Abstract
How do nascent species evolve reproductive isolation during speciation with on-going gene flow? How do hybrid lineages become stabilised hybrid species? While commonly used genomic approaches provide an indirect way to identify species incompatibility factors, synthetic hybrids generated from interspecific crosses allow direct pinpointing of phenotypic traits involved in incompatibilities and the traits that are potentially adaptive in hybrid species. Here we report the analysis of phenotypic variation and hybrid breakdown in crosses between closely-related Senecio aethnensis and S. chrysanthemifolius, and their homoploid hybrid species, S. squalidus. The two former species represent a likely case of recent (<200 ky) speciation with gene flow driven by adaptation to contrasting conditions of high- and low-elevations on Mount Etna, Sicily. As these species form viable and fertile hybrids, it remains unclear whether they have started to evolve reproductive incompatibility. Our analysis represents the first study of phenotypic variation and hybrid breakdown involving multiple Senecio hybrid families. It revealed wide range of variation in multiple traits, including the traits previously unrecorded in synthetic hybrids. Leaf shape, highly distinct between S. aethnensis and S. chrysanthemifolius, was extremely variable in F2 hybrids, but more consistent in S. squalidus. Our study demonstrates that interspecific incompatibilities can evolve rapidly despite on-going gene flow between the species. Further work is necessary to understand the genetic bases of these incompatibilities and their role in speciation with gene flow.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Nevado, Bruno 2 ; Hiscock, Simon J. 3 ; Filatov, Dmitry A. 4
1 University of Oxford, Department of Biology, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.507705.0)
2 University of Oxford, Department of Biology, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); University of Lisbon, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263)
3 University of Oxford, Department of Biology, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); Oxford Botanic Garden and Arboretum, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5)
4 University of Oxford, Department of Biology, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)





