It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Assessing customers’ satisfaction with service quality has been a common practice that allows leaders and managers to improve service delivery to the customers in business studies. In education, the measurement of student satisfaction has received popularity and so does the satisfaction of teaching staff. Studies examining student teachers’ and tutors’ satisfaction with service quality particularly in teacher education are scant. The aims of this study are threefold: to determine the level of support that the Teacher Education Support Project (TESP) provides to strengthen teacher education in Tanzania; to explore the student teachers’ and tutors’ perceptions and satisfaction with the facilities and overall college environment in public TCs and to determine the factors explaining student teachers’ and tutors’ satisfaction with service quality. A survey study involving 2772 student teachers and 302 tutors from all 35 public TCs was conducted in the Tanzania Mainland. The study findings revealed that the TESP has provided significant support of textual and non-textual facilities and learning materials in all public TCs. Besides, student teachers’ satisfaction is most strongly predicted by in-class teaching aids and practical materials albeit other factors such as library and ICT facilities had a considerable prediction. Whereas tutors’ teaching strategies made a significant contribution in regression analysis to explain student teachers’ satisfaction Tutors’ satisfaction was most strongly explained by ICT-supported teaching environments followed up by teaching aids and science facilities. The study concludes by proposing that the measurement of student teachers’ and tutors’ satisfaction be approached and improved separately. Implications for these findings are discussed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies, College of Education, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
2 Department of Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies, College of Education, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania; The African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science, University of Rwanda, Rwanda
3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Dodoma, Tanzania
4 Teacher Training Section, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Lilongwe, Tanzania