It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the present study, a bypass passive jet flow control method was proposed to mitigate unsteady wind loads and to manipulate the flow field around a single box girder of a bridge. With a geometric ratio of 1:125, the single box girder model was determined using the cross-section of the Great Belt East Bridge. During the experiments, one test model without control was adopted, while five different test models with different suction/jet configurations were employed to analyze the effects of the control method and to reveal the underlying mechanism of different control schemes. The incoming wind speed was fixed to 12 m/s and the wind attack angles were changed from −20° to 20°, resulting in a corresponding Reynolds number of Re = 0.28 × 105–0.74 × 105 based on the different attack angles. A six-component force balance, a set of digital sensor array (DSA) pressure transducers, and a particle image velocimetry (PIV) system was used to measure the aerodynamic forces, pressure distributions, and flow fields around the test models to evaluate the control effectiveness of different control cases. Detailed flow structures are presented and discussed for two test cases when the angles of attack are +15° and −20°. The effects of control on the aerodynamic forces were first investigated to determine and select the best one out of five control cases. The pressure distributions on the surface of the test model without control and the best control case were then compared to evaluate the control effectiveness of the pressure gradient and the fluctuating pressure coefficients. The flow fields around the test models demonstrate that the bypass passive jet flow control could decrease vortex strength, delay flow separation, and change recirculation region and size. The results of the aerodynamic forces, pressure distributions, and flow fields indicate that the bypass passive jet flow control method results in effective control.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 School of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
2 Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disasters of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China; Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China




