Content area

Abstract

Background

Optimal elective surgical treatment for splenic flexure neoplasm (SFN) is unclear. Subtotal colectomy (STC) and left hemicolectomy (LHC) are the two more common strategies used.

Methods

Observational multicentric study comparing postoperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival on patients with SFN electively operated by STC versus LHC between 2003 and 2014.

Results

After revision of the databases, 144 patients were included (STC group, n = 68; LHC group, n = 76). No differences were found on epidemiological and surgical data. A higher global morbidity (58%vs37%, p = 0.014), surgical morbidity (50%vs33%, p = 0.037), postoperative ileus (37%vs20%, p = 0.023) and harvested lymph nodes (26vs18, p = 0.0001) were found on the STC group. No significant differences in complications according to severity, reoperation rate, hospital stay, mortality, recurrence or long-term survival were found between groups.

Conclusions

A higher surgical morbidity was found on the STC group, mainly due to mild postoperative ileus. No differences on long-term oncological results were found.

Details

Title
Subtotal colectomy versus left hemicolectomy for the elective treatment of splenic flexure colonic neoplasia
Author
Beisani, Marc 1 ; Vallribera, Francesc 1 ; García, Albert 2 ; Mora, Laura 2 ; Biondo, Sebastiano 3 ; Lopez-Borao, Jaime 3 ; Farrés, Ramon 4 ; Gil, Júlia 4 ; Espin, Eloy 1 

 Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebrón 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain 
 Department of Surgery, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí, 1, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain 
 Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain 
 Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Girona Ramon Trueta, Avinguda de França, s/n, 17007, Girona, Spain 
Pages
251-254
Publication year
2018
Publication date
Aug 2018
Publisher
Elsevier Limited
ISSN
00029610
e-ISSN
18791883
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2071533271
Copyright
Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2018