It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The young African turquoise killifish has a high regenerative capacity, but loses it with advancing age, adopting several aspects of the limited form of mammalian regeneration. We deployed a proteomic strategy to identify pathways that underpin the loss of regenerative power caused by aging. Cellular senescence stood out as a potential brake on successful neurorepair. We applied the senolytic cocktail Dasatinib and Quercetin (D + Q) to test clearance of chronic senescent cells from the aged killifish central nervous system (CNS) as well as rebooting the neurogenic output. Our results show that the entire aged killifish telencephalon holds a very high senescent cell burden, including the parenchyma and the neurogenic niches, which could be diminished by a short-term, late-onset D + Q treatment. Reactive proliferation of non-glial progenitors increased substantially and lead to restorative neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. Our results provide a cellular mechanism for age-related regeneration resilience and a proof-of-concept of a potential therapy to revive the neurogenic potential in an already aged or diseased CNS.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 KU Leuven, Laboratory of Neuroplasticity and Neuroproteomics, Department of Biology, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
2 KU Leuven, Laboratory of Neuroplasticity and Neuroproteomics, Department of Biology, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884); KU Leuven, Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
3 University of Antwerp, Centre for Proteomics, Antwerpen, Belgium (GRID:grid.5284.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 3681)
4 University of Antwerp, Centre for Proteomics, Antwerpen, Belgium (GRID:grid.5284.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 3681); Health Unit, VITO, Mol, Belgium (GRID:grid.6717.7) (ISNI:0000000120341548)
5 KU Leuven, Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884); KU Leuven, KU Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
6 KU Leuven, Laboratory of Neuroplasticity and Neuroproteomics, Department of Biology, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884); KU Leuven, KU Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)