Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

Copyright Freie Universität Berlin 2011

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare two different Computer Assisted Qualitative Data AnalysiS (CAQDAS) packages (NVivo and MAXQDA) on a specific aspect. The same data from an auto-photographic study is analyzed using the same approach to make the comparison. The comparison is not based on a data oriented evaluation, but the methodological approach used constitutes the basis for the evaluation. The criteria for the evaluation of these tools are: closeness to the data, ease of coding and memoing, and the interrelationship among the data, code and the memo which were derived from the methodological approach. The first level coding process was accomplished using Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) with two different CAQDAS packages. As for the result, in the GTM interpretation is crucial and MAXQDA supports the interpretive style better than NVivo. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101345

Details

Title
Systematic Versus Interpretive Analysis with Two CAQDAS Packages: NVivo and MAXQDA
Author
Elif Ku? Saillard
Pages
n/a
Section
The Experiment: Users' Perspectives
Publication year
2011
Publication date
2011
Publisher
Freie Universität Berlin
e-ISSN
14385627
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
870465691
Copyright
Copyright Freie Universität Berlin 2011