Academic Editor:Ricardo Aguilar-Lopez
School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Received 11 October 2014; Revised 6 February 2015; Accepted 6 February 2015; 8 March 2015
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Tracked vehicles are widely used in the field of military, agriculture, and construction industries. They are applied on the ground that has a low carrying capacity or wheeled vehicles cannot go through (swamp, snowfield, etc.) or are used for obstacle-crossing and climbing, and so forth because the tracks can be treated as self-carried road to increase the vehicle's passing ability. Nowadays, there are lots of modeling methods about tracked vehicles which primarily treat the tracks as flexible [1-5] or rigid ones [6-9].
Ma and Perkins employed a nonlinear finite element method to represent the track segment contacting with the terrain [1, 2]; Park et al. divided the track system contacting with terrain into a finite number of small elements and used structural analysis and the numerical iterative method to calculate the drawbar pull force [3]; Ma treated the tracks as flexible tracks and exerted the excitation directly on the road wheels to reduce the complexity of the model [4]; Han et al. regarded tracks as flexible ones and used springs to replace tracks between road wheels in order to build the ride comfort model of the tracked vehicle [5].
The assumption of flexible tracks cannot fully reflect the dynamic performance of tracks. Rigid models are adopted by more researchers. Merhof and Hackbarth illustrated the actual structure of the tracks and set up their dynamic equations [6]; Rubinstein and Hitron described each track's positions, movements, and the interaction with terrain by coordinate transformation in three-dimensional space [7]; Ma et al. regarded the tracks and the road wheels as a whole and analyzed each part in the track system [8]; Hu took heavy tracked vehicle as a research object and divided the track system into 4 parts, namely, the tracks in contact with terrain, the tracks in contact with front idler, the tracks in contact with driving sprocket, and the tracks between front idler and driving sprocket [9].
Although the assumption of rigid tracks is approaching the truth, the effects of structure parameters on the performance are difficult to analyze, and generally the model cannot be used in the structural optimization. Therefore, this paper presents a simplified dynamic model based on the assumption of rigid tracks. A discrete method is used to solve the coupled equations. The computation results, namely, the acceleration of the vehicle's mass center and the tractive force of driving sprocket, are compared with those obtained from RecurDyn to verify the model's validity.
2. Dynamic Model of Tracked Vehicles
2.1. Random Road Excitations
In this paper grade [figure omitted; refer to PDF] road surface is taken as the random excitations for the tracked vehicles. The road model is built by making use of power spectral density function in time frequency domain [figure omitted; refer to PDF] [10-12] and the iteration of trigonometric series method [13]; the result is illustrated in Figure 1. The tracked vehicle's highest speed is 60 km/h, the length of a track is 0.153 m, and so the time that a wheel passes by a track is 0.009 s. Thus the time interval for the discrete sampling of terrain excitation [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is 0.009 s in order to simulate the vehicle run on the road surface.
Figure 1: Grade E random road surface.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
2.2. Track-Terrain Contact
Currently the most widely used model for analyzing soil sinkage is Bekker's equation [14, 15]: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the pressure, kpa; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the pressure-sinkage exponent; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the soil cohesive coefficient, kN/mn +1 ; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the soil internal friction coefficient, kN/mn +2 ; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the width of a track, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the sinkage, m.
Actually the tracked vehicle will have repeated loads on the same terrain when different wheels of the vehicle pass by it. This phenomenon can be more precisely described by the loading-unloading curve of soil model introduced by Wong [16] than Bekker's equation, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Loading-unloading curve of soil [16].
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
As it can be seen from Figure 2, OA is the continuous loading curve which can be described by (1); BA is the unloading and repeated loading curve in which the slope can be seen as a constant value [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and the curve can be described by [17] [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the maximum sinkage, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the sinkage, m.
In order to build and solve the dynamic models of tracked vehicles, some simplifications, which have little effects on the final calculation results, are needed: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] every [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is sequentially exerted on the two pins of a track so that the terrain under the track would be complete and continuous; this will lay the foundation for the calculation of shear forces acting on tracks by terrain; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in reality the angle of track changes when a boogie passes by it. However, since the time is very short, it is reasonable to assume that the track keeps the same angle during this period so that the coupled relationships among wheel, track, and terrain can be decoupled; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] the average sinkage of both pins of a track after the wheel leaves it is regarded as the sinkage of the track when the wheel is on the middle of it, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Average sinkage, where, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the midpoint of the track; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the road excitation; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the average sinkage under the pins, namely [figure omitted; refer to PDF] .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
At the first sampling time, terrain excitations on both pins of the track under the first road wheel are original excitations [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . At the second sampling time, the excitations on the track under the first wheel are [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] that has sinkage and springback after the first sampling time and so are the following excitations on the track. For the tracks under the second to the sixth road wheels, the terrain excitations on both pins of them are excitations that have sinkage and springback after the former sampling time. Besides, there are 2 tracks at the right and left sides of one terrain excitation and at least one road wheel has passed by before. Therefore, all of the former sinkage and springback should be taken into consideration; namely, the original excitation should subtract the maximum average sinkage among all the ones and then add the springback to form the new excitations acting on the later tracks.
2.3. Mechanical Analysis of Tracks
In this model the inertial force and inertial moment of a track are neglected due to the fact that the mass of a track is very small compared with the whole vehicle. Thus, the forces and moments acting on a track can be illustrated in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Forces and moments acting on a track contacting with a road wheel, where, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and subscript [figure omitted; refer to PDF] are the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] th track, the same as below; subscripts [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] are the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] th road wheel, left pin, right pin, shear force, the direction along the track, the direction vertical to the track, and road wheel's vertical force on the track, the same as below; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the midpoint of the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] th track; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the force components acting on both pins in the direction along the track, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is force components acting on both pins in the direction vertical to the track, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the moments acting on both pins of the track, kN·m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the vertical force acting on the track from road wheel, which equals the sum of the weight of a road wheel, inertial force of a road wheel and the suspension's reactive force, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the shear force acting on a track from terrain, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the acceleration of gravity, m/s2 ; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the mass of a track, kg; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the length of a track, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the angle of the track, rad; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the pressure distribution function under a track, kpa.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
In order to compute the shear force acting on a track, the first step is to calculate [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . Here, it is supposed that the time period that a road wheel passes a track is [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . During this period the angle of a track, vertical and angular acceleration of the vehicle's mass center, the vertical force acting on a track from road wheel [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and the sinkage of excitation are calculated every [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , other physical variables are calculated every [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . Therefore, there are 4 calculation points in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] except the midpoint. Figure 5 illustrates this concept.
Figure 5: Geometric and mechanical relationships between tracks, where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the concentrated force obtained by summing the forces distributed along the whole track, KN.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Firstly, let us analyze the interaction between the first road wheel and the track under it, and the analysis result also applies to other wheels and tracks. It is supposed that the tracked vehicle is initially static on a level terrain. After a [figure omitted; refer to PDF] the angle of the track contacting with the road wheel ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) changes to [figure omitted; refer to PDF] because of the excitation from terrain. [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] acting on the track can be obtained from Figure 6: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Figure 6: Forces acting on the left pin of the track under the first road wheel, where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the pretensioning force of tracks, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the rotation angle of the vehicle's mass center, rad; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the angle between the tracks that link front idler and the level terrain when the vehicle is static, rad. superscript " [figure omitted; refer to PDF] " represents the values obtained at the former calculation point, the same as below (see (3) and (4)).
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Two force components of the pretensioning force, namely, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , are acting on the right pin. Figure 7 illustrates all the forces acting on the track at the first calculation point in the time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] .
Figure 7: Forces acting on a track at the first calculation point in the first time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
The pressure distribution [figure omitted; refer to PDF] acting on the track from terrain is obtained by Figure 7 and the shear force (mentioned in Section 2.4) at the first calculation point can be calculated.
In order to solve the coupled equations, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] are kept unchanged at the next calculation point. At the second calculation point, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] can be obtained according to equilibrium conditions. For instance, in Figure 8, we can have [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Figure 8: Calculation of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] at the second point in the time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
In Figure 9, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] moves [figure omitted; refer to PDF] forward, the pressure distribution acting on the track from terrain and the shear force can be calculated by [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] (5) and the unchanged values of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . Based on this method, the similar values can be obtained when the road wheel is at the midpoint, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] of the track.
Figure 9: Forces acting on the track before the calculation of the shear force at the second calculation point in the time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
In the second time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , road wheel ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) moves on to track ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). At this junction point the tractive force acting on tracks ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) and ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) keeps unchanged. According to Figure 10, after the pressure distribution and shear force are obtained at the fourth calculation point in the first time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] can be calculated as follows: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Figure 10: The calculation of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] at the end of the fourth calculation point in the first [figure omitted; refer to PDF] .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
As illustrated in Figure 11, after the road wheel moves onto track ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] can be obtained from [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , which is the sum of force components of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in the direction along with track [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . [figure omitted; refer to PDF] equals [figure omitted; refer to PDF] (obtained by (8)): [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Figure 11: Forces acting on the track ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) at the first calculation point in the second [figure omitted; refer to PDF] .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
To obtain the values at the following calculation points, the method is the same as the calculation points in the first [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . When the sixth time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] comes, random terrain excitation begins to be exerted on the track under the second road wheel because there are 5 tracks between two wheels, as illustrated in Figure 12.
Figure 12: Forces acting on the left pin of track [figure omitted; refer to PDF] contacting with the second road wheel.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
In Figure 12, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] act on the same pin as [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . So they are active and reactive forces (moments). Then [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] can be computed by the equilibrium condition of track ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ); namely, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
The method to calculate [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the same as the one used to calculate the force or moment values of the track under the first road wheel in the first [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . In this way, forces or moments acting on the tracks under and between the road wheels can be obtained.
As illustrated in Figure 13, suppose track [figure omitted; refer to PDF] contacts with the sixth road wheel. After calculating [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] can be obtained by [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the driving force given by sprocket, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the rotation angle of the vehicle's mass center, rad; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the angle between the tracks connected with the driving sprocket and the level terrain when the vehicle is static, rad.
Figure 13: Forces acting on a track when the driving sprocket pulls the right pin of it.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
2.4. Shear Forces Acting on Tracks
When tracks are pulled from terrain by the driving sprocket, tractive forces will be exerted on them by terrain. On the soft terrain, the tractive force is mainly due to the shear force. Therefore, the tractive force given by the driving sprocket can be obtained by calculating the shear force acting on tracks from terrain [18]. When a road wheel passes by a track in a time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , the pressure distribution under the track changes according to the wheels' positions, and so do forces and moments on both pins of the track. Figure 14 illustrates the simplification of forces and moments acting on a track at a specific calculation point.
Figure 14: Resultant forces of a track.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
After the simplification, the forces and moments exerted on a track are equal to a force [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and a moment [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . For a rigid and small track, the pressure distribution under the track can be regarded as a linear distribution [19]. There are 3 different situations according to the resultant force [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and moment [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , as illustrated in Figure 15: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] are the maximum and minimum values of the distribution, kpa; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the length of a track, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the width of a track, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the eccentricity, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , m.
Figure 15: Pressure distributions under a track.
(a) [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
(b) [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
(c) [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
A local coordinate can be placed on a track so that the pressure distribution function can be described as [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the pressure distribution function under a track, kpa; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the slope; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the intercept, m.
Substitute (13) into Janosi shear stress equation [20] (14), shear force acting on tracks from terrain according to different pressure distribution functions can be calculated: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Equation (14) can be reduced to [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the distance that road wheels pass by a track, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the width of a track, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the soil cohesion coefficient, kN/m2 ; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the internal friction angle of soil, rad; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the shear modulus deformation of soil, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the sliding rate of vehicle.
2.5. Dynamic Equations of Tracked Vehicles
The following assumptions are made to set up dynamic equations of tracked vehicles: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] the vehicle is bilaterally symmetrical; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] excitations exerted on both left and right tracks are exactly the same; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] road wheels and tracks are rigid. Based on these assumptions, a half vehicle model can be used to build the dynamic model of the vehicle, as illustrated in Figure 16.
Figure 16: Half vehicle model.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
[figure omitted; refer to PDF] Initially the vehicle is static and in equilibrium. So the dynamic equations in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] direction are as follows: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the mass of half vehicle, kg; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the displacement of mass center in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] direction, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the forces acting on vehicle' s body from the suspension system, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the forces acting on front idler and driving sprocket of tracks, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the force components in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] direction acting on front idler and driving sprocket of tracks, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the angle between the tracks connecting the driving sprocket and the level road when the vehicle is static, rad; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the rotation angle of the mass center of the vehicle, rad.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF] Pitching movement equations for the vehicle body, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the inertial moment when the vehicle rotates around the mass center, kg·m2 ; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the force components in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] direction acting on front idler and driving sprocket, kN; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the horizontal and vertical distances of road wheels' mass center from vehicle's mass center, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] are positive, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] are negative; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the horizontal and vertical distances of front idler's and driving sprocket's mass center from vehicle's mass center, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is positive, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is negative.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF] Forces exerted by suspension system, [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Since the mass center of the tracked vehicle rotates slightly when it is moving on the grade E random road surface, so [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the damping coefficient, kN/(m/s); [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the spring coefficient, kN/m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the excitations exerted on a track's right pin, m; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the stroke of the suspension system, m.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF] The vertical force acting on the track from road wheel, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the mass of a road wheel, kg; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the acceleration of gravity, m/s2 ; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the road wheel's acceleration, m/s2 ; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the angle of track [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , rad.
3. Decoupling of Dynamic Model
3.1. Coupled Dynamic Model
There exist couplings in the dynamic model of tracked vehicles: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] if the shear force under a track is to be calculated, it is necessary to know the forces and moments acting on both pins of the track and the vertical force acting on the track by road wheels. But in order to get these forces and moments, the shear force must be first calculated, as mentioned in Section 2.3; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in order to solve (16)-(18), the shear force and displacements of springs must be known. But, as described in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , the shear force should be obtained through the vertical force acting on the track from road wheel and so are the displacements of springs. Obviously, the vertical force is related to the vibration and pitching movement of the tracked vehicle's mass center, which means (16)-(18) are required to calculate the force. The coupling relationships among them are illustrated in Figure 17.
Figure 17: Coupling relationships between tracked vehicle and terrain.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
3.2. Model Decoupling Process
The process is shown in Figure 18. Discretization is adopted to solve the coupled dynamic model. A very short sampling time is taken to precisely calculate the derivation and integral of equations or to obtain all the parameters that are needed to calculate other ones, and then substitute the parameters obtained at the former calculation point into the equations to get the parameters for the next calculation point. In the decoupling process, the pressure distribution and the shear force are calculated every [figure omitted; refer to PDF] when a road wheel passes by a track. The vertical and angular velocities of the mass center and so forth are calculated every [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , in which [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , calculated at the fourth calculation point in a [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , must be known beforehand. When the road wheel is at the midpoint of a track, the method introduced in Section 2.3, namely, the calculation equations for the pressure distribution at every calculation point, can be adopted to get the pressure distribution values, and thus the average sinkage of the track can be obtained.
Figure 18: Decoupling process.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
4. Case Study
The main parameters of a tracked vehicle are shown in Table 1. The slipping rate of the vehicle [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , the sampling time period [figure omitted; refer to PDF] s. Parameters of the soil, that is, sandy loam, are [figure omitted; refer to PDF] kN/mn +1 , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] kN/mn +2 , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] kN/m2 , [figure omitted; refer to PDF] rad, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] m, and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and the maximum sinkage = 0.2 m.
Table 1: Main parameters of a certain type of tracked vehicle.
Parameters | Values |
Mass of half vehicle [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /t | 20 |
Moment of inertia [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /kg·m2 | 115680.6 |
Damping coefficient of suspension [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /kN/(m/s) | 5 |
Spring coefficient of suspension [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /kN/m | 170 |
Pretensioning force [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /kN | 40 |
Horizontal distance of road wheels' mass centers from vehicle's mass center [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | [ [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ] |
Vertical distance of road wheels' mass center from vehicle's mass center [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | 0.3 |
Horizontal distance of front idler's and driving sprocket's mass center from vehicle's mass center [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | [figure omitted; refer to PDF] |
Vertical distance of front idler's and driving sprocket's mass center from vehicle's mass center [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | -0.1 |
Width of a track [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | 0.464 |
Length of a track [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | 0.153 |
Radius of a road wheel [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | 0.30 |
Pitch radius of the driving sprocket [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | 0.25 |
Radius of a carrier wheel [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | 0.1 |
Radius of a front idler [figure omitted; refer to PDF] /m | 0.2 |
Distance between two road wheels/m | 0.92 |
A virtual prototype model of the tracked vehicle was built using the module "Track-HM" in RecurDyn to test the accuracy of calculation, as illustrated in Figure 19. The parameters used to build the virtual prototype are the same as the ones used in this paper, as shown in Table 1. Considering it needs some time for the virtual prototype model to accelerate to the required speed, a Step function is used to drive the model: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the time, s; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the initial time, 0; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the initial function value, 0; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the end time, 6 s; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the maximum angular velocity of the driving sprocket. The maximum speed of vehicle is 60 km/h, the pitch radius of driving sprocket is 0.25 m, so its value is 67 rad/s.
Figure 19: Virtual prototype model of tracked vehicle.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
The vehicle model is initially static and the friction between components is neglected. When the vehicle is in a uniform rectilinear motion after 6 seconds, the vertical acceleration of the mass center of the vehicle and the tractive force of driving sprocket can be compared with the results of this paper.
It can be seen from Figure 20 that when the tracked vehicle reaches stable state, the vertical acceleration of the vehicle body's mass center calculated by the model presented in this paper is basically consistent with the result from RecurDyn, and the acceleration values are in the range of -6 m/s2 ~6 m/s2 , which meets the requirement that the maximum vertical acceleration of tracked vehicle's mass center should be less than 1 g. The maximum values of the model given in this paper and RecurDyn are 5.808 m/s2 and 5.938 m/s2 , respectively. The error between them is 2.19%.
Figure 20: Comparison of the vertical accelerations of the vehicle body's mass center output by the model presented in this paper and RecurDyn.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
It can be seen from Figure 21 that when the tracked vehicle reaches stable state, the tractive force calculated by our model is basically consistent with the result from RecurDyn if the friction among components of the vehicle and centrifugal force of the tracks are not taken into consideration. The error between our model and RecurDyn is 8.77%.
Figure 21: Comparison of the tractive forces output by our model and RecurDyn.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
The results of the model presented in this paper have some deviations from the results output by RecurDyn. This is because [figure omitted; refer to PDF] our model is built without consideration of inertia forces of tracks and slippage of the vehicle. [figure omitted; refer to PDF] When a road wheel passes by a track, the track will certainly rotate a little angle. Although the time period that a road wheel on a track is very short, neglecting this angular change may affect the result. [figure omitted; refer to PDF] Discretization of the computation process is used to decouple the coupled problems, computation errors may be inevitably induced into the results. However, generally the computation errors are in an acceptable range, which indicates the model introduced in this paper is useful for the future optimization of design variables.
5. Conclusion
This paper introduces a dynamic model of tracked vehicle when the vehicle moves on the soft random terrain. The contributions of the paper include [figure omitted; refer to PDF] the soft random terrain excitation is introduced into the model, which makes it much closer to the reality; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] a detailed track modeling method is introduced; [figure omitted; refer to PDF] a decoupling method is introduced to solve the coupled dynamic model. Future work would be directed towards improving the modeling of tracks by taking the inertia forces, frictions, and so forth into consideration, so that the computation errors can be further reduced.
Acknowledgments
The research work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China with the Grant nos. 51175457 and 51475416. The first author is also supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] Z.-D. Ma, N. C. Perkins, "A super-element of track-wheel-terrain interaction for dynamic simulation of tracked vehicles," Multibody System Dynamics , vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 347-368, 2006.
[2] Z.-D. Ma, N. C. Perkins, "A track-wheel-terrain interaction model for dynamic simulation of tracked vehicles," Vehicle System Dynamics , vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 401-421, 2002.
[3] W. Y. Park, Y. C. Chang, S. S. Lee, J. H. Hong, J. G. Park, K. S. Lee, "Prediction of the tractive performance of a flexible tracked vehicle," Journal of Terramechanics , vol. 45, no. 1-2, pp. 13-23, 2008.
[4] J. Ma, "A simplified calculation of response of a tracked vehicle simulated by road roughness," Mechanics in Engineering , vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 32-35, 2012.
[5] B. Han, X. Li, F. Sun, "Modeling and simulation of high speed tracked vehicles," Computer Simulation , vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 107-109, 2003.
[6] W. Merhof, E. M. Hackbarth Driving dynamics of tracked vehicle , National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China, 1989.
[7] D. Rubinstein, R. Hitron, "A detailed multi-body model for dynamic simulation of off-road tracked vehicles," Journal of Terramechanics , vol. 41, no. 2-3, pp. 163-173, 2004.
[8] X.-G. Ma, S.-W. Pan, X.-M. You, M. Ye, X.-L. Gong, "Mathematical models for a caterpillar driving system and its tension calculation," Journal of Vibration and Shock , vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 186-190, 2014.
[9] J. Hu Research about the Traveling Performance of Heavy Crawler Vehicle on Soft Ground , Jilin University, Jilin, China, 2012.
[10] Y. Yang, Y. Liu, "Research process on mathematical model of road roughness," Shanghai Auto , vol. 3, pp. 23-26, 2010.
[11] J.-F. Yu, "The discussion of building road file's method in simulation of vehicle ride comfort," Technology & Economy in Areas of Communications , vol. 6, pp. 107-109, 2010.
[12] Z. Yu Theory of Automobile , China Machine Press, Beijing, China, 2000., 3rd.
[13] Y. Xu, "Computer simulation on stochastic road irregularities," Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery , vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 33-36, 2007.
[14] M. G. Bekker Off-the-Road Locomotion , University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1960.
[15] M. G. Bekker The Introduction of Ground-Vehicle Systems , China Machine Press, Beijing, China, 1978.
[16] J. Y. Wong Theory of Ground Vehicle , Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
[17] W. Wang Study on tracked mobile robot with manipulator in complex terrain [Dissertation] , Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2009.
[18] Y. Cai Research on Dynamic Performance and Transmission Type of the Engine of Bulldozer , Chang'an University, Xi'an, China, 2006.
[19] K. Zhang, S. Liu Soil Mechanics , China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China, 2010., 3rd.
[20] J. Janosi, B. Hanamoto, "The analytical determination of draw bar pull as a function slip for tracked vehicles in deformable soil," in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicles Systems (ISTVS '61), Turin, Italy, 1961.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2015 Yuliang Li and Chong Tang. Yuliang Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
In order to conveniently analyze the dynamic performance of tracked vehicles, mathematic models are established based on the actual structure of vehicles and terrain mechanics when they are moving on the soft random terrain. A discrete method is adopted to solve the coupled equations to calculate the acceleration of the vehicle's mass center and tractive force of driving sprocket. Computation results output by the model presented in this paper are compared with results given by the model, which has the same parameters, built in the multi-body dynamic software. It shows that the steady state calculation results are basically consistent, while the model presented in this paper is more convenient to be used in the optimization of structure parameters of tracked vehicles.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer