It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Anthocyanins, a major class of flavonoids, are important pigments of grape berries. Despite the recent discovery of the genetic cause underlying the loss of color, the metabolomic and molecular responses are unknown. Anthocyanin quantification among diverse berry color muscadines suggests that all genotypes could produce adequate anthocyanin quantities, irrespective of berry color. Transcriptome profiling of contrasting color muscadine genotypes proposes a potential deficiency that occurs within the anthocyanin transport and/or degradation mechanisms and might cause unpigmented berries. Genome-wide association studies highlighted a region on chromosome-4, comprising several genes encoding glutathione S-transferases involved in anthocyanin transport. Sequence comparison among genotypes reveals the presence of two GST4b alleles that differ by substituting the conserved amino acid residue Pro171-to-Leu. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that GST4b2–Leu171 encodes an inactive protein due to modifications within the H-binding site. Population genotyping suggests the recessive inheritance of the unpigmented trait with a GST4b2/2 homozygous. A model defining colorless muscadines’ response to the mutation stimulus, avoiding the impact of trapped anthocyanins within the cytoplasm is established.
Transcriptome profiling and mutational analysis suggest a potential deficiency in anthocyanin transport by glutathione S-transferases and/or degradation mechanisms that might cause unpigmented berries.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Florida A&M University, Center for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255948.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2214 9445); Damanhour University, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour, Egypt (GRID:grid.449014.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0583 5330)
2 Florida A&M University, Center for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255948.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2214 9445)
3 United Arab Emirates University, Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates (GRID:grid.43519.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 6666)
4 University of Guelph, Department of Plant Agriculture, Vineland Station, Canada (GRID:grid.34429.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8198)
5 Florida A&M University, Center for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255948.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2214 9445); Minia University, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Minia, Egypt (GRID:grid.411806.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 8999 4945)