Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

1. Introduction

Observation of changes that have been occurring in social contexts suggests an increasingly marked need to restructure organizational practices in companies to guarantee their continuity [1]. Implementation of sustainable processes has received more attention in research, since structural and behavioral changes in companies are driven less by competition and more by the need for organizational legitimacy [2].

Sustainable consumption, in its essence, is a normative concept that requires people, companies, and nations to reduce the “footprints” they leave by incorrect use of resources in the interest of environmental protection and ecological integrity [3]. This type of consumption involves many factors beyond individual behavior, given that cultural, social, historical, and economic factors can influence consumption decisions [4].

This is a subject of extreme relevance for minimizing the impacts on the environment caused by inadequate (sometimes irresponsible) consumption, which motivates the development of studies that point to difficulties and barriers to sustainable consumption, and guidelines, opportunities, and innovations that can be used to overcome these barriers. These topics are aligned with what is considered essential for companies and consumers to expand their knowledge or guide their first steps toward practices that favor sustainable consumption. In this context, in an attempt to increase knowledge about the subject, the present study had as a general objective to carry out a systematic literature review on sustainable consumption, with a main focus on the business environment of companies, but without neglecting to address issues related to consumer behavior and public policies.

It is noteworthy that the research was limited to analyzing publications from the last ten years from four categories of the Web of Science with an environmental focus, namely: (i) Environmental Sciences; (ii) Green Sustainable Science Technology; (iii) Environmental Studies; and (iv) Environmental Engineering.

The relevance of the present study lies in the following ways in which it contributes to advancing knowledge of the topic: (i) participating in growing educational efforts in several areas with the purpose of expanding knowledge about the background and consequences of consumption [5]; (ii) presenting the results of the studies with transparency so the public at large receives adequate information and has resources to act sustainably regarding consumerism [6]; and (iii) providing a basis for future studies in the area based on the gaps found in the literature.

The present study contains four additional sections. Section 2 describes the methodological steps followed during the study’s execution. Section 3 and Section 4 show its main contributions, addressing a systematic literature review (Section 3) and an agenda and directions for future studies on sustainable consumption (Section 4). The Section 5 contains the final considerations and emphasizes the main theoretical and practical implications and the study’s limitations.

2. Materials and Methods

The literature review process is an important step in any sort of scientific research. By carrying out an adequate review, it is possible to determine limits in each study field, indicate its boundaries, and point out questions not yet addressed, those that have already reached saturation, and, above all, gaps to be explored. Therefore, a literature review must put together, structure, and classify study materials aiming to show paths for future studies in certain key subjects [7,8].

According to De La Torre-Ugarte-Guanilo et al. [9], a literature review method that has gained adherents is the so-called systematic literature review. This is a secondary study that systematizes, identifies, selects, evaluates, and summarizes primary studies about a certain relevant research topic and also exposes gaps in the literature and limitations in a branch of knowledge [10,11,12,13].

A systematic literature review was applied in the present study because it provides researchers with a reliable volume of systematized information by means of a rigorous and reproducible process [14]. Consequently, the present systematic literature review aimed to organize the knowledge disseminated over the past decade about sustainable consumption, increasing its visibility [15], contributing to the research process [16], offering a historical perspective, and consolidating individual research efforts about this subject [12]. The basic structure of a systematic literature review is shown in Figure 1 [10,12,17,18,19].

The process of carrying out a systematic literature review begins with planning, which involves a definition of the study scope [19] and objective [10], protocol formulation, and team training [17]. Subsequently, during selection, the data search strategy is defined [10,12,19] and a bibliographic survey is carried out [17]. The extraction phase involves obtaining and evaluating the research material [10,12,19]. The last step, execution, focuses on study synthesis and writing [17].

According to Tseng et al. [18], systematic literature reviews have four steps, which involve, in short, data identification, initial data screening, eligibility determination, and data inclusion. The steps represented in Figure 1 (construed as macroprocesses) can be split up into smaller steps (microprocesses), as indicated by Soni and Kodali [20] and Hall et al. [14] and shown in Figure 2 by Okoli [17].

During the selection phase, the data search strategy, specifically regarding keywords, must be chosen carefully, because if the choice is poor, additional efforts will be required of researchers in the initial data screening step [12].

A structured research protocol was produced based on the information discussed so far, as shown in Figure 3.

3. Systematic Literature Review

In this section, the produced systematic literature review is presented. The section is in seven parts: (i) definitions of sustainable consumption; (ii) historical evolution of sustainable consumption; (iii) sustainable consumption from the perspective of materials and methods used; (iv) contributions of sustainable consumption to companies; (v) barriers to the adoption of sustainable consumption by companies; (vi) guidelines for the adoption of sustainable consumption by companies; and (vii) sustainable consumption-related innovations.

3.1. Definitions of Sustainable Consumption

The formal introduction of the “sustainable consumption” concept occurred during the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The definitions of sustainable consumption address the environmental consequences of consumption acts [26]. Several authors stated that sustainable consumption is a great source of concern for society and business [27].

Barber [28] stated that sustainable consumption raises awareness and brings about changes in the values and motivations that lead to consumer behavior. The concept emerged as a response to sustainability challenges faced by communities around the world [29]. Sustainable consumption involves sustainable solutions seen as crucial for changing production and consumption patterns [30].

From the organizational point of view, the concept is related to sustainability and green technologies, which are used in attempts to bring benefits to companies, such as improvement of their image or even economic advantages [31]. One of the concepts used that is aligned with sustainable consumption is sustainable consumption and production (SCP), defined by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as promoting resources and energy efficiency, sustainable infrastructure, access to basic services and green and decent jobs, and a better quality of life for all [32].

It is common to find articles that address both sustainable consumption and SCP in the literature, since discussions of these subjects complement each other. However, studies more focused on SCP have involved more organizational or political contexts, such as those that have addressed the sharing economy [29,32,33], measures for adoption of sustainable processes [34], and future challenges related to sustainability in countries [30].

3.2. Historical Evolution of Sustainable Consumption

According to Yarimoglu and Binboga [35], a tendency toward social change in consumer behavior in developed countries already existed, showing that they voluntarily began worrying more about sustainability and “green” products. This social change prompted the development of many studies in different spheres and from different perspectives on sustainable consumption. The diversity in the “sustainability consumption” subject allowed the field of study to expand into areas that examine people’s social behavior and its impacts on the public sector by analyzing regional and national public policies, and on the private sector by considering the realities of companies and their relationships with their target audiences.

The articles used in the present literature review were separated and organized into research areas to facilitate the understanding of the extracted results. The most active areas of research over the past ten years were: “people’s sustainable behavior”, “public policies and countries”, and “companies and business environments”. These divisions and their branches are shown in Figure 4.

The thematic area “people’s sustainable behavior” was created to group articles that discussed sustainable consumption by focusing specifically on the daily behavior of study populations, taking into account cultural, economic, educational, and social aspects. This area was split into “social and economic factors”, “personal factors”, and “role of education in consumption”.

“Public policies and countries” is a thematic area that included publications that addressed sustainable consumption as public policies or reported good sustainable consumption practices either in urban environments or as national policies. This area was divided into “legal and normative incentives”, “public policies in cities”, and “national public policies”.

Lastly, the division “companies and business environments” put together the studies on sustainable consumption in business settings, more specifically surveys of company structures, commitment to SCP in production processes, and stakeholder behavior. The area was split into “infrastructure and organizational environment”, “sustainable consumption and production”, and “consumer and stakeholder behavior”.

To facilitate further analysis of the articles and follow the evolution of the subject over time, Figure 5 shows the publications by thematic areas and their branches by year of publication of the studies.

When the decade began in 2011, the studies had the objective of helping to elucidate the role in sustainable consumption played by two factors. One was that of governments, by means of the creation of incentive policies [36] or the establishment of rules for the development of products [37]. The other was the internal aspects of companies, including alterations in their structure and policies to be implemented to encourage adherence to sustainable consumption [38].

This trend persisted until 2013, when the focus of the studies was reoriented toward greater concern with surveying and understanding perceptions, motivations, and values of consumers that were or were not associated with sustainable consumption practices [39,40,41,42].

Over the past five years, there has been a gradual increase in the number of studies on education and sustainable consumption, since schools and universities can be foundational for ideas and attitudes of populations [43,44,45].

3.3. Sustainable Consumption from the Perspective of Used Materials and Methods

Figure 6 shows the grouping of methods found in the articles selected for the present systematic literature review.

Examination of the 114 publications selected for the present review showed that there were 61 publications with objectives oriented toward elucidating what influenced people’s behavior in a certain context or analyzing a specific reality in more detail. To achieve that, primary (such as interviews, questionnaires, and case studies) and secondary (surveying data in books, documents, etc.) data collection methods were the most used.

Interviews and questionnaires were the techniques chosen in studies that concentrated their efforts on understanding people’s behavior (57 publications). In these studies, direct questions about perceptions regarding sustainable consumption, reasons why or why not it was practiced, and other issues were asked of the examined public [46]. This type of study can formulate hypotheses on the subject being addressed that are directly connected with the established research problems, so questions to be asked can be drafted and the hypotheses confirmed or not. The study by [47] proposed eight hypotheses about the relationship between marketing strategies, consumer frugality, and consumer behavior. Analysis of 387 users of websites and social media in China proved all hypotheses correct and allowed conclusions that e-mavenism (that is, distribution of information on the internet and searches of consumers) was positively correlated with frugality, which, in turn, was essential for people to adhere to sustainable consumption.

These techniques can be applied together with the case study method. Da Silva et al. [1] used information obtained from a Brazilian company in an attempt to identify the role played by stakeholders in incentives for sustainable consumption in the electricity sector. Figure 7 shows the number of studies published over the period covered in the present systematic literature review and compares the main research methods used.

Surveying documents and applying questionnaires and interviews can be used in tandem, such as in the process of gathering information on a company and its stakeholders to identify what roles these people play in incentives for sustainable consumption, specifically in the electricity sector [1].

Theoretical studies were the second most common type. Many publications reported creation or application of these theories to try to understand decisions made by consumers, consciously or unconsciously [48]. The present systematic literature review could fit into this group, because it adds a more recent view to previous studies and sought to organize information that could be useful for improving future studies on sustainable consumption. In this theoretical field, there were 11 articles addressing people’s sustainable behavior, 3 publications about public policies and countries, and 8 articles discussing the topic of companies and business environments.

Application of diverse methods was also found, although in smaller number. Some examples that stood out were the use of an analytical hierarchy process to prioritize barriers dealt with in the adoption of sustainable consumption by production chains [49] and studies focused on creating a business model that encouraged sustainable consumption in companies in a circular economy [50].

3.4. Contributions of Sustainable Consumption to Companies

Sustainable consumption of resources used in the production process by companies has the objectives of offering ecologically correct products, adjusting production activities to socioenvironmental realities, and promoting good practices by the consuming public. Given increased concern shown by populations about sustainability, companies that adopt sustainable consumption or measures that encourage it end up creating positive perceptions in the public, who become more likely to buy their products or services [51].

One study pointed out that production systems that respect sustainable consumption limitations, in addition to strengthening the image of companies, end up positively influencing the economic performance of organizations [52]. It was also found that each market required its own SCP policies, depending on the economic growth level [53].

The literature indicated the need for critical changes in sustainable business analysis, which include considering sociocultural dimensions to reinforce brand socialization and climatic care. This could contribute to more progressive social action on climate change [54]. However, adopting sustainable consumption may not be so simple for some companies. For multinationals, this could imply seeking to understand sustainability incentive policies, or prohibition of parts of their production systems in certain countries, and consideration of how to adapt to these rules [30]. For companies in general, this may result in replacement of systems and infrastructure with more sustainable, and even more technological, processes [55].

International companies need to assess the motivations of consumers that cause them to engage in sustainable consumption in the countries where these organizations develop their activities [56]. They can also adopt smart grids. Since new technologies expand consumer scope, they create new sustainable consumption opportunities [57]. Because companies face difficulties when they formulate plans that incorporate sustainability into their activities, Table 1 shows the contributions by several authors in different contexts to help guide companies that seek to gain deeper knowledge of the subject.

3.5. Barriers to Adoption of Sustainable Consumption by Companies

Although sustainable consumption has been shown to have a growing trend over the years, it has not always translated into action, because of the existence of several barriers. Therefore, managers must be aware of these obstacles so organizations can plan ways to “take the first steps” toward sustainable consumption. According to Torkabadi et al. [66], internal barriers (such as economic conditions, knowledge or technological limitations, incompetence of the workforce, and lack of support by management) have a greater impact than external barriers (for instance, legislation and consumer behavior). Table 2 shows the most relevant barriers found in each research area in the selected articles.

From the consumer point of view, lack of knowledge and resistance to changing habits were the keys to failure or success in the creation of sustainable consumption projects [69]. Consequently, education plays a role in disseminating information about the benefits, either global or personal, of adopting sustainable practices [72,73,74].

Because consumption is a social phenomenon, several factors can influence the behavior of the population [90]. The notion of living in a state of “well-being” can be understood in different ways, depending on geographic location [78], and what is expected from consumption practices can vary, too. In certain groups in more developed countries, for instance, people are expected to buy organic products or purchase most of their items of clothing in thrift shops, which creates a form of social pressure toward this type of consumption [76].

Additionally, it is difficult to measure consumers’ emotions, but these feelings can also impact consumption decisions [77]. Usually, sustainable actions are translated into slogans such as “stop buying certain products” that result in behavioral changes. This effect can lead to negative feelings and resistance in consumers [75]. In the current context, social media affects consumer behavior and awareness of sustainable consumption positively and negatively, but they tend to create homogenized consumption, which, in many cases, exhausts the environment [71]. Therefore, efforts are necessary to promote sustainable consumption as something positive that can lead to global or individual benefits [79].

Pro-environmental behavior experts who face barriers to disseminating sustainable consumption resulting from pressure by industries can be considered highly conscious, motivated, and well-informed references, and they can critically impact other people and their consumption behavior [70].

Regarding the public policies and countries area, it is possible to state that lack of inspection and lack of incentives by regulatory institutions ends up influencing nonuse of sustainable production measures [81,82,91]. These types of incentives are more commonly found in developed countries, which causes this discussion to be overlooked in developing countries [35,80].

From the companies’ perspective, the most evident barrier is financial, given that adopting sustainable measures can generate high costs to effectively adjust the organizational structure [67]. Additionally, these changes must be very well-disseminated over entire companies since these measures imply not only bringing new technologies to corporations but also affecting corporate governance as a whole [86]. Organizational changes must concomitantly involve managers, employees, stakeholders, and stockholders [84,85].

It is important to emphasize that companies are not isolated in the environment and that all previously cited barriers related to policies and consumers also impact organizations. Incentives to sustainable consumption must be a collective effort, and society as a whole must have them as a common objective. Otherwise, there will always be barriers to the adoption of this consumption system [87,88,89].

Lastly, the gap itself in the literature about incorporation of measures oriented toward encouraging sustainable consumption can be considered a barrier, because research on this subject is focused mainly on consumer purchasing behaviors. There are few studies on how companies try to shape sustainable consumption in practice, for instance [63].

3.6. Guidelines for Adoption of Sustainable Consumption by Companies

In addition to barriers, the examined literature also pointed out some guidelines and good practices that can be adopted to guarantee implementation of sustainable consumption practices in companies and society (Figure 8).

According to Lim, Arita, and Joung [92], consumers already understand what sustainable consumption is and, therefore, nonexistence of sustainability-related practices cannot be explained by knowledge deficits. The results reported in the selected studies suggested the need for positive and constant recognition by society, which leads to the practice of sustainability by the population, since individuals may not perceive themselves as part of society’s decision-making [93] and may not identify the impacts of consumption on the environment.

A study by Lo [94] examined sustainable consumption practices in metropolitan regions by consulting the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development database. The study showed that these practices were associated with socioeconomic factors, and that there was not a direct association with urban structure. Efforts to boost a transformation toward urban sustainability, especially regarding lifestyle and behaviors, mean more than developing adequate infrastructures. They also require innovation in governance and institutional alterations, that is, changes in norms, formal and informal rules, laws, cognitive structures, policies, and governance systems that shape the way people see the world and think about it [95].

Another important step toward adoption of sustainable consumption by companies is a greater understanding of consumption practices by society as a whole, since this would be necessary to change people’s routines and concepts about sustainable options in order to get more visibility, which could lead to modifications in people’s behavior and the contexts in which actions occur [31]. Consequently, it is fundamental to develop new studies and theories about consumer behavior. One possibility is designing general or specific studies funded by certain organizations to elucidate their consumers’ preferences, sustainability-related concerns, and what their public expects of and accepts in offered products and services [4].

From a more internal perspective, organizations also have their own consumption behaviors when buying supplies to produce their goods or services. Measures to achieve the adoption of sustainable consumption may require that many processes be altered [52] and that investments in new technologies be made [96]. Understanding internal processes and which changes must be carried out is important, in order for these actions to be seen as positive by the entire organization, so other stakeholders can be mobilized, too, including the media and third-sector companies [1].

The guidelines based on the results mentioned by the authors cited in this subsection reinforce the need for coordinated strategies between several sectors that allow not just understanding what sustainable consumption practice really is but also creating incentives that encourage the participation of society, together with companies and public institutions. There is not a direct relationship between the level of urban development and sustainable practices. However, it was shown that studies that delved more deeply into everyday behavior found that people in areas with higher levels of urban development were more prone to engage in pro-environmental behavior. Therefore, it is crucial to develop public and private policies without ignoring the individual initiatives of certain groups, in order for society to deal more naturally with sustainable consumption in everyday life. Lim, Arita, and Joung [92] stressed that the lack of such naturalness was associated with the population’s not being used to certain habits. Consequently, incentives by companies and authorities are fundamental for changing habits.

3.7. Sustainable Consumption-Related Innovations

Table 3 summarizes new ideas, theories, and methods applied in studies that addressed sustainable consumption.

Some studies related to consumer sustainable behavior have developed evaluations to better elucidate the main steps and criteria involved in consumer behavior choices. Caeiro et al. [97] analyzed and quantified sustainable household consumption. Di Giulio and Fuchs [98] examined the concept of sustainable consumption corridors, which, by defining what the minimum and maximum standards for what people believe they need to have a “good life”, can become an adequate starting point for establishing sustainable consumption criteria.

By considering companies’ internal perspectives, it is possible to stress that building partnerships between organizations is currently perceived as a growth and development opportunity for them, because there can be exchanges of processes and good practices to increase their efficiency. These partnerships may also involve the establishment of sustainable consumption goals, as shown in a study by Dubey et al. [99], which measured collaborative performance in consumption goals, and even sustainable production of associate companies, by means of big data and predictive analysis.

Examination of technological innovations that are being developed and widely disseminated in society and organizations allows the identification of studies on the use of technology to spread information on the importance of sustainable consumption [96], creation of new production systems that implement sustainability measures [55], and data that include a description of characteristics related to environmental, health, and nutritional dimensions of target products in relation to reference values [102]. Information and knowledge provided in ecological labels, for instance, help with strategies to obtain energy efficiency in electronic devices [103].

In studies addressing public policies and countries, it was possible to notice progress in concerns of developing countries about sustainable consumption, a situation that can be considered newer, since, until recently, most studies on this subject focused on the realities of developed countries [30,35]. A tendency to expand proposals to carry out actions directly related to SCP was also identified [100]. Regarding the theoretical area, there have been innovations in considering systematic, structural, and institutional perspectives to foster understanding of how consumption [69] and sustainable consumption occur in other contexts, such as the sharing economy [101].

Finally, it is important to emphasize that consumption, whether sustainable or not, is a social phenomenon and, therefore, any changes experienced by societies can influence consumer practices [104], including economic changes, greater ecological concerns [105], and modifications of social values [106,107]. Consequently, there will always be innovations in the sustainable consumption research area.

4. Agenda and Directions for Future Studies on Sustainable Consumption

The challenges to bridging the gaps found in the selected studies also provide opportunities to obtain new results from different perspectives and contribute to the progress of studies on sustainable consumption in society. Table 4 puts together some subjects that required more studies and were addressed by some authors over the past decade. This list is not an exhaustive list.

In addition, recommendations for the development of future studies addressing research gaps that remain to be addressed are shown in Table 5. The authors of the present review opted to exclude recommendations seen as “generic,” such as “replicate the study with a larger sample.” Therefore, Table 5 shows potential research subjects that can be explored in the sustainable consumption field.

Regarding a future sustainable consumption research agenda, there are new opportunities that can help deepen knowledge of the area in the short term and be good focuses of attention for researchers who are planning new studies on this subject. Figure 9 shows these opportunities grouped into research areas.

The studies found in the survey carried out for the present review were more focused on elucidating consumer behavior and what influenced people to adopt sustainable consumption practices [104], which created a gap in the understanding of the role of companies in the perpetuation of sustainable consumption. That does not mean that these studies did not exist. However, they were smaller in number and were more oriented toward stressing infrastructure changes for adoption of new practices [67] and the associated financial benefits [52], rather than focusing on other contexts or the actual role companies have to play in the face of new concerns about the relationship between consumption and sustainability.

Consequently, this research field would benefit from studies addressing the following topics: (i) managers’ concerns about making the companies they work for more sustainable; (ii) the role of stakeholders and stockholders in strategic choices for consumption [99,126]; (iii) case studies on decreases in consumption of resources and materials in production; (iv) ways to make production processes more transparent to the population; (v) companies’ ability to engage their public in sustainable consumption; and (vi) even using a method, such as an analytical hierarchy process, to rank good practices that are most commonly used internally by companies that implement sustainable consumption.

It would also be interesting to design studies focused on benchmarking companies and/or specific products in order to make it possible to reach more accurate conclusions about the process of adapting certain organizations to accommodate sustainable consumption, or which barriers hindered this process in specific settings or contexts [127].

Most studies that analyzed consumer behavior surveyed opinions and habits of part of a population, but did not show divisions among consumers, such as the proportion of people who have higher purchasing power compared to a group with lower purchasing power [128]. Therefore, it would be helpful to try to understand how different types and segments of clients behave [129], and their perceptions regarding new types of products [114].

Studies on consumer behavior are always important, because the social phenomenon that is consumption can be different in different locations, which makes it impossible to select a sample that is representative of the world’s entire population [130]. In addition to the opportunity to replicate studies in order to understand the behavior of people living in different countries, it may also be possible to carry out analyses that take into account unbridled consumerism [131] and how it can harm the environment in different nations.

More than simply observing consumer behavior, researchers must pay more attention to new consumption phenomena. Because societies are in constant evolution, new factors may influence the actions of populations, and these must be properly measured by means of indicators [132]. Additionally, new tendencies may arise in economies [133] or in the patterns of consumption to be studied, such as reuse of products and shopping in thrift stores [134]. It is also necessary to consider the idea suggested by Ma et al. [32] that additional research areas and sociotechnical studies that advance sustainability theories and practices in developing countries should be part of the examination of SCP.

Finally, it should be emphasized that, because of the scope chosen for the present systematic literature review, only recommendations for future studies pointed out in articles published between 2011 and 2020 were shown. Therefore, it may be important to examine material published before 2011 to compare progress in the research field and analyze whether these studies indicate gaps and whether these unsolved questions remain relevant or applicable at present.

5. Final Considerations

The present review analyzed a sample of 114 articles published over the past ten years and available on the Web of Science. From the organizational point of view, the concept of sustainable consumption is more related to sustainability and green technologies and agrees with SCP discussions found in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

The articles included in the present review were organized into “research areas” to facilitate grouping of discussion. The most active areas of research were: “people’s sustainable behavior”, with 61 articles; “public policies and countries”, with 21 publications; and “companies and business environments”, with 32 articles. Of the 114 publications, 22 focused on mathematical models, 7 were literature reviews, and 85 were empirical studies, of which 57 applied interviews and questionnaires more oriented toward elucidating people’s behavior.

5.1. Theoretical Implications

Although the results of the present review showed concerns about the impacts of people on sustainable consumption, since most discussions in the selected studies focused on analysis of consumer behavior, one of the main theoretical implications of the present study was shedding light on sustainable consumption in companies and public policies. Some examples were studies in which the researchers sought solutions to understanding the adoption of sustainable consumption by companies and related these consumption practices to the companies’ target publics.

Given that different actors have to be engaged in order for the promotion of sustainable consumption to be successful, the authors of the present review suggest that discussions about the role of companies and public policies receive more attention from researchers, because organizations are also important in shaping the development of and changes in sustainable behavior by individuals. Studies involving individuals must continue to be carried out, but there is no doubt that the participation of companies and governments can facilitate the promotion of sustainable consumption in societies as a whole. In order to deepen this discussion, the business perspective must not limit itself to monitoring consumer behavior but must seek to elucidate the motivations that inspire people to develop attitudes that support sustainable consumption. Still, it is necessary to explain how companies themselves can influence their publics to look for products that observe sustainability practices.

The search for sustainable consumption strategies in organizations manifests in attempts to reduce information asymmetry between the parts involved, whether they are part of the production process or of the development of new products. The impact of information asymmetry has been the object of study in public organizations when analyzing whether or not governments have adopted sustainable consumption public policies.

Another relevant theoretical implication was confirmation that the subject of sustainable consumption allows the application of different methodologies in theoretical and practical studies and those involving use of mathematical models. These methods have been applied to issues ranging from sustainable production to solutions for urban mobility and the sharing economy, and have offered new perceptions regarding the problems, solutions, and contexts in which the sustainable consumption can be implemented.

5.2. Practical Implications

The issues pointed by the authors cited in the present study highlight the need for strategies that are coordinated between diverse sectors, not only in order to understand what sustainable consumption practices are, but also to create incentives that encourage participation of societies, together with companies and public institutions. Although there were a considerable number of studies about sustainable consumption over the past ten years, there were few studies that actually highlighted the practices applied to the adoption of sustainable consumption. There were even fewer studies that deepened the discussion about the tools and/or processes that must be used to achieve better results in the sustainable consumption area.

Nevertheless, dissemination of new technologies can help production processes, making them more efficient, economical, and sustainable, which may positively impact the creation of products with raw materials that are better for the environment, and procedures that facilitate adoption of sustainable consumption practices. Still regarding companies, a substantial number of studies analyzed SCP, which indicated the existence of great concern about linking sustainable consumption to cleaner production.

Regarding public policies, there is not a direct relationship between the level of urban development and sustainable practices. However, it was shown that studies that delved more deeply into everyday behavior found that people in areas with higher levels of urban development were more prone to engage in pro-environmental behavior. Therefore, without ignoring the role played by individual initiatives of certain groups, it is crucial to develop public and private policies in order for societies to gradually deal more naturally with sustainable consumption. Incentives by companies and authorities are fundamental in changing and promoting new habits.

Companies that adopt sustainable consumption, or measures that encourage it, end up strengthening their image. However, implementing sustainable practices becomes more complex in large companies, and may even imply adjustment in areas such as law, technology, and infrastructure.

Research in the area of sustainable consumption often has the objectives of helping in the process of overcoming barriers to its application and encouraging implementation of sustainable consumption practices in companies and society. In line with that trend, the literature highlighted some recommendations that include recognition by individuals that they are part of the sustainable changes implemented in companies, and ideas for institutional and organizational changes to establish rules and functioning dynamics of production systems. Studies that presented new ideas, theories, and methods included elucidating the behavior of individuals, and addressing the public sphere, which can create incentives for sustainable consumption, and included analysis of different metrics used by companies.

5.3. Study Limitations

One of the limitations of the present review was the fact that only articles published in journals in English and available on the Web of Science were considered for selection. Therefore, the authors do not rule out the possibility that there are quality studies on this subject in journals in Spanish or Portuguese on the Web of Science, or even publications in other languages and databases. Additionally, the present review addressed discussions about sustainable consumption found in articles published over the past ten years. Consequently, future studies could have a search strategy that includes more terms, covers a longer period, and includes other databases.

For example, an important aspect that can be explored in future studies is the relationship between price, behaviour, and sustainable consumption. Geiger et al. [121], in this direction, affirms that the employment of sustainability-adapted mindfulness-based intervention (sMBI) may decline materialistic value orientation (MVO), which may lead to more ethical consumption patterns, contributing partly to a sustainable consumption. Purnomo et al. [135], looking at the coffee industry, believes that when consumers have higher knowledge and attention to the products they seek and buy, there can be better competitive conditions to local and more sustainable producers.

Still in this matter, Ülkü and Hsuan [65] believe that conscientious advertising and recycling/reusing modular parts of products can support the reduction of prices and increase of a company’s market share. These practices come with the purpose of aligning environmental commitment of consumers and companies, and at the same time offering accessible prices. Therefore, although this is a limitation of this study, there is an opportunity in future research to expand this in-depth review, for example, by converting the topic related to consumers behavioral impact on the strategy of companies, because there can be elements, such as socioeconomic conditions and pro-ecological attitudes, that possibly can relate to consumers’ patterns and its relation to market-share, quality, price, and the level of greenness of a product.

Another limitation of the present review was that it did not identify in detail any actions and technical procedures that companies and public institutions can adopt to promote sustainable consumption. This limitation resulted from the characteristics of the analyzed articles, since most focused on consumer behavior. Therefore, for future studies that aim to bridge this gap, the authors recommend carrying out searches that go beyond the traditional literature and include business reports, successful cases, and managers’ actions related to adoption of sustainable consumption practices in the organizations they work for. These sources would allow researchers to understand the tools that are most commonly used, and the concerns of companies located in certain environments about sustainability questions.

An additional limitation is that the present study did not consider the need for analysis of multiple variables that directly influence the sustainable consumption actions of companies and people, especially regarding suggestions for future studies. The reason is that public policies, social, economic, ethical, and cultural factors, and individual preferences can motivate populations to develop greater concern with sustainability.

In the public policy sphere, these surveys could be used to find out what abrogated and existing laws of countries can influence sustainable practices. In fact, Figure 5 shows that there is less research carried out on this topic in relation to the others discussed here (consumers and companies), especially in recent years. Additionally, taking into account the issues raised by Koide and Akenjii [80] and Yarimoglu and Binboga [35] concerning a lack of incentives in developing countries, it is important to emphasize that, within the period delimited for the review, no studies were found that focused on public policies that boosted or impaired adoption of sustainable consumption in Latin and South American countries. In our view, these observations are configured as additional incentives for carrying out future research involving public policies and sustainable consumption.

Finally, even though there has been a substantial number of studies oriented toward elucidating consumer behavior, the research field would benefit from studies that carefully consider economic changes and new consumption practices that may appear over the years, and even the role of the media in the construction of perceptions regarding companies and sustainable practices. It would also be interesting to carry out studies involving not only undergraduates in certain institutions or random samples from specific populations but also people from different social classes, to understand how they make their consumption-related decisions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.R.d.O., T.S.M.G. and G.G.d.O.; methodology, U.R.d.O., T.S.M.G. and G.G.d.O.; validation, U.R.d.O.; formal analysis, U.R.d.O., T.S.M.G., G.G.d.O., J.C.A.d.A., M.A.O. and A.d.S.C.; investigation, T.S.M.G. and G.G.d.O.; resources, U.R.d.O., T.S.M.G., G.G.d.O., J.C.A.d.A., M.A.O., A.d.S.C. and V.A.F.; data curation, T.S.M.G. and G.G.d.O.; writing—original draft preparation, U.R.d.O., T.S.M.G., G.G.d.O., J.C.A.d.A., M.A.O., A.d.S.C. and V.A.F.; writing—review and editing, U.R.d.O., T.S.M.G., G.G.d.O., J.C.A.d.A., M.A.O., A.d.S.C. and V.A.F.; visualization, U.R.d.O., J.C.A.d.A., M.A.O. and A.d.S.C.; supervision, U.R.d.O.; project administration, U.R.d.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1. Basic structure of a systematic literature review. Source: Designed by the authors and based on Okoli [17] and Tranfield et al. [10].

Figure 2. Systematic literature review flowchart. Source: Designed by the authors and based on Okoli [17].

Figure 3. Systematic literature review protocol and details about the present study [21,22,23,24,25].

Figure 4. Research areas related to sustainable consumption and their branches.

Figure 5. Number of publications per year in each research area.

Figure 6. Grouping of the research methods found in the articles on sustainable consumption.

Figure 7. Studies by research method over the past ten years.

Figure 8. Guidelines for adoption of sustainable consumption by companies.

Figure 9. Recommendations for future studies.

Table 1

Studies that offered contributions to companies regarding sustainable consumption.

Contributions to Companies	Author(s)
Suggested that governance models (environmental laws) can promote the mode of operation of industrial symbiosis.	Lehtoranta et al. [37]
Identified the need for mutual and complementary interaction between stakeholders.	Da Silva et al. [1]
Proposed the “meta labeling” system to make it easier for consumers to align their purchase decisions with sustainable development goals.	Dendler [58]
Contributed to the discussion about approaches to systemic thinking from the sustainable consumption perspective.	Sedlacko et al. [59]
Argued that SCP must be discussed by means of a political agenda.	Akenji and Bengtsson [60]
Explained how material values and social recognition influence sustainable consumption in the transcultural context.	Ceglia et al. [4]
Demonstrated the efficacy of descriptive rules when they influence pro-environmental behavior in the online shopping context.	Demarque et al. [61]
Showed the participation of Portuguese public transport companies in management and sustainability practices.	Cruz and Katz-Gerro [31]
Provided an evaluation instrument that assigned a score for the level of sustainability of companies (more specifically, for the products they offered) with the objective of decreasing information asymmetry between buyers and sellers.	Nikolaou and Kazantzidis [62]
Demonstrated the role played by managers when they deal with institutional pressures during SCP implementation, based on institutional theory and agency theory.	Dubey et al. [2]
Presented a structural model to analyze barriers to acceptance of insertion of SCP strategies in the supply chain.	Mangla et al. [49]
Explored the use of value propositions that shape sustainable consumption by means of examples of product-service systems.	Stal and Jansson [63]
Consolidated the mode of consumption and production based on the upgrade capacity of product-service systems (upgradable product-service systems).	Pialot et al. [64]
Showed consumers’ acceptance of product-service systems.	Catulli et al. [55]
Contributed to a structure focused on adoption of SCP to help regulatory agencies, managers, consumers, and policymakers.	Luthra et al. [34]
Sought to elucidate the intricate relationships between sustainability, operations, and marketing by discussing customization of sustainable products and how these products can generate demand as a result of personalization and durability.	Ulku and Hsuan [65]
Listed the main barriers identified in each dimension (internal and external) faced by companies.	Torkabadi et al. [66]
Suggested that business models allow for achieving sustainable consumption.	Tunn et al. [50]
Contributed to the perception that companies that achieve better environmental performance are more likely to disseminate environmental information.	Nishitani and Kokubu [52]
Sought to elucidate how purchase and use of sustainable services can replace unsustainable alternatives.	Soler et al. [67]
Suggested that each market requires their own SCP policies, depending on the economic growth level.	Yagi and Kokubu [53]
Sought to explain the factors that contribute to sustainable consumption in specific segments of the market and help companies incorporate sustainability into their activities to improve their image and reduce their impact.	Quoquab & Mohammad [68]
Suggested that international companies need to assess the motivations of consumers that cause them to engage in sustainable consumption in the countries where these corporations develop their activities and evaluate the absolute impacts of the sustainability of their initiatives.	Iran and Müller [56]
Pointed out that companies can adopt smart grids, since new technologies expand consumer scope, leading to new sustainable consumption opportunities.	Schappert and von Hauff [57]

Table 2

List of barriers to adoption of sustainable consumption found in the selected publications.

Research Area	Barrier	Author(s)
People’s sustainable behavior	Lack of knowledge and resistance to changing habits	Byers and Gilmer [69], Torma [70], Simeone and Scarpato [71]
	Role of education	Fischer and Barth [72], Geng, Liu, and Zhu [73], Calafel, Banqué, and Viciana [74], Iran and Müller [56]
	Difficulty analyzing the variables that influence consumption	Spaargaren [75], Hanss, Böhm, Doran, and Homburg [76], Wang and Wu [77], Carrero, Valor, and Redondo [78], Tang, Chen, and Yuan [79], Quoquab and Mohammad [68]
Public policies and countries	Lack of incentives in developing countries	Koide and Akenjii [80], Yarimoglu and Binboga [35]
Public policies and countries	Role of governments	Qu, Li, Jia, and Guo [81], Liobikiene and Dagiliute [82]
Companies and business environments	Problems with finances	Solér, Koroschetz, and Salminen [67]
	Technology in isolation does not bring the necessary changes	Safarzyńska [83]
	Corporate governance	Schroeder [84], Van Gameren, Ruwet, and Bauler [85], Wang [86]
	Influence of consumers, policies, and society as a whole	Lehmann [87], Brizga et al. [88], Vringer et al. [89]
	Existence of few studies to understand the practice	Stål and Jansson [63]

Table 3

Studies that brought innovation into the study of sustainable consumption.

Research Area	Authors	Presented Innovation
People’s sustainable behavior (Social and economic factors)	Caeiro et al. [97]	Developing an approach to defining the main steps and criteria for formulation and evaluation of “sustainable household consumption” by means of sets of indicators.
People’s sustainable behavior (Social and economic factors)	Di Giulio and Fuchs [98]	Determining how realistic the approach “sustainable consumption corridors” would be to increase the feasibility of sustainable consumption, both empirically and politically.
Companies and business environments (Infrastructure and organizational environments)	Dubey et al. [99]	Offering predictive analysis of collaborative performance metrics of companies that have practices related to sustainable consumption.
	Biswas and Roy [96] Catulli, Cook, and Potter [55]	Addressing use of new technologies for creation of new metrics, methods of production, and ways to disseminate information on sustainable consumption.
Public policies and countries (national public policies)	Lukman, Glavič, Carpenter, and Virtič [30]	Reporting positive results about sustainable consumption in developing countries.
	Byers and Gilmer [69]	Creating a conceptual structure to address systematic, structural, and institutional perspectives on how consumption, by means of public policy initiatives, can be developed to reflect a deeper ecological basis.
	Pineiro-Villaverde and García-Álvarez [100]	Listing proposals oriented toward actions directly related to SCP, such as promoting use of recycled raw material in public works or requiring Ecolabel certification for agreements with public administrations.
Public policies and countries (legal and normative incentives)	Wang et al. [101]	Pioneering in the explanation of roles, behaviors, and strategies related to sustainable consumption in a sharing economy context.
	Guido et al. [102]	Developing a food labeling index to promote sustainable consumption. The index is calculated by classifying several resources in the environmental, health, and nutritional dimensions of target products in relation to a reference value.

Table 4

List of recommended research subjects studied over the past decade.

Topics Recommended as Research Opportunities	Researcher(s) That Followed These Recommendations
Business dynamics	Sedlacko et al. [59], Doyle, Farrell, and Goodman [54], Schappert and von Hauff [57]
“Greenwashing” driving forces	Kim et al. [51]
Influence of choices and behaviors of consumers on environmental quality	Wang et al. [108], Torma [70]
Environmental problems and human behavior	Alvarez-Suarez et al. [6]
Social innovations and sustainable consumption	Jaeger-Erben et al. [104], Iran and Müller [56]
Attitudes implicit in green consumer behavior	Ceglia et al. [4]
Behavioral SCP model	Dubey et al. [2]
Consumption-value gaps and sustainable consumption behavior	Biswas [46]
Consumer behavior	Rezvani et al. [109], Dhandra [41]
“Material possession love” consumer behavior	Dong et al. [110]
Sustainable consumption behavior concept	Figueroa-Garcia et al. [111]
Sustainable consumption and online shopping	Guillen-Royo [112]
Behavioral control	Ansu-Mensahe and Bein [113], Simeone and Scarpato [71]
Motivation to consume for status	Ali et al. [114]
Adults and young people’s sustainable creative competence	Kreuzer et al. [115]
Rational action theory	Yarimoglu and Binboga [35]
Values, motivations, and paths involved in the engagement of people who adopt low-carbon lifestyles	Carrero et al. [78]

Table 5

List of recommendations for future studies (based on research topics that still contain open problems).

Topics Recommended for Study	Authors
Expanding mental models	Sedlacko et al. [59]
Exploring other characteristics of consumers	Kim et al. [51]
Improving questionnaire design and sample selection	Wang et al. [108]
Developing new studies on adoption of alternative routines and practices	Jaeger-Erben et al. [104]
Identifying how transcultural differences can create a powerful and synergic system to promote sustainable consumption	Ceglia et al. [4]
Improving the study by using several case studies or alternative methods and theories	Dubey et al. [2]
Replicating the study to test generalization in other samples	Biswas [46]
Examining the effect of motivations that lead to pro-environmental behavior in a more representative sample	Rezvani et al. [109]
Analyzing the different variables to help understand the relationship between material possession love and sustainable consumption behavior	Dong et al. [110]
Identifying the variables and projecting scales to measure them	Figueroa-Garcia et al. [111]
Exploring how “mindfulness” practices can encourage sustainable consumption in schools	Bohme et al. [44]
Analyzing levels of knowledge and attitudes related to sustainable consumption in students at other universities, taking into account the characteristics of these spaces	Ahamad and Ariffin [116]
Replicating the study on the role of big data in the collaborative performance of partners in sustainable consumption programs by collecting longitudinal data	Dubey et al. [99]
The approach used in the interview failed to consider the specific factors of the context, which left opportunities for future studies	Huttel et al. [117]
Carrying out in-depth analysis of each subdomain to offer detailed suggestions about the topics addressed	Shao [118]
Evaluating adherence of additional research areas and development of sociotechnical studies	Ma et al. [32]
Bridging the gaps in “practice theory” research fields; more specifically, addressing how results of the application of this theory differ from those obtained in studies on sustainable behaviors	Corsini et al. [119]
Examining people with low levels of education to determine to what extent noneducational factors can act as sustainable consumption drivers	Ukenna et al. [120]
Seeking to confirm the causal relationship between online shopping and well-being	Guillen-Royo [112]
Examining and analyzing the actual behavior of consumers and connecting the results with the data reported in the original study	Ansu-Mensahe and Bein [113]
Examining the additional cultural dimensions to obtain more insights	Ali et al. [114]
Collecting data from interviewees of different levels of education, ages, and cultural origins	Dhandra [41]
Empirically testing improvement in sustainable behavior	Kreuzer et al. [115]
Empirically testing sustainable consumption behavior	Yarimoglu and Binboga [35]
Giving more emphasis to relationships inherent in “mindfulness” and ethical values	Geiger et al. [121]
Future studies can use the model to compare knowledge of and interest in sustainable products between young people and older people	Legere and Kang [42]
Considering the effect of “self-caused” and “caused” factors	Han [122]
Examining how these moral competencies are developed, paying special attention to gender-based differences	Valor et al. [45]
Repeating the study in other countries and with samples that are representative of different age groups	Piligrimiene et al. [123]
Developing new studies on second-hand product attitudes, social standards, intentions, and behavior to deepen knowledge about pro-environmental behavior	Borusiak et al. [124]
Considering profiles of other types of consumers and identifying whether the results of the new studies agree with those of the original	Awais et al. [47]
Developing new studies on environmental performance by especially taking into account sustainable development goals and SCP	Nishitani and Kokubu [52]
Exploring the potential of emotional mechanisms in the sustainability domain	Tarditi et al. [125]
Considering empirical validation of the behavior	Kapoor and Dwivedi [107]
Addressing the mediator effect of cultural facilitation and focal constructs in countries where sustainable consumption is well-established	Carrero et al. [78]

References

1. da Silva, M.E.; de Oliveira, A.P.G.; Gómez, C.R.P. Can collaboration between firms and stakeholders stimulate sustainable consumption? Discussing roles in the Brazilian electricity sector. J. Clean. Prod.; 2013; 47, pp. 236-244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.027]

2. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Papadopoulos, T.; Wamba, S.F.; Song, M. Towards a theory of sustainable consumption and production: Constructs and measurement. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.; 2016; 106, pp. 78-89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.008]

3. Anantharaman, M. Critical sustainable consumption: A research agenda. J. Environ. Stud. Sci.; 2018; 8, pp. 553-561. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0487-4]

4. Ceglia, D.; Lima, S.; Leocádio, L. An Alternative Theoretical Discussion on Cross-Cultural Sustainable Consumption. Sustain. Dev.; 2015; 23, pp. 414-424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1600]

5. Frank, P.; Stanszus, L.S. Transforming Consumer Behavior: Introducing Self-Inquiry-Based and Self-Experience-Based Learning for Building Personal Competencies for Sustainable Consumption. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 2550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11092550]

6. Álvarez-Suárez, P.; Vega-Marcote, P.; Mira, R.G. Sustainable consumption: A teaching intervention in higher education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ.; 2013; 15, pp. 3-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2011-0044]

7. Seuring, S.; Müller, M.; Westhaus, M.; Morana, R. Conducting a Literature Review — The Example of Sustainability in Supply Chains. Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management; Kotzab, H.; Seuring, S.; Müller, M.; Reiner, G. Physica-Verlag HD: Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_7]

8. Van Wee, B.; Banister, D. How to Write a Literature Review Paper?. Transp. Rev.; 2016; 36, pp. 278-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456]

9. De-La-Torre-Ugarte-Guanilo, M.C.; Takahashi, R.F.; Bertolozzi, M.R. Revisão sistemática: Noções gerais. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP; 2011; 45, pp. 1260-1266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342011000500033] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22031392]

10. Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag.; 2003; 14, pp. 207-222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375]

11. Gough, D.; Oliver, S.; Thomas, J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews; Sage: London, UK, 2012.

12. de Oliveira, U.R.; Espindola, L.S.; da Silva, I.R.; da Silva, I.N.; Rocha, H.M. A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: Research implications and future perspectives. J. Clean. Prod.; 2018; 187, pp. 537-561. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.083]

13. Badi, S.; Murtagh, N. Green supply chain management in construction: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. J. Clean. Prod.; 2019; 223, pp. 312-322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.132]

14. Hall, T.; Beecham, S.; Bowes, D.; Gray, D.; Counsell, S. A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Prediction Performance in Software Engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.; 2012; 38, pp. 1276-1304. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2011.103]

15. Meredith, J. Theory building through conceptual methods. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.; 1993; 13, pp. 3-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579310028120]

16. Easterby-Smith, M.; Thorpe, R.; Lowe, A. Management Research—An Introduction; Sage: London, UK, 2002.

17. Chitu, C. A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst.; 2015; 37, 43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03743]

18. Tseng, M.-L.; Islam, M.S.; Karia, N.; Fauzi, F.A.; Afrin, S. A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.; 2019; 141, pp. 145-162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009]

19. Agi, M.A.N.; Faramarzi-Oghani, S.; Hazır, Ö. Game theory-based models in green supply chain management: A review of the literature. Int. J. Prod. Res.; 2020; 59, pp. 4736-4755. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1770893]

20. Soni, G.; Kodali, R. A critical analysis of supply chain management content in empirical research. Bus. Process Manag. J.; 2011; 17, pp. 238-266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151111122338]

21. Vieira, E.S.; Gomes, J.A.N.F. A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics; 2009; 81, pp. 587-600. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0]

22. Boyle, F.; Sherman, D. Scopus™: The product and its development. Ser. Libr.; 2006; 49, pp. 147-153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J123v49n03_12]

23. Chadegani, A.A.; Salehi, H.; Yunus, M.; Farhadi, H.; Fooladi, M.; Farhadi, M.; Ebrahim, N.A. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Soc. Sci.; 2013; 9, pp. 18-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18]

24. Pérez-Fuentes, M.D.C.; Jurado, M.D.M.M.; Martín, A.B.B.; Linares, A.J.J.G. Profiles of Violence and Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Relation to Impulsivity: Sustainable Consumption in Adolescents. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 651. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11030651]

25. ElShafei, R. Managers’ risk perception and the adoption of sustainable consumption strategies in the hospitality sector: The moderating role of stakeholder salience attributes. Smart Sustain. Built Environ.; 2020; 11, pp. 1-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2020-0024]

26. Kastner, I.; Matthies, E. Motivation and Impact. Implications of a Twofold Perspective on Sustainable Consumption for Intervention Programs and Evaluation Designs. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc.; 2014; 23, pp. 175-183. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.S1.5]

27. Pinto, D.C.; Herter, M.M.; Rossi, P.; Borges, A. Going green for self or for others? Gender and identity salience effects on sustainable consumption. Int. J. Consum. Stud.; 2014; 38, pp. 540-549. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12114]

28. Barber, J. Mapping the movement to achieve sustainable production and consumption in North America. J. Clean. Prod.; 2007; 15, pp. 499-512. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.010]

29. Cohen, B.; Muñoz, P. Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: Towards an integrated framework. J. Clean. Prod.; 2016; 134, pp. 87-97. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.133]

30. Lukman, R.K.; Glavič, P.; Carpenter, A.; Virtič, P. Sustainable consumption and production—Research, experience, and development—The Europe we want. J. Clean. Prod.; 2016; 138, pp. 139-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.049]

31. Cruz, I.S.; Katz-Gerro, T. Urban public transport companies and strategies to promote sustainable consumption practices. J. Clean. Prod.; 2016; 123, pp. 28-33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.007]

32. Ma, Y.; Rong, K.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mangalagiu, D.; Thornton, T.F. Value Co-creation for sustainable consumption and production in the sharing economy in China. J. Clean. Prod.; 2018; 208, pp. 1148-1158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.135]

33. Coderoni, S.; Perito, M.A. Sustainable consumption in the circular economy. An analysis of consumers’ purchase intentions for waste-to-value food. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 252, 119870. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119870]

34. Luthra, S.; Govindan, K.; Mangla, S.K. Structural model for sustainable consumption and production adoption—A grey-DEMATEL based approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.; 2017; 125, pp. 198-207. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.018]

35. Yarimoglu, E.; Binboga, G. Understanding sustainable consumption in an emerging country: The antecedents and consequences of the ecologically conscious consumer behavior model. Bus. Strat. Environ.; 2019; 28, pp. 642-651. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2270]

36. Berg, A.; Hukkinen, J.I. Beyond effectiveness: The uses of Finland’s national programme to promote sustainable consumption and production. J. Clean. Prod.; 2011; 19, pp. 1788-1797. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.020]

37. Lehtoranta, S.; Nissinen, A.; Mattila, T.; Melanen, M. Industrial symbiosis and the policy instruments of sustainable consumption and production. J. Clean. Prod.; 2011; 19, pp. 1865-1875. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.002]

38. Chiou, Y.-C.; Lan, L.W.; Chang, K.-L. Sustainable consumption, production and infrastructure construction for operating and planning intercity passenger transport systems. J. Clean. Prod.; 2013; 40, pp. 13-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.004]

39. Watkins, L.; Aitken, R.; Mather, D. Conscientious consumers: A relationship between moral foundations, political orientation and sustainable consumption. J. Clean. Prod.; 2016; 134, pp. 137-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.009]

40. Wang, Y.; Hao, F. Does Internet penetration encourage sustainable consumption? A cross-national analysis. Sustain. Prod. Consum.; 2018; 16, pp. 237-248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.011]

41. Dhandra, T.K. Achieving triple dividend through mindfulness: More sustainable consumption, less unsustainable consumption and more life satisfaction. Ecol. Econ.; 2019; 161, pp. 83-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.021]

42. Legere, A.; Kang, J. The role of self-concept in shaping sustainable consumption: A model of slow fashion. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 258, 120699. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120699]

43. Sharma, M.; Rani, L. Social learning tools for environmentally sustainable consumption behavior in primary schools. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev.; 2016; 5, pp. 187-202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p187]

44. Böhme, T.; Stanszus, L.S.; Geiger, S.M.; Fischer, D.; Schrader, U. Mindfulness Training at School: A Way to Engage Adolescents with Sustainable Consumption?. Sustainability; 2018; 10, 3557. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10103557]

45. Valor, C.; Antonetti, P.; Merino, A. The relationship between moral competences and sustainable consumption among higher education students. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 248, 119161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119161]

46. Biswas, A. A consumption value-gap analysis for sustainable consumption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2017; 24, pp. 7714-7725. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8355-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28124271]

47. Awais, M.; Samin, T.; Gulzar, M.A.; Hwang, J.; Zubair, M. Unfolding the Association between the Big Five, Frugality, E-Mavenism, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 490. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12020490]

48. Jaeger-Erben, M.; Offenberger, U. A Practice Theory Approach to Sustainable Consumption. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc.; 2014; 23, pp. 166-174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.S1.4]

49. Mangla, S.K.; Govindan, K.; Luthra, S. Prioritizing the barriers to achieve sustainable consumption and production trends in supply chains using fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. J. Clean. Prod.; 2017; 151, pp. 509-525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.099]

50. Tunn, V.; Bocken, N.; Hende, E.V.D.; Schoormans, J. Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: An expert study. J. Clean. Prod.; 2018; 212, pp. 324-333. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.290]

51. Kim, Y.; Yun, S.; Lee, J. Can Companies Induce Sustainable Consumption? The Impact of Knowledge and Social Embeddedness on Airline Sustainability Programs in the U.S. Sustainability; 2014; 6, pp. 3338-3356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su6063338]

52. Nishitani, K.; Kokubu, K. Can firms enhance economic performance by contributing to sustainable consumption and production? Analyzing the patterns of influence of environmental performance in Japanese manufacturing firms. Sustain. Prod. Consum.; 2020; 21, pp. 156-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.12.002]

53. Yagi, M.; Kokubu, K. A framework of sustainable consumption and production from the production perspective: Application to Thailand and Vietnam. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 276, 124160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124160]

54. Doyle, J.; Farrell, N.; Goodman, M.K. The cultural politics of climate branding: Project Sunlight, the biopolitics of climate care and the socialisation of the everyday sustainable consumption practices of citizens-consumers. Clim. Chang.; 2019; 163, pp. 117-133. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02487-6]

55. Catulli, M.; Cook, M.; Potter, S. Product Service Systems Users and Harley Davidson Riders: The Importance of Consumer Identity in the Diffusion of Sustainable Consumption Solutions. J. Ind. Ecol.; 2017; 21, pp. 1370-1379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12518]

56. Iran, S.; Müller, M. Social Innovations for Sustainable Consumption and Their Perceived Sustainability Effects in Tehran. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 7679. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12187679]

57. Schappert, M.; von Hauff, M. Sustainable consumption in the smart grid: From key points to eco-routine. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 267, 121585. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121585]

58. Dendler, L. Sustainability Meta Labelling: An effective measure to facilitate more sustainable consumption and production?. J. Clean. Prod.; 2014; 63, pp. 74-83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.037]

59. Sedlacko, M.; Martinuzzi, A.; Røpke, I.; Videira, N.; Antunes, P. Participatory systems mapping for sustainable consumption: Discussion of a method promoting systemic insights. Ecol. Econ.; 2014; 106, pp. 33-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.002]

60. Akenji, L.; Bengtsson, M. Making Sustainable Consumption and Production the Core of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability; 2014; 6, pp. 513-529. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su6020513]

61. Demarque, C.; Charalambides, L.; Hilton, D.J.; Waroquier, L. Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. J. Environ. Psychol.; 2015; 43, pp. 166-174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008]

62. Nikolaou, I.E.; Kazantzidis, L. A sustainable consumption index/label to reduce information asymmetry among consumers and producers. Sustain. Prod. Consum.; 2016; 6, pp. 51-61. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.01.001]

63. Stål, H.I.; Jansson, J. Sustainable Consumption and Value Propositions: Exploring Product-Service System Practices Among Swedish Fashion Firms. Sustain. Dev.; 2017; 25, pp. 546-558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1677]

64. Pialot, O.; Millet, D.; Bisiaux, J. “Upgradable PSS”: Clarifying a new concept of sustainable consumption/production based on upgradablility. J. Clean. Prod.; 2017; 141, pp. 538-550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.161]

65. Ülkü, M.A.; Hsuan, J. Towards sustainable consumption and production: Competitive pricing of modular products for green consumers. J. Clean. Prod.; 2017; 142, pp. 4230-4242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.050]

66. Torkabadi, A.M.; Pourjavad, E.; Mayorga, R.V. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach to improve sustainable consumption and production trends in supply chain. Sustain. Prod. Consum.; 2018; 16, pp. 99-109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.05.008]

67. Solér, C.; Koroschetz, B.; Salminen, E. An infrastructural perspective on sustainable consumption—Activating and obligating sustainable consumption through infrastructures. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 243, 118601. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118601]

68. Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J. Cognitive, Affective and Conative Domains of Sustainable Consumption: Scale Development and Validation Using Confirmatory Composite Analysis. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 7784. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12187784]

69. Byers, V.; Gilmer, A. Developing a unified approach to sustainable consumption behaviour: Opportunities for a new environmental paradigm. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev.; 2018; 7, pp. 1-10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n1p1]

70. Torma, G. How to Cope with Perceived Tension towards Sustainable Consumption? Exploring Pro-Environmental Behavior Experts’ Coping Strategies. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 8782. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12218782]

71. Simeone, M.; Scarpato, D. Sustainable consumption: How does social media affect food choices?. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 277, 124036. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124036]

72. Fischer, D.; Barth, M. Key Competencies for and beyond Sustainable Consumption An Educational Contribution to the Debate. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc.; 2014; 23, pp. 193-200. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.S1.7]

73. Geng, D.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Q. Motivating sustainable consumption among Chinese adolescents: An empirical examination. J. Clean. Prod.; 2017; 141, pp. 315-322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.113]

74. Calafell, G.; Banqué, N.; Viciana, S. Purchase and Use of New Technologies among Young People: Guidelines for Sustainable Consumption Education. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 1541. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11061541]

75. Spaargaren, G. Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Glob. Environ. Chang.; 2011; 21, pp. 813-822. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010]

76. Hanss, D.; Böhm, G.; Doran, R.; Homburg, A. Sustainable Consumption of Groceries: The Importance of Believing that One Can Contribute to Sustainable Development. Sustain. Dev.; 2016; 24, pp. 357-370. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1615]

77. Wang, J.; Wu, L. The impact of emotions on the intention of sustainable consumption choices: Evidence from a big city in an emerging country. J. Clean. Prod.; 2016; 126, pp. 325-336. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.119]

78. Carrero, I.; Valor, C.; Redondo, R. Do All Dimensions of Sustainable Consumption Lead to Psychological Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from Young Consumers. J. Agric. Environ. Ethic.; 2020; 33, pp. 145-170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09818-8]

79. Tang, Y.; Chen, S.; Yuan, Z. The effects of hedonic, gain, and normative motives on sustainable consumption: Multiple mediating evidence from China. Sustain. Dev.; 2020; 28, pp. 741-750. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.2024]

80. Koide, R.; Akenji, L. Assessment of Policy Integration of Sustainable Consumption and Production into National Policies. Resources; 2017; 6, 48. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/resources6040048]

81. Qu, Y.; Li, M.; Jia, H.; Guo, L. Developing More Insights on Sustainable Consumption in China Based on Q Methodology. Sustainability; 2015; 7, pp. 14211-14229. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su71014211]

82. Liobikiene, G.; Dagiliūtė, R. The relationship between economic and carbon footprint changes in EU: The achievements of the EU sustainable consumption and production policy implementation. Environ. Sci. Policy; 2016; 61, pp. 204-211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.017]

83. Safarzyńska, K. Evolutionary-economic policies for sustainable consumption. Ecol. Econ.; 2013; 90, pp. 187-195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.020]

84. Schroeder, P. Assessing effectiveness of governance approaches for sustainable consumption and production in China. J. Clean. Prod.; 2014; 63, pp. 64-73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.039]

85. Van Gameren, V.; Ruwet, C.; Bauler, T. Towards a governance of sustainable consumption transitions: How institutional factors influence emerging local food systems in Belgium. Local Environ.; 2015; 20, pp. 874-891. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.872090]

86. Wang, Y. Promoting Sustainable Consumption Behaviors: The Impacts of Environmental Attitudes and Governance in a Cross-National Context. Environ. Behav.; 2017; 49, pp. 1128-1155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916516680264]

87. Lehmann, S. Resource recovery and materials flow in the city: Zero waste and sustainable consumption as paradigms in urban development. Sustain. Dev. Law Policy; 2011; 11, 13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3992/jgb.6.3.88]

88. Brizga, J.; Mishchuk, Z.; Golubovska-Onisimova, A. Sustainable consumption and production governance in countries in transition. J. Clean. Prod.; 2014; 63, pp. 45-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.011]

89. Vringer, K.; Van Der Heijden, E.; Van Soest, D.; Vollebergh, H.; Dietz, F. Sustainable Consumption Dilemmas. Sustainability; 2017; 9, 942. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9060942]

90. Shao, J.; Taisch, M.; Mier, M.O. Influencing factors to facilitate sustainable consumption: From the experts’ viewpoints. J. Clean. Prod.; 2017; 142, pp. 203-216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.111]

91. Heiskanen, E.; Lovio, R.; Jalas, M. Path creation for sustainable consumption: Promoting alternative heating systems in Finland. J. Clean. Prod.; 2011; 19, pp. 1892-1900. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.005]

92. Lim, E.; Arita, S.; Joung, S. Advancing Sustainable Consumption in Korea and Japan—From Re-Orientation of Consumer Behavior to Civic Actions. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 6683. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11236683]

93. Di Giulio, A.; Schweizer, C.R.; Defila, R.; Hirsch, P.; Burkhardt-Holm, P. “These Grandmas Drove Me Mad. It Was Brilliant!”—Promising Starting Points to Support Citizen Competence for Sustainable Consumption in Adults. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 681. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11030681]

94. Lo, A.Y. Small is green? Urban form and sustainable consumption in selected OECD metropolitan areas. Land Use Policy; 2016; 54, pp. 212-220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.014]

95. Schröder, P.; Vergragt, P.; Brown, H.S.; Dendler, L.; Gorenflo, N.; Matus, K.; Quist, J.; Rupprecht, C.D.; Tukker, A.; Wennersten, R. Advancing sustainable consumption and production in cities—A transdisciplinary research and stakeholder engagement framework to address consumption-based emissions and impacts. J. Clean. Prod.; 2019; 213, pp. 114-125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.050]

96. Biswas, A.; Roy, M. Technology acceptance perception for promotion of sustainable consumption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2018; 25, pp. 6329-6339. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0964-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29247417]

97. Caeiro, S.; Ramos, T.B.; Huisingh, D. Procedures and criteria to develop and evaluate household sustainable consumption indicators. J. Clean. Prod.; 2012; 27, pp. 72-91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.026]

98. Di Giulio, A.; Fuchs, D. Sustainable consumption corridors: Concept, objections, and responses. GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc.; 2014; 23, pp. 184-192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.S1.6]

99. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Luo, Z.; Wamba, S.F.; Roubaud, D.; Foropon, C. Examining the role of big data and predictive analytics on collaborative performance in context to sustainable consumption and production behaviour. J. Clean. Prod.; 2018; 196, pp. 1508-1521. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.097]

100. Pineiro-Villaverde, G.; García-Álvarez, M.T. Sustainable Consumption and Production: Exploring the Links with Resources Productivity in the EU-28. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 8760. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12218760]

101. Wang, Y.; Xiang, D.; Yang, Z.; Ma, S. Unraveling customer sustainable consumption behaviors in sharing economy: A socio-economic approach based on social exchange theory. J. Clean. Prod.; 2019; 208, pp. 869-879. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.139]

102. Guido, Y.D.A.S.; Fonseca, G.; Soares, A.D.F.; da Silva, E.C.N.; Ostanik, P.A.G.; Perobelli, J.E. Food-triad: An index for sustainable consumption. Sci. Total Environ.; 2020; 740, 140027. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140027]

103. Waris, I.; Hameed, I. Promoting environmentally sustainable consumption behavior: An empirical evaluation of purchase intention of energy-efficient appliances. Energy Effic.; 2020; 13, pp. 1653-1664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09901-4]

104. Jaeger-Erben, M.; Rückert-John, J.; Schäfer, M. Sustainable consumption through social innovation: A typology of innovations for sustainable consumption practices. J. Clean. Prod.; 2015; 108, pp. 784-798. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.042]

105. Yan, B.; Spangenberg, J.H. Needs, wants and values in China: Reducing physical wants for sustainable consumption. Sustain. Dev.; 2018; 26, pp. 772-780. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1847]

106. Jansson, J.; Nordlund, A.; Westin, K. Examining drivers of sustainable consumption: The influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden. J. Clean. Prod.; 2017; 154, pp. 176-187. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.186]

107. Kapoor, K.K.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Sustainable consumption from the consumer’s perspective: Antecedents of solar innovation adoption. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.; 2020; 152, 104501. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104501]

108. Wang, P.; Liu, Q.; Qi, Y. Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. J. Clean. Prod.; 2014; 63, pp. 152-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.007]

109. Rezvani, Z.; Jansson, J.; Bengtsson, M. Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption. Bus. Strat. Environ.; 2018; 27, pp. 1272-1283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074]

110. Dong, X.; Li, H.; Liu, S.; Cai, C.; Fan, X. How does material possession love influence sustainable consumption behavior towards the durable products?. J. Clean. Prod.; 2018; 198, pp. 389-400. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.054]

111. Figueroa-García, E.C.; García-Machado, J.J.; Yábar, D.C.P.-B. Modeling the Social Factors That Determine Sustainable Consumption Behavior in the Community of Madrid. Sustainability; 2018; 10, 2811. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10082811]

112. Guillen-Royo, M. Sustainable consumption and wellbeing: Does on-line shopping matter?. J. Clean. Prod.; 2019; 229, pp. 1112-1124. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.061]

113. Ansu-Mensah, P.; Bein, M.A. Towards sustainable consumption: Predicting the impact of social-psychological factors on energy conservation intentions in Northern Cyprus. Nat. Resour. Forum; 2019; 43, pp. 181-193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12174]

114. Ali, A.; Xiaoling, G.; Ali, A.; Sherwani, M.; Muneeb, F.M. Customer motivations for sustainable consumption: Investigating the drivers of purchase behavior for a green-luxury car. Bus. Strat. Environ.; 2019; 28, pp. 833-846. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2284]

115. Kreuzer, C.; Weber, S.; Off, M.; Hackenberg, T.; Birk, C. Shedding Light on Realized Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Perceived Barriers of Young Adults for Creating Stimulating Teaching–Learning Situations. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 2587. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11092587]

116. Ahamad, N.R.; Ariffin, M. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards sustainable consumption among university students in Selangor, Malaysia. Sustain. Prod. Consum.; 2018; 16, pp. 88-98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.006]

117. Hüttel, A.; Ziesemer, F.; Peyer, M.; Balderjahn, I. To purchase or not? Why consumers make economically (non-)sustainable consumption choices. J. Clean. Prod.; 2018; 174, pp. 827-836. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.019]

118. Shao, J. Sustainable consumption in China: New trends and research interests. Bus. Strat. Environ.; 2019; 28, pp. 1507-1517. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2327]

119. Corsini, F.; Laurenti, R.; Meinherz, F.; Appio, F.P.; Mora, L. The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11020341]

120. Ukenna, S.; Nkamnebe, A.; Idoko, E. Inhibitors of sustainable consumption: Insights from university academic staff in southern Nigeria. Sustain. Dev.; 2019; 27, pp. 96-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1865]

121. Geiger, S.M.; Fischer, D.; Schrader, U.; Grossman, P. Meditating for the Planet: Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Sustainable Consumption Behaviors. Environ. Behav.; 2020; 52, pp. 1012-1042. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916519880897]

122. Han, H. Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for sustainable consumption of green hotel and green restaurant products. Bus. Strat. Environ.; 2020; 29, pp. 2815-2828. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2545]

123. Piligrimienė, Ž.; Žukauskaitė, A.; Korzilius, H.; Banytė, J.; Dovalienė, A. Internal and External Determinants of Consumer Engagement in Sustainable Consumption. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 1349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12041349]

124. Borusiak, B.; Szymkowiak, A.; Horska, E.; Raszka, N.; Żelichowska, E. Towards Building Sustainable Consumption: A Study of Second-Hand Buying Intentions. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 875. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030875]

125. Tarditi, C.; Hahnel, U.J.J.; Jeanmonod, N.; Sander, D.; Brosch, T. Affective Dilemmas: The Impact of Trait Affect and State Emotion on Sustainable Consumption Decisions in a Social Dilemma Task. Environ. Behav.; 2018; 52, pp. 33-59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916518787590]

126. Jonkutė, G.; Staniškis, J.K. The role of different stakeholders in implementing sustainable consumption and production in Lithuania. Environ. Eng. Manag. J.; 2019; 18, pp. 617-632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2019.057]

127. Chekima, B.; Chekima, S.; SyedKhalidWafa, S.A.W.; Igau, O.A.; Sondoh, S.L., Jr. Sustainable consumption: The effects of knowledge, cultural values, environmental advertising, and demographics. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol.; 2016; 23, pp. 210-220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1114043]

128. Ahvenharju, S. Potential for a radical policy-shift? The acceptability of strong sustainable consumption governance among elites. Environ. Politi.; 2020; 29, pp. 134-154. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1688532]

129. Yang, C.; Tu, J.-C.; Jiang, Q. The Influential Factors of Consumers’ Sustainable Consumption: A Case on Electric Vehicles in China. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 3496. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12083496]

130. Awuni, J.A.; Du, J. Sustainable Consumption in Chinese Cities: Green Purchasing Intentions of Young Adults Based on the Theory of Consumption Values. Sustain. Dev.; 2016; 24, pp. 124-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1613]

131. Waring, T.M.; Goff, S.H.; Smaldino, P.E. The coevolution of economic institutions and sustainable consumption via cultural group selection. Ecol. Econ.; 2017; 131, pp. 524-532. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.022]

132. Severis, R.M.; Simioni, F.J.; Moreira, J.M.M.; Alvarenga, R.A. Sustainable consumption in mobility from a life cycle assessment perspective. J. Clean. Prod.; 2019; 234, pp. 579-587. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.203]

133. Saunders, H.D. Toward a neoclassical theory of sustainable consumption: Eight golden age propositions. Ecol. Econ.; 2014; 105, pp. 220-232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.011]

134. Czuba, M. Upcycling as a Manifestation of Consumer and Business Behavior that Expresses Sustainable Consumption and Determines the Functioning of the Communal Services Sector. Probl. Ekorozw.; 2018; 13, pp. 159-163.

135. Purnomo, M.; Daulay, P.; Utomo, M.R.; Riyanto, S. Moderating Role of Connoisseur Consumers on Sustainable Consumption and Dynamics Capabilities of Indonesian Single Origin Coffee Shops. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 1319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11051319]

Word count: 12483

Show less

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Translate

Sustainable consumption requires that people, companies, and nations promote correct use of their resources in the interest of environmental protection and ecosystem integrity. Given the relevance of this subject, the main objective of the present study was to provide an overview of the literature on sustainable consumption, going beyond knowledge related to consumer behavior, and addressing questions connected with the role of companies and public policies in the promotion of sustainable consumption. To achieve that, a systematic literature review was carried out by selecting 114 articles published over the past ten years, from Web of Science categories with an environmental focus. The study allowed for showing the state of the art of the subject, as well as suggestions for future studies based on gaps in the literature. It was found that there is a concentration of studies oriented toward surveying and understanding consumer behavior at the expense of those focused on examining companies and their relationship with sustainability and consumption.

Details

Title

Systematic Literature Review on Sustainable Consumption from the Perspective of Companies, People and Public Policies

Author

Ualison Rébula de Oliveira¹; Thaís Stiegert Meireles Gomes¹; Geovani Gabizo de Oliveira¹; Júlio Cesar Andrade de Abreu¹

; Murilo Alvarenga Oliveira¹; Aldara da Silva César²

; Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes³

¹ Departamento de Administração, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Volta Redonda 27213-145, Brazil
² Departamento de Engenharia de Agronegócios, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Volta Redonda 27255-125, Brazil
³ Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifícia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile

First page

13771

Publication year

2022

Publication date

2022

Publisher

MDPI AG

e-ISSN

20711050

Source type

Scholarly Journal

Language of publication

English

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113771

ProQuest document ID

2769915331

Systematic Literature Review on Sustainable Consumption from the Perspective of Companies, People and Public Policies

Jump to:

Full Text

Abstract

Details

Suggested sources