1. Introduction
Foodborne illnesses caused by pathogens represent a major public health concern worldwide [1]. Among these, salmonellosis stands out as one of the most significant foodborne bacterial zoonoses [2]. The genus Salmonella comprises two species: Salmonella bongori and Salmonella enterica [3]. S. enterica currently includes approximately 2600 serotypes [4].
Salmonella has been widely reported in cattle [1] and dairy cows [2]. Its presence in bovine can lead to the contamination of milk or meat through various environmental sources on the farm, including other animals, rodents, wildlife, insects, water, resulting in both direct and indirect infection of humans and other animals [3]. Salmonella Cerro has been detected in dairy herds as an asymptomatic carrier, with fecal shedding observed in clinically healthy animals [4]. Although this serotype is rarely associated with human illness [5,6], it has emerged in recent years due to its increasing prevalence among dairy cattle [6].
Salmonella Schwarzengrund is frequently associated with human infections [7] and is also commonly reported in farm animals, food products and agricultural environments, where it has been linked to antimicrobial-resistant infections in humans [8]. In many countries, S. Schwarzengrund ranks among the top 15 Salmonella serotypes isolated from humans, food sources and animals [9].
Data from the United States Department of Agriculture [10] indicate that the global cattle herd is expected to reach approximately 914 million head in 2025. This report also describes the global distribution of cattle, with Brazil ranking second place in herd size, behind only India among the seven regions analyzed. Between 2014 and 2024, Brazilian beef production increased by 21.88% (in thousand tons). According to the CiCarne Yearbook of the beef production chain, published in March 2025, Brazil is recognized for its high food productivity, particularly in animal-based foods, and it is the world’s largest exporter of the most widely consumed meat [11].
The Midwest region is the largest producer of cattle in Brazil. In 2024, Mato Grosso state led all states in beef exports, shipping 161,98 thousand tons abroad, with China and the United States as the main destinations [12]. Regarding milk production, recent data indicate that the Central-West region ranks third place among Brazilian regions, accounting for approximately 11.3% of the raw milk purchased by dairies. Despite these high levels of bovine productivity and exports, there are still limited studies on pathogenic bacteria in this sector, especially Salmonella.
In Brazil, several studies have utilized whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to investigate pathogenic bacteria, including various Salmonella serotypes [13,14,15,16,17]. Given the limitations of conventional serology, WGS has become a critical tool for characterizing foodborne pathogens and predicting genotypic antimicrobial resistance [18,19]. Insights into pathogen genomes are essential for disease prevention, management and treatment [20]. WGS enables the identification of resistance genes, virulence factors, mobile genetic elements and relevant mutations [21,22].
In a previous study, Cunha Neto et al. [23] analyzed 225 cheese samples from Brazilian dairies, and Muller et al. [24] examined 107 beef samples from various slaughterhouses in Mato Grosso, Brazil. In both cases, the isolates were phenotypically identified as Salmonella Schwarzengrund. However, it is well known that traditional isolation and serological methods have limited accuracy and may allow cross-reactions, which can hinder the complete characterization of bacterial strains. Therefore, the aim of this study was to sequence the first two genomes of Salmonella strains isolated from cheese and beef in Mato Grosso state, Brazil, to confirm their serovar designations and to genotypically characterize their antimicrobial resistance profile, virulence determinants and phylogenetic relationships in the context of other Brazilian Salmonella genomes.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Strain Recovery and DNA Extraction
The strains used in this study were previously identified as Salmonella Schwarzengrund in the studies by [23,24]. For DNA extraction, a single colony was resuspended in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (KASVI®, laboratories Conda S.A, Madrid, Spain) and incubated overnight at 35 °C. Genomic DNA was then extracted and quantified using Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and QUBIT 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen®, Carlsbad, CA, USA), respectively, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Data Processing
The sequencing library was prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) by GenOne Biotechnologies (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), achieving a minimum coverage depth of 100×.
The quality of raw sequencing reads was assessed using FastQC and further processed with fastp. De novo genome assembly was performed using Shovill, which employs SPAdes v.1.1.0 (
In addition, all sequences available in the NCBI Pathogen Detection database (
2.3. Genome Quality, Annotation, Virulence and Resistance Gene Determination
Genome quality was first assessed using QUAST (v. 5.3.0) with default parameters, generating PDF reports. In addition, NCBI assemblies were evaluated using the seqkit tool (v2.10.0), specifically the L50 metric. The L50 is defined as the minimum number of largest contigs whose combined length comprises at least 50% of the total genome assembly. In this study, the highest L50 value observed was 68, which nevertheless indicated that the assemblies from the Pathogen Detection database were of sufficient quality for downstream analyses. Supplementary Materials Table S1 is provided with N50, L50 and additional sequencing quality metrics.
Genome annotation was then performed with Prokka (1.14.6) [26], using GFF3 output format and setting a minimum contig size of 200 bp. For specialized gene annotation, including virulence genes, ABRicate v. 1.0.1 was employed with the VirulenceFinder Database [27]. Antimicrobial resistance genes were identified by running ABRIcate again, this time using the Resfinder database (updated on 22 March 2024) [28]. All ABRicate analyses were performed using the default parameters (80% coverage and identity). Pathogenicity islands were detected using SPIFinder 2.0, applying thresholds of 95% identity and 60% coverage [29,30,31]. For plasmid analysis, we used the PlasmidFinder (Version 2.1.6; Database version: 18 January 2023) [32]. All the analyses described above were carried out on a total of 84 strains retrieved from the NCBI Pathogen Detection database and the 2 newly sequenced strains in this study, totaling 86 strains.
2.4. Phylogenetic Tree Comparison
For a genome comparison, the GFF3 files generated by Prokka (as described above) were used to construct a pangenome from our set of 86 serotypes. The Roary tool (v3.13.0) [33] was run with a minimum sequence identity of 95% and a gene presence threshold of 99% of isolates to define the core genome. We then generated two figures: one showing the accessory genome (all non-core genes) and another depicting the pangenome based on core-genome genes.
After obtaining the accessory-genome alignment, a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using IQ-TREE v2.4.0 [34], with ultrafast bootstrap analysis of 1.000 replicates. For the pangenome analysis, Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were extracted from the core genome alignment using SNP, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with FastTree 2.1.10 [35].
For the metadata of the tree figures, manual curation was performed by the authors, and the data were distributed into the following groups and depicted in a phylogenetic tree: carcass/meat/organ; clinical/fluids; environmental sources; fecal/swab sample; food/feed or others; type of isolation (clinical or environmental); serotype (Cerro or Schwarzengrund); presence or absence of genes in the pathogenicity islands; and resistance profile to some classes of antibiotics.
2.5. Data Processing and Visualization
The phylogenetic tree was visualized using the Microreact web platform, enabling interactive exploration of the tree alongside metadata [36]. Data processing and analysis, including the generation of the heatmap and grouped bar chart, were performed in Python (v. 3.10.11) using Pandas (1.5.2), Numpy (1.24.2), Matplotlib (3.6.3) and Seaborn (0.12.1).
Reports obtained from Resfinder, PlasmidFinder and VFDB were merged and converted into binary matrices (0 = absence; 1 = presence), considering only genes detected with an identity greater than 80%. For heatmap generation, these binary values were transformed into percentages (1 = 100%; 0 = 0%), and frequencies were calculated and visualized by color intensities. The heatmap illustrating the average percentage distribution of pathogenicity islands was generated with Seaborn to facilitate group comparisons. For antimicrobial resistance gene analysis, the Resfinder results were processed and visualized as grouped bar charts using Matplotlib, highlighting the incidence of resistance genes across serotypes.
3. Results
3.1. Serovar Determination and Sequence Classification
Salmonella_R5748 was identified as serovar Cerro, while Salmonella_R10633 was classified as Schwarzengrund. To assess the prevalence of these serovars in Brazil, we queried the Pathogen Detection database (
Based on the metadata, the distribution of Schwarzengrund isolates was as follows: 49.3% (35/71) were obtained from carcass/meat/organs; 36.6% (26/71) from environmental sources; 5.6% (4/71) from food or animal feed (including Salmonella_R10633); 4.2% (3/71) from fecal samples or anal junction swabs; 2.8% (2/71) from other or undetermined sources; and 1.4% (1/71) from clinical specimens. For Cerro, 28.6% (4/14) of the isolates were obtained from carcass/meat/organs; 21.4% (3/14) from environmental sources; 21.4% (3/14) from fecal/swab samples; 14.3% (2/14) from food or animal feed; and 14.3% (2/14) from other/undetermined sources.
Notably, both [23,24] identified these isolates as Salmonella Schwarzengrund using conventional serology. This discrepancy between in vitro serological results and in silico genomic analysis represents the first major inconsistency observed in this study.
3.2. Detection of Resistance Genes and Plasmids in Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund
RESfinder and PlasmidFinder were applied to the WGS data to identify resistance genes and plasmids in S. Cerro (Salmonella_R5748) and S. Schwarzengrund (Salmonella_R10633). Both strains harbored the aac(6′)-Iaa_1, which confers resistance to the aminoglycosides amikacin (AMI) and tobramycin (TOB). In the S. Schwarzengrund isolate, the qnrB19_1 gene was also identified, encoding resistance to the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin (CIP). Thus, resistance in these sequenced strains was associated with the aminoglycoside and quinolone classes, although few genes were identified. No plasmid was detected in the S. Cerro (Salmonella_R5748), whereas S. Schwarzengrund (Salmonella_R10633) harbored the Col440I_1 plasmid (Table 1).
To compare the resistance profiles of our isolates with other Cerro and Schwarzengrund strains available in NCBI, we re-analyzed publicly available genomes using Resfinder and summarized the antibiotic-specific resistance data in Figure 1. In this bar graph, the aac(6′)-Iaa_1 gene, conferring resistance to the aminoglycosides amikacin (AMI) and tobramycin (TOB), was present in 100% of both serotypes. For antibiotics outside the aminoglycosides class, S. Cerro exhibited resistance frequencies of approximately 10–40% across the agents evaluated. In contrast, S. Schwarzengrund displayed higher resistance rates (20–40%) for most antibiotic genes and a notably high frequency (~85%) of ciprofloxacin (CIP) resistance, primarily due to the presence of the qnrB19_1 gene.
Regarding plasmids, we conducted a comparative genomic annotation of Brazilian genomes from the Cerro and Schwarzengrund serovars and observed greater genomic plasticity in Schwarzengrund. This finding aligns with our isolates, where the Col440I_1 plasmid was detected exclusively in this serovar. Although the overall frequency of Col440I_1 was similar between Cerro and Schwarzengrund, other plasmids, such as Col (pHAD28), were more frequently identified in both serovars, despite being absent in our isolates (Figure 2). The Col440I_1 plasmid belongs to the ColE family and functions as a cryptic plasmid involved in initiating plasmid DNA replication within the host cell [37]. In contrast, Col (pHAD28) has been described as originating from Klebsiella pneumoniae and is widely implicated in the dissemination of aminoglycoside resistance, often in association with genes from the aac(6′) family [38].
3.3. Phylogeny of Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund and SPI Determinants
A total of 3493 Salmonella genomes were downloaded from the NCBI database, from which all the available isolates belonging to the Cerro and Schwarzengrund serovars were identified. To infer their evolutionary relationships, we constructed a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the core genome, incorporating 85 genomes (71 Schwarzengrund and 14 Cerro) (Figure 3). In this tree, isolates from the Cerro and Schwarzengrund serovars form distinct clades that correlate with serotype, source and isolation type. Branch annotations further indicate the presence or absence of key virulence genes located within Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs), as highlighted in the figure.
The clades observed in this study clearly demonstrate the separation between the Cerro and Schwarzengrund serovars, particularly in relation to pathogenicity islands. All Cerro isolates lacked islands 13 and 14, whereas these islands were consistently present in Schwarzengrund strains (Figure 3). In addition, a higher overall resistance to antibiotic classes was observed in Schwarzengrund compared to Cerro strain, which may partially explain the greater number of sequenced genomes available for this serovar.
Regarding the strains sequenced in this study, Salmonella_R5748 (Cerro) showed a notable phylogenetic distance from the other Cerro isolates available in the NCBI database. Although the reference strains are of the same geographical origin (Brazil) and have a similar antimicrobial resistance profile (low resistance to antibiotic classes), hypotheses may explain this phylogenetic distance, such as the origin of contamination. The Cerro strain in this study was isolated from food, while the others were isolated from other contaminated matrices; only one strain (GCA_024516335.1) had the same contaminated origin (food), but it was phylogenetically distant. In contrast, Salmonella_R10633 (Schwarzengrund) clustered closely with an environmentally derived isolate (GCA_029756055.1), sharing a similar profile in terms of pathogenicity island content and antibiotic resistance patterns.
In Figure 4, the pangenome of Salmonella Cerro (14 strains) and S. Schwarzengrund (71 strains) is contrasted. In S. Cerro, 3730 gene clusters are shared by more than 99% of genomes (core genome), with no clusters identified in the soft core. Also, 685 clusters belong to the shell, and 1695 are found in less than 15% of genomes (cloud). For S. Schwarzengrund, 3879 clusters constitute the core, 251 the soft core, 716 the shell and 2801 the cloud. The core-genome SNP phylogeny reveals two major subclades within the Cerro lineage and at least three well-supported lineages in Schwarzengrund. The adjacent presence/absence heatmap illustrates that the patterns of accessory gene gain and loss closely correspond to the phylogenetic clades, suggesting that differential acquisition of accessory genes contributes to lineage divergence and may reflect specific adaptative processes.
3.4. Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands and Virulence Genes
Expanding the analysis of pathogenicity islands, Figure 5 shows that there is a considerable difference between the two serovars, especially in the presence of SPI-4, SPI-13 and SPI-14. These islands are mainly associated with key virulence functions: SPI-4 contributes to host cell adherence and cytotoxicity; SPI-13 is involved in macrophage internalization and intracellular survival; and SPI-14 plays a role in systemic virulence and bile salt tolerance, facilitating survival during passage through the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent invasion of internal organs.
Finally, we assessed the virulence gene profiles of Cerro and Schwarzengrund isolates to identify potential differences between the groups. Genomic annotation using the VFDB database revealed a total of 139 virulence genes across all genomes. Among these, 116 genes were conserved across 100% of the isolates, while only 23 genes showed variation between the two serovars (Figure 6).
The results shown in Figure 6 indicate the presence of genes from the pltABC family in all Schwarzengrund genomes, while none of the Cerro strains carried these genes. The pltABC gene cluster encodes a tripartite exotoxin, originally identified in Salmonella typhi, which contributes to host cell damage and disruption of the immune response. Similarly, the cdtB gene was detected exclusively in Schwarzengrund isolates. On the other hand, S. Cerro genomes consistently harbored the sseK1 and sseK2 genes (responsible for favoring intracellular survival and systemic dissemination), as well as the tlde1 gene (responsible for encoding a toxin with an antimicrobial effect on competing bacterial cells).
4. Discussion
4.1. Serovar Determination and Sequence Classification
Serotyping via agglutination remains the initial step in the characterization of Salmonella [39], although in silico platforms based on WGS are increasingly employed for faster and more reliable serotype prediction [40]. In the present study, we observed discrepancy between traditional serology and WGS for Salmonella_R5748, which was initially classified as Schwarzengrund via serology but later confirmed as Cerro by SeqSero. According to [41], an agreement rate was observed between traditional serotyping and WGS using SeqSero; however, 7.7% of the isolates showed discordant results, and 5.9% remained untyped by the molecular tool. Thus, these findings underscore the transformative potential of WGS-based tools in public health microbiology [40,42]. The current global trend is to use whole-genome sequencing in outbreak detection and routine surveillance of pathogenic bacteria [43]. Based on the studies highlighting the importance of WGS, it is valuable to emphasize that this tool could easily make a significant contribution to surveillance systems in Brazil.
Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund have been reported worldwide across a variety of food matrices [6,9,44,45], and dozens of isolates have had their genomes sequenced and made publicly available in the NCBI database. In contrast, only a limited number of studies in Brazil have performed WGS to characterize Salmonella isolates [13,15]. To our knowledge, this is the first study is Mato Grosso to apply WGS for the characterization of Salmonella serotypes isolated from both cheese and beef, thereby addressing a critical gap in regional surveillance and food safety research.
S. Schwarzengrund is a relatively uncommon cause of human salmonellosis worldwide [46], but its incidence has increased in recent decades in countries such as Thailand, Slovakia, New Zealand and Venezuela [46]. Its prevalence has also risen in Japan, where isolates have been recovered from chicken meat [46,47]. In China, poultry meat remains the primary source of contamination, along with cases in humans and animals [48]. Reflecting these trends, nearly half (49.3%) of all S. Schwarzengrund genomes in the NCBI Pathogen Detection database originate from carcasses, meat and organs. In the present study, we identified that there is a global convergence regarding the source of isolation that has been reported in the literature with our findings, since the sequenced Schwarzengrund strain was isolated from beef.
Poultry, especially chicken, has been identified as the main vehicle for S. Schwarzengrund infections [49,50]. In Brazil, S. Schwarzengrund has similarly been isolated from poultry and chicken meat [51,52], and more recently from beef [24], highlighting its relevance across multiple food matrices.
S. Cerro is rarely implicated in human salmonellosis [53], although it has been associated with clinical disease in cattle in the United States [54]. In Brazil, S. Cerro has been recovered from poultry [55], swine [56] and wild boar [57]. Despite this diversity of hosts, its prevalence in Brazilian cattle remains poorly characterized; however, one study did report the detection of S. Cerro in veal calves [58]. The relatively low incidence of human infection caused by S. Cerro, especially compared to S. Schwarzengrund, likely contributes to its under-representation in the NCBI Pathogen Detection database.
Salmonella primarily colonizes the intestinal tract of humans and animals, including cattle [59]. Salmonellosis in cattle is a global concern, with serotypes such as S. Dublin and S. Typhimurium commonly implicated [60]. Notably, outbreaks linked to Salmonella transmission through raw milk in Denmark and raw meat in Ireland have been documented [61,62]. These incidents highlight the importance of ensuring food quality control measures to ensure consumer safety.
Salmonella enterica frequently colonizes both dairy products and livestock, serving as vehicles and reservoirs for human exposure [63,64]. Human salmonellosis is most commonly attributed to the consumption of contaminated poultry meat and eggs, as well as dairy and beef products [2]. In our metadata analysis, only 5.6% (4/71) of the S. Schwarzengrund isolates originated from food sources or animal feed, highlighting the under-representation of these reservoirs in publicly available genomic data.
Salmonella colonization in cattle can result in the contamination of both milk and meat at the farm level [65]. Cattle often carry the pathogen asymptomatically, introducing it into slaughterhouses and posing significant food safety risks through cross-contamination during processing. In this study, we focused on strains isolated from cheese and beef. Notably, no other Salmonella isolates from cheese were present in the current metadata, underscoring the novelty and relevance of our findings.
4.2. Detection of Resistance Genes and Plasmids in Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund
Antimicrobial resistance can be transmitted to humans through the food chain, either via the ingestion of resistant bacteria or via horizontal gene transfer to other micro-organisms [66]. Resistance among foodborne pathogens represents a serious global public health threat [67,68]. In our study, we detected the aac(6′)-Iaa_1 gene, associated with resistance to aminoglycosides, specifically amikacin (AMI) and tobramycin (TOB), in both sequenced serotypes. This same behavior was observed in reference strains available in the NCBI database, as both Cerro and Schwarzengrund harbored genes conferring resistance to this antibiotic class.
Although approximately 85 aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes have been identified, only a subset are commonly selected and responsible for the majority of aminoglycoside resistance. Among them, aac(6′)-I is particularly notable [69]. The same authors suggest that intrinsic resistance to aminoglycosides may be explained by the mechanism of antibiotic uptake, which depends on bacterial respiration. This process generates an electrochemical potential across the cytoplasmic membrane. However, a reduced or absent membrane potential, often observed in anaerobic bacteria, may account for resistance in these organisms [70].
The qnrB19 gene was previously identified by [71] in the WGS of Salmonella enterica isolated from duck carcasses. Similarly, ref. [14] detected the qnrB19 gene in serotypes circulating within the Brazilian food production chain. Their study was also the first in Brazil to report the presence of this gene in S. Schwarzengrund isolates from poultry and environmental samples. In addition, the qnrB19 gene has been reported in other Salmonella serotypes in Brazil, with [72] documenting its presence in isolates from both food and human sources. In our phylogenetic analysis, we detected that most Schwarzengrund isolates have genes that confer resistance to the quinolone class (high frequency). In 2024, the World Health Organization [73] published a list of bacterial pathogens of public health importance, in which Salmonella Tiphi is in the high group category (difficult to treat and showing increasing trends of antimicrobial resistance), with an association of resistance to fluoroquinolones.
We observed that the S. Schwarzengrund serotype exhibited resistance to ciprofloxacin (CIP), a quinolone antibiotic, mediated by the qnrB19_1 gene. Genes in the qnr family encode pentapeptide-repeat proteins that bind DNA gyrase, thereby blocking quinolone activity [13]. Salmonella spp. can serve as both recipients or donors of resistance determinants, facilitating horizontal gene transfer and posing significant food safety risks to human health [74]. Although CIP remains the drug of choice for treating complicated gastrointestinal infections, resistance among Salmonella isolates has been widely reported [75,76]. In addition, our findings reveal distinct resistome profiles for S. Cerro and S. Schwarzengrund: S. Cerro exhibited a lower frequency of antibiotic resistance genes across most antibiotic classes, while S. Schwarzengrund harbored a broader and more diverse resistome. Plasmids can play a significant role in antimicrobial resistance or virulence, with Col440I_1 playing a role in initiating plasmid DNA replication within the host cell [37]. This leads us to hypothesize that they may be acting more directly in the relationship with MDR strains.
Mato Grosso ranked among Brazil’s top beef-exporting states in 2024, supplying predominantly China and the United States [12]. This highlights the critical importance of maintaining herd health to ensure the safety of animal-derived foods. However, the routine use of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) and synthetic growth promoters (SGPs) can compromise dietary sustainability and lead to the accumulation of residues in meat, milk and eggs [77]. Moreover, China (23%), the United States (13%), Brazil (13%), India (3%) and Germany (3%) together account for the highest levels of antimicrobial consumption in food animal production systems [78].
Salmonella gastroenteritis is typically treated with quinolones and fluoroquinolones, especially in elderly patients [79]. Ciprofloxacin is considered the drug of choice for salmonellosis and has been associated with the presence of the qnrB19 gene in non-human isolates [80]. The qnr genes are typically plasmid-mediated, conferring resistance to quinolones, including ciprofloxacin, commonly used in veterinary medicine [81]. In our study, S. Schwarzengrund displayed elevated resistance across multiple antibiotics (Figure 1), with approximately 85% of the isolates resistant to CIP. The qnrB19 gene was identified by [14] as the most prevalent resistance determinant in their study. Also, ref. [82] reported high levels of fluoroquinolone resistance among several serotypes, including S. Schwarzengrund. According to [83], such resistance may also result from mutations in the gyrA gene.
No plasmids were detected in the S. Cerro isolates in this study, whereas S. Schwarzengrund harbored a Col440I_1 replicon. Although Col440I_1-type plasmids have been reported in both serotypes in other Brazilian isolates, our data demonstrate their presence exclusively in S. Schwarzengrund (Figure 2), highlighting their greater genomic plasticity. Col440I_1 plasmids have been reported in S. Schwarzengrund by [22,84] in Chile. According to [85], plasmids can play a critical role in the antimicrobial resistance and virulence of S. Schwarzengrund. Consistent with these findings, we observed a higher prevalence of plasmids in S. Schwarzengrund compared to S. Cerro.
4.3. Phylogeny of Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund and SPI Determinants
The phylogenetic analysis revealed a clear division between Salmonella Cerro and Salmonella Schwarzengrund, consistent with their classification as distinct serotypes. In Brazil, little is known about the occurrence of S. Cerro in cattle, and this serotype has not been reported in the literature as a direct cause of human salmonellosis [53]. Notably, within the S. Cerro clade, the strain sequenced in this study was phylogenetically more distant from the other Cerro isolates, a divergence further supported by the pangenome analysis. This distinct clustering may be partially explained by its limited antibiotic resistance (Figure 1), although a consistent resistance pattern across antibiotic classes was still observed among the Cerro strains.
According to [86], several studies have sought to explain why S. Cerro is frequently associated with livestock but rarely causes human disease. In the study by [53], the authors evaluated the diversity of Salmonella subtypes in dairy cattle and found that S. Cerro lacked virulence genes located in pathogenicity islands 10, 12 and 13. Consistent with these findings, Figure 5 shows that all S. Cerro genomes available in the NCBI database lack SPI-13 virulence genes, a pattern not observed in S. Schwarzengrund.
The clades and branches of the S. Schwarzengrund serotype form distinct isolation groups, with farm animals frequently identified as the sources of contamination. The isolate sequenced in this study did not cluster within any well-defined group but was phylogenetically closest to the GCA_029756055.1 strain, which grouped with strains recovered from environmental water. S. Schwarzengrund infections have increased globally in recent years [85]. Moreover, ref. [87] had documented infections caused by this serotype in both humans and birds across various Western countries. Notably, all strains clustering within our isolate were obtained in Brazil from poultry and environmental sources; none originated from beef.
Finally, upon comparison of the resistance frequencies across antibiotic classes, we observed that S. Schwarzengrund obtained from the NCBI database exhibited broad resistance profiles, with many strains classified as multidrug-resistant (Figure 3). In contrast, the strain sequenced in this study showed resistance only to the quinolone class. S. Cerro isolates, by comparison, displayed uniformly low resistance frequencies across all antibiotic classes.
4.4. Virulence Genes in Pathogenicity Islands
Pathogenicity islands are genomic regions acquired through horizontal gene transfer that contribute to microbial virulence [88]. Ref. [89] provided an early overview of their evolution in Salmonella enterica serotypes, initially describing twelve pathogenicity islands. Subsequent research has expanded this number to seventeen known islands in Salmonella [88,90]. Ref. [91] further elucidated how these islands enhance the pathogenic potential of different Salmonella serovars. In particular, ref. [92] identified several virulence genes in Salmonella serotypes that are implicated in transmission and infection via type III secretion system (T3SS), which plays a critical role in host invasion. The pathogenicity of S. Schwarzengrund is driven by a wide array of virulence factors, notably the T3SS, encoded by Salmonella islands I and II [85,93]. SPI-II activity is essential for the formation and maintenance of the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV), an intracellular niche that supports bacterial survival and replication [88].
Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) harbor a diverse array of virulence genes, most of which are chromosomally located [14]. These islands are horizontally acquired genomic segments that play a central role in Salmonella pathogenesis [94]. Of the approximately 23 SPIs described to date [95], SPIs 1 and 2 are considered the most critical virulence determinants in Salmonella [96].
Pathogenicity island I (SPI-1) is the most extensively characterized among the Salmonella pathogenicity islands [97]. According to [94], SPI-I encodes effector proteins that are secreted via type III secretion system, facilitating the invasion of intestinal epithelial cells. In contrast, SPI-2, SPI-3 and SPI-4 are primarily involved in promoting bacterial growth and survival within the host during the systemic phase of the infection [97].
Salmonella pathogenicity island 4 (SPI-4) encodes six main genes: siiA–F. Among them, SiiC, SiiD and SiiF form a type I secretion system responsible for secreting SiiE [88]. In our study, SiiE was detected in all sequences analyzed. This gene mediates adhesion to bovine intestinal epithelial cells [98]. Also, genes of the pltABC operon encode an exotoxin that damages host cells and subverts immune defenses [99]. These virulence genes were present in our S. Schwarzengrund isolate but were absent from all S. Cerro strains examined.
In S. Cerro, the effector genes sseK1 and sseK2 were detected in 100% of the isolates and were absent from all S. Schwarzengrund strains. These genes are located on Salmonella pathogenicity island II [100].
Until recently, the contributions of the sseK2 gene to Salmonella virulence has not been well understood. Refs. [99,100] examined the role of sseK2 in Salmonella enterica and demonstrated that deletion of this gene significantly attenuates pathogenicity both in vivo and in vitro. SseK2 is a novel translocated effector protein originally described in S. typhimurium and is highly conserved across Salmonella strains [100].
We observed that Cerro lacked virulence genes located on pathogenicity islands 13 and 14. Similarly, ref. [53] reported the absence of SPI-13 in S. Cerro. The exact number of genes that constitute SPI-13 remains unclear [101,102]. This island has also been observed in other S. enterica subspecies [103,104], as well as in S. Gallinarum [105]. According to [106], an in silico analysis revealed that most genes within SPI-13 encode proteins involved in bacterial metabolism, leading to the hypothesis that the absence of this island may result in a nutritional disadvantage, potentially impairing Salmonella virulence in specific hosts.
In contrast, S. Schwarzengrund harbored genes located on pathogenicity islands 13 and 14, a finding also observed by [107]. Genes associated with SPI-14 play a central role in the activation of SPI-1 genes, primarily through a regulator encoded within SPI-14 (STM14_1008) known as low-oxygen-induced factor A (LoiA), which functions as a key virulence determinant [108].
4.5. Limitations
Although the data obtained for the Salmonella Cerro and Salmonella Schwarzengrund serovars are relevant, it is important to acknowledge some limitations. Given the number of strains sequenced (N = 2) and the lack of phenotypic validation, the observed percentages of Cerro and Schwarzengrund strains may not accurately reflect their true prevalence due to potential selection bias in sequencing efforts. Serotypes such as S. Typhimurium, S. Typhi and S. Enteritidis are more frequently studied and sequenced, which does not necessarily imply that they are more prevalent in the environment than Cerro and Schwarzengrund. We encourage further studies focusing on these less characterized serotypes, as the findings related to resistance genes, virulence factors, plasmid presence and pathogenicity islands presented here represent potential capabilities rather than definitive resistance or virulence profiles.
Finally, it is important to note that the strains sequenced in this study were isolated from food sources, which may affect comparisons with clinical isolates in public databases. Clinical strains are generally better characterized and tend to exhibit higher resistance profiles than environmental or food-derived isolates.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, Salmonella Cerro and Salmonella Schwarzengrund represent a small fraction of the strains isolated and sequenced in the NCBI database. Our analysis revealed that S. Cerro exhibited a lower antimicrobial resistance profile but carried virulence gene clusters with potential threat to human health. Notably, the S. Cerro virulome lacked genes located on SPI-13 and SPI-14, whereas S. Schwarzengrund harbored genes associated with both islands. A virulome analysis indicated that most S. Schwarzengrund strains were multidrug-resistant (MDR); however, the strain sequenced in this study showed resistance only to aminoglycoside and quinolone. Although only one plasmid was detected in our S. Schwarzengrund isolate, a broader diversity of plasmids was observed in both serotypes across the dataset, underscoring the potential for future dissemination of resistance and virulence genes through horizontal gene transfer.
Conceptualization, N.B.N., V.S.C., A.d.C.-N. and E.E.d.S.F.; Methodology, N.B.N. and V.S.C.; Validation, N.B.N., V.S.C., A.d.C.-N. and F.T.C.; Formal Analysis, N.B.N. and V.S.C.; Investigation, N.B.N., V.S.C. and F.T.C.; Writing—Original Draft, N.B.N.; Writing—Review and Editing, N.B.N., V.S.C., A.d.C.-N. and R.C.T.C.; Visualization, N.B.N. and V.S.C.; Supervision, E.E.d.S.F.; Project Administration, E.E.d.S.F.; Funding Acquisition, R.C.T.C. and E.E.d.S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not Applicable.
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1 Frequency (%) of antimicrobial resistance genes in S. Cerro and S. Schwarzengrund isolates. Legend: Bar graph showing the resistance profile of Cerro (blue) and Schwarzengrund (orange). The x-axis indicates the antibiotics, and the y-axis indicates the frequency of antibiotic resistance.
Figure 2 Heatmap of plasmid prevalence in Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund. Legend: Heatmap indicates the presence (%) of plasmids in Cerro and Schwarzengrund. The color gradient ranges from white (0% presence) to black (100% presence).
Figure 3 Phylogenetic tree of sequenced Salmonella Cerro and Salmonella Schwarzengrund serotypes present in the NCBI database, their virulence and frequency of antibiotic classes. Legend: The strains sequenced in this study are named Salmonella_R5748 and Salmonella_R10633. Beta_lactams: Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Aztreonam, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Cephalothin, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin. Aminoglycosides: Amikacin, Apramycin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin, Neomycin, Netilmicin, Paromomycin, Tobramycin, Streptomycin, Dibekacin, Ribostamycin, Sisomicin, Spectinomycin, Hygromycin, Lividomycin. Tetracyclines: Tetracycline, Doxycycline, Minocycline. Phenicols: Chloramphenicol, Florfenicol. Quinolones: Ciprofloxacin. Polymyxins: Colistin. Sulfonamides: Sulfamethoxazole. Trimethoprim: Trimethoprim. Pathogenicity island: (1) Present, (0) Absent.
Figure 4 Pangenome composition and core-genome SNP phylogeny of Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund isolates. Legend: The figures on the left show a pie chart of pangenome composition, dividing gene clusters into core (present in >99% of strains; in blue), soft core (95–99%; orange), shell (15–95%; green) and cloud (<15%; red). On the right, a core-genome SNP phylogeny (dendrogram) is displayed alongside a binary presence/absence matrix (blue = gene present; white = gene absent).
Figure 5 Heatmap of the frequency of SPIs in relation to serovars. Legend: Heatmap showing the frequency of pathogenicity islands (SPIs) under the serotypes in shades of red.
Figure 6 Heatmap of the percentage presence of virulence genes in Salmonella Cerro and Schwarzengrund isolates. Legend: Heatmap of the percentage presence of selected virulence genes in isolates of Salmonella serotypes Cerro and Schwarzengrund. The vertical axis lists the genes analyzed; the horizontal axis lists the serotypes. The color gradient ranges from white (0% presence) to black (100% presence). Salmonella_R5748 (Cerro) demonstrated the presence of the following genes: allB, bapA, entA, lpfA, lpfB, lpfC, lpfE, pipB, rpoS, siiE, spaO/sctQ, sseK1, sseK2, sseL, steC tlde1, while exhibiting absence of the following genes: cdtB, pltA, pltB, pltC, ratB, sopD2, sspH1. Salmonella_R10633 (Schwarzengrund) demonstrated the presence of the following genes: bapA, cdtB, entA, pipB, pltA, pltB, pltC, ratB, rpoS, siiE, sopD2, spaO/sctQ, sseK1, sspH1, tlde1, while exhibiting absence of the following genes: allB, lpfA, lpfB, lpfC, lpfE, sseK2, sseL, steC.
Resistance genes and plasmids found in the sequenced serotypes through WGS.
| Strain | S. Cerro | S. Schwarzengrund | Classes of Antibiotics/Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance genes | Aac(6′)-Iaa_1 | Aac(6′)-Iaa_1 | Aminoglicosides |
| Plasmids | None | Col440I_1 | They play a role in antimicrobial resistance and virulence |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
1. Ehuwa, O.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Jaiswal, S. Salmonella, Food Safety and Food Handling Practices. Foods; 2021; 10, 907. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10050907] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919142]
2. Bonifait, L.; Thépault, A.; Baugé, L.; Rouxel, S.; Le Gall, F.; Chemaly, M. Occurrence of Salmonella in the Cattle Production in France. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 872. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040872] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920734]
3. Wu, S.; Hulme, J.P. Recent Advances in the Detection of Antibiotic and Multi-Drug Resistant Salmonella: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 3499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073499] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800682]
4. Dos Santos Bersot, L.; Quintana Cavicchioli, V.; Viana, C.; Konrad Burin, R.C.; Camargo, A.C.; de Almeida Nogueira Pinto, J.P.; Nero, L.A.; Destro, M.T. Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Diversity of Salmonella along the Pig Production Chain in Southern Brazil. Pathogens; 2019; 8, 204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040204]
5. Hughes, L.E.; Gibson, E.A.; Roberts, H.E.; Davies, E.T.; Davies, G.; Sojka, W.J. Bovine Salmonellosis in England and Wales. Br. Vet. J.; 1971; 127, pp. 225-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1935(17)37588-7]
6. Salaheen, S.; Sonnier, J.; Kim, S.W.; Haley, B.J.; Van Kessel, J.A.S. Interaction of Salmonella enterica with Bovine Epithelial Cells Demonstrates Serovar-Specific Association and Invasion Patterns. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.; 2020; 17, pp. 608-610. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2019.2765]
7. Van Kessel, J.A.S.; Karns, J.S.; Wolfgang, D.R.; Hovingh, E.; Schukken, Y.H. Dynamics of Salmonella Serotype Shifts in an Endemically Infected Dairy Herd. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.; 2012; 9, pp. 319-324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.1054]
8. Rodriguez-Rivera, L.D.; Cummings, K.J.; Loneragan, G.H.; Rankin, S.C.; Hanson, D.L.; Leone, W.M.; Edrington, T.S. Salmonella Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Among Dairy Farm Environmental Samples Collected in Texas. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.; 2016; 13, pp. 205-211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2015.2037]
9. Tewari, D.; Sandt, C.H.; Miller, D.M.; Jayarao, B.M.; M’ikanatha, N.M. Prevalence of Salmonella Cerro in Laboratory-Based Submissions of Cattle and Comparison with Human Infections in Pennsylvania, 2005–2010. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.; 2012; 9, pp. 928-933. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2012.1142]
10. Vugia, D.J.; Samuel, M.; Farley, M.M.; Marcus, R.; Shiferaw, B.; Shallow, S.; Smith, K.; Angulo, F.J. Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group. Invasive Salmonella Infections in the United States, FoodNet, 1996–1999: Incidence, Serotype Distribution, and Outcome. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2004; 38, pp. S149-S156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/381581]
11. Keelara, S.; Scott, H.M.; Morrow, W.M.; Hartley, C.S.; Griffin, D.L.; Gebreyes, W.A.; Thakur, S. Comparative Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Temporally Related Nontyphoidal Salmonella Isolated from Human Clinical Cases, Pigs, and the Environment in North Carolina. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.; 2014; 11, pp. 156-164. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2013.1630]
12. Chen, M.H.; Wang, S.W.; Hwang, W.Z.; Tsai, S.J.; Hsih, Y.C.; Chiou, C.S.; Tsen, H.Y. Contamination of Salmonella Schwarzengrund Cells in Chicken Meat from Traditional Markets in Taiwan and Comparison of Their Antibiograms with Those of Human Isolates. Poult. Sci.; 2010; 89, pp. 359-365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20075291]
13. Publication: USDA ARS. Available online: https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=127846 (accessed on 5 June 2025).
14. Biscola, P.H.N.; Malafaia, G.C. Cicarne Yearbook of the Beef Production Chain: 2024–2025.—Portal Embrapa. Available online: https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1174114/anuario-cicarne-da-cadeia-produtiva-da-carne-bovina-2024---2025 (accessed on 4 June 2025).
15. IBGE. Estatística Da Produção Pecuária. 2025, 83. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=73087 (accessed on 4 June 2025).
16. Almeida, F.; Seribelli, A.A.; Medeiros, M.I.C.; Rodrigues, D.D.P.; de MelloVarani, A.; Luo, Y.; Allard, M.W.; Falcão, J.P. Phylogenetic and antimicrobial resistance gene analysis of Salmonella Typhimurium strains isolated in Brazil by whole genome sequencing. PLoS ONE; 2018; 13, e0201882. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201882] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102733]
17. Monte, D.F.; Lincopan, N.; Berman, H.; Cerdeira, L.; Keelara, S.; Thakur, S.; Fedorka-Cray, P.J.; Landgraf, M. Genomic Features of High-Priority Salmonella enterica Serovars Circulating in the Food Production Chain, Brazil, 2000–2016. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 11058. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45838-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363103]
18. Rodrigues, G.L.; Panzenhagen, P.; Ferrari, R.G.; dos Santos, A.; Paschoalin, V.M.F.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Frequency of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Salmonella From Brazil by in Silico Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis: An Overview of the Last Four Decades. Front. Microbiol.; 2020; 11, 1864. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01864]
19. Tiba-Casas, M.R.; Sacchi, C.T.; Gonçalves, C.R.; Almeida, E.A.; Soares, F.B.; de Jesus Bertani, A.M.; Fernandes, S.A.; de Paula Eduardo, M.B.; Camargo, C.H. Molecular Analysis of Clonally Related Salmonella Typhi Recovered from Epidemiologically Unrelated Cases of Typhoid Fever, Brazil. Int. J. Infect. Dis.; 2019; 81, pp. 191-195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.02.009]
20. Vilela, F.P.; dos Prazeres Rodrigues, D.; Allard, M.W.; Falcão, J.P. Genomic Analyses of Drug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Heidelberg Strains Isolated from Meat and Related Sources between 2013 and 2017 in the South Region of Brazil. Curr. Genet.; 2023; 69, pp. 141-152. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00294-023-01264-4]
21. Lakicevic, B.; Jankovic, V.; Pietzka, A.; Ruppitsch, W. Wholegenome Sequencing as the Gold Standard Approach for Control of Listeria Monocytogenes in the Food Chain. J. Food Prot.; 2023; 86, 100003. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2022.10.002]
22. Li, I.-C.; Wu, H.-H.; Chen, Z.-W.; Chou, C.-H. Prevalence of IncFIB Plasmids Found among Salmonella enterica Serovar Schwarzengrund Isolates from Animal Sources in Taiwan Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Pathogens; 2021; 10, 1024. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10081024]
23. Baert, L.; McClure, P.; Winkler, A.; Karn, J.; Bouwknegt, M.; Klijn, A. Guidance Document on the Use of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for Source Tracking from a Food Industry Perspective. Food Control; 2021; 130, 108148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108148]
24. Tagg, K.A.; Francois Watkins, L.; Moore, M.D.; Bennett, C.; Joung, Y.J.; Chen, J.C.; Folster, J.P. Novel Trimethoprim Resistance Gene DfrA34 Identified in Salmonella Heidelberg in the USA. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 2019; 74, pp. 38-41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky373]
25. da Cunha-Neto, A.; Carvalho, L.A.; Castro, V.S.; Barcelos, F.G.; Carvalho, R.C.T.; Rodrigues, D.d.P.; Conte-Junior, C.A.; de Figueiredo, E.E.S. Salmonella Anatum, S. Infantis and S. Schwarzengrund in Brazilian Cheeses: Occurrence and Antibiotic Resistance Profiles. Int. J. Dairy Technol.; 2020; 73, pp. 296-300. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12636]
26. Muller, B.; Cunha-Neto, A.; Castro, V.S.; Carvalho, R.C.T.; Carvalho Teixeira, L.A.; Rodrigues, D.D.P.; De Souza Figueiredo, E.E. Salmonella Schwarzengrund, Akuafo, and O:16 Isolated from Vacuum-Packaged Beef Produced in the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries.; 2021; 15, pp. 1876-1882. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.13726]
27. Zhang, S.; den Bakker, H.C.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Dinsmore, B.A.; Lane, C.; Lauer, A.C.; Fields, P.I.; Deng, X. SeqSero2: Rapid and Improved Salmonella Serotype Determination Using Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2019; 85, e01746-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01746-19]
28. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation. Bioinformatics; 2014; 30, pp. 2068-2069. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153]
29. Chen, L.; Zheng, D.; Liu, B.; Yang, J.; Jin, Q. VFDB 2016: Hierarchical and Refined Dataset for Big Data Analysis—10 Years On. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2016; 44, pp. D694-D697. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1239] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26578559]
30. Zankari, E.; Hasman, H.; Cosentino, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Rasmussen, S.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Larsen, M.V. Identification of Acquired Antimicrobial Resistance Genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 2012; 67, pp. 2640-2644. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks261]
31. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and Applications. BMC Bioinform.; 2009; 10, 421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003500]
32. Clausen, P.T.L.C.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Lund, O. Rapid and Precise Alignment of Raw Reads against Redundant Databases with KMA. BMC Bioinform.; 2018; 19, 307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2336-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157759]
33. Yoon, S.H.; Park, Y.-K.; Kim, J.F. PAIDB v2.0: Exploration and Analysis of Pathogenicity and Resistance Islands. Nucleic Acids Res; 2015; 43, pp. D624-D630. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku985]
34. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; García-Fernández, A.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Hasman, H. In Silico Detection and Typing of Plasmids Using PlasmidFinder and Plasmid Multilocus Sequence Typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.; 2014; 58, pp. 3895-3903. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02412-14]
35. Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.G.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid Large-Scale Prokaryote Pan Genome Analysis. Bioinformatics; 2015; 31, pp. 3691-3693. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198102]
36. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 2015; 32, pp. 268-274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25371430]
37. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2—Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLoS ONE; 2010; 5, e9490. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009490] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20224823]
38. Argimón, S.; Abudahab, K.; Goater, R.J.E.; Fedosejev, A.; Bhai, J.; Glasner, C.; Feil, E.J.; Holden, M.T.G.; Yeats, C.A.; Grundmann, H.
39. González-Santamarina, B.; García-Soto, S.; Dang-Xuan, S.; Abdel-Glil, M.Y.; Meemken, D.; Fries, R.; Tomaso, H. Genomic Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Serovars Derby and Rissen From the Pig Value Chain in Vietnam. Front. Vet. Sci.; 2021; 8, 705044. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.705044]
40. Shelenkov, A.; Mikhaylova, Y.; Voskanyan, S.; Egorova, A.; Akimkin, V. Whole-Genome Sequencing Revealed the Fusion Plasmids Capable of Transmission and Acquisition of Both Antimicrobial Resistance and Hypervirulence Determinants in Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates. Microorganisms; 2023; 11, 1314. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051314]
41. Diep, B.; Barretto, C.; Portmann, A.-C.; Fournier, C.; Karczmarek, A.; Voets, G.; Li, S.; Deng, X.; Klijn, A. Salmonella Serotyping; Comparison of the Traditional Method to a Microarray-Based Method and an in Silico Platform Using Whole Genome Sequencing Data. Front. Microbiol.; 2019; 10, 2554. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02554]
42. Zhang, S.; Yin, Y.; Jones, M.B.; Zhang, Z.; Deatherage Kaiser, B.L.; Dinsmore, B.A.; Fitzgerald, C.; Fields, P.I.; Deng, X. Salmonella Serotype Determination Utilizing High-Throughput Genome Sequencing Data. J. Clin. Microbiol.; 2015; 53, pp. 1685-1692. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00323-15]
43. Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Nielsen, E.M.; Kaas, R.S.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M. Evaluation of Whole Genome Sequencing for Outbreak Detection of Salmonella Enterica. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e87991. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087991]
44. Köser, C.U.; Ellington, M.J.; Cartwright, E.J.P.; Gillespie, S.H.; Brown, N.M.; Farrington, M.; Holden, M.T.G.; Dougan, G.; Bentley, S.D.; Parkhill, J.
45. Chapagain, P.P.; Kessel, J.S.V.; Karns, J.S.; Wolfgang, D.R.; Hovingh, E.; Nelen, K.A.; Schukken, Y.H.; Grohn, Y.T. A Mathematical Model of the Dynamics of Salmonella Cerro Infection in a US Dairy Herd. Epidemiol. Infect.; 2008; 136, pp. 263-272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268807008400] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17445313]
46. Duc, V.M.; Shin, J.; Nagamatsu, Y.; Fuhiwara, A.; Toyofuku, H.; Obi, T.; Chuma, T. Increased Salmonella Schwarzengrund Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Salmonella Enterica Isolated from Broiler Chickens in Kagoshima Prefecture in Japan between 2013 and 2016. J. Vet. Med. Sci.; 2020; 82, pp. 585-589. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0096]
47. Aarestrup, F.M.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Lockett, J.; Gay, K.; Teates, K.; McDermott, P.F.; White, D.G.; Hasman, H.; Sørensen, G.; Bangtrakulnonth, A.
48. Sasaki, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Yonemitsu, K.; Kuroda, M.; Ogawa, M.; Sakata, R.; Uema, M.; Momose, Y.; Ohya, K.; Watanabe, M.
49. Matsui, K.; Nakazawa, C.; Thiri Maung Maung Khin, S.; Iwabuchi, E.; Asai, T.; Ishihara, K. Molecular Characteristics and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella enterica Serovar Schwarzengrund from Chicken Meat in Japan. Antibiotics; 2021; 10, 1336. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111336]
50. Du, X.; Jiang, X.; Ye, Y.; Guo, B.; Wang, W.; Ding, J.; Xie, G. Next Generation Sequencing for the Investigation of an Outbreak of Salmonella Schwarzengrund in Nanjing, China. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.; 2018; 107, pp. 393-396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.005]
51. Bangtrakulnonth, A.; Pornreongwong, S.; Pulsrikarn, C.; Sawanpanyalert, P.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Wong, D.M.A.L.F.; Aarestrup, F.M. Salmonella Serovars from Humans and Other Sources in Thailand, 1993–2002. Emerg. Infect. Dis.; 2004; 10, pp. 131-136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.02-0781]
52. Tsai, H.-J.; Hsiang, P.-H. The Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Salmonella and Campylobacter in Ducks in Taiwan. J. Vet. Med. Sci.; 2005; 67, pp. 7-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.67.7]
53. Tejada, T.S.; Silva, C.S.J.; Lopes, N.A.; Silva, D.T.; Agostinetto, A.; Silva, E.F.; Menezes, D.B.; Timm, C.D. DNA Profiles of Salmonella Spp. Isolated from Chicken Products and From Broiler and Human Feces. Braz. J. Poult. Sci.; 2016; 18, pp. 693-700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0316]
54. Voss-Rech, D.; Vaz, C.S.L.; Alves, L.; Coldebella, A.; Leão, J.A.; Rodrigues, D.P.; Back, A. A Temporal Study of Salmonella enterica Serotypes from Broiler Farms in Brazil. Poult. Sci.; 2015; 94, pp. 433-441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu081]
55. Rodriguez-Rivera, L.D.; Wright, E.M.; Siler, J.D.; Elton, M.; Cummings, K.J.; Warnick, L.D.; Wiedmann, M. Subtype Analysis of Salmonella Isolated from Subclinically Infected Dairy Cattle and Dairy Farm Environments Reveals the Presence of Both Human- and Bovine-Associated Subtypes. Vet. Microbiol.; 2014; 170, pp. 307-316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.013]
56. Kovac, J.; Cummings, K.J.; Rodriguez-Rivera, L.D.; Carroll, L.M.; Thachil, A.; Wiedmann, M. Temporal Genomic Phylogeny Reconstruction Indicates a Geospatial Transmission Path of Salmonella Cerro in the United States and a Clade-Specific Loss of Hydrogen Sulfide Production. Front. Microbiol.; 2017; 8, 737. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00737]
57. Pulido-Landínez, M.; Sánchez-Ingunza, R.; Guard, J.; do Nascimento, V.P. Assignment of Serotype to Salmonella enterica Isolates Obtained from Poultry and Their Environment in Southern Brazil. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.; 2013; 57, pp. 288-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lam.12110] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734786]
58. de Azevedo, E.C.; Martins, B.T.F.; Tiba Casas, M.R.; Possebon, F.S.; Araújo Junior, J.P.; Nero, L.A.; Yamatogi, R.S. Multidrug Resistance and Virulence Profiles of Salmonella Isolated from Swine Lymph Nodes. Microb. Drug Resist.; 2021; 27, pp. 562-570. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2020.0120] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32865485]
59. Carraro, P.E.; de Barbosa, F.O.; Benevides, V.P.; Casas, M.R.T.; Berchieri Junior, A.; Bürger, K.P. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Spp. Isolated from Free-Ranging Wild Boars in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Cienc. Rural; 2022; 52, e20210263. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210263]
60. Gabana, A.D.A.; Núncio, A.S.P.; Lopes, B.C.; de Oliveira, J.A.; da Silva Monteiro, L.; de Menezes Coppola, M.; Furian, T.Q.; Borges, K.A.; Rodrigues, L.B.; Mayer, F.Q. Different Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Spp. Serovars Isolated from Slaughter Calves in Southern Brazil. Curr. Microbiol.; 2022; 80, 11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03136-5]
61. Gutema, F.D.; Agga, G.E.; Abdi, R.D.; De Zutter, L.; Duchateau, L.; Gabriël, S. Prevalence and Serotype Diversity of Salmonella in Apparently Healthy Cattle: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Studies, 2000–2017. Front. Vet. Sci.; 2019; 6, 102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00102]
62. Barrow, P.A.; Jones, M.A.; Thomson, N. Salmonella. Pathogenesis of Bacterial Infections in Animals; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 231-265. ISBN 978-0-470-95820-9
63. Ågren, E. Salmonella in Swedish Cattle. 2017; Available online: https://publications.slu.se/?file=publ/show&id=104094 (accessed on 16 April 2025).
64. Kemal, J. A Review on the Public Health Importance of Bovine Salmonellosis. J Vet. Sci Technol; 2014; 5, 175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000175]
65. Gould, L.H.; Mungai, E.; Barton Behravesh, C. Outbreaks Attributed to Cheese: Differences Between Outbreaks Caused by Unpasteurized and Pasteurized Dairy Products, United States, 1998–2011. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.; 2014; 11, pp. 545-551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2013.1650]
66. Koohmaraie, M.; Scanga, J.A.; De la zerda, M.J.; Koohmaraie, B.; Tapay, L.; Beskhlebnaya, V.; Mai, T.; Greeson, K.; Samadpour, M. Tracking the Sources of Salmonella in Ground Beef Produced from Nonfed Cattle. J. Food Prot.; 2012; 75, pp. 1464-1468. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-540]
67. Fossler, C.P.; Wells, S.J.; Kaneene, J.B.; Ruegg, P.L.; Warnick, L.D.; Bender, J.B.; Godden, S.M.; Halbert, L.W.; Campbell, A.M.; Zwald, A.M.G. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. on Conventional and Organic Dairy Farms. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.; 2004; 225, pp. 567-573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2004.225.567] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15344365]
68. Nhung, N.T.; Van, N.T.B.; Cuong, N.V.; Duong, T.T.Q.; Nhat, T.T.; Hang, T.T.T.; Nhi, N.T.H.; Kiet, B.T.; Hien, V.B.; Ngoc, P.T.
69. Carroll, L.M.; Wiedmann, M.; den Bakker, H.; Siler, J.; Warchocki, S.; Kent, D.; Lyalina, S.; Davis, M.; Sischo, W.; Besser, T.
70. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; ISBN 978-92-4-156474-8
71. Nguyen, T.T.; Le, H.V.; Vu Thi Hai, H.; Nguyen Tuan, T.; Nguyen, H.M.; Pham Xuan, D.; Tran Thi Thanh, H.; Le Thi, H.H. Whole-Genome Analysis of Antimicrobial-Resistant Salmonella enterica Isolated from Duck Carcasses in Hanoi, Vietnam. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol.; 2023; 45, pp. 2213-2229. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45030143]
72. Moura, Q.; Fernandes, M.R.; Silva, K.C.; Monte, D.F.; Esposito, F.; Dropa, M.; Noronha, C.; Moreno, A.M.; Landgraf, M.; Negrão, F.J.
73. World Health Organization. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List 2024 Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance, to Guide Research, Development, and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance; 1st ed. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024; ISBN 978-92-4-009346-1
74. McMillan, E.A.; Gupta, S.K.; Williams, L.E.; Jové, T.; Hiott, L.M.; Woodley, T.A.; Barrett, J.B.; Jackson, C.R.; Wasilenko, J.L.; Simmons, M.
75. Qian, H.; Cheng, S.; Liu, G.; Tan, Z.; Dong, C.; Bao, J.; Hong, J.; Jin, D.; Bao, C.; Gu, B. Discovery of Seven Novel Mutations of GyrB, ParC and ParE in Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi Strains from Jiangsu Province of China. Sci Rep; 2020; 10, 7359. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64346-0]
76. Randall, L.P.; Coldham, N.G.; Woodward, M.J. Detection of Mutations in Salmonella enterica gyrA, GyrB, ParC and ParE Genes by Denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography (DHPLC) Using Standard HPLC Instrumentation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 2005; 56, pp. 619-623. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki293]
77. Gonzalez Ronquillo, M.; Angeles Hernandez, J.C. Antibiotic and Synthetic Growth Promoters in Animal Diets: Review of Impact and Analytical Methods. Food Control; 2017; 72, pp. 255-267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.03.001]
78. Van Boeckel, T.P.; Brower, C.; Gilbert, M.; Grenfell, B.T.; Levin, S.A.; Robinson, T.P.; Teillant, A.; Laxminarayan, R. Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2015; 112, pp. 5649-5654. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112]
79. Hopkins, K.L.; Davies, R.H.; Threlfall, E.J. Mecanismos de Resistência Às Quinolonas Em Escherichia Coli e Salmonella: Desenvolvimentos Recentes. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents; 2005; 25, pp. 358-373. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.02.006]
80. Casas, M.R.T.; Camargo, C.H.; Soares, F.B.; da Silveira, W.D.; Fernandes, S.A. Presence of Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Determinants and Mutations in Gyrase and Topoisomerase in Salmonella enterica Isolates with Resistance and Reduced Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.; 2016; 85, pp. 85-89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.01.016]
81. Salah, F.D.; Soubeiga, S.T.; Ouattara, A.K.; Sadji, A.Y.; Metuor-Dabire, A.; Obiri-Yeboah, D.; Banla-Kere, A.; Karou, S.; Simpore, J. Distribution of Quinolone Resistance Gene (Qnr) in ESBL-Producing Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella spp. in Lomé, Togo. Antimicrob Resist. Infect. Control; 2019; 8, 104. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0552-0]
82. Heisig, P. High-Level Fluoroquinolone Resistance in a Salmonella Typhimurium Isolate Due to Alterations in Both GyrA and GyrB Genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 1993; 32, pp. 367-377. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/32.3.367] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8262859]
83. Casin, I.; Breuil, J.; Darchis, J.P.; Guelpa, C.; Collatz, E. Fluoroquinolone Resistance Linked to GyrA, GyrB, and ParC Mutations in Salmonella enterica Typhimurium Isolates in Humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis.; 2003; 9, pp. 1455-1457. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0911.030317] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14718091]
84. Moreno-Switt, A.I.; Pezoa, D.; Sepúlveda, V.; González, I.; Rivera, D.; Retamal, P.; Navarrete, P.; Reyes-Jara, A.; Toro, M. Transduction as a Potential Dissemination Mechanism of a Clonal QnrB19-Carrying Plasmid Isolated From Salmonella of Multiple Serotypes and Isolation Sources. Front. Microbiol.; 2019; 10, 2503. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02503]
85. Felix, M.A.; Han, J.; Khajanchi, B.K.; Sanad, Y.M.; Zhao, S.; Foley, S.L. Salmonella enterica Serovar Schwarzengrund: Distribution, Virulence, and Antimicrobial Resistance. Microorganisms; 2025; 13, 92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13010092]
86. Cohn, A.R.; Orsi, R.H.; Carroll, L.M.; Liao, J.; Wiedmann, M.; Cheng, R.A. Salmonella enterica Serovar Cerro Displays a Phylogenetic Structure and Genomic Features Consistent with Virulence Attenuation and Adaptation to Cattle. Front. Microbiol.; 2022; 13, 1005215. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1005215]
87. Li, I.-C.; Wu, R.; Hu, C.-W.; Wu, K.-M.; Chen, Z.-W.; Chou, C.-H. Comparison of Conventional Molecular and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Schwarzengrund Isolates Obtained from Food and Animal Sources. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 2046. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102046]
88. Kombade, S.; Kaur, N.; Kombade, S.; Kaur, N. Pathogenicity Island in Salmonella spp.—A Global Challenge; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; ISBN 978-1-83969-018-1
89. Hensel, M. Evolution of Pathogenicity Islands of Salmonella enterica. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.; 2004; 294, pp. 95-102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2004.06.025]
90. Riquelme, S.; Varas, M.; Valenzuela, C.; Velozo, P.; Chahin, N.; Aguilera, P.; Sabag, A.; Labra, B.; Álvarez, S.A.; Chávez, F.P.
91. Nieto, P.A.; Pardo-Roa, C.; Salazar-Echegarai, F.J.; Tobar, H.E.; Coronado-Arrázola, I.; Riedel, C.A.; Kalergis, A.M.; Bueno, S.M. New Insights about Excisable Pathogenicity Islands in Salmonella and Their Contribution to Virulence. Microbes Infect.; 2016; 18, pp. 302-309. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2016.02.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26939722]
92. Pornsukarom, S.; Patchanee, P.; Erdman, M.; Cray, P.F.; Wittum, T.; Lee, J.; Gebreyes, W.A. Comparative Phenotypic and Genotypic Analyses of Salmonella Rissen That Originated from Food Animals in Thailand and United States. Zoonoses Public Health; 2015; 62, pp. 151-158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12144]
93. Han, J.; Aljahdali, N.; Zhao, S.; Tang, H.; Harbottle, H.; Hoffmann, M.; Frye, J.G.; Foley, S.L. Infection Biology of Salmonella enterica. EcoSal Plus; 2024; 12, eesp-0001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0001-2023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38415623]
94. Fàbrega, A.; Vila, J. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Skills To Succeed in the Host: Virulence and Regulation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2013; 26, pp. 308-341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00066-12] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554419]
95. Sévellec, Y.; Vignaud, M.-L.; Granier, S.A.; Lailler, R.; Feurer, C.; Le Hello, S.; Mistou, M.-Y.; Cadel-Six, S. Polyphyletic Nature of Salmonella enterica Serotype Derby and Lineage-Specific Host-Association Revealed by Genome-Wide Analysis. Front. Microbiol.; 2018; 9, 891. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00891]
96. Sousa, A.D.A. Caracterização Fenotípica e Genética de Resistência Antimicrobiana em Salmonella enterica. Master’s Thesis; Fernando Pessoa University: Ponte de Lima, Portugal, 2023.
97. Marcus, S.L.; Brumell, J.H.; Pfeifer, C.G.; Finlay, B.B. Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands: Big Virulence in Small Packages. Microbes Infect.; 2000; 2, pp. 145-156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00273-2]
98. Ibarra, J.A.; Steele-Mortimer, O. Salmonella—the Ultimate Insider. Salmonella ate Intracellular Survival. Cell Microbiol.; 2009; 11, pp. 1579-1586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01368.x]
99. Sheehan, J.R.; Sadlier, C.; O’Brien, B. Bacterial Endotoxins and Exotoxins in Intensive Care Medicine. BJA Educ.; 2022; 22, pp. 224-230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2022.01.003]
100. Kujat Choy, S.L.; Boyle, E.C.; Gal-Mor, O.; Goode, D.L.; Valdez, Y.; Vallance, B.A.; Finlay, B.B. SseK1 and SseK2 Are Novel Translocated Proteins of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun.; 2004; 72, pp. 5115-5125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.72.9.5115-5125.2004]
101. Zhang, X.; He, L.; Zhang, C.; Yu, C.; Yang, Y.; Jia, Y.; Cheng, X.; Li, Y.; Liao, C.; Li, J.
102. Espinoza, R.A.; Silva-Valenzuela, C.A.; Amaya, F.A.; Urrutia, Í.M.; Contreras, I.; Santiviago, C.A.; Espinoza, R.A.; Silva-Valenzuela, C.A.; Amaya, F.A.; Urrutia, Í.M.
103. Desai, P.T.; Porwollik, S.; Long, F.; Cheng, P.; Wollam, A.; Bhonagiri-Palsikar, V.; Hallsworth-Pepin, K.; Clifton, S.W.; Weinstock, G.M.; McClelland, M. Evolutionary Genomics of Salmonella enterica Subspecies. MBio; 2013; 4, e00579-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00198-13] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23462113]
104. Haneda, T.; Ishii, Y.; Danbara, H.; Okada, N. Genome-Wide Identification of Novel Genomic Islands That Contribute to Salmonella Virulence in Mouse Systemic Infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.; 2009; 297, pp. 241-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01686.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19583791]
105. Shah, D.H.; Lee, M.-J.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Eo, S.-K.; Kwon, J.-T.; Chae, J.-S. Identification of Salmonella Gallinarum Virulence Genes in a Chicken Infection Model Using PCR-Based Signature-Tagged Mutagenesis. Microbiology; 2005; 151, Pt 12, pp. 3957-3968. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.28126-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339940]
106. Elder, J.R.; Chiok, K.L.; Paul, N.C.; Haldorson, G.; Guard, J.; Shah, D.H. The Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 13 Contributes to Pathogenesis in Streptomycin Pre-Treated Mice but Not in Day-Old Chickens. Gut Pathog.; 2016; 8, 16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-016-0098-0]
107. Benevides, V.P.; Saraiva, M.M.S.; Ferreira, V.A.; Funnicelli, M.I.G.; Rodrigues Alves, L.B.; Almeida, A.M.; Christensen, H.; Olsen, J.E.; Berchieri Junior, A. Unveiling the Genomic Landscape of Understudied Salmonella enterica Serovars from Poultry and Human: Implications for Food Safety. Curr. Microbiol.; 2025; 82, 279. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04234-w]
108. Jiang, L.; Feng, L.; Yang, B.; Zhang, W.; Wang, P.; Jiang, X.; Wang, L. Signal Transduction Pathway Mediated by the Novel Regulator LoiA for Low Oxygen Tension Induced Salmonella Typhimurium Invasion. PLoS Pathog.; 2017; 13, e1006429. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006429]
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; da Cunha-Neto Adelino 2 ; Carvalho, Fernanda Tavares 3 ; Carvalho Ricardo César Tavares 3
; Figueiredo Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza 4
1 Faculty of Agronomy and Zootechnics, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá 78060-900, MT, Brazil; [email protected]
2 Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá 78060-900, MT, Brazil; [email protected], Program in Animal Bioscience, University of Cuiabá (UNIC), Cuiabá 78065-900, MT, Brazil; [email protected] (F.T.C.); [email protected] (R.C.T.C.)
3 Program in Animal Bioscience, University of Cuiabá (UNIC), Cuiabá 78065-900, MT, Brazil; [email protected] (F.T.C.); [email protected] (R.C.T.C.)
4 Faculty of Agronomy and Zootechnics, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá 78060-900, MT, Brazil; [email protected], Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá 78060-900, MT, Brazil; [email protected]