa. ns indicates no significant difference.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Principal component analysis reveals superior genotype combinations. (A) Principal component analysis of 20 GNPP-related genes with parental genotypes differences in RILs population; (B) parental differential gene loadings for principal component 1 and principal component 2; (C) differences from the QTN of LAX1 for GNPP in the RILs population; (D) differences from the QTN of GNP1for GNPP in the RILs population; (E) QTN combination of LAX1 and GNP1 affecting GNPP in the RILs population; (F) effects of QTN combination with LAX1 and GNP1 on the yield of HAU533 rice materials. * indicates p value < 0.05. *** indicates p value < 0.001. Different alphabets denote significant difference and vice versa.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Haplotype analysis of LAX1 and GNP1 using the MBK database. The number of haplotypes of the LAX1 (A) and GNP1 (D) gene is based on the SNP positions in the MBK database. The relationship between the LAX1/GNP1 haplotypes (B,E); (C) the difference in GNPP among the LAX1 (C) and GNP1 (F) haplotypes recorded in MBK; n means the number of records. The geographical distribution of various haplotypes of LAX1 (G) and GNP1 (H).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Similarity clustering of 272 RILs population based on 4758 bin markers. Red indicates the male parent, yellow indicates the female parent and white indicates the recombination/NA region.
Details for differences in the known genes related to the grains number per panicle between LH9 and RPY in rice.
| Gene | RGAP Locus ID | GNPP | PRB | SRB | Number of Mutations | Functional Impact of Mutations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gn1a | LOC_Os01g10110 | - | - | - | 4 | N535K, H116R, G54A, A79_A80del |
| NOG1 | LOC_Os01g54860 | + | 1 | E346del * | ||
| PYL1 | LOC_Os01g61210 | - | - | - | 1 | F49C |
| LAX1 | LOC_Os01g61480 | + | + | + | 2 | D74E *, S117A |
| LP | LOC_Os02g15950 | - | - | - | 2 | L3fs *, S32fs * |
| PYL4 | LOC_Os03g18600 | - | - | - | 1 | A86P |
| OSH1 | LOC_Os03g51690 | + | + | + | 1 | Q23_H24dup |
| DST | LOC_Os03g57240 | - | - | - | 2 | T201dup, A124_V125insAAAAAV |
| GNP1 | LOC_Os03g63970 | + | + | 1 | V41A | |
| An-1 | LOC_Os04g28280 | - | - | - | 1 | Q87fs * |
| LAX2 | LOC_Os04g32510 | + | + | 8 | H65_H66dup, T131_P138del, L177P, A180T, P210A, R225M *, A237del, A237V | |
| APO1 | LOC_Os06g45460 | + | + | + | 3 | G292_G294del, R204G, I17V |
| DTH7 | LOC_Os07g49460 | + | + | + | 8 | D68E |
| DTH8 | LOC_Os08g07740 | + | + | + | 8 | N295S |
| PAY1 | LOC_Os08g31470 | + | + | 2 | W2R, P150T | |
| GAD1 | LOC_Os08g37890 | + | 1 | R101fs * | ||
| IPA1 | LOC_Os08g39890 | + | + | + | 1 | L292I |
| DEP1 | LOC_Os09g26999 | + | + | + | 3 | L228H, Q283fs *, C324S |
| TAW1 | LOC_Os10g33780 | + | + | + | 1 | A33_A34insSASA |
| SP1 | LOC_Os11g12740 | + | + | + | 5 | A550_G551del, D475_G476del *, A401G, V328A, H301_A306del |
GNPP—grains number per panicle; PRB—primary branch; SRB—secondary branch. +—promote; -—inhibit; *—deleterious mutations.
Score of parental genotypes in the mean of grains number per panicle in five years.
| Gene | Genotype | HN19 | EZ18 | EZ17 | LS17 | EZ16 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gn1a | F | 182.6497 | 173.4107 | 167.1413 | 152.6666 | 212.2488 | 0 |
| M | 213.6251 | 209.3672 | 201.3538 | 194.33 | 266.876 | 5 | |
| NOG1 | F | 216.5889 | 213.6555 | 209.3696 | 191.0993 | 261.7751 | 3 |
| M | 209.5623 | 204.0087 | 194.7091 | 192.5892 | 266.6108 | 2 | |
| PYL1 | F | 214.8368 | 212.1481 | 208.8955 | 197.772 | 267.9565 | 5 |
| M | 211.2413 | 204.1541 | 192.9816 | 188.7112 | 262.2566 | 0 | |
| LAX1 | F | 217.2252 | 214.2353 | 210.1405 | 199.207 | 270.9662 | 5 |
| M | 209.5813 | 202.1089 | 192.1287 | 187.8076 | 261.0606 | 0 | |
| LP | F | 222.9414 | 202.7627 | 200.4978 | 204.8714 | 260.9552 | 2 |
| M | 213.5856 | 211.2246 | 202.819 | 192.9035 | 268.4735 | 3 | |
| PYL4 | F | 198.6192 | 185.3971 | 171.8941 | 160.8207 | 219.5586 | 0 |
| M | 210.525 | 209.27 | 200.3168 | 192.4851 | 265.109 | 5 | |
| OSH1 | F | 212.5358 | 222.7958 | 191.7582 | 199.8374 | 289.2342 | 4 |
| M | 211.9244 | 203.0429 | 200.4007 | 189.2127 | 255.0527 | 1 | |
| DST | F | 201.8318 | 200.084 | 187.2243 | 187.9039 | 234.3329 | 0 |
| M | 219.2916 | 211.2264 | 207.4977 | 196.3835 | 275.7076 | 5 | |
| GNP1 | F | 201.8206 | 199.0928 | 191.335 | 192.5 | 259.8899 | 0 |
| M | 217.3728 | 211.268 | 204.5793 | 192.7047 | 266.2327 | 5 | |
| An-1 | F | 209.6562 | 215.0945 | 202.7716 | 188.6553 | 260.9996 | 2 |
| M | 213.6572 | 200.3582 | 199.252 | 198.3246 | 268.3011 | 3 | |
| LAX2 | F | 212.1621 | 210.6081 | 200.55 | 189.7581 | 251.7476 | 3 |
| M | 211.6038 | 206.166 | 199.4247 | 193.7761 | 274.4033 | 2 | |
| APO1 | F | 208.4567 | 200.882 | 198.3117 | 195.7946 | 246.0994 | 1 |
| M | 213.6812 | 208.9489 | 200.5811 | 191.586 | 268.7792 | 4 | |
| DTH7 | F | 216.7544 | 203.4692 | 219.8124 | 200.7108 | 274.3199 | 4 |
| M | 211.679 | 207.5063 | 198.7814 | 191.6447 | 263.6816 | 1 | |
| DTH8 | F | 219.7284 | 210.7304 | 206.7825 | 196.22 | 271.8351 | 5 |
| M | 209.1165 | 206.4734 | 196.9023 | 190.8444 | 262.2673 | 0 | |
| PAY1 | F | 218.0417 | 214.4899 | 214.4749 | 192.9009 | 278.6728 | 4 |
| M | 212.2218 | 207.3872 | 196.8358 | 193.6027 | 263.799 | 1 | |
| GAD1 | F | 213.9167 | 210.7948 | 204.68 | 192.4931 | 261.6666 | 3 |
| M | 211.1683 | 207.3715 | 196.0528 | 194.2355 | 262.2458 | 2 | |
| DEP1 | F | 211.652 | 220.5395 | 205.0621 | 226.2993 | 266.4615 | 4 |
| M | 212.3448 | 206.3899 | 199.034 | 188.2502 | 263.9062 | 1 | |
| TAW1 | F | 212.9674 | 192.356 | 187.9528 | 198.0376 | 253.4211 | 2 |
| M | 212.3691 | 210.8745 | 203.1138 | 191.4399 | 267.4437 | 3 | |
| SP1 | F | 217.9557 | 219.8128 | 206.507 | 199.3304 | 278.6635 | 5 |
| M | 209.8068 | 203.1178 | 194.7337 | 188.4645 | 257.744 | 0 |
F—japonica RPY gene genotype; M—indica Luohui9 genotype.
Parental genotypes in the MBK database corresponding to genotypes and yield traits.
| Gene | ID | Genotype | GNPP | FERT/% | EPN | TGW/g | GYPM/kg | Aus | Indica | Japonica | Intermediate | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYL1 | LOC_Os01g61210 | LH9 | T1 | 127.2 ± 47.22 | 80.16 ± 9.94 | 9.02 ± 3.54 | 25.1 ± 3.87 | 396.14 ± 102.47 | 52 | 1779 | 103 | 56 | 1990 |
| RPY | T3 | 131.42 ± 33.65 | 81.13 ± 9.98 | 10.45 ± 2.73 | 26.3 ± 4.88 | 518.73 ± 105.69 | 12 | 98 | 751 | 75 | 936 | ||
| LAX1 | LOC_Os01g61480 | LH9 | T4 | 112.06 ± 39.1 | 74.87 ± 16.54 | 26.06 ± 3.42 | 367.73 ± 71.71 | 0 | 134 | 4 | 0 | 138 | |
| RPY | T2 | 128.06 ± 35.34 | 81.22 ± 9,42 | 9.56 ± 2.82 | 25.48 ± 2.53 | 549.23 ± 90.84 | 0 | 65 | 1304 | 23 | 1392 | ||
| OSH1 | LOC_Os03g51690 | LH9 | T15 | 24.25 ± 2.98 | 400 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | |||
| RPY | T3 | 127.47 ± 31.73 | 80.64 ± 10.26 | 10.39 ± 2.76 | 26.16 ± 4.65 | 523.32 ± 96.86 | 0 | 9 | 261 | 6 | 276 | ||
| SP1 | LOC_Os11g12740 | LH9 | T2 | 128.1 ± 35.29 | 81.15 ± 9.51 | 9.56 ± 2.82 | 25.5 ± 2.92 | 545.93 ± 91.16 | 8 | 551 | 54 | 12 | 625 |
| RPY | T3 | 126.8 ± 31.39 | 80.47 ± 10.18 | 10.41 ± 2.76 | 26.01 ± 4.27 | 535.14 ± 99.06 | 2 | 6 | 224 | 1 | 233 | ||
| DTH8 | LOC_Os08g07740 | LH9 | T3 | 126.64 ± 31.35 | 80.40 ± 10.10 | 10.43 ± 2.76 | 25.97 ± 4.26 | 534.86 ± 98.71 | 2 | 231 | 40 | 4 | 277 |
| RPY | T1 | 127.79 ± 37.03 | 81.11 ± 9.98 | 9.49 ± 2.70 | 25.32 ± 3.48 | 521.64 ± 108.78 | 0 | 121 | 1471 | 40 | 1632 | ||
| DST | LOC_Os03g57240 | LH9 | T2 | 127.97 ± 35.63 | 80.87 ± 9.94 | 9.55 ± 2.82 | 25.4 ± 3.21 | 533.27 ± 98.41 | 15 | 843 | 41 | 29 | 928 |
| RPY | T1 | 126.99 ± 35.56 | 81.26 ± 9.97 | 9.55 ± 2.70 | 25.4 ± 3.27 | 531.51 ± 102.87 | 7 | 58 | 1108 | 27 | 1200 | ||
| PYL4 | LOC_Os03g18600 | LH9 | T6 | 135.87 ± 56.44 | 78.08 ± 7.17 | 23.58 ± 3.67 | 337.22 ± 89.13 | 8 | 194 | 9 | 1 | 212 | |
| RPY | T1 | 126.58 ± 35.19 | 81.25 ± 9.94 | 9.57 +2.72 | 25.44 ± 3.17 | 533.95 ± 100.24 | 0 | 92 | 1443 | 28 | 1563 | ||
| GNP1 | LOC_Os03g63970 | LH9 | T3 | 126.84 ± 31.59 | 80.46 ± 10.02 | 10.43 ± 2.77 | 25.86 ± 4.25 | 526.83 ± 105.58 | 8 | 581 | 36 | 22 | 647 |
| RPY | T1 | 126.56 ± 35.41 | 81.21 ± 9.88 | 9.52 ± 2.74 | 25.44 ± 3.27 | 535.59 ± 101.01 | 130 | 618 | 1941 | 150 | 2839 | ||
GNPP—grains number per panicle, FRET—fertility, EPN—effective panicle number, TGW—thousand grain weight, GYPM—grain yield per Mu.
Genotypes of over 200 GNPP rice varieties in MBK database.
| Name | Group | Origin | LAX1 |
GNP1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZhongHan502 | Japonica | China | T2 | T6 |
| Bg90-2 | Intermediate(hybrid) | Sri Lanka | T6 | T1 |
| NingGeng28Hao | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| YanGeng7Hao | Japonica | China | T5 | T1 |
| XiangQing | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| C9083 | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| FUNAKIOMACHI | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| HOUMANSHINDENINE | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| KABASHIKO | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| KAMEJI | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| KAMENOO | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| NingGeng24Hao | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| RAIDEN | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| WATARIBUNE1681 | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| CP231 | Japonica | United States | T2 | T1 |
| Basmati370 | Indica | India | T1 | T5 |
| Zhongchao 123 | Japonica | China | T2 | T21 |
| ChangShu-6-85 | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| LianGeng11Hao | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| PuTe6Hao | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| SongGeng15 | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| TASENSHO | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| R162 | Japonica | China | T2 | T1 |
| NingGeng35Hao | Japonica | China | T13 | T1 |
| SHINYAMADABO1 | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| GORIKI | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| MANGOKU | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| JC1 | Indica | India | T3 | T1 |
| SEKIYAMA | Japonica | Japan | T2 | T1 |
| AMBARIKORI | Indica | Africa | T1 | T3 |
References
1. Tilman, D.; Balzer, C.; Hill, J.; Befort, B.L. Global Food Demand and the Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2011; 108, pp. 20260-20264. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22106295]
2. Demont, M.; Stein, A.J. Global Value of GM Rice: A Review of Expected Agronomic and Consumer Benefits. New Biotechnol.; 2013; 30, pp. 426-436. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.04.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23628812]
3. Yin, C.; Zhu, Y.; Li, X.; Lin, Y. Molecular and Genetic Aspects of Grain Number Determination in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 728. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020728] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33450933]
4. Crowell, S.; Korniliev, P.; Falcão, A.; Ismail, A.; Gregorio, G.; Mezey, J.; McCouch, S. Genome-Wide Association and High-Resolution Phenotyping Link Oryza Sativa Panicle Traits to Numerous Trait-Specific QTL Clusters. Nat. Commun.; 2016; 7, 10527. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10527]
5. Wing, R.A.; Purugganan, M.D.; Zhang, Q. The Rice Genome Revolution: From an Ancient Grain to Green Super Rice. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2018; 19, pp. 505-517. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0024-z]
6. Xing, Y.; Zhang, Q. Genetic and Molecular Bases of Rice Yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.; 2010; 61, pp. 421-442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112209]
7. Xiong, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, H.; Sun, W.; Wang, P.; Wang, D.; Qiu, X.; Ali, J.; Yu, S. Identification of Heterotic Loci with Desirable Allelic Interaction to Increase Yield in Rice. Rice; 2021; 14, 97. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12284-021-00539-z]
8. Li, Y.; Xiao, J.; Chen, L.; Huang, X.; Cheng, Z.; Han, B.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, C. Rice Functional Genomics Research: Past Decade and Future. Mol. Plant; 2018; 11, pp. 359-380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.01.007]
9. Chen, L.; Bian, J.; Shi, S.; Yu, J.; Khanzada, H.; Wassan, G.M.; Zhu, C.; Luo, X.; Tong, S.; Yang, X. et al. Genetic Analysis for the Grain Number Heterosis of a Super-Hybrid Rice WFYT025 Combination Using RNA-Seq. Rice; 2018; 11, 37. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12284-018-0229-y]
10. Kong, W.; Deng, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, C.; Sun, T.; Ji, W.; Zhong, H.; Fu, X.; Li, Y. High-resolution Bin-based Linkage Mapping Uncovers the Genetic Architecture and Heterosis-related Loci of Plant Height in Indica–Japonica Derived Populations. Plant J.; 2022; 110, pp. 814-827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15705]
11. Bevan, M.W.; Uauy, C.; Wulff, B.B.H.; Zhou, J.; Krasileva, K.; Clark, M.D. Genomic Innovation for Crop Improvement. Nature; 2017; 543, pp. 346-354. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature22011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300107]
12. Huang, X.; Kurata, N.; Wei, X.; Wang, Z.-X.; Wang, A.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, K.; Lu, H.; Li, W. et al. A Map of Rice Genome Variation Reveals the Origin of Cultivated Rice. Nature; 2012; 490, pp. 497-501. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11532] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034647]
13. Varshney, R.K.; Nayak, S.N.; May, G.D.; Jackson, S.A. Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies and Their Implications for Crop Genetics and Breeding. Trends Biotechnol.; 2009; 27, pp. 522-530. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.05.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19679362]
14. Peng, H.; Wang, K.; Chen, Z.; Cao, Y.; Gao, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Lu, H.; Du, H.; Lu, M. et al. MBKbase for Rice: An Integrated Omics Knowledgebase for Molecular Breeding in Rice. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2019; gkz921. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz921]
15. Li, X.; Wu, L.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Xia, X.; Geng, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, Z.; Xu, Q. Genome Sequencing of Rice Subspecies and Genetic Analysis of Recombinant Lines Reveals Regional Yield- and Quality-Associated Loci. BMC Biol.; 2018; 16, 102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0572-x]
16. Deveshwar, P.; Prusty, A.; Sharma, S.; Tyagi, A.K. Phytohormone-Mediated Molecular Mechanisms Involving Multiple Genes and QTL Govern Grain Number in Rice. Front. Genet.; 2020; 11, 586462. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.586462]
17. Kong, W.; Deng, X.; Liao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y. De Novo Assembly of Two Chromosome-Level Rice Genomes and Bin-Based QTL Mapping Reveal Genetic Diversity of Grain Weight Trait in Rice. Front. Plant Sci.; 2022; 13, 995634. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.995634]
18. Gao, Z.-Y.; Zhao, S.-C.; He, W.-M.; Guo, L.-B.; Peng, Y.-L.; Wang, J.-J.; Guo, X.-S.; Zhang, X.-M.; Rao, Y.-C.; Zhang, C. et al. Dissecting Yield-Associated Loci in Super Hybrid Rice by Resequencing Recombinant Inbred Lines and Improving Parental Genome Sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2013; 110, pp. 14492-14497. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306579110]
19. Zhao, K.; Tung, C.-W.; Eizenga, G.C.; Wright, M.H.; Ali, M.L.; Price, A.H.; Norton, G.J.; Islam, M.R.; Reynolds, A.; Mezey, J. et al. Genome-Wide Association Mapping Reveals a Rich Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits in Oryza Sativa. Nat. Commun.; 2011; 2, 467. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1467]
20. Huang, X.; Yang, S.; Gong, J.; Zhao, Q.; Feng, Q.; Zhan, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, W.; Cheng, B.; Xia, J. et al. Genomic Architecture of Heterosis for Yield Traits in Rice. Nature; 2016; 537, pp. 629-633. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19760]
21. Wei, X.; Qiu, J.; Yong, K.; Fan, J.; Zhang, Q.; Hua, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, Q.; Olsen, K.M.; Han, B. et al. A Quantitative Genomics Map of Rice Provides Genetic Insights and Guides Breeding. Nat. Genet.; 2021; 53, pp. 243-253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-00769-9]
22. Choi, Y.; Chan, A.P. PROVEAN Web Server: A Tool to Predict the Functional Effect of Amino Acid Substitutions and Indels. Bioinformatics; 2015; 31, pp. 2745-2747. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv195]
23. Deshmukh, R.; Singh, A.; Jain, N.; Anand, S.; Gacche, R.; Singh, A.; Gaikwad, K.; Sharma, T.; Mohapatra, T.; Singh, N. Identification of Candidate Genes for Grain Number in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Funct. Integr. Genom.; 2010; 10, pp. 339-347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10142-010-0167-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20376514]
24. Jin, J.; Huang, W.; Gao, J.-P.; Yang, J.; Shi, M.; Zhu, M.-Z.; Luo, D.; Lin, H.-X. Genetic Control of Rice Plant Architecture under Domestication. Nat. Genet.; 2008; 40, pp. 1365-1369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.247] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18820696]
25. Rasheed, A.; Hao, Y.; Xia, X.; Khan, A.; Xu, Y.; Varshney, R.K.; He, Z. Crop Breeding Chips and Genotyping Platforms: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives. Mol. Plant; 2017; 10, pp. 1047-1064. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.008]
26. Oikawa, T.; Kyozuka, J. Two-Step Regulation of LAX PANICLE1 Protein Accumulation in Axillary Meristem Formation in Rice. The Plant Cell; 2009; 21, pp. 1095-1108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.065425] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19346465]
27. Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mi, X.-F.; Shan, J.-X.; Li, X.-M.; Xu, J.-L.; Lin, H.-X. The QTL GNP1 Encodes GA20ox1, Which Increases Grain Number and Yield by Increasing Cytokinin Activity in Rice Panicle Meristems. PLoS Genet.; 2016; 12, e1006386. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006386]
28. Zhao, H.; Li, J.; Yang, L.; Qin, G.; Xia, C.; Xu, X.; Su, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ming, L.; Chen, L.-L. et al. An Inferred Functional Impact Map of Genetic Variants in Rice. Mol. Plant; 2021; 14, pp. 1584-1599. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2021.06.025]
29. Zhao, H.; Yao, W.; Ouyang, Y.; Yang, W.; Wang, G.; Lian, X.; Xing, Y.; Chen, L.; Xie, W. RiceVarMap: A Comprehensive Database of Rice Genomic Variations. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2015; 43, pp. D1018-D1022. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku894]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Kong, Weilong 2
; Sun, Tong 1
; Li, Yangsheng 1 1 State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2 Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China