Content area
Full Text
Shakespeare's Women: Performance and Conception. By DAVID MANN. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Illus. Pp. x + 294. $93.00 cloth.
Reviewed by PHYLLIS RACKIN
During the last forty years, Shakespeare's female characters, especially those who appear in male disguise, have attracted considerable attention, largely because of their relevance to our own concerns about gender and sexuality. To David Mann, this scholarship needs to be refuted because it is ahistorically distorted by present preoccupations. In the end, Mann's arguments are less than convincing, but some of them raise useful challenges to currently received wisdom about Shakespeare's female characters.
Mann castigates feminist and gay critics for focusing on Shakespeare's supposed gender politics, rather than on the ways Shakespeare exploited the cross-dressed convention as a dramatic medium. Ironically, however, Mann's own argument is heavily inflected by his own gender politics-so much so that his analysis is often reduced to self-contradiction and incoherence. In disputing the validity of feminist criticism, for instance, he insists that in Shakespeare's theater, neither the male actors who played women's roles nor the playgoers would have had "any profound commitment to the female character being represented" (202). When female characters are mistreated, he contends, "The cries of fear are not those of real women imaginatively conceived in a situation of any authenticity, but those of cross-dressed performers for whom inevitably there will be an element of male salaciousness, whichever roles they play" (188). In refuting gay readings, however, he insists that the male body would have disappeared from spectators' consciousness as they responded to the represented body of the woman.
The book is not without virtues. Mann never loses sight of the fact that Shakespeare was a working commercial playwright, and he contextualizes his discussions of Shakespeare's work with numerous references to plays written by his predecessors and contemporaries. Mann's own experience as an actor and director keeps him alert to the possibilities (and impossibilities) of performance and produces convincing arguments about a number of contested issues and interpretations (his perceptive discussion at the end of chapter 4 on Lady Macbeth's changing role is one example). In the case of the female characters, he points out that post-Shakespearean interpretations are often colored by the unacknowledged influence of the fact that female...