It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This paper explores the subjective experiences of mental health practitioners, people with psychosis and carers, on social isolation and community integration of people with psychosis. Focus groups and one-to-one interviews with 80 adult participants across three sites in the UK were conducted. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Participants commented on various aspects that may cause social isolation or enable community integration, including institutional factors (lack of resources, hospitalisation impact), illness symptoms (e.g., paranoia; over-pathologising vs individual choice), stigma (particularly the psychosis label), and the importance of communities that foster agency and embrace change. Hospitalisation maybe be a cause for isolation and psychiatric wards should consider allowing for socialisation as a therapeutic tool. Initiatives should consider the social fabric of our communities, socioeconomic inequalities and stigmatisation. Building communities that are accepting, kind and flexible can create opportunities that could lead to independence from mental health services.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Exeter, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter, UK (GRID:grid.8391.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8024)
2 Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK (GRID:grid.439568.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 8948 8567)
3 Newham Centre for Mental Health, Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK (GRID:grid.416554.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2227 3745)
4 University of York, International Centre for Mental Health Social Research, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, York, UK (GRID:grid.5685.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9668)
5 Newham Centre for Mental Health, Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK (GRID:grid.416554.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2227 3745); University of Warwick, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK (GRID:grid.7372.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 8809 1613)